The PROTECT Study: final results of a large multicenter postmarketing study in patients with type 2 diabetes. Precose Resolution of Optimal Titration to Enhance Current Therapies

Purification and Functional Characterization of the Chloroform/Methanol-Soluble Protein 3 (CM3) From Triticum aestivum in Drosophila melanogaster

Non-celiac wheat sensitivity (NCWS) has been proposed to be an independent disease entity that is characterized by intestinal (e.g., abdominal pain, flatulence) and extra-intestinal symptoms (e.g., headache, fatigue), which are propagated following the ingestion of wheat products. Increased activity of amylase trypsin inhibitors (ATIs) in modern wheat is suggested to be major trigger of NCWS, while underlying mechanisms still remain elusive. Here, we aimed to generate and functionally characterize the most abundant ATI in modern wheat, chloroform/methanol-soluble protein 3 (CM3), in vitro and in Drosophila melanogaster. We demonstrate that CM3 displays α-glucosidase but not α-amylase or trypsin inhibitory activity in vitro. Moreover, fruit flies fed a sucrose-containing diet together with CM3 displayed significant overgrowth of intestinal bacteria in a sucrose-dependent manner while the consumption of α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitors was sufficient to limit bacterial quantities in the intestine. Notably, both CM3 and acarbose-treated flies showed a reduced lifespan. However, this effect was absent in amylase inhibitor (AI) treated flies. Together, given α-glucosidase is a crucial requirement for disaccharide digestion, we suggest that inhibition of α-glucosidase by CM3 enhances disaccharide load in the distal gastrointestinal tract, thereby promoting intestinal bacteria overgrowth. However, it remains speculative if this here described former unknown function of CM3 might contribute to the development of gastrointestinal symptoms observed in NCWS patients which are very similar to symptoms of patients with small intestinal bacterial overgrowth.

Acarbose: safe and effective for lowering postprandial hyperglycaemia and improving cardiovascular outcomes

α-Glucosidase inhibitors (AGIs) are a class of oral glucose-lowering drugs used exclusively for treatment or prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus. AGIs act by altering the intestinal absorption of carbohydrates through inhibition of their conversion into simple sugars (monosaccharides) and thus decrease the bioavailability of carbohydrates in the body, significantly lowering blood glucose levels. The three AGIs used in clinical practice are acarbose, voglibose and miglitol. This review will focus on the cardiovascular properties of acarbose. The current available data suggest that AGIs (particularly acarbose) may be safe and effective for the treatment of prediabetes and diabetes.

Evaluation of anti-diabetic and alpha glucosidase inhibitory action of anthraquinones from Rheum emodi

The 1,8-dihydroxyanthraquinones from the culinary and medicinally important plant Rheum emodi exert anti-hyperglycemic potential but notably different α-glucosidase actions as established by in vitro, in vivo, kinetics and molecular docking studies.

Achieving glycemic control in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: a critical comparison of current options

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is increasing in the elderly. Because of the unique characteristics of elderly people with T2DM, therapeutic strategy and focus should be tailored to suit this population. This article reviews the guidelines and studies related to older people with T2DM worldwide. A few important themes are generalized: 1) the functional and cognitive status is critical for older people with T2DM considering their life expectancy compared to younger counterparts; 2) both severe hypoglycemia and persistent hyperglycemia are deleterious to older adults with T2DM, and both conditions should be avoided when determining therapeutic goals; 3) recently developed guidelines emphasize the avoidance of hypoglycemic episodes in older people, even in the absence of symptoms. In addition, we raise the concern of glycemic variability, and discuss the rationale for the selection of current options in managing this patient population.

Safety and efficacy of acarbose in the treatment of diabetes in Chinese patients

Acarbose is an α-glucosidase inhibitor that is commonly used to control postprandial blood glucose. It functions as a competitive and reversible inhibitor of small intestinal brush border glucosidase, blocks the degradation of starch and sucrose, and delays the absorption of glucose and fructose in the alimentary tract. The starch content of a diet might alter the hypoglycemic effects of acarbose because of its mechanism of action. Chinese individuals consume a typical Eastern diet, which is characterized by a high intake of whole grains, legumes, vegetables, fruits, and fish. These dietary habits allow acarbose to be used extensively in the People’s Republic of China. Several Chinese-based studies have demonstrated that the use of acarbose as a monotherapy had similar effects on other anti-diabetes agents in decreasing glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA_1c) and blood glucose levels, and acarbose in combination with other anti-diabetic drugs could further reduce blood glucose and decrease the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions. Importantly, acarbose is safe and well tolerated, with a low incidence of adverse effects. This article provides a comprehensive review of the safety and efficacy of acarbose for the treatment of diabetes in Chinese patients.

Drug treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients for whom metformin is contraindicated

Metformin is considered an initial drug of choice for type 2 diabetes mellitus by leading recommendations. When contraindications to its use exist or patients cannot tolerate it due to adverse effects, clinicians have a variety of other classes of agents to treat hyperglycemia associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Each class of agent has its own benefit and safety profile. There are numerous factors to consider when selecting another agent in lieu of metformin including, but not limited to, overall efficacy in A1c reduction, adverse effect profile, cost, and patient preference. The number of factors influencing the decision process presents challenges and often no one specific agent is ideal. Each pharmacotherapeutic class of agents alternative to metformin for the treatment of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus as initial monotherapy is reviewed.

Comparison of the hypoglycemic effect of acarbose monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus consuming an Eastern or Western diet: a systematic meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Because of its mechanism of action, the starch content of a diet might alter the hypoglycemic effect of acarbose.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine whether differences in this hypoglycemic effect existed between individuals consuming Eastern and Western diets with significantly different starch contents, a systematic meta-analysis of studies comparing acarbose with placebo or other hypoglycemic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) was performed.

METHODS

Records were retrieved from the Cochrane clinical controlled trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Wanfang, Chinese Technical Periodicals, and ongoing trials databases, and full texts and reference lists were screened. Because no study has directly compared patients consuming different types of diet, fixed- and random-effect models were used to indirectly compare the hypoglycemic effect of acarbose monotherapy with that of placebo and/or comparator drugs in patients with T2DM consuming an Eastern (Eastern Asia) or Western (including Europe and North America) diet.

RESULTS

A total of 46 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The results revealed that, compared with placebo, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels were reduced to a significantly greater extent (1.02%) in the Eastern diet (mean [SD], 1.54% [2.00%]) than in the Western diet (mean [SD], 0.52% [1.20%]) P < 0.00001). The ability of acarbose to reduce HbA1c levels in the Eastern (P = 0.20) and Western (P = 0.10) diet groups was similar to that of sulfonylureas, and HbA1c levels were reduced significantly more (0.39%; P < 0.00001) in the Eastern than in the Western diet group. The ability of acarbose to reduce HbA1c levels was similar to those of metformin and nateglinide/repaglinide, but a comparison of its efficacy with different diets was difficult because of the inclusion of few studies in these categories. Analysis of all included studies revealed that acarbose achieved a greater absolute reduction of HbA1c levels in the Eastern diet (mean [SD], 1.26% [1.20%]) than in the Western diet (mean [SD], 0.62% [1.28%]; P < 0.00001) group. However, the poor quality of Eastern diet trials may have affected the outcomes of the meta-analysis.

CONCLUSION

The hypoglycemic effect of acarbose is superior in patients with T2DM consuming an Eastern diet than in those consuming a Western diet and is similar to that of sulfonylureas, metformin, and glinide drugs.

An observational study of acarbose treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes from the Middle East and Morocco

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes is increasing dramatically in the Middle East and North Africa region. However, there are few trials that have determined the effect of antidiabetic treatment in an observational setting in these countries.

METHODS

This was a noninterventional study performed in Morocco in 2006-2007 and in the Middle East in 2005-2006 to observe the efficacy and safety of acarbose in patients with pretreated or untreated type 2 diabetes. Glycemic parameters (fasting blood glucose, one-hour postprandial blood glucose, and HbA1c) were recorded within a 3-month period. The observation period included an initial visit at the start of acarbose therapy and up to three follow-ups.

RESULTS

Acarbose was effective in reducing glycemic parameters in patients from Morocco (n = 1082) and the Middle East (n = 1737). The mean one-hour postprandial blood glucose decreased by 35.5% to 165.4 ± 47.9 mg/dL in the Middle East and by 35.5% to 179.0 ± 49.9 mg/dL in Morocco. Mean fasting blood glucose decreased by 30.8% to 126.6 ± 34.2 mg/dL (Middle East) and by 34.5% to 150.6 ± 47.1 mg/dL (Morocco). The absolute reduction in HbA1c was 1.3% in the Middle East (final value 7.4%) and 1.0% in Morocco (final value 7.5%). Overall, 107 patients (Middle East) and 26 patients (Morocco) experienced minor drug-related adverse events, which were mainly gastrointestinal. The tolerability of acarbose was rated as very good/good by 80.8% in the Middle East and by 68.6% in Morocco.

CONCLUSION

This study illustrates the efficacy and safety of acarbose in the treatment of type 2 diabetic patients in an observational setting.

Evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of acarbose in patients with diabetes mellitus : a postmarketing surveillance study

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy and tolerability of acarbose were examined in a postmarketing surveillance study of 27 803 patients with diabetes mellitus (26 044 were diagnosed as having type 2 diabetes) over a 12-week treatment period. PATIENTS AND M ethods: Overall efficacy data were reported for type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and a detailed data analysis was conducted for patients with type 2 diabetes. Tolerability was described for the total group. Of the type 2 diabetes patients, 37.6% were treated with diet only; 44.2% were additionally treated with sulphonylureas; 6.3% with metformin or metformin plus sulphonylurea; and 11.6% with insulin alone or in combination with oral treatment. The frequency of two or more concomitant diseases was 45.8% for all type 2 diabetes patients, and 62.4% in elderly patients (age >/=70 years).

RESULTS

In patients with type 2 diabetes, acarbose administration in addition to the existing treatment resulted in reductions in mean blood glucose levels (fasting 50 mg/dL, 1h post-prandial [pp] 60 mg/dL, 2h pp 56 mg/dL), glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c) 1.3%; HbA(1) 1.6%) and bodyweight (1.5 kg). Results for type 1 diabetes patients were similar. No clinically relevant influence of age, body mass index or number of concomitant diseases on the results could be observed. Tolerability was good: 83% of patients had no adverse events, 13.7% reported flatulence, and 2.2% had at least one occurrence of diarrhoea. Hypoglycaemia was found in 0.07% of patients, mainly in combination with metformin or insulin. Tolerability was independent of patients' age. Laboratory investigations gave no indication of other adverse events.

CONCLUSION

This postmarketing surveillance study documents the therapeutic benefit and good tolerability and compliance of acarbose as mono- and combination therapy, even in elderly and multimorbid patients.

Critical evaluation of the role of acarbose in the treatment of diabetes: patient considerations

The alpha-glucosidase inhibitor acarbose has been used for more than 20 years in the management of hyperglycemia. Owing to its unique mode of action in the gastrointestinal tract, its properties are very different from other antidiabetic medications. Patients on long-term treatment to control a chronic disease are not only interested in good treatment efficacy, but are also even more interested in the safety and side effects of their medications. Significant aspects of acarbose predominantly regarding safety and tolerability in the management of type 2 diabetes and prediabetes are reviewed. It is concluded that acarbose is a convenient long-term treatment option, with benefits for both type 2 diabetics and patients in a prediabetic state.

International noninterventional study of acarbose treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

AIM

To obtain data on efficacy, safety and tolerability of acarbose monotherapy or combination therapy during daily-life treatment.

METHODS

This prospective, non-controlled, observational study enrolled patients with type 2 diabetes, whose physician decided that acarbose treatment was appropriate, from China, Middle East, Indonesia, Morocco, Pakistan, Philippines, Poland and Taiwan. The observation period included an initial visit and up to three follow-up visits; an extension of 2 years was realized in Pakistan and Poland.

RESULTS

Of 14,574 patients enrolled, 14,418 comprised the intent-to-treat population. At the initial visit, 74.1% of patients had been treated with a glucose-lowering agent. Fasting blood glucose was reduced from 175.2mg/dL at the initial visit to 133.7 mg/dL at the last visit (mean of 11.3 weeks after initial visit; P<0.0001). Mean 2-h postprandial blood glucose decreased from 244.7 mg/dL to 172.4 mg/dL (P<0.0001). HbA1c reduced from 8.4% to 7.4% (P<0.0001). Glycemic efficacy was maintained over the 2-year extension period. There were 432 adverse events in 293 patients (2.03%), mainly gastrointestinal. Physicians assessed efficacy as "very good"/"good" in 85.1% of patients, and were "very satisfied"/"satisfied" with acarbose therapy in 94.3% of cases.

CONCLUSION

Acarbose therapy was efficacious and well tolerated in daily life in patients with type 2 diabetes.

A review of the response to oral antidiabetes agents in patients with type 2 diabetes

In patients with type 2 diabetes, a progressive decline in glycemic control exacerbates the microvascular (retinopathy, neuropathy, and nephropathy) and macrovascular (cardiovascular disease, stroke, and peripheral arterial disease) complications associated with this disease. In a consensus statement, the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes stated that the main goal of antidiabetes therapy is to achieve glycemic control, defined as a glycated hemoglobin of < 7%, although goals should be individualized to each patient, especially in patients at highest risk of cardiovascular disease events. However, because type 2 diabetes is a progressive disease, the response to oral antidiabetes (OAD) agents declines over time and the majority of patients are unable to maintain glycemic control, thus necessitating additional therapy. This requirement for additional antidiabetes therapies as the disease progresses suggests that more aggressive and earlier use of synergistic therapies may help achieve and prolong glycemic control. This review examines the efficacy of OAD therapies to address the unmet need for prompt and maintained glycemic control to the recommended goal in patients with type 2 diabetes, the factors that can affect the glycemic response to the various classes of OAD agents, and ways in which the management of hyperglycemia can be improved in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Treatment Considerations for Diabetes: A Pharmacist’s Guide to Improving Care in the Elderly

The management of diabetes in elderly patients has many nuances that are important to the pharmacist, regardless of his or her practice setting. General guidelines and treatment modalities applied to the younger population cannot necessarily be applied to the elderly population and in most cases, should be tailored to meet their needs. The purpose of this article is to gain a better understanding of the complex nature of diabetes and management in the elderly by (1) reviewing the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of diabetes in the patients, (2) understanding complications and geriatric syndromes that may affect management of diabetes, (3) becoming familiar with nationally accepted diabetes care guidelines in the elderly, (4) reviewing recent literature pertaining to management of diabetes, and (5) reviewing medications (including newer agents) to treat diabetes in the elderly.

Cardiovascular benefits and safety profile of acarbose therapy in prediabetes and established type 2 diabetes

Dysglycaemic disease is one of the most important health issues facing the world in the 21^st century. Patients with type 2 diabetes and individuals with prediabetes are at risk of developing macrovascular and microvascular complications. Long-term management strategies are therefore required that are effective at controlling dysglycaemia, well tolerated and, ideally, offer additional cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk-reduction benefits. The efficacy, safety and tolerability of the α-glucosidase inhibitor acarbose have been well-established in a wide range of patient populations in both clinical and community trials. In addition, acarbose has been shown to reduce cardiovascular complications in type 2 diabetes and prevent hypertension and CVD in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). Acarbose has a very good safety profile and, owing to its straightforward, non-systemic mode of action, avoids most adverse events. The most common side-effects of acarbose are mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal complaints that subside as treatment continues. They can be minimised through the use of an appropriate stepwise dosing regimen and careful choice of diet. Acarbose is therefore a valuable option for the management of type 2 diabetes and, as the only oral antidiabetes agent approved for the treatment of prediabetes, can help to improve clinical management across the dysglycaemic disease continuum.

Diabetes research in the Department of Veterans Affairs

OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) research activities, highlighting diabetes-related research.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Diabetes is an important component of the VA research portfolio. All four VA research services support aspects of diabetes research. VA diabetes research projects and funding were examined from 1998 to 2003.

RESULTS

VA scientists are conducting research on diabetes genetics, etiology, diagnosis, therapy, epidemiology, health services, and rehabilitation. VA research funding is available to answer important veteran-relevant questions through peer review, Center of Excellence activities, and multisite trial mechanisms. Many VA scientists also receive research support from nonfederal sources, including private corporations and nonprofit foundations. The VA Office of Research and Development actively supports training the next generation of researchers through their career development awards and the VA health profession training programs.

CONCLUSIONS

The VA's diabetes research portfolio is extensive and includes many investigators, trainees, and fellows. There is substantial leveraging of VA diabetes research with support from other federal and nonfederal funding agencies, foundations, and private corporations. VA diabetes research findings benefit the global diabetes care community.

Improved glycemic control by acarbose therapy in hypertensive diabetic patients: effects on blood pressure and hormonal parameters

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was carried out on 44 hypertensive type 2 diabetic subjects previously treated by diet associated or not with sulfonylurea to assess the effects of acarbose-induced glycemic control on blood pressure (BP) and hormonal parameters. Before randomization and after a 22-week treatment period (100 to 300 mg/day), the subjects were submitted to a standard meal test and to 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) and had plasma glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, lipid profile, insulin, proinsulin and leptin levels determined. Weight loss was found only in the acarbose-treated group (75.1 +/- 11.6 to 73.1 +/- 11.6 kg, P<0.01). Glycosylated hemoglobin decreased only in the acarbose group (6.4 +/- 1.7 to 5.6 +/- 1.9%, P<0.05). Fasting proinsulin decreased only in the acarbose group (23.4 +/- 19.3 to 14.3 +/- 13.6 pmol/l, P<0.05), while leptin decreased in both (placebo group: 26.3 +/- 6.1 to 23.3 +/- 9.4 and acarbose group: 25.0 +/- 5.5 to 22.7 +/- 7.9 ng/ml, P<0.05). When the subset of acarbose-treated patients who improved glycemic control was considered, significant reductions in diurnal systolic, diastolic and mean BP (102.3 +/- 6.0 to 99.0 +/- 6.6 mmHg, P<0.05) were found. Acarbose monotherapy or combined with sulfonylurea was effective in improving glycemic control in hypertensive diabetic patients. Acarbose-induced improvement in metabolic control may reduce BP in these patients. Our data did not suggest a direct action of acarbose on insulin resistance or leptin levels.

Postoperative management of the diabetic patient

Diabetic patients are at increased risk for adverse outcomes of surgery. These adverse outcomes are related to pre-existing complications of diabetes, especially atherosclerotic disease, nephropathy (and perhaps increased susceptibility to other renal toxins), and peripheral and autonomic neuropathy. Hyperglycemia is associated with likely risks for poorer wound healing, increased susceptibility to infection, and probable loss of administered nutrients through glycosuria. Insulin use has the flexibility of timing and dose in the postoperative management of most diabetic patients. The combinations of intermediate-acting and long-acting insulins and short-acting insulins usually are related to the experience and preferences of the treating physicians and allied health professionals. Intravenous insulin (always R) may be limited to administration in the ICU because of the need for frequent blood glucose monitoring and rapidity of glucose response to intravenous insulin. The use of short-acting insulin analogues has been shown to work well as premeal insulin or for rapidly treating marked hyperglycemia in the outpatient setting. Meal delivery in the hospitalized patient may not be timed as precisely as in the home situation. Nurses may be responsible for many patients. The rapid-acting analogues may be associated with increased risk for hypoglycemia in the hospitalized patient if insulin cannot be given immediately before a meal. These rapid-acting insulin analogues usually are limited to circumstances in which the patient can determine the dose and self-administer just before ingestion of the meal. The long-acting insulin analogues may not afford enough flexibility in many situations in which daily dosages changes are occurring in intermediate-acting and long-acting insulins. Oral glucose-lowering agent use in the postoperative state usually is limited to selected patients, including patients who have been on such agents before surgery, who have only mild elevations of blood glucose, who are able to ingest oral medications, and who do not have significant comorbid conditions (or significant risk for such conditions) that may be contraindications to use of such agents (see Table 3). Sulfonylureas and other insulin secretagogues (e.g., meglitinide, nateglinide) lower glucoses acutely. The risk for hypoglycemia is slightly less with the nonsulfonylurea agents. Efficacy and side effects limit the use of carbohydrase inhibitors for hospitalized patients. The glucose-lowering effects of biguanides and thiazolidinediones usually are not rapid enough for hospitalized patients who have never taken these medications. For patients who have been on a biguanide or thiazolidinedione before admission, these agents often are restarted in the postoperative period when oral intake of medications is possible and hepatic and renal function are stable. The hospital period affords an opportunity to review long-term management issues related to diabetes and its complications. Instruction on the importance of medical nutrition therapy, glycemic control, management of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and aspirin use as well as basic guidelines for foot care should be carried out during the hospitalization and at the time of discharge. Similarly, appropriate arrangements for medical nutrition therapy, general diabetes education (especially for newly diagnosed diabetic patients), and regular medical follow-up are important to ensure long-term, excellent surgical and medical outcomes.

Pathophysiology and pharmacological treatment of insulin resistance

Diabetes mellitus type 2 is a world-wide growing health problem affecting more than 150 million people at the beginning of the new millennium. It is believed that this number will double in the next 25 yr. The pathophysiological hallmarks of type 2 diabetes mellitus consist of insulin resistance, pancreatic beta-cell dysfunction, and increased endogenous glucose production. To reduce the marked increase of cardiovascular mortality of type 2 diabetic subjects, optimal treatment aims at normalization of body weight, glycemia, blood pressure, and lipidemia. This review focuses on the pathophysiology and molecular pathogenesis of insulin resistance and on the capability of antihyperglycemic pharmacological agents to treat insulin resistance, i.e., a-glucosidase inhibitors, biguanides, thiazolidinediones, sulfonylureas, and insulin. Finally, a rational treatment approach is proposed based on the dynamic pathophysiological abnormalities of this highly heterogeneous and progressive disease.

Management of Type 2 Diabetes in the Geriatric Patient

Type 2 diabetes is prevalent in the elderly population. In the past five years, there has been an increased number of drugs with unique mechanisms of action which have become available for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Recent studies have shown that attaining optimal glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes will prevent or delay the complications associated with this disease. This article will review the management of type 2 diabetes.

Recent advances in pharmacological treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus

Several new pharmacological agents attempt to correct abnormalities in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. The availability of agents with different mechanisms of action and side-effect profiles permits the design of individualized regimens that address the various pathophysiologic abnormalities.