Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin in mallatia leventinese

Macular neovascularization in inherited retinal diseases: A review

Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) are the most common cause of blindness in working-age adults. Macular neovascularization (MNV) may be a presenting feature or occurs as a late-stage complication in several IRDs. We performed an extensive literature review on MNV associated with IRDs. MNV is a well-known complication of Sorsby fundus dystrophy and pseudoxanthoma elasticum. Those with late-onset Stargardt disease may masquerade as exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) when MNV is the presenting feature. Peripherinopathies may develop MNV that responds well to a short course of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy, while bestrophinopathies tend to develop MNV in the early stages of the disease without vision loss. Enhanced S-cone syndrome manifests type 3 MNV that typically regresses into a subfoveal fibrotic nodule. MNV is only a rare complication in choroideraemia and rod-cone dystrophies. Most IRD-related MNVs exhibit a favorable visual prognosis requiring less intensive regimens of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy compared to age-related macular degeneration. We discuss the role of key imaging modalities in the diagnosis of MNV across a wide spectrum of IRDs and highlight the gaps in our knowledge with respect to the natural history and prognosis to pave the way for future directions of research.

The second Japanese family with Malattia Leventinese/Doyne honeycomb retinal dystrophy

PURPOSE

To describe the clinical and genetic findings of patients in the second Japanese family with Malattia Leventinese/Doyne honeycomb retinal dystrophy (ML/DHRD).

METHODS

Two patients (a 41-year-old male proband and his third son) underwent comprehensive ophthalmic examinations, including full-field and multifocal electroretinography (ERG). Sanger sequencing was performed to detect an EFEMP1 gene variant (p.Arg345Trp), which was identified as the only causative pathogenic variant.

RESULTS

Genetic analysis revealed that both patients carried the heterozygous variant, but the other unaffected family members did not. Although the proband exhibited innumerable radially distributed drusen in both the posterior poles and good visual acuity at initial presentation, bilateral choroidal neovascularization (CNV) developed during the 15-year follow-up. The proband received 15 intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections in the left eye (LE) and two injections in the right eye (RE). At 56 years of age, his decimal best-corrected visual acuity was 0.1 and 1.2 in the LE and RE, respectively. Full-field ERG showed that while the rod and combined responses were within normal amplitudes, the cone and 30-Hz flicker responses had slightly decreased amplitudes. Multifocal ERG revealed attenuated central responses in the LE and decreased temporal responses in the RE. In the 20-year-old son, multifocal ERG showed normal responses in both eyes.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report of ML/DHRD in a patient who developed bilateral CNV and received anti-VEGF treatment in both eyes. Although multifocal ERG exhibited worsening of macular function, the generalized photoreceptor function was preserved until middle age.

Utility of pattern recognition and multimodal imaging in the diagnosis and management of doyne honeycomb retinal dystrophy complicated with type one choroidal neovascular membrane

A 44-year-old woman presented with decreased vision in both eyes. The retina in both eyes had drusen distributed along vascular arcades, central macula and in peripapillary region. Macula had pigmented scarring and exudation. Fundus autofluorescence showed drusen. Optical coherence tomography showed drusen, subretinal and intraretinal fluid. Fundus fluorescein and indocyanine green angiography showed drusen, retinal pigment epithelial atrophy and vascular network. Younger age at presentation, bilateral symmetry, typical distribution of drusen along the arcades in a radiating pattern, peripapillary involvement, scarring and atrophy at macula were suggestive of doyne honeycomb retinal dystrophy. The reduced vision was due to macular atrophy and an active choroidal neovascular membrane. The patient was treated with antivascular endothelial growth factor injections for choroidal neovascular membrane. Our case highlights the importance of pattern recognition and multimodal imaging for diagnosing the type of macular dystrophy as doyne honeycomb retinal dystrophy, while simultaneously managing choroidal neovascular membrane.

A novel haplotype with the R345W mutation in the EFEMP1 gene associated with autosomal dominant drusen in a Japanese family

PURPOSE

To describe ophthalmic and molecular genetic findings in a family of Japanese patients with Malattia leventinese (ML)/Doyne honeycomb retinal dystrophy (DHRD), also known as autosomal dominant drusen.

METHODS

Four patients with ML/DHRD, including a 42-year-old female proband, were ascertained. The proband underwent complete ophthalmic examinations, including fundus and electrodiagnostic investigations, and Humphrey visual field (VF) perimetry. Mutation screening of the EFEMP1 gene and haplotype analysis were performed in the family, an Indian ML/DHRD family, and a branch of 1 of 39 ML/DHRD families in the United States, in which all affected patients shared a common haplotype.

RESULTS

A heterozygous missense mutation (p.R345W) was identified in all four Japanese patients and in affected patients of the other two families. This mutation was the only mutation that has been exclusively found in the gene. The disease haplotype in the Japanese family was different from those of the other two families. Clinically, central retinas were prominently affected in the proband and her mother, and subsequently the proband developed subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in the left eye, whereas her younger sister with the mutation, who was asymptomatic, exhibited only fine macular drusen. Long-term follow-up of Humphrey VF and multifocal-electroretinography (mfERG) in the proband also revealed progressive attenuation of macular function in the right eye.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report to describe a Japanese family with variable expressivity of ML/DHRD, in which a novel disease haplotype was identified. Humphrey VF and mfERG testing may be helpful in determining the long-term outcome of macular function.

Indocyanine green angiography features of Malattia leventinese

BACKGROUND/AIM

Malattia leventinese (ML) is an inherited macular degeneration characterised by the presence of small radial drusen. Despite extensive descriptions of this study of the fundus, angiographic features of ML have been inadequately described. The aim is to describe the indocyanine green angiography (ICG) features observed in ML.

METHODS

10 eyes from five consecutive ML patients (aged 27-44 years) were prospectively included. A complete ophthalmological examination including colour fundus photographs, autofluorescence, fluorescein angiography (FA), and ICG was performed.

RESULTS

ICG differentiated two types of drusen. Large round aggregated drusen were consistently hypofluorescent in the early phases and presented as hyperfluorescent spots surrounded by halos of hypofluorescence in the late phases. Conversely, small radial drusen were mostly hyperfluorescent in the early phases with decreased fluorescence in the late phases of the ICG sequence. FA also showed differences in staining between the two types of drusen.

CONCLUSIONS

ICG angiography revealed marked differences between the large round and small radial drusen observed in ML. The large central drusen presented with an unusual pustuliform feature on the late phases of the ICG sequence. This distinct feature may be useful in the diagnosis of late stage disease when drusen consolidation could obscure the radial drusen.

Photodynamic therapy for inflammatory choroidal neovascularisation unresponsive to immunosuppression

AIM

To report on visual and angiographic outcomes of a consecutive series of patients with inflammatory choroidal neovascular membranes (CNV) unresponsive to systemic immunosuppression treated with photodynamic therapy (PDT).

METHODS

The medical records of six consecutive patients with inflammatory CNVs that failed to respond to systemic immunosuppression and that later underwent PDT were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, visual acuity, and fluorescein angiographic findings were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were five females and one male with a mean age of 40.8 years (range 35-58 years). Four patients had clinical features consistent with punctate inner choroidopathy and two with presumed ocular histoplasmosis. In all cases clinical signs of CNV activity, including subretinal fluid, subretinal blood, hard exudates, and/or recent decrease in visual acuity were present prior to PDT. All patients had been treated with high dose systemic immunosuppressants, which failed to induce regression of the CNV and/or to improve vision. The CNVs were subfoveal in five patients and juxtafoveal in one; all were classified as predominantly classic. Following PDT an improvement in vision occurred in all cases (median improvement of 18 letters, range 3-42 letters). At last follow up, signs of decreased activity in the CNV were detected in all cases. Patients were followed for a median of 10 months (range 9-20 months).

CONCLUSION

PDT appears to be a useful option in the management of patients with inflammatory CNVs unresponsive to immunosuppressive therapies.

PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY AND VITELLIFORM LESIONS

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin on patients with vitelliform lesions caused by cuticular drusen or adult-onset foveomacular vitelliform dystrophy (AOFVD).

DESIGN

Observational case series.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eight eyes of seven patients from two centers were examined prospectively. Each patient received PDT with verteporfin applied to the vitelliform lesions.

RESULTS

Photodynamic therapy did not significantly affect the median visual acuity outcome (20/50 before PDT and 20/66 after PDT) in all seven treated patients. Of note, however, were four eyes of four patients who experienced a severe decrease in visual acuity after PDT with verteporfin. The temporary relationship of the vision loss to the treatment suggests that this may represent an adverse effect from therapy. The fluorescein angiographic appearance was virtually unchanged in all treated patients, whereas indocyanine green angiography showed typical PDT-associated reduction of choroidal perfusion in the treatment area.

CONCLUSION

Photodynamic therapy does not have a positive influence on the visual outcome in patients with vitelliform lesions and may have a negative impact on vision in some treated patients. It is important for physicians using PDT to exercise caution in distinguishing between choroidal neovascular membranes and vitelliform lesions because the outcome in this latter group may be worse with application of PDT than with the natural course.