Adjuvant therapy of colorectal cancer

The Effect of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Stoma-Related Complications After Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis

PURPOSE

To assess stoma-related complications of colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgery with curative intent who received adjuvant chemotherapy compared to those who underwent surgery alone.

DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained colorectal cancer clinical audit database was completed.

SUBJECTS AND SETTINGS

Patients undergoing curative surgery for colorectal cancer with the formation of a stoma (end ileostomy, loop ileostomy, end colostomy) between 1999 and 2011 at a single hospital in Lanarkshire, United Kingdom. Patients who underwent neo-adjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. Two hundred twenty-two patients comprised the study sample; 130 (59%) were male. Seventy-five (34%) patients comprised the chemotherapy group and 147 (66%) made up the surgery-only group. Patients in the chemotherapy group were younger (61.6 vs 65.4 years; P = .001) and had higher stage colorectal cancer (P < .001). There was no difference in baseline (day 10) stoma scores between the chemotherapy or surgery-only groups.

METHODS

Postoperative stoma-related complications were serially assessed using a stoma complication scoring tool; scores were calculated at 10 days and 3 months postoperatively. Scores of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy were compared to scores of participants who underwent surgery alone.

INSTRUMENT

A composite stoma function score was calculated for each patient after assessment of stoma-related complications. The overall score included a global assessment of stoma quality (stoma retraction, prolapse, stenosis, parastomal hernia, skin changes) and patient-reported stoma function (leakage, soiling, nighttime emptying, odor).

RESULTS

At 3 months, the mean loop ileostomy stoma function score was poorer among the chemotherapy group when compared to the surgery-only group (4.55 vs 1.53; P = .041). No differences were found when colostomy (2.00 vs 2.62; P = .411) or end ileostomy (1.00 vs 2.00; P = .170) function scores were compared at 3 months.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing curative surgery for colorectal cancer resulting in a loop ileostomy who received adjuvant chemotherapy had higher stoma complication scores at 3 months compared to those who underwent surgery with no chemotherapy. This difference was not seen in patients with colostomies or end ileostomies. Patients, WOC nurses, and medical staff must be alert to the potential of increased loop ileostomy-related complications with adjuvant chemotherapy. Fully informed patient consent coupled with timely support and advice may reduce stoma-related morbidity and improve quality of life for such patients.

Surgeon perspectives on the use and effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in the treatment of rectal cancer: a comprehensive review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Despite screening initiatives, rectal cancer remains one of the most prevalent malignancies diagnosed in patients worldwide with a high mortality. The introduction of neoadjuvant therapy has resulted in a paradigm shift in the treatment and outcomes of rectal cancer. Surgeons play an intricate role in the pre-operative, operative, and post-operative management of these patients.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this comprehensive literature review was to summarize the evolution of the use chemotherapy and radiation and the process of differentiation into specific neoadjuvant chemoradiation protocols in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer. This will provide a concise summary for practicing surgeons of the current evidence for neoadjuvant chemoradiation as well as the various implications of therapy on operative outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The initial benefit of adjuvant therapy in the treatment of rectal cancer patients became evident with prospective studies demonstrating improvements in various oncologic survival outcomes. Due to the improved compliance and reduced toxicity, as well as the potential for tumor down-staging and sphincter preservation, neoadjuvant approaches became the preferred method of administering chemotherapy and radiation. Furthermore, a subgroup of patients has been shown to present with complete clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy. This has resulted in the development of the non-operative "watch and wait" approach, which has initiated discussions on changing the interval from the completion of neoadjuvant therapy to surgical resection. The continued development of the multidisciplinary approach will only further improve our ability to provide patients with the best possible oncologic outcomes.

The therapeutic and adverse effects of modified radiation fields for patients with rectal cancer

PURPOSE

To compare the therapeutic effect and complications of modified radiation fields (MRFs) with those of conventional pelvic radiation fields (CPRFs) for rectal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From December 1996 to October 2009, a total of 160 patients with rectal carcinoma who received total mesorectal excision and postoperative radiotherapy were examined. Ninety-four patients were in the CPRFs group, and 66 were in the MRFs group. The dose was 50 Gy per 25 fractions in the initial plan.

RESULTS

The treatment volume and the volume of small bowel that received more than 15 Gy of the MRFs was smaller than that of the CPRFs (P < .001). The rates of local recurrence, overall survival, and disease-free survival were not statistically significant between the MRFs and CPRFs groups (P > .05). There was a statistical difference (P < .05) in the incidence of acute toxicity, which included serious complications in the lower digestive tract (grade ≥3). The completion rate for the initial radiotherapy plan was higher in the MRFs group than in the CPRFs group (P = .027).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with CPRFs, MRFs manifested a lower incidence of complications and the same therapeutic effects. This finding will facilitate the clinical application of MRFs for patients with rectal cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer: analysis of clinical outcomes from a 13-year institutional experience

OBJECTIVE

To examine clinical outcomes in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Preoperative radiation therapy, either alone or in combination with 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, has proven both safe and effective in the treatment of rectal cancer. However, data are lacking regarding which subgroups of patients benefit from the therapy in terms of decreased local recurrence and increased survival rates.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on 141 consecutive patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation (5-fluorouracil +/- cisplatin and 4,500-5,040 cGy) for biopsy-proven locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Surgery was performed 4 to 8 weeks after completion of chemoradiation. Standard statistical methods were used to analyze recurrence and survival.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 27 months, and mean age was 59 years (range 28-81). Mean tumor distance from the anal verge was 6 cm (range 1-15). Of those staged before surgery with endorectal ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging, 57% of stage II patients and 82% of stage III patients were downstaged. The chemotherapeutic regimens were well tolerated, and resections were performed on 140 patients. The percentage of sphincter-sparing procedures increased from 20% before 1996 to 76% after 1996. On pathologic analysis, 24% of specimens were T0. However, postoperative pathologic T stage had no effect on either recurrence or survival. Positive lymph node status predicted increased local recurrence and decreased survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation is safe, effective, and well tolerated. Postoperative lymph node status is the only independent predictor of recurrence and survival.

Chemotherapy of Colorectal Cancer

Progress has been made in the adjuvant treatment of colorectal carcinoma. The improvement in survival with the use of adjuvant 5-FU and leucovorin in patients with stage III colon carcinoma has been readily established. However, a survival benefit in stage II patients treated with adjuvant therapy remains unproven. Further evaluation using additional/new prognostic factors may identify a high-risk stage II group that would benefit from adjuvant treatment. Adjuvant chemoradiation has become standard therapy for stage II and III patients with rectal carcinoma. Investigations using preoperative combined-modality therapy are being explored to assess sphincter preservation rates and to evaluate any impact on survival. Radiosensitizing chemotherapeutic agents need to be evaluated in this patient population. Recent advances in metastatic disease have occurred. Frontline therapy remains 5-FU and leucovorin. CPT-11 has demonstrated responses in 5-FU relapsed and refractory patients and is the new standard therapy in these patients. New data recently available also show a survival advantage in patients treated with CPT-11 versus supportive care in 5-FU and leucovorin failures. New agents such as UFT and oxaliplatin have demonstrated activity in colorectal carcinomas and in the future these agents will likely aid in the treatment of this disease.

Preoperative radiation and chemotherapy in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the rectum

OBJECTIVE

In this study, the impact of preoperative chemotherapy and radiation on the histopathology of a subgroup of patients with rectal adenocarcinoma was examined. As well, survival, disease-free survival and pelvic recurrence rates were examined, and compared with a concurrent control group.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The optimal treatment of large rectal carcinomas remains controversial; current therapy usually involves abdominoperineal resection plus postoperative chemoradiation; the combination can be associated with significant postoperative morbidity. In spite of these measures, local recurrences and distant metastases continue as serious problems.

METHODS

Fluorouracil, cisplatin, and 4500 cGy were administered preoperatively over a 5-week period, before definitive surgical resection in 43 patients. In this group of patients, all 43 had biopsy-proven lesions > 3 cm (median diameter), involving the entire rectal wall (as determined by sigmoidoscopy and computed tomography scan), with no evidence of extrapelvic disease. The patients ranged from 31 to 81 years of age (median 61 years), with a male:female ratio of 3:1. A concurrent control group consisting of 56 patients (median: 62 years, male:female ration of 3:2) with T2 and T3 lesions was used to compare survival, disease-free survival, and pelvic recurrence rates.

RESULTS

The preoperative chemoradiation therapy was well tolerated, with no major complications. All patients underwent repeat sigmoidoscopy before surgery; none of the lesions progressed while patients underwent therapy, and 22 (51%) were determined to have complete clinical response. At the time of resection, 21 patients (49%) had gross disease, 9 (22%) patients had only residual microscopic disease, and 11 (27%) had sterile specimens. Of the 30 patients with evidence of residual disease, 4 had positive lymph nodes. In follow-up, 39 of the 43 remain alive (median follow-up = 25 months), and only 1 of the 11 patients with complete histologic response developed recurrent disease. Six of the 32 patients with residual disease (2 with positive nodes) have developed metastatic disease in follow-up (median time to diagnosis 10 months, range 3-15 months). Three of these patients with metastases have died (median survival after diagnosis of metastases = 36 months). Local recurrence was seen in only 2 of 43 patients (< 5%). Cox-Mantel analysis of Kaplan-Meier distributions demonstrated increased survival (p = 0.017), increased disease-free survival (p = 0.046), and decreased pelvic recurrence (p = 0.031) for protocol versus control patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This therapeutic regimen has provided enhanced local control and decreased metastases. Furthermore, the marked degree of tumor downstaging, as seen by a 27% incidence of sterile pathologic specimens and a low rate of positive lymph nodes in this group with initially advanced lesions, strongly suggest that less radical surgery and sphincter preservation may be used with increasing frequency.

Rectal carcinoma. Long-term experience with moderately high-dose preoperative radiation and low anterior resection

This report updated an analysis of a 14-year experience of moderately high-dose (4500 to 5000 cGy) preoperative radiation as an adjuvant to low anterior resection of 95 cases of adenocarcinoma of the rectum. The treatment was well tolerated without treatment-related mortality and with a low incidence (5.2%) of severe complications. The local recurrence rate was 4.2%, and distant failure rate was 10.5%. At 5 years, the actuarial survival rate was 66% and the disease-free survival rate was 64%. At 10 years, the actuarial survival rate and disease-free survival rate were 52%. The authors concluded that moderately high-dose (4500 to 5000 cGy) neoadjuvant radiation in clinically resectable adenocarcinoma of the rectum in which one segment of the anastomosis was in the preoperative radiation field is a safe, effective adjuvant to low anterior resection and that it offered patients excellent local control, long-term survival, and sphincter preservation. Results could be enhanced by chemotherapy, and the authors urged well-designed prospective randomized multicenter trials to determine the most appropriate drugs, dosage, and sequencing of co-adjuvant preoperative radiation therapy and chemotherapy with surgery.

Gastrointestinal malignancy: rationale for adjuvant therapy using early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy

The treatment of gastrointestinal cancer and the prognosis of patients with this disease have changed very little over the past several decades. No screening tools have been developed which allow this disease to be surgically treated for cure at an early stage. None of the forms of adjuvant chemotherapy instituted in the months and years after surgical resection of cancer have been successful. We show that resection site recurrence and spread of disease on the peritoneal surfaces are the most common sites for surgical treatment failure. By changing the route of administration and the timing of chemotherapy, the efficacy of drugs now routinely employed in gastrointestinal cancer can be markedly improved. Our early studies suggest that there is a definite change in the natural history of these malignancies when intraperitoneal chemotherapy is administered immediately after surgery. The pharmacology and physiology of drug delivery in the immediate postoperative period are explored. Toxicity studies have been performed in a series of treatment protocols already in use. These protocols need to be subjected to randomized controlled trials in the near future.