Treatment of hypertension with an angiotensin II-receptor antagonist compared with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor: a review of clinical studies of telmisartan and enalapril

Discovery of MT-1207: A Novel, Potent Multitarget Inhibitor as a Promising Clinical Candidate for the Treatment of Hypertension

Herein, a series of novel arylpiperazine (piperidine) derivatives were designed, synthesized, and evaluated for mechanisms of action through in vitro and in vivo studies. The most promising compound, II-13 (later named as MT-1207), is a potent α1 and 5-HT2A receptor antagonist with remarkable IC50 in the picomolar level. Importantly, in the in vivo assay, II-13 achieved an effective blood pressure (BP) reduction in the 2K2C rat model without damaging renal function. Compound II-13, with its significant advantages in terms of pharmacological effects, pharmacokinetic parameters, and a large safety window, was extensively investigated. Moreover, data also showed that compound II-13 had fewer side effects in a postural BP assay and could prevent the onset of postural hypotension. Together, these results suggested that compound II-13 is a highly potent antihypertensive drug candidate with multitarget mechanisms of action in preclinical models. Currently, MT-1207 is in phase II hypertensive clinical trials in China.

Targeting Brain Aminopeptidase A: A New Strategy for the Treatment of Hypertension and Heart Failure

The pathophysiology of heart failure (HF) and hypertension are thought to involve brain renin-angiotensin system (RAS) hyperactivity. Angiotensin III, a key effector peptide in the brain RAS, provides tonic stimulatory control over blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive rats. Aminopeptidase A (APA), the enzyme responsible for generating brain angiotensin III, constitutes a potential therapeutic target for hypertension treatment. We focus here on studies of RB150/firibastat, the first prodrug of the specific and selective APA inhibitor EC33 able to cross the blood-brain barrier. We consider its development from therapeutic target discovery to clinical trials of the prodrug. After oral administration, firibastat crosses the gastrointestinal and blood-brain barriers. On arrival in the brain, it is cleaved to generate EC33, which inhibits brain APA activity, lowering BP in various experimental models of hypertension. Firibastat was clinically and biologically well tolerated, even at high doses, in phase I trials conducted in healthy human subjects. It was then shown to decrease BP effectively in patients of various ethnic origins with hypertension in phase II trials. Brain RAS hyperactivity leads to excessive sympathetic activity, which can contribute to HF after myocardial infarction (MI). Chronic treatment with oral firibastat (4 or 8 weeks after MI) has been shown to normalize brain APA activity in mice. This effect is accompanied by a normalization of brain RAS and sympathetic activities, reducing cardiac fibrosis and hypertrophy and preventing cardiac dysfunction. Firibastat may therefore represent a novel therapeutic advance in the clinical management of patients with hypertension and potentially with HF after MI.

Evolution of a New Class of Antihypertensive Drugs: Targeting the Brain Renin-Angiotensin System

In addition to the circulating renin-angiotensin system, activation of the brain renin-angiotensin system plays an important role in the pathophysiology of hypertension. One of the major components of the brain renin-angiotensin system implicated in the development of hypertension is Ang III (angiotensin III). Brain Ang III, produced from Ang II (angiotensin II) by APA (aminopeptidase A), exerts a tonic stimulatory control over blood pressure in hypertensive rats. Targeting Ang III by inhibiting brain APA is now considered a potentially important target in the management of hypertension. This has led to development of RB150, an orally active prodrug of the specific and selective APA inhibitor, EC33. Orally administered RB150 crosses the gastrointestinal and blood-brain barriers, enters the brain where it generates 2 active molecules of EC33 that block brain APA activity. This results in decreased brain Ang III formation and reduced blood pressure in hypertensive rats. The RB150-induced blood pressure decrease is due to a reduced vasopressin release, which increases diuresis, reducing extracellular volume, a decrease in sympathetic tone, leading to a reduction of vascular resistances, and the improvement of the baroreflex function. RB150 was renamed firibastat by the World Health Organization. Phase Ia/Ib clinical trials showed that firibastat is clinically and biologically well tolerated in healthy volunteers. Clinical efficacy of firibastat in hypertensive patients was, therefore, demonstrated in 2 phase II studies. Accordingly, firibastat could represent the first drug of a novel class of antihypertensive drugs targeting the brain renin-angiotensin system.

Pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interaction between enalapril, enalaprilat and felodipine extended release (ER) in healthy subjects

Since angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and calcium antagonists have complimentary mechanisms of action, enalapril, an ACE inhibitor, is used in combination with felodipine, a vascular selective dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, for the treatment of hypertension. The present study was designed to investigate the possible drug-drug interaction between these two agents in Chinese healthy subjects. A randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, 3-treatment, 3-period, 6-sequence cross-over study enrolling 12 healthy subjects (six male and six female subjects) was performed. Plasma pharmacokinetic studies were performed after 5 mg of enalapril and 5 mg of felodipine were administered alone or concomitantly twice per day for six days, and once in the morning of day seven. All 12 healthy subjects (mean [SD] age, 24.3 [2.8] years; body weight, 57.3 [5.7] kg; height, 163.2 [5.2] cm) completed all scheduled pharmacokinetic studies. Geometric mean ratios (with 90% CIs) of AUC_τ,ss and C_max,ss for enalapril administered concomitantly with felodipine vs. enalapril administered alone were 1.025 (0.80-1.25) and 1.065 (0.70-1.43), respectively. Geometric mean ratios (with 90% CIs) of AUC_τ,ss and C_max,ss for felodipine administered concomitantly with enalapril vs. felodipine administered alone were 1.14 (0.97-1.31) and 0.80 (0.65-0.95), respectively. There were no severe or serious drug-related adverse events observed during the study. Our results revealed that the co-administration of enalapril and felodipine affected the pharmacokinetics of felodipine, but not that of enalapril. Although the difference in PK parameters was statistically significant, its clinical significance may be limited, considering safety profile observed in the present study.

Early vs. late intervention of high fat/low dose streptozotocin treated C57Bl/6J mice with enalapril, α-lipoic acid, menhaden oil or their combination: Effect on diabetic neuropathy related endpoints

We have previously demonstrated that enalapril, α-lipoic acid and menhaden (fish) oil has potential as a treatment for diabetic peripheral neuropathy. In this study we sought to determine the efficacy of these treatments individually or in combination on multiple neuropathic endpoints in a high fat fed low dose streptozotocin treated mouse, a model of type 2 diabetes, following early or late intervention. Four or twelve weeks after the onset of hyperglycemia, diabetic mice were treated with enalapril, α-lipoic acid, menhaden oil or their combination for 12 weeks. Afterwards, endpoints including glucose tolerance, motor and sensory nerve conduction velocity, thermal nociception, and intraepidermal and cornea nerve fiber density was determined. Glucose clearance was impaired in diabetic mice and significantly improved only with combination treatment and early intervention. Diabetes caused steatosis, slowing of motor and sensory nerve conduction velocity, thermal hypoalgesia and reduction in intraepidermal and cornea nerve fiber density. Treating diabetic mice with enalapril, α-lipoic acid or menhaden oil partially protected diabetic mice from these deficits, whereas the combination of these three treatments was more efficacious following early or late intervention. These studies suggest that a combination therapy may be more effective for treating neural complications of type 2 diabetes.

Effect of combination therapy consisting of enalapril, α-lipoic acid, and menhaden oil on diabetic neuropathy in a high fat/low dose streptozotocin treated rat

We have previously demonstrated that treating diabetic rats with enalapril, an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, α-lipoic acid, an antioxidant, or menhaden oil, a natural source of omega-3 fatty acids can partially improve diabetic peripheral neuropathy. In this study we sought to determine the efficacy of combining these three treatments on vascular and neural complications in a high fat fed low dose streptozotocin treated rat, a model of type 2 diabetes. Rats were fed a high fat diet for 8 weeks followed by a 30 mg/kg dose of streptozotocin. Eight weeks after the onset of hyperglycemia diabetic rats were treated with a combination of enalapril, α-lipoic acid and menhaden oil. Diabetic rats not receiving treatment were continued on the high fat diet. Glucose clearance was impaired in diabetic rats and significantly improved with treatment. Diabetes caused steatosis, elevated serum lipid levels, slowing of motor and sensory nerve conduction, thermal hypoalgesia, reduction in intraepidermal nerve fiber profiles, decrease in cornea sub-basal nerve fiber length and corneal sensitivity and impairment in vascular relaxation to acetylcholine and calcitonin gene-related peptide in epineurial arterioles of the sciatic nerve. Treating diabetic rats with the combination of enalapril, α-lipoic acid and menhaden oil reversed all these deficits to near control levels except for motor nerve conduction velocity which was also significantly improved compared to diabetic rats but remained significantly decreased compared to control rats. These studies suggest that a combination therapeutic approach may be most effective for treating vascular and neural complications of type 2 diabetes.

[Orally active aminopeptidase A inhibitors reduce blood pressure: a new strategy for treating hypertension]

The hyperactivity of the brain renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has been implicated in the development and maintenance of hypertension in several types of experimental and genetic hypertension animal models. Among the main bioactive peptides of the brain RAS, angiotensin (Ang) II and Ang III display the same affinity for type 1 and type 2 Ang II receptors. Both peptides, injected intracerebroventricularly, similarly increase arginine vasopressin release and blood pressure (BP); however, because Ang II is converted in vivo to Ang III, the identity of the true effector is unknown. We first identified the enzymes involved in the metabolism of brain angiotensins and developed specific and selective inhibitors. Here we review new insights into the predominant role of brain Ang III in the control of BP, underlining the fact that brain aminopeptidase A (APA), the enzyme generating brain Ang III, may therefore be an interesting candidate target for the treatment of hypertension. This justifies the development of potent systemically active APA inhibitors, such as RB150, as prototypes of a new class of antihypertensive agents for the treatment of certain forms of hypertension.

A new strategy for treating hypertension by blocking the activity of the brain renin-angiotensin system with aminopeptidase A inhibitors

Hypertension affects one-third of the adult population and is a growing problem due to the increasing incidence of obesity and diabetes. Brain RAS (renin-angiotensin system) hyperactivity has been implicated in the development and maintenance of hypertension in several types of experimental and genetic hypertension animal models. We have identified in the brain RAS that APA (aminopeptidase A) and APN (aminopeptidase N), two membrane-bound zinc metalloproteases, are involved in the metabolism of AngII (angiotensin II) and AngIII (angiotensin III) respectively. The present review summarizes the main findings suggesting that AngIII plays a predominant role in the brain RAS in the control of BP (blood pressure). We first explored the organization of the APA active site by site-directed mutagenesis and molecular modelling. The development and the use in vivo of specific and selective APA and APN inhibitors EC33 and PC18 respectively, has allowed the demonstration that brain AngIII generated by APA is one of the main effector peptides of the brain RAS, exerting a tonic stimulatory control over BP in conscious hypertensive rats. This identified brain APA as a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of hypertension, which has led to the development of potent orally active APA inhibitors, such as RB150. RB150 administered orally in hypertensive DOCA (deoxycorticosteroneacetate)-salt rats or SHRs (spontaneously hypertensive rats) crosses the intestinal, hepatic and blood-brain barriers, enters the brain, generates two active molecules of EC33 which inhibit brain APA activity, block the formation of brain AngIII and normalize BP for several hours. The decrease in BP involves two different mechanisms: a decrease in vasopressin release into the bloodstream, which in turn increases diuresis resulting in a blood volume reduction that participates in the decrease in BP and/or a decrease in sympathetic tone, decreasing vascular resistance. RB150 constitutes the prototype of a new class of centrally acting antihypertensive agents and is currently being evaluated in a Phase Ib clinical trial.

The vascular relaxing effects of sevoflurane and isoflurane are more important in hypertensive than in normotensive rats

PURPOSE

The vascular response to anesthetics is altered in hypertensive patients since the functional and structural integrities of vascular smooth muscle and endothelium are deranged. The effects of anesthetics on angiotensin II (Ang II)-induced changes in vascular tone are not well understood. We investigated the effects of sevoflurane and isoflurane on Ang II-induced vasoconstriction in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR).

METHODS

The dose-dependent effects of sevoflurane and isoflurane on the Ang II-induced contraction of aortic rings, in the presence and absence of an intact endothelium, were investigated in normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY) and SHR and compared using isometric force transducers.

RESULTS

Ang II (10(-9)-10(-6) M) induced a similar transient phasic contraction of endothelium-intact rings from the two rat strains in a dose-dependent manner. Removal of the endothelium augmented the Ang II-elicited phasic contraction, to a greater extent in the SHR group than in the WKY group. Sevoflurane and isoflurane (1-3 minimum alveolar concentration) concentration-dependently inhibited the Ang II-induced contraction of endothelium-intact rings from WKY; an effect that was greatly enhanced following removal of the endothelium. A greater degree of attenuation of the Ang II-induced contraction of both endothelium-intact and -denuded rings by the two anesthetics was observed in the SHR group. The inhibitory effects of isoflurane on the Ang II-induced contraction of aortic rings from both strains appeared to be stronger than that of sevoflurane at equipotent concentrations.

CONCLUSION

Our finding that the inhibitory effects of isoflurane and sevoflurane on Ang II-induced vasoconstriction are enhanced in SHR may, at least in part, account for the anesthesia-induced systemic hypotension frequently seen in hypertensive patients.

Pharmacokinetics of Oral Doses of Telmisartan and Nisoldipine, Given Alone and in Combination, in Patients With Essential Hypertension

This randomized, single-blind, parallel-group study was performed to assess pharmacokinetic interactions potentially occurring during concomitant use of telmisartan and nisoldipine. Patients with essential hypertension (n = 37) were treated with once-daily doses of telmisartan, nisoldipine, or their combination for 6 weeks. The regimen was started at low dose with an increase of dosage after 3 weeks of treatment. AUC(ss) (132%; P < .01) of telmisartan applied in doses of 80 mg was significantly higher after concomitant application with nisoldipine (10 mg), whereas CL/f(ss) (-54%; P < .05) and Vz/f(ss) (-72%; P < .05) were significantly lower. Regarding pharmacokinetic parameters of nisoldipine, significant differences between treatment groups were not detected. In conclusion, the results of this study strongly suggest that concomitant treatment with nisoldipine enhances telmisartan bioavailability in hypertensive individuals. Larger crossover trials will have to establish these observations and investigate whether interaction of both drugs affects telmisartan efficacy and tolerability in clinical use.

Telmisartan: from lowering blood pressure to end-organ protection

The principal aim in the treatment of patients with high blood pressure is to ensure a maximum reduction in the total risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The renin-angiotensin system plays an important role in volume homeostasis and blood pressure regulation. The angiotensin receptor blockers control high blood pressure by preventing the binding of angiotensin II to the subtype 1 receptor, which is believed to mediate most of the physiologic actions of angiotensin II relevant to the regulation of blood pressure. Telmisartan is a widely used angiotensin receptor blocker with distinct pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Due to its long duration of action, it compares favorably with other angiotensin receptor blockers. Latest data from clinical trials and newest research regarding telmisartan will be reviewed in this article.

The role of the brain renin-angiotensin system in hypertension: implications for new treatment

Hypertension affects 26% of adults and is in constant progress related to increased incidence of obesity and diabetes. One-third of hypertensive patients may be successfully treated with one antihypertensive agent, one-third may require two agents and in the remaining patients will need three agents for effective blood pressure (BP) control. The development of new classes of antihypertensive agents with different mechanisms of action therefore remains an important goal. Brain renin-angiotensin system (RAS) hyperactivity has been implicated in hypertension development and maintenance in several types of experimental and genetic hypertension animal models. Among the main bioactive peptides of the brain RAS, angiotensin (Ang) II and Ang III have similar affinities for type 1 (AT1) and type 2 (AT2) Ang II receptors. Following intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection, Ang II and Ang III similarly increase arginine-vasopressin (AVP) release and BP. Blocking the brain RAS may be advantageous as it simultaneously (1) decreases sympathetic tone and consequently vascular resistance, (2) decreases AVP release, reducing blood volume and vascular resistance and (3) blocks angiotensin-induced baroreflex inhibition, decreasing both vascular resistance and cardiac output. However, as Ang II is converted to Ang III in vivo, the exact nature of the active peptide is not precisely determined. We summarize here the main findings identifying AngIII as one of the major effector peptides of the brain RAS in the control of AVP release and BP. Brain AngIII exerts a tonic stimulatory effect on BP in hypertensive rats, identifying brain aminopeptidase A (APA), the enzyme generating brain Ang III, as a potentially candidate target for hypertension treatment. This has led to the development of potent orally active APA inhibitors, such as RB150--the prototype of a new class of centrally acting antihypertensive agents.

Telmisartan: a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Telmisartan belongs to the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonizing class of antihypertensives, which are widely recognized and increasingly prescribed because of their good tolerability. Moreover, due to the results of the ONTARGET trial program, telmisartan was the first AT1 receptor antagonist to receive approval for the prevention of cardiovascular events in cardiovascular high risk patients, thereby, indicating that its clinical importance will further increase.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

This article reviews the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of telmisartan with a special focus on novel pharmacokinetic characteristics of the drug.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

An overview of the published data regarding the pharmacokinetic properties of telmisartan as well as a summary of the results from selected small exploratory and large clinical outcome trials involving telmisartan.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Telmisartan is a safe and effective alternative for the treatment of hypertension. Moreover, due to its good tolerability, an increasing use of telmisartan in cardiovascular high risk patients can be anticipated. This will grant further experimental and clinical research on AT1 receptor-independent pharmacodynamics of telmisartan as well as on telmisartan-related drug safety issues.

Simultaneous determination of fimasartan, a novel antihypertensive agent, and its active metabolite in rat plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

Fimasartan, 2-butyl-5-dimethylaminothiocarbonylmethyl-6-methyl-3-[[2'-(1H tetrazol -5-yl)biphenyl-4-yl]methyl]pyrimidin-4(3H)-one (BR-A-657), is a novel angiotensin II receptor blocker exhibiting potent and selective AT1 receptor blocking activity. This study reports the liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay for the simultaneous determination of fimasartan and its active metabolite, BR-A-557, in rat plasma. The assay was validated to demonstrate the specificity, linearity, recovery, lower limit of quantification, accuracy, precision and stability. The multiple reaction monitoring was based on the transition of m/z 502.1 → 207.1 for fimasartan, 486.2 → 207.1 for BR-A-557 and 526.1 → 207.1 for BR-A-563 (internal standard). The assay utilized a simple precipitation procedure with acetonitrile and isocratic elution. The LLOQ was 0.2 ng/mL for fimasartan and BR-A-557 using 50 μL plasma samples. The assay was linear over a concentration range from 0.2 to 500 ng/mL for fimasartan and BR-A-557, with correlation coefficients >0.9995. The intra- and inter-day assay accuracies were 93.6-108.0 and 90.8-101.4% for fimasartan and 102.2-107.1 and 99.6-103.3% for BR-A-557, respectively. The intra- and inter-day precision were 2.4-4.4 and 3.0-13.4% for fimasartan and 3.1-5.2 and 2.8-9.8% for BR-A-557, respectively. The developed assay may be used to study the metabolism and mechanistic pharmacokinetics of fimasartan in future studies.

Jacques Benoit lecture: the neuroendocrine view of the angiotensin and apelin systems

The hyperactivity of the brain renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has been implicated in the development and maintenance of hypertension in several types of experimental and genetic hypertension animal models. Among the main bioactive peptides of the brain RAS, angiotensin (Ang) II and Ang III display the same affinity for type 1 and type 2 Ang II receptors. Both peptides, injected intracerebroventricularly, similarly increase arginine vasopressin (AVP) release and blood pressure (BP); however, because Ang II is converted in vivo to Ang III, the identity of the true effector is unknown. We review new insights into the predominant role of brain Ang III in the control of BP, underlining the fact that brain aminopeptidase A (APA), the enzyme generating brain Ang III, may therefore be an interesting candidate target for the treatment of hypertension. This justifies the development of potent systemically active APA inhibitors, such as RB150, as prototypes of a new class of antihypertensive agents for the treatment of certain forms of hypertension. We also searched for a putative angiotensin receptor subtype specific for Ang III and isolated a seven transmembrane-domain G protein-coupled receptor corresponding to the receptor for apelin, a newly-discovered peptide isolated from bovine stomach. Apelin and its receptor are expressed in magnocellular vasopressinergic neurones in the hypothalamus. The central injection of apelin in lactating rats decreases the phasic electrical activity of vasopressinergic neurones and the systemic secretion of AVP, inducing water diuresis. Apelin is therefore a natural inhibitor of the antidiuretic effect of AVP. In addition, systemic administration of apelin decreases BP, improves cardiac contractility and reduces cardiac loading. The development of nonpeptide agonists of the apelin receptor may provide new therapeutic tools for treating water retention, hyponatraemia and cardiovascular diseases. Angiotensins and apelin thus exert opposing but complementary effects, and are thereby determinant for the maintenance of body fluid homeostasis and cardiovascular functions.

Telmisartan improves endothelial function in patients with essential hypertension

BACKGROUND

: Hypertension is a cardiovascular risk factor commonly associated with endothelial dysfunction and increased renal vascular resistance. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may beneficially affect these parameters via antagonism of angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptor-mediated vasoconstriction and vascular superoxide production. We therefore investigated whether the new ARB telmisartan improves endothelial function and renal vascular resistance in patients with essential hypertension.

METHODS

: Thirty-seven patients with essential hypertension were randomized to receive telmisartan, the calcium channel blocker nisoldipine, or their combination for 6 weeks in a prospective, parallel group study. Brachial artery flow-mediated (endothelium-dependent) dilation (FMD) and renal vascular resistance index (RVRI) were evaluated using high-resolution ultrasound before, at 3 weeks (low dose), and at 6 weeks (high dose) after initiation of treatment.

RESULTS

: At baseline, FMD and RVRI did not significantly differ between treatment groups. After 3 weeks of treatment neither treatment significantly changed FMD or RVRI. After 6 weeks of treatment, patients randomized to receive telmisartan alone or the combination, but not those treated with nisoldipine alone, displayed a significantly improved FMD, whereas RVRI values again were not significantly different as compared to those at baseline.

CONCLUSION

: In our study cohort of patients with essential hypertension, treatment with telmisartan improved FMD but did not change RVRI. Future studies will demonstrate whether this telmisartan-induced effect may contribute to a blood pressure-independent reduction in cardiovascular morbidity.

Aminopeptidase A inhibitors as centrally acting antihypertensive agents

Among the main bioactive peptides of the brain renin-angiotensin system, angiotensin (Ang) II and AngIII exhibit the same affinity for the type 1 and type 2 Ang receptors. Both peptides, injected intracerebroventricularly, cause similar increase in blood pressure (BP). Because AngII is converted in vivo to AngIII, the identity of the true effector is unknown. This review summarized recent insights into the predominant role of brain AngIII in the central control of BP underlining the fact that brain aminopeptidase A (APA), the enzyme forming central AngIII, could constitute a putative central therapeutic target for the treatment of hypertension. This led to the development of potent, systematically active APA inhibitors, such as RB150, as a prototype of a new class of centrally acting antihypertensive agents for the treatment of certain forms of hypertension.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of telmisartan using an indirect response model in spontaneously hypertensive rats

AIM

To investigate the pharmacokinetic (PK) and the pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of telmisartan in spontaneously hypertensive (SH) rats using an indirect response and effect-compartment link models, and compare two PK-PD models fitting quality.

METHODS

The SH rats received a single oral dose of 2, 4, and 8 mg/kg of telmisartan. The plasma concentrations of telmisartan were determined by the liquid chromatography-mass spectrum method. The mean arterial blood pressure was measured to characterize the pharmacodynamics of telmisartan by tail-cuff manometry. The relationship for the telmisartan concentration-hypotensive effect in the SH rats was characterized using an indirect response model.

RESULTS

The PK parameters showed dose proportionality, with a long terminal half-life of 16 h, a clearance of 0.15 Lxkg( -1) xh( -1), and a volume of distribution of 5.36 Lxkg( -1) in the study. For the indirect response PD model, the estimated K(in) were 36.6, 34.1, and 32.8 %.h( -1), K(out) were 36.7, 34.6, and 31.9 h( -1); the IC(50) values were 86.2, 95.8, and 91.1 ngxmL( -1); and the area under the effect curve (AUEC) were 762.8, 1490.5, and 2086.2 mmHg.h at three doses, respectively. For the effect-compartment model, the K(eo) were 29.4, 33.8, and 28.7 h( -1); the IC(50) values were 78.2, 85.7, and 80.9 ngxmL(-1), and the AUEC were 781.5, 1602.8, and 2215.7 mmHg.h at three doses, respectively.

CONCLUSION

According to Akaike's information criterion values, the proposed indirect response model provided a more appropriate and good-fitting PK/PD characterization of telmisartan than the effect-compartment link model in SH rats.

Effective treatment of hypertension by AT(1) receptor antagonism: the past and future of telmisartan

Lowering blood pressure is the most effective treatment method to ensure a reduction in the total risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The renin-angiotensin system plays an important role in volume homeostasis and blood pressure regulation and is a target for several groups of pharmaceutical agents. Angiotensin II receptor blockers represent the newest class of antihypertensive compounds. They prevent the binding of angiotensin II to the subtype 1 receptor (AT(1)), which is believed to mediate most of the physiological actions relevant to the regulation of blood pressure. Telmisartan, a widely used AT(1) receptor antagonist, is a highly selective compound with high potency, a long duration of action and a tolerability profile similar to placebo. Numerous randomized clinical trials and community-based studies have demonstrated that oral telmisartan and combinations of telmisartan with hydrochlorothiazide are at least as effective in lowering blood pressure as all other hypertensive medications. This has been demonstrated in different populations of adult patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension, including patients with coexisting Type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome or renal impairment. Several large-scale, long-term, clinical endpoint studies are in progress to assess the beneficial effects of telmisartan on hypertension-related end-organ damage in patients at high risk of renal, cardiac and vascular damage whose blood pressure is well controlled. The most recent data from clinical trials and latest research regarding telmisartan will be reviewed in this article.

Effect of telmisartan on blood pressure control and kidney function in hypertensive, proteinuric patients with chronic kidney disease

OBJECTIVES

To assess the antihypertensive and antiproteinuric efficacy and safety of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker telmisartan in patients with hypertension and chronic kidney disease.

METHODS

A multicenter, prospective trial was performed in adults with hypertension [systolic blood pressure (SBP)/diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >130/85 mmHg), chronic renal insufficiency (serum creatinine <4.0 mg/dl), and proteinuria (>1 g/24 h). In addition to existing antihypertensive therapy, the nature and doses of which remained unchanged throughout the study, patients received once-daily telmisartan 40 mg for the first 3 months followed by forced titration to telmisartan 80 mg for the subsequent 3 months to achieve a target SBP/DBP of <130/85 mmHg. The rationale for using telmisartan was its long half-life efficacy, greater antihypertensive effect compared with valsartan or losartan, and newly discovered potential antidiabetic effect.

RESULTS

The study was conducted in 92 patients (45 men, 47 women), of whom 60 had diabetes mellitus (54 patients with type 2 disease). Five patients discontinued prematurely: two because of hyperkalemia, two because of protocol violation, and one because of lack of efficacy. After 6 months' telmisartan treatment, office trough seated SBP was reduced by 19.6 mmHg (P<0.001) from 154.9+/-14.6 mmHg and DBP by 11.8 mmHg (P<0.001) from 91.7+/-8.1 mmHg. Seated trough SBP/DBP of <130/85 mmHg was achieved at 6 months in 34.8% of patients. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring also demonstrated significant reductions in mean daytime SBP of 10.9 mmHg (P=0.01), night-time SBP of 12.1 mmHg (P=0.05), daytime DBP of 3.1 mmHg (P=0.05), and night-time DBP of 6.5 mmHg (P=0.05). Proteinuria decreased significantly from 3.6+/-3.4 to 2.8+/-2.8 g/24 h (P=0.01). A decrease in proteinuria depended significantly on a decrease in SBP at the end of the study (P=0.044). Each decrease in SBP of about 10 mmHg led to a decrease in proteinuria of about 0.79 g/24 h (95% CI 0.02-1.56 g/24 h). Serum creatinine increased from 1.96+/-0.79 to 2.08+/-0.89 mg/dl (P=0.01), whereas creatinine clearance did not change significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Telmisartan effectively and safely reduced blood pressure and brought about regression of proteinuria in diabetic and nondiabetic, hypertensive, proteinuric patients with chronic kidney disease, even in those with mild-to-moderate chronic renal failure.

A double-blind ambulatory blood pressure monitoring study of the efficacy and tolerability of once-daily telmisartan 40 mg in comparison with losartan 50 mg in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension in Taiwanese patients

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was used to compare the efficacy and tolerability of once-daily telmisartan 40 mg and once-daily losartan 50 mg in Taiwanese patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension in a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study. The initial 2-week placebo run-in phase was followed by randomisation to treatment with telmisartan 40 mg (n = 31) or losartan 50 mg (n = 30) for 6 weeks. The reduction in 18- to 24-h mean (SE) ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from baseline was significantly greater with telmisartan 40 mg (-12.1 +/- 1.6 mmHg, p = 0.036) than with losartan 50 mg (-7.0 +/- 1.8 mmHg). The reduction in 18- to 24-h mean (SE) ambulatory systolic blood pressure (SBP) from baseline was also greater with telmisartan 40 mg (-16.0 +/- 2.4 mmHg) than with losartan 50 mg (-11.8 +/- 2.7 mmHg), but did not achieve statistical significance. Telmisartan was well tolerated; no serious adverse events occurred.

Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of telmisartan 40 mg vs. enalapril 10 mg in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension: a multicentre, double-blind study in Taiwanese patients

The purpose of this randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of telmisartan 40 mg once daily vs. enalapril 10 mg once daily in 147 Taiwanese patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension (diastolic blood pressure [DBP] 90-109 mmHg). After 6 weeks' treatment, telmisartan produced a significantly greater reduction from baseline in the primary endpoint of trough seated DBP compared with enalapril 10 mg (11.7 vs. 8.7 mmHg, respectively; p = 0.02). Numerically greater reductions compared with baseline in seated systolic blood pressure (SBP), standing DBP, and standing SBP were achieved with telmisartan compared with enalapril. Also, numerically greater proportions of patients achieved blood pressure control (DBP/systolic blood pressure [SBP] <90/140 mmHg) and responded to treatment (reduction from baseline in trough seated DBP > or = 10 mmHg and/or post-treatment DBP <90 mmHg; reduction from baseline in trough seated SBP > or = 10 mmHg and/or post-treatment SBP <140 mmHg) with telmisartan 40 mg compared with enalapril 10 mg. Although both treatments were well tolerated, the incidence of cough was markedly lower with telmisartan 40 mg (8.5%) than with enalapril 10 mg (18.4%) in this population of Taiwanese hypertensive patients.

Randomized, controlled, parallel-group comparison of ambulatory and clinic blood pressure responses to amlodipine or enalapril during and after treatment in adult chinese patients with hypertension

BACKGROUND

Few studies have examined the relative efficacy and tolerability of antihypertensive drug classes in Chinese populations.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared the efficacy, tolerability, and duration of antihypertensive effect of amlodipine besylate and enalapril in Chinese patients with hypertension, including elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension.

METHODS

This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group dose-titration study was conducted at the Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong. Chinese patients aged 18 to 80 years with primary hypertension were enrolled. After a 4-week placebo run-in period, patients were randomly assigned to receive active oral, once-daily treatment with amlodipine (5 mg) or with enalapril (5 mg) for 14 weeks. Treatment doses were titrated at weeks 4 and 8 if necessary according to blood pressure (BP) response and if the dose had been tolerated. Patients also underwent 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) at the end of the placebo run-in, after the first and last doses of active treatment, and 48 hours after discontinuation of treatment to determine the duration of drug action and to mimic the effect of 2 missed doses.

RESULTS

Eighty patients were recruited for the study (26 men, 54 women; mean [SD] age, 60.5 [11.6] years) (40 patients per group). Thirty-seven patients in each group completed the active treatment phase. Baseline trough BPs were similar: 167.7 (15.0)/94.6 (9.7) mm Hg in the amlodipine group and 168.6 (11.9)/93.4 (9.5) mm Hg in the enalapril group. After 14 weeks of treatment, amlodipine (mean [SD] final dose, 6.3 [2.3] mg) produced greater reductions than enalapril (mean [SD] final dose, 13.3 [6.6] mg) in trough BP (-20.8 [13.2]/-9.2 [9.0] vs -5.5 [14.9]/-3.2 [10.6] mm Hg, respectively; P < or = 0.01). Most of the effect of amlodipine persisted for 72 hours after the last dose (-18.9 [14.6]/-11.1 [11.7] mm Hg), but enalapril had no significant antihypertensive effect at 72 hours (-1.3 [12.3]/-1.8 [9.1] mm Hg). Similar observations were found with ABPM recordings. Cough was reported in 5 patients (12.5%) and 13 patients (32.5%) in the amlodipine and enalapril groups, respectively, but was thought to be treatment related in only 6 patients (15.0%), all in the enalapril group. One of the patients in the enalapril group withdrew from the study because of cough, and 1 patient in the amlodipine group withdrew because of ankle edema.

Brain renin-angiotensin system blockade by systemically active aminopeptidase A inhibitors: a potential treatment of salt-dependent hypertension

The hyperactivity of the brain renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has been implicated in the development and maintenance of hypertension in several types of experimental and genetic hypertension animal models. We previously reported that in the murine brain, aminopeptidase A (APA) is involved in the conversion of angiotensin II (AngII) to AngIII and that AngIII is one of the main effector peptides of the brain RAS in the control of vasopressin release. Here we report that brain AngIII exerts a tonic stimulatory effect on blood pressure in a model of salt-dependent hypertension, the DOCA-salt rat, characterized by a depressed systemic but a hyperactive brain RAS. Similar high blood pressure accompanied by a low systemic renin state was described in some patients, especially in hypertensive African Americans who are resistant to treatment by blockers of the systemic RAS. We developed RB150, a prodrug of the specific and selective APA inhibitor, EC33. RB150 given i.v. is able to cross the blood-brain barrier, to inhibit brain APA, and to block the formation of central AngIII. A single dose of systemic RB150 (15 mg/kg, i.v.) in conscious DOCA-salt rats inhibited brain APA activity and markedly reduced blood pressure for up to 24 h. These results demonstrate the crucial role of brain APA as a candidate target for the treatment of hypertension and suggest that RB150, a potent systemically active APA inhibitor, could be the prototype of a new class of antihypertensive agents for the treatment of certain forms of hypertension.