Acute respiratory failure in cancer patients

Acute respiratory failure in critically ill patients with cancer. Diagnosis and management

Respiratory failure remains a common cause of admission to the ICU for patients with cancer, regardless of the nature of malignancy. The diagnosis and management of ARF in patients with cancer poses special challenges to the intensivist. Depending on the type of cancer, the degree of immunosuppression, underlying comorbidities, the modality of cancer treatment, progression or spread of underlying cancer, and disease- or therapy-associated complications are the most common causes of ARF in these patients. Despite significant advances in antineoplastic therapies and supportive management in the ICU, the mortality rate of patients with cancer with ARF remains high. Severity-of-illness scoring systems and mortality probability models, although useful in discriminating between survivors and nonsurvivors in large groups of critically ill patients, should not be used alone to justify reluctance in admitting individual patients with cancer with potentially reversible respiratory failure to the ICU. Close collaboration between oncologists and intensivists will ensure the establishment of clear goals and direction of treatment for every patient with cancer who requires mechanical ventilation.

Is intensive care justified for patients with haematological malignancies?

The course of 260 adults with haematological malignancies admitted to a medical intensive care unit was studied to evaluate the value of life support techniques and to research predictive factors. The overall in the medical intensive care unit (MICU) and hospital mortality rates were respectively 43% (113 patients) and 57% (148 patients). Among survivors, 64% (49 patients) were still alive after 6 months and 44% (35 patients) after 1 year. Among 34 haemodialysed patients, the MICU mortality was 67% (23 patients) and among 111 mechanically ventilated patients 85% (94 patients). Prolonged mechanical ventilation, more than seven days, was performed in 11 of the 17 survivors and did not influence long term survival. No individual predictor of mortality was found comparing survivors and non-survivors. However, SAPS, intractable sepsis and failure of more than one organ system were significantly different in non-survivors (p less than 0.001). Among the 20 patients requiring both mechanical ventilation and haemodialysis, only two left the MICU and both died soon thereafter. We conclude that life support therapy should be initiated in patients with haematological disorders and that prolonged mechanical ventilation is compatible with long term survival. However, the combination of mechanical ventilation and haemodialysis is always associated with a poor prognosis and therefore the use of both techniques simultaneously for one patient is questionable.

Prognosis in acute organ-system failure

This prospective study describes the current prognosis of patients in acute Organ System Failure (OSF). Objective definitions were developed for five OSFs, and then 5677 ICU admissions from 13 hospitals were monitored. The number and duration of OSF were linked to outcome at hospital discharge for each of the 2719 ICU patients (48%) who developed OSF. For all medical and most surgical admissions, a single OSF lasting more than 1 day resulted in a mortality rate approaching 40%. Among both medical and surgical patients, two OSFs for more than 1 day increased death rates to 60%. Advanced chronologic age increased both the probability of developing OSF and the probability of death once OSF occurred. Mortality for 99 patients with three or more OSFs persisting after 3 days was 98%. The two patients who survived were both young, in prior excellent health, and had severe but limited primary diseases. These results emphasize the high death rates associated with acute OSF and the rapidity with which mortality increases over time. The prognostic estimates provide reference data for physicians treating similar patients.

Precedents for meaningful recovery during treatment in a medical intensive care unit. Outcome in patients with hematologic malignancy

The medical records of 77 patients with hematologic malignancy who were admitted to a medical intensive care unit over a 21-month period were reviewed. The overall hospital mortality rate was 80 percent. Sixteen patients (21 percent) were discharged from the intensive care unit but eventually died in the hospital. The cause of death was the result of a new problem in only three of these 16 patients. Hypotension (shock) and acute respiratory failure were the reasons prompting admission to the intensive care unit in 75 percent, but death in the intensive care unit was almost always the result of intractable hypotension rather than refractory hypoxemia. Only four of 52 patients who required mechanical ventilation left the hospital. In all four, the duration of ventilatory support was less than five days and the cause of respiratory failure was noninfectious in nature. Factors such as congestive heart failure, leukopenia, and abnormalities in mental status modified the hospital course, but did not alter outcome once prolonged mechanical ventilation became necessary. The data suggest that once acute respiratory failure develops in patients with lymphoma or leukemia, presumably as a result of infection, and mechanical ventilation for more than a relatively brief period is required, the prognosis is uniformly grim. Decisions to limit aggressive therapies is subsets of intensive care patients such as these should be aided by data that show a lack of precedent for meaningful recovery.