Outpatient costs of osteoporosis in a national health insurance population

Review on use of German health insurance medication claims data for epidemiological research

PURPOSE

The objective was to evaluate the use of German health insurance claims data on medications over the last 10 years by a review of published studies.

METHODS

PubMed and Scopus were searched for relevant studies published in 1998 through 2007.

RESULTS

A total of 70 studies were included. Use of these data increased from 32 reports (45.7%) between 1998 and 2005 to 38 (54.3%) over the last 2 years (2006-2007). Over half of the studies (57.1%; n = 40) were written in English and the most frequent research types were health service utilization (51.4%; n = 36) and cost analyses (18.6%; n = 13). In most of the studies (65.7%; n = 46), medication data were linked with other health care utilization claims (e.g. hospitalization data and physicians' outpatient services). Data validity was not taken into consideration in 40.6% (n = 13) of the 32 studies that also analysed hospitalization or physicians' outpatient diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS

German health insurance medication claims data were increasingly used for research purposes over the last 10 years. Especially methodological and validation studies are clearly needed.

[Metabolic bone diseases]

Osteomalacia is caused by impaired vitamin D receptor (VDR) signaling, calcium deficiency, and altered bone mineralization. This can be due to insufficient sunlight exposure, malabsorption, reduced D hormone activation in chronic kidney disease, and rare alterations of VDR signaling and phosphate metabolism. Leading symptoms are bone pain, muscular cramps, and increased incidence of falls in the elderly. The adequate respective countermeasures are to optimize the daily intake of calcium and vitamin D3 and to replace active D hormone and phosphate if deficient. Osteoporosis is characterized by bone fragility fractures upon minor physical impact. Indications for diagnosis and treatment can be established by estimating the absolute fracture risk, taking into account bone mineral density, age, gender, and individual risk factors. Exercise, intervention programs to avoid falls, and specific drugs are capable of substantially reducing fracture risk even in the elderly. Secondary osteoporosis primarily requires both bone-altering medications and effective treatment of underlying diseases.

The cost-effectiveness of risedronate treatment in Japanese women with osteoporosis

We constructed a mathematical model for assessing the cost-effectiveness of providing BMD (bone mineral density) scans to Japanese women aged 55 years and over and treating, with risedronate, those that are shown to be osteoporotic. Fracture rates, cost data, utility values, and the increased risks of fractures associated with T-score and vertebral fracture history were taken from published literature. We estimated the cost of fractures avoided due to risedronate treatment, allowing the net changes in cost, incorporating both intervention and fracture costs to be calculated. The QALYs (quality adjusted life years) gained through treatment were calculated enabling cost per QALY ratios to be presented. Further analyses were undertaken assuming treatment was reserved for older women and/or those who had sustained a vertebral fracture in the previous 2 years. Cost per QALY values were inversely related to absolute risk of fracture. Assuming a cost per QALY value threshold of US dollars 100,000, we concluded that providing BMD scans to women aged 70 years and over who had sustained a vertebral fracture in the previous 2 years and treating those that were osteoporotic was cost-effective. However, providing BMD scans for women without a vertebral fracture in the previous 2 years was not cost-effective, even in women aged 85 years and older.

Epidemiology, treatment and costs of osteoporosis in Germany--the BoneEVA Study

INTRODUCTION

In Germany, accurate data on the prevalence and treatment of osteoporosis, as well as the cost of this illness, are not available. The aim of this study is to give a valid estimation of these items for the year 2003.

METHODS

Routine data from a German sickness fund covering 1.5 million beneficiaries and billing data for outpatient visits were used to obtain estimates of prevalence for osteoporosis. Claims data for patients with osteoporosis (M80, M81) or an osteoporosis-related fracture diagnosis (S22, S32, S42, S52, S72, S82) or treatment with anti-osteoporosis drugs were examined. Costs were calculated from the perspective of the German health insurance system and the German nursing care insurance system, respectively. Only direct costs of osteoporosis were considered.

RESULTS

In 2003, 7.8 million Germans (6.5 million women) were affected by osteoporosis. Of them, 4.3% experienced at least one clinical fracture. Only 21.7% were treated with an anti-osteoporosis drug. The total direct costs attributable to osteoporosis amounted to euros 5.4 billion.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that osteoporosis is underdiagnosed, undertreated and imposes a considerable economic burden on the health system in Germany. Effective strategies for the prevention and management of this disease are needed.

The direct and indirect costs of the chronic management of osteoporosis: a prospective follow-up of 3440 active subjects

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to estimate the direct and indirect costs attributable to osteoporosis (OP) from a societal and a payer's perspective among active subjects living in Belgium and employed in the public workforce.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cohort of 3440 subjects employed by the Liege City Council was followed for 6 months. The City Council employees were invited to fill a monthly log of the data related to their utilization of health resources (contacts with health professionals, medical examinations, drug use,...) due to OP. Information on work disability (number of days of sick leave) and on informal care (number of days off work incurred by active subjects in helping relatives or friends suffering from OP) was also collected.

RESULTS

Of those asked to participate in the study, 1,811 subjects filled in at least one questionnaire. The mean duration of follow-up was 3.46 months. Self-reported prevalence of OP at inclusion was 5.3%. OP subjects were significantly older (52.7+/-6.1 years) than normal subjects (45.5+/-9.8 years) (p<0.05) and included more women (85.3 vs. 55.9%). Direct costs came to 44.6 euros per OP patient-month: 10.9 euros was spent on contact with health professionals, 19.0 euros on medical examinations, 12.1 euros on drugs and 2.6 euros on hospitalizations. During this 6-month study, a total of 140 days of sick leave was recorded (mean: 0.4 per OP patient-month). From a payer's perspective, this loss in productivity yielded a mean cost of 34.05 euros per OP patient-month. A mean number of days off work of 0.018 per active subject-month, attributable to informal care, was recorded. These days of inactivity represented, for the employer, a mean cost of 1.8 euros per active subject-month.

CONCLUSION

The results of this survey of a large sample of active subjects confirm that OP-related expenditures, both for medical care and for loss of productivity, are significant.

Cost-of-illness studies : a review of current methods

The number of cost-of-illness (COI) studies has expanded considerably over time. One outcome of this growth is that the reported COI estimates are inconsistent across studies, thereby raising concerns over the validity of the estimates and methods. Several factors have been identified in the literature as reasons for the observed variation in COI estimates. To date, the variation in the methods used to calculate costs has not been examined in great detail even though the variations in methods are a major driver of variation in COI estimates. The objective of this review was to document the variation in the methodologies employed in COI studies and to highlight the benefits and limitations of these methods. The review of COI studies was implemented following a four-step procedure: (i) a structured literature search of MEDLINE, JSTOR and EconLit; (ii) a review of abstracts using pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria; (iii) a full-text review using pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria; and (iv) classification of articles according to the methods used to calculate costs. This review identified four COI estimation methods (Sum_All Medical, Sum_Diagnosis Specific, Matched Control and Regression) that were used in categorising articles. Also, six components of direct medical costs and five components of indirect/non-medical costs were identified and used in categorising articles.365 full-length articles were reflected in the current review following the structured literature search. The top five cost components were emergency room/inpatient hospital costs, outpatient physician costs, drug costs, productivity losses and laboratory costs. The dominant method, Sum_Diagnosis Specific, was a total costing approach that restricted the summation of medical expenditures to those related to a diagnosis of the disease of interest. There was considerable variation in the methods used within disease subcategories. In several disease subcategories (e.g. asthma, dementia, diabetes mellitus), all four estimation methods were represented, and in other cases (e.g. HIV/AIDS, obesity, stroke, urinary incontinence, schizophrenia), three of the four estimation methods were represented. There was also evidence to suggest that the strengths and weaknesses of each method were considered when applying a method to a specific illness. Comparisons and assessments of COI estimates should consider the method used to estimate costs both as an important source of variation in the reported COI estimates and as a marker of the reliability of the COI estimate.

Incidence and causes for failure of treatment of women with proven osteoporosis

The purpose of this study was to examine factors influencing women's compliance with medical therapy for osteoporosis in Israel. The study population consisted of women diagnosed with osteoporosis using a DEXA examination in the year 2000. Medication purchases for a period of 13 months after the exam were analyzed. Data were gathered from the computerized data base of Clalit Health Care Services and phone interviews. Treatment was divided into specific drugs and food additives (preparation of calcium plus vitamin D). Full, intermediate, low and no compliance were defined as >80, 50-80, 25-50 and <25% of treatment days, respectively. In the study, 857 women with a mean age of 73.6 years were enrolled; 581 (67.8%) were interviewed by telephone. Most of women were undereducated and unemployed. Twenty percent did not purchase any specific drug; 4.5% did not purchase any drug or food additive for osteoporosis; 60% were fully or intermittently compliant (by purchasing) with drug therapy. The most frequent single specific drugs purchased were bisphosphanates and SERM: 62.3 and 76.3% purchased bisphosphanates and/or food additives, respectively. Multi-variant analysis showed that predictors of compliance were healthy women, compliant with calcium plus vitamin D preparations, and/or spending more on drugs. Reasons for low or non-compliance were inconsistent recommendations by various physicians and the side effects of specific drugs. The relatively high compliance rate of osteoporosis treatment may be attributed to the increase in awareness of its benefits. The effect of physicians on compliance needs further investigation.

Impediments to the diffusion of innovative medicines in Europe

The pharmaceutical industry has developed many innovative medicines, which are able to extend the life expectancy of patients to increase their quality of life and often to reduce expenditures in the health care sector as a whole. Although these medicines are available in principle for all eligible patients throughout Europe, not everyone receives adequate treatment. There is a huge difference between a possible optimal treatment and the treatment delivered to the patient. In some cases patients are not treated at all; in some cases they only receive outdated medicines (e.g. with lower effectiveness and/or more severe side effects); and in some cases the prescribed dosages of the innovative drugs are too low to be effective. This study gives an overview of the shortfalls in provision of state-of-the-art medicines in selected European countries for about 20 of the most relevant diseases. The following five different groups of factors can be identified as leading to this insufficient diffusion of medicines and are discussed in this text: (i) patient-related factors; (ii) healthcare professional-related factors; (iii) industry-related factors; (iv) system-related (long-term) factors; and (v) policy-related (short-term) factors. It must be clear that these shortages are not isolated cases but general trends in Europe, which have to be discussed in public.