Reduction of intraocular pressure with treatment of latanoprost once daily in patients with normal-pressure glaucoma

How latanoprost changed glaucoma management

Glaucoma is currently considered one of the leading causes of severe visual impairment and blindness worldwide. Topical medical therapy represents the treatment of choice for many glaucoma patients. Introduction of latanoprost, 25 years ago, with an entirely new mechanism of action from that of the antiglaucoma drugs used up to that time was a very important milestone. Since then, due mainly to their efficacy, limited systemic side effects and once daily dosing, prostaglandin analogues (PGAs) have become as the first-choice treatment for primary open-angle glaucoma. PGAs are in general terms well tolerated, although they are associated with several mild to moderate ocular and periocular adverse events. Among them, conjunctival hyperemia, eyelash changes, eyelid pigmentation, iris pigmentation and hypertrichosis around the eyes are the most prevalent. The objective of this paper is to review the role of PGAs in the treatment of glaucoma over the 25 years since the launch of Latanoprost and their impact on clinical practice outcomes.

One-Year Efficacy and Safety Assessment of Ripasudil, a Rho Kinase Inhibitor, in an Addition to or Replacing Existing Treatment Regimens: A Retrospective Study

Purpose: To evaluate efficacy and safety of ripasudil for 1 year in addition to or replacing existing treatment regimens. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records for 128 eyes of 128 glaucoma patients who were prescribed ripasudil as an addition to or a switch from their preexisting antiglaucoma instillations. We investigated the rate and factors for discontinuation and intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction. Results: Almost half of the patients (60 eyes) discontinued ripasudil treatment before the 1 year mark, while remaining patients completed the treatment. The lack of efficacy and development of adverse effects were significantly correlated with discontinuation (P < 0.001) in the Cox proportional hazards model. In the Kaplan-Meier curve, adverse effects occurred in earlier phase and almost 60% dropped out within 3 months after ripasudil administration. However, adverse effects also occurred randomly throughout the study period. In patients who continued ripasudil, the mean IOPs (mmHg) at baseline, 6 and 12 months after treatment were 17.7 ± 5.1, 14.6 ± 5.0, and 14.8 ± 3.8 in the Addition group, and 17.8 ± 4.1, 15.4 ± 3.2, and 15.4 ± 5.0 in the Switch group, respectively (all P values <0.05). Conclusions: Almost half of the patients discontinued ripasudil owing to the lack of efficacy and the generation of adverse effects within the 1 year. In the remaining half, the addition and switching of ripasudil to the existing glaucoma treatment effectively reduced IOP for 1 year.

Direct and crossover effects of brinzolamide, betaxolol, and latanoprost on choroidal thickness

PURPOSE

To investigate the acute effects of brinzolamide, betaxolol, and latanoprost (drugs commonly used in the medical management of glaucoma) on choroidal thickness using enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT).

METHODS

Ninety healthy volunteers were evaluated in this prospective study. Participants were randomly divided into 3 groups. Brinzolamide, betaxolol, and latanoprost were administered into the left eyes of the first group (n = 30), second group (n = 30), and third group (n = 30), respectively, and artificial tear (Sodium hyaluronate) was instilled into the right eyes of all participants. Subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) was measured using EDI-OCT before and 45 minutes after administration of the antiglaucomatous drops.

RESULTS

SFCT revealed a significant increase in the left eye (administered antiglaucomatous drop) in the brinzolamide (p = 0.001) and betaxolol groups (p = 0.049) and a significant increase also in the right eye (administered artificial drop) in the brinzolamide (p = 0.001) and betaxolol groups (p = 0.001). However, SFCT did not reveal a significant increase in the left eye (p = 0.213) or in the right eye (p = 0.062) in the latanoprost group.

CONCLUSION

Brinzolamide and betaxolol caused an increase in SFCT, while latanoprost had no significant effect on SFCT.

Intraocular Pressure Lowering Effect of Latanoprost as First-line Treatment for Glaucoma

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the intraocular pressure (IOP) - reducing effect of latanoprost in treatment-naïve patients with newly detected open-angle glaucoma with no restriction of the level of untreated IOP.

METHODS

Eighty-six patients (105 eyes) with a diagnosis of open-angle glaucoma received IOP-lowering therapy with latanoprost. The IOP reduction 1 and 3 months after initiation of treatment was recorded.

RESULTS

Mean untreated IOP for all eyes was 26.2 mm Hg (ranging from 10 to 51 mm Hg). The mean pressure reduction was 7.9 mm Hg (28%), with equivalent average levels at 1 and 3 months. The reduction in IOP ranged from -2.3 to 25.3 mm Hg after 1 month, and from -1.3 to 33.3 mm Hg after 3 months. The pressure-lowering effect was considerably more pronounced in eyes with higher untreated IOP; the reduction increased by 0.55 mm Hg per mm Hg higher untreated IOP. Four eyes, with untreated IOP within statistically normal limits, had no or negative IOP-reduction. A regression model predicted that IOP reduction ended at untreated IOP≤16 mm Hg. Multiple regression analysis showed that an additional IOP-lowering effect of 1.28 mm Hg was achieved in eyes with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, this paper is the first to report the IOP-reducing effect of latanoprost treatment at all untreated IOP levels in newly detected glaucoma patients. The effect was proportional to the untreated IOP at all levels above 16 mm Hg and better at higher untreated IOP levels, also in relative terms. Our results further confirm the indication of latanoprost as a first-line therapy for glaucoma.

Neuroprotection for treatment of glaucoma in adults

BACKGROUND

Glaucoma is a heterogeneous group of conditions involving progressive damage to the optic nerve, deterioration of retinal ganglion cells, and ultimately visual field loss. It is a leading cause of blindness worldwide. Open angle glaucoma (OAG), the most common form of glaucoma, is a chronic condition that may or may not present with increased intraocular pressure (IOP). Neuroprotection for glaucoma refers to any intervention intended to prevent optic nerve damage or cell death.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to systematically examine the evidence regarding the effectiveness of neuroprotective agents for slowing the progression of OAG in adults compared with no neuroprotective agent, placebo, or other glaucoma treatment.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2016, Issue 7), Ovid MEDLINE, Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily (January 1946 to August 2016), Embase (January 1980 to August 2016), Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS) (January 1982 to August 2016), the ISRCTN registry (www.isrctn.com/editAdvancedSearch), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov), and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 16 August 2016.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which topical or oral treatments were used for neuroprotection in adults with OAG. Minimum follow-up time was four years.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently reviewed titles and abstracts from the literature searches. We obtained full-text copies of potentially relevant studies and re-evaluated for inclusion. Two review authors independently extracted data related to study characteristics, risk of bias, and outcomes. We identified one trial for this review, thus we performed no meta-analysis. Two studies comparing memantine to placebo are currently awaiting classification until study investigators provide additional study details. We documented reasons for excluding studies from the review.

MAIN RESULTS

We included one multicenter RCT of adults with low-pressure glaucoma (Low-pressure Glaucoma Treatment Study, LoGTS) conducted in the USA. The primary outcome was progression of visual field loss after four years of treatment with either brimonidine or timolol. Of the 190 adults enrolled in the study, the investigators excluded 12 (6.3%) after randomization; 77 participants (40.5%) did not complete four years of follow-up. The rate of attrition was unbalanced between groups with more participants dropping out of the brimonidine group (55%) than the timolol group (29%).Of those remaining in the study at four years, participants assigned to brimonidine showed less progression of visual field loss than participants assigned to timolol (risk ratio (RR) 0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14 to 0.86; 101 participants). Because of high risk of attrition bias and potential selective outcome reporting, we graded the certainty of evidence for this outcome as very low. At the four-year follow-up, the mean IOP was similar in both groups among those for whom data were available (mean difference 0.20 mmHg, 95% CI -0.73 to 1.13; 91 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The study authors did not report analyzable data for visual acuity or any data related to vertical cup-disc ratio, quality of life, or economic outcomes. The most frequent adverse event was ocular allergy to the study drug, which affected more participants in the brimonidine group than the timolol group (RR 5.32, 95% CI 1.64 to 17.26; 178 participants; very low-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Although the only trial we included in this review found less visual field loss in the brimonidine-treated group, the evidence was of such low certainty that we can draw no conclusions from this finding. Further clinical research is needed to determine whether neuroprotective agents may be beneficial for individuals with OAG. Such research should focus on outcomes important to patients, such as preservation of vision, and how these outcomes relate to cell death and optic nerve damage. As OAG is a chronic, progressive disease with variability in symptoms, RCTs designed to measure the effectiveness of neuroprotective agents require a long-term follow-up of five years or longer to detect clinically meaningful effects.

Nonresponders to Prostaglandin Analogs Among Normal-Tension Glaucoma Patients

PURPOSE

To investigate patients whose intraocular pressure (IOP) did not decrease after treatment using a prostaglandin analog (nonresponders).

METHODS

This was an open-label, retrospective, case series study from a single institution. We retrospectively investigated the mean IOP reduction rates, and the proportions of nonresponders, among normal tension glaucoma (NTG) patients (209 cases, 209 eyes) treated using 1 of 4 prostaglandin analogs: latanoprost (40 patients), travoprost (64 patients), tafluprost (52 patients), or bimatoprost (53 patients). Absolute IOP was compared with pretreatment values for all 4 groups at the first and second visits after commencement of prostaglandin analog monotherapy. The IOP reduction rate was compared between groups. The proportion of nonresponders, defined as patients with IOP reduction rate <10% at both visits, was calculated in each group.

RESULTS

The average IOP had significantly decreased from the pretreatment value at the first visit after treatment; the average IOP reduction rate ranged from 15.3% to 22.6%. The IOP reduction rate in the bimatoprost group was significantly higher than those in the travoprost and tafluprost groups (P < 0.001). We identified 6 nonresponders (15.0%) in the latanoprost group, 9 (14.1%) in the travoprost group, 4 (7.7%) in the tafluprost group, and none (0.0%) in the bimatoprost group; nonresponse rates were significantly lower in the bimatoprost group than in the other groups (P ≤ 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Among NTG patients treated using prostaglandin analogs, from 0% to 15% were classified as nonresponders, depending on the prostaglandin analog used. The proportion of nonresponders was significantly lower in the bimatoprost group.

Evaluation of the Effect of Latanoprostene Bunod Ophthalmic Solution, 0.024% in Lowering Intraocular Pressure over 24 h in Healthy Japanese Subjects

Introduction

Latanoprostene bunod is a novel nitric oxide (NO)-donating prostaglandin F2α receptor agonist in clinical development for the reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. We evaluated the effect of latanoprostene bunod 0.024% instilled once daily (QD) on lowering IOP over a 24-h period in healthy Japanese subjects following 14 days of treatment.

Methods

This was a single-arm, single-center, open-label clinical study of 24 healthy Japanese male volunteers. A baseline IOP profile was established in both eyes in the sitting position at 8 PM, 10 PM, 12 AM, 2 AM, 4 AM, 8 AM, 10 AM, 12 PM, and 4 PM using a Goldmann applanation tonometer. Subjects subsequently instilled latanoprostene bunod 0.024% QD at 8 PM for 14 days in both eyes. The absolute and change from baseline in sitting IOP was assessed on day 14.

Results

The mean (SD) age of the subjects was 26.8 (6.3) years, and mean (SD) baseline IOP was 13.6 (1.3) mmHg in the study eye. Latanoprostene bunod 0.024% instilled QD for 14 days reduced IOP at all the evaluated time points (P < 0.001) with a mean (SD) 24-h reduction of 3.6 (0.8) mmHg or 27% from the baseline in the study eye. Peak and trough IOP lowering occurred at 8 AM and 8 PM (12 and 24 h following instillation) with a mean reduction of 4.2 (1.8) mmHg, or 30%, and 2.8 (2.2) mmHg, or 20%, respectively. Punctate keratitis and ocular hyperemia, both mild in severity, were the most common adverse events.

Conclusion

Latanoprostene bunod ophthalmic solution 0.024%, dosed QD for 14 days, significantly lowered mean IOP in healthy Japanese subjects during the entire 24-h period. Studies of latanoprostene bunod in patients diagnosed with normal tension glaucoma are warranted.

Trial Registration

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01895985.

Funding

Bausch & Lomb, Inc.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12325-015-0260-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The diurnal and nocturnal effect of travoprost with sofZia on intraocular pressure and ocular perfusion pressure

PURPOSE

To determine the 24-hour effects of travoprost with sofZia on intraocular pressure (IOP) and ocular perfusion pressure as well as the endurance of IOP lowering after last dosing.

DESIGN

Prospective, open-label study.

METHODS

Forty subjects with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension were admitted to our sleep laboratory for three 24-hour sessions monitoring IOP, blood pressure (BP), and heart rate. The first baseline session occurred after medication washout or immediately after enrollment for treatment-naïve patients. A second 24-hour monitoring session was performed after 4 weeks of once-nightly treatment of travoprost with sofZia. The medication was then discontinued and a third 24-hour session was completed 60-84 hours after the last dose taken. IOP measurements were taken using a pneumotonometer every 2 hours in the sitting position during the 16-hour diurnal period and in the supine position during the 8-hour nocturnal period. Ocular perfusion pressure was defined as 2/3[diastolic BP + 1/3(systolic BP - diastolic BP)] - IOP.

RESULTS

Treatment with travoprost with sofZia significantly lowered mean diurnal and nocturnal IOP levels from baseline (diurnal 18.1 ± 3.9 to 15.3 ± 3.3 mm Hg; nocturnal 20.6 ± 3.6 to 19.4 ± 3.4 mm Hg, P < .01 for both). Once treatment was discontinued, mean IOP remained at levels significantly less than baseline during both the diurnal (16.6 ± 3.8 mm Hg) and nocturnal periods (19.4 ± 3.5 mm Hg). Mean baseline ocular perfusion pressure was significantly increased during the diurnal but not the nocturnal period (diurnal 73.7 ± 11.4 to 76.5 ± 10.3 mm Hg, P = .01; nocturnal 64.4 ± 12.6 to 64.2 ± 11.1 mm Hg, P = .67).

CONCLUSION

Travoprost with sofZia significantly lowers IOP throughout the diurnal and nocturnal periods, and increases ocular perfusion pressure in the diurnal, but not the nocturnal, period in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. The treatment effect on IOP endures for at least 84 hours after the last dose.

Neuroprotection for treatment of glaucoma in adults

BACKGROUND

Glaucoma is a heterogeneous group of conditions involving progressive damage to the optic nerve, deterioration of retinal ganglion cells and ultimately visual field loss. It is a leading cause of blindness worldwide. Open angle glaucoma (OAG), the commonest form of glaucoma, is a chronic condition that may or may not present with increased intraocular pressure (IOP). Neuroprotection for glaucoma refers to any intervention intended to prevent optic nerve damage or cell death.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to systematically examine the evidence regarding the effectiveness of neuroprotective agents for slowing the progression of OAG in adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 9), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Ovid OLDMEDLINE, (January 1950 to October 2012), EMBASE (January 1980 to October 2012), Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS) (January 1982 to October 2012), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. The electronic databases were last searched on 16 October 2012.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which topical or oral treatments were used for neuroprotection in adults with OAG. Minimum follow up time was four years.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently reviewed titles and abstracts from the literature searches. Full-text copies of potentially relevant studies were obtained and re-evaluated for inclusion. Two review authors independently extracted data related study characteristics, risk of bias, and outcome data. One trial was identified for this review, thus we performed no meta-analysis. Two studies comparing memantine to placebo are currently awaiting classification until additional study details are provided. We documented reasons for excluding studies from the review.

MAIN RESULTS

We included one multi-center RCT of adults with low-pressure glaucoma (Low-pressure Glaucoma Treatment Study, LoGTS) conducted in the USA. The primary outcome was visual field progression after four years of treatment with either brimonidine or timolol. Of the 190 adults enrolled in the study, 12 (6.3%) were excluded after randomization and 77 (40.5%) did not complete four years of follow up. The rate of attrition was unbalanced between groups with more participants dropping out of the brimonidine group (55%) than the timolol group (29%). Of those remaining in the study at four years, participants assigned to brimonidine showed less visual field progression than participants assigned to timolol (5/45 participants in the brimonidine group compared with 18/56 participants in the timolol group). Since no information was available for the 12 participants excluded from the study, or the 77 participants who dropped out of the study, we cannot draw any conclusions from these results as the participants for whom data are missing may or may not have progressed. The mean IOP was similar in both groups at the four-year follow up among those for whom data were available: 14.2 mmHg (standard deviation (SD) = 1.9) among the 43 participants in the brimonidine group and 14.0 mmHg (SD = 2.6) among the 48 participants in the timolol group. Among the participants who developed progressive visual field loss, IOP reduction of 20% or greater was not significantly different between groups: 4/9 participants in the brimonidine group and 12/31 participants in the timolol group. The study authors did not report data for visual acuity or vertical cup-disc ratio. The most frequent adverse event was ocular allergy to study drug, which occurred more frequently in the brimonidine group (20/99 participants) than the timolol group (3/79 participants).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Although neuroprotective agents are intended to act as pharmacological antagonists to prevent cell death, this trial did not provide evidence that they are effective in preventing retinal ganglion cell death, and thus preserving vision in people with OAG. Further clinical research is needed to determine whether neuroprotective agents may be beneficial for individuals with OAG. Such research should focus outcomes important to patients, such as preservation of vision, and how these outcomes relate to cell death and optic nerve damage. Since OAG is a chronic, progressive disease with variability in symptoms, RCTs designed to measure the effectiveness of neuroprotective agents would require long-term follow up (more than four years) in order to detect clinically meaningful effects.

A randomized crossover study comparing tafluprost 0.0015% with travoprost 0.004% in patients with normal-tension glaucoma [corrected]

Purpose:

We compared the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect of tafluprost 0.0015% once daily with travoprost 0.004% once daily in Japanese patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG).

Methods:

One hundred sixteen patients with NTG were randomized to use tafluprost 0.0015% or travoprost 0.004% once daily for 12 weeks, followed by a washout period of 4 weeks between switching medications. IOP was measured at baseline and 4, 8, and 12 weeks of each treatment period.

Results:

Ninety patients completed both treatment periods and had IOP data available for evaluation. In both groups, a significant decrease in IOP was observed for all measurement points compared with baseline values (P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in IOP at each time point between the two groups. Both drugs were effective (defined as more than 10% IOP reduction) in 39 (43%) of 90 patients; only tafluprost was effective in 26 (29%) patients, and only travoprost was effective in 17 (19%) patients. Eight (9%) patients were nonresponders to both drugs.

Conclusions:

Tafluprost and travoprost were equally effective in lowering IOP in patients with normal-tension glaucoma. However, patients with normal-tension glaucoma may vary in response to each medication.

A review of the use of latanoprost for glaucoma since its launch

INTRODUCTION

Prostaglandins are increasingly used as first choice treatment for glaucoma because they are highly effective, lack relevant systemic side effects and require just once-daily administration. Latanoprost is an ester prodrug analog of prostaglandin F2α, which reduces intraocular pressure (IOP) by increasing uveoscleral outflow. Latanoprost 0.005% has received European and US approval as the first-line drug for reducing IOP in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Following the recent patent expiry for Xalatan®, a number of latanoprost generics have entered the glaucoma market.

AREAS COVERED

This review, achieved through PubMed and Medline research methods, describes the composition, pharmacokinetics, mode of action, efficacy, side effects and safety profile of latanoprost.

EXPERT OPINION

Latanoprost was the first prostaglandin analog introduced in glaucoma management and it dramatically changed the market of the disease thanks to its efficacy and safety. Conjunctival hyperemia, which is commonly found after latanoprost use, is associated with a minor efficacy and duration of trabeculectomy; yet, from the ophthalmologist's perspective, this side effect seems largely counterbalanced by the high efficacy and safety of this compound. It is always advisable to consider the pro-inflammatory mode of action of latanoprost because this may have negative effects in particular patients (i.e., those with uveitis and cystoid macular edema) for whom caution and close follow-up is necessary.

Additive intraocular pressure-lowering effect of dorzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination on prostaglandin monotherapy in patients with normal tension glaucoma

Purpose

To evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect of adding dorzolamide 1.0%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination (DTFC) to prostaglandin analogs (PGAs) as monotherapy in patients with normal tension glaucoma.

Methods

A prospective, clinical, case-controlled study of patients with normal tension glaucoma. Patients had been on a once-daily night dose of prostaglandins (PGs) as monotherapy and then received DTFC added to PGs for 8 weeks. The IOP was measured at 9 am, week 0 (baseline), week 4, and week 8.

Results

The baseline IOP of 40 patients who had previously been treated by prostaglandin monotherapy was 15.6 ± 2.0 mmHg at baseline. The IOPs at 4 and 8 weeks after adding DTFC to PGs were 13.5 ± 2.1 mmHg and 13.7 ± 2.2 mmHg, respectively. Significant decrease of the IOP was observed at each time point of measurement as compared with the baseline IOP before adding DTFC (P = 0.01). The percent IOP reduction from the baseline IOP at week 4 and week 8 was 13.5% ± 12.3% and 11.7% ± 13.1%, respectively. The percentage of patients who achieved 10% or more IOP reduction from the baseline IOP at week 8 was 62.5%. The baseline IOP was significantly correlated with the percent IOP reduction at week 8 (P = 0.03, r = 0.34).

Conclusion

DTFC therapy added to PGAs as glaucoma monotherapy is effective in patients with normal tension glaucoma.

Efficacy and safety of switching from topical latanoprost to bimatoprost in patients with normal-tension glaucoma

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bimatoprost in Japanese patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) who showed insufficient response to latanoprost.

METHODS

A prospective, nonrandomized study was conducted in patients with NTG, with ≤20% intraocular pressure (IOP) decrease from pretreatment baseline with latanoprost monotherapy who had been switched to bimatoprost. The IOP was measured at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after the switch to bimatoprost. In 12 weeks after the switch to bimatoprost, efficacy and safety were evaluated.

RESULTS

Postswitch to bimatoprost, IOP was significantly reduced at every visit. Bimatoprost produced significantly greater mean% IOP reduction rate from pretreatment than that of latanoprost at week 12 (P<0.01). There was a significant correlation between% IOP reduction of bimatoprost and that of latanoprost (Pearson r(2)=0.374; P=0.007). No significant difference was observed in the mean scores of conjunctival hyperemia and corneal epithelial disorder between bimatoprost-treated eyes and latanoprost-treated eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant additional IOP lowering was achieved by switching to bimatoprost in Japanese patients with NTG with insufficient response to latanoprost. Bimatoprost treatment was safe and well tolerated.

The impact of intraocular pressure reduction on retinal ganglion cell function measured using pattern electroretinogram in eyes receiving latanoprost 0.005% versus placebo

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of intraocular (IOP) reduction on retinal ganglion cell (RGC) function measured using pattern electroretinogram optimized for glaucoma (PERGLA) in glaucoma suspect and glaucomatous eyes receiving latanoprost 0.005% versus placebo.

METHODS

This was a prospective, placebo-controlled, double masked, cross-over clinical trial. One randomly selected eye of each subject meeting eligibility criteria was enrolled. At each visit, subjects underwent five diurnal measurements between 8:00 am and 4:00 pm consisting of Goldmann IOP, and PERGLA measurements. A baseline examination was performed following a 4-week washout period, and repeat examination after randomly receiving latanoprost or placebo for 4-weeks. Subjects were then crossed over to receive the alternative therapy for 4 weeks following a second washout period, and underwent repeat examination. Linear mixed-effect models were used for the analysis.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight eyes (35 glaucoma, 33 glaucoma suspect) of 68 patients (mean age 67.4 ± 10.6 years) were enrolled. The mean IOP (mmHg) after latanoprost 0.005% therapy (14.9 ± 3.8) was significantly lower than baseline (18.8 ± 4.7, p<0.001) or placebo (18.0 ± 4.3), with a mean reduction of -20 ± 13%. Mean PERGLA amplitude (μV) and phase (π-radian) using latanoprost (0.49 ± 0.22 and 1.71 ± 0.22, respectively) were similar (p > 0.05) to baseline (0.49 ± 0.24 and 1.69 ± 0.19) and placebo (0.50 ± 0.24 and 1.72 ± 0.23). No significant (p > 0.05) diurnal variation in PERGLA amplitude was observed at baseline, or using latanoprost or placebo. Treatment with latanoprost, time of day, and IOP were not significantly (p > 0.05) associated with PERGLA amplitude or phase.

CONCLUSION

Twenty percent IOP reduction using latanoprost monotherapy is not associated with improvement in RGC function measured with PERGLA.

Effect of travoprost on 24-hour intraocular pressure in normal tension glaucoma

PURPOSE

The effect of travoprost 0.004% on 24-hour intraocular pressure (IOP) was examined in patients with normal tension glaucoma (NTG).

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This study included 17 patients with newly diagnosed unilateral NTG. IOP was measured at three-hour intervals over 24 hours by Goldman applanation tonometer in patients taking topical travoprost 0.004% and was compared retrospectively with 24-hour IOP data in untreated eyes.

RESULTS

IOP values were significantly reduced at individual time points after treatment (P < 0.01). Mean 24-hour IOP, maximum 24-hour IOP, minimum 24-hour IOP, and 24-hour IOP fluctuations at baseline (mean +/- SD) were 12.9 +/- 2.2 mmHg, 15.4 +/- 2.7 mmHg, 10.5 +/- 2.2 mmHg, and 4.9 +/- 1.2 mmHg, respectively, and were significantly reduced to 10.3 +/- 2.0 mmHg, 12.4 +/- 2.5 mmHg, 8.5 +/- 1.9 mmHg (all P < 0.001), and 3.9 +/- 1.5 mmHg (P < 0.05), respectively, after treatment. The rate of IOP reduction greater than 20% was 58.8% (10 eyes) for maximum 24-hour IOP and 53.0% (nine eyes) for mean 24-hour IOP.

CONCLUSION

Travoprost reduced IOP throughout the 24-hour study period, with over half of the eyes examined showing IOP reduction exceeding 20%.

Clinical utility and differential effects of prostaglandin analogs in the management of raised intraocular pressure and ocular hypertension

Prostaglandin analogs (PGA) are powerful topical ocular hypotensive agents available for the treatment of elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). Latanoprost 0.005% and travoprost 0.004% are prodrugs and analogs of prostaglandin F2α. Bimatoprost 0.03% is regarded as a prostamide, and debate continues as to whether it is a prodrug. The free acids of all 3 PGAs reduce IOP by enhancing uveoscleral and trabecular outflow via direct effects on ciliary muscle relaxation and remodeling of extracellular matrix. The vast majority of clinical trials demonstrate IOP-lowering superiority of latanoprost, bimatoprost and travoprost compared with timolol 0.5%, brimonidine 0.2%, or dorzolamide 2% monotherapy. Bimatoprost appears to be more efficacious in IOP-lowering compared with latanoprost, with weighted mean difference in IOP reduction documented in one meta-analysis of 2.59% to 5.60% from 1- to 6-months study duration. PGAs reduce IOP further when used as adjunctive therapy. Fixed combinations of latanoprost, bimatoprost or travoprost formulated with timolol 0.5% and administered once daily are superior to monotherapy of its constituent parts. PGA have near absence of systemic side effects, although do have other commonly encountered ocular adverse effects. The adverse effects of PGA, and also those found more frequently with bimatoprost use include ocular hyperemia, eyelash growth, and peri-ocular pigmentary changes. Iris pigmentary change is unique to PGA treatment. Once daily administration and near absence of systemic side effects enhances tolerance and compliance. PGAs are often prescribed as first-line treatment for ocular hypertension and open-angle glaucoma.

Predictors of additional intraocular pressure reduction in patients changed to latanoprost/timolol fixed combination

Background

Given the growing number of ocular hypotensive medications available, it is important to be able to predict a positive response to therapy. The purpose of the present study was to identify predictors of an additional 10% intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction after 12 weeks of treatment with latanoprost/timolol fixed combination (FC) in patients requiring a change in their previous ocular hypotensive medication.

Methods

This multicenter, open-label, prospective, phase IIIb study included subjects ≥18 years of age with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT). Eligible subjects had baseline IOP ≥21 mmHg and insufficient response to current beta-blocker monotherapy. The primary efficacy analysis (logistic regression) identified predictors of a positive response after 12 weeks of latanoprost/timolol FC.

Results

The intent-to-treat (ITT) population included 383 subjects treated with ≥1 drop of FC and having ≥1 follow-up IOP assessment. Mean IOP was 22.19 ± 2.16 mmHg at baseline and was reduced by 5.42 ± 2.71 mmHg at study end. In all, 325 (84.9%) subjects had a positive response to latanoprost/timolol FC; the response rate was similar across groups: OAG (n = 208; 82.7%); OHT (n = 161; 87.6%); OAG+OHT (n = 14; 85.7%). Higher baseline IOP (odds ratio: 1.284; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.101, 1.497; p = 0.0014) and absence of adverse events (odds ratio: 0.318; 95% CI: 0.161, 0.629; p = 0.0010) were significant predictors of positive response. Age, gender, ethnic origin, diagnosis, family history of OAG/OHT, corneal thickness, and concomitant systemic beta-blocker were not significant predictors of a positive response in the ITT analysis. The FC was well tolerated. The most common adverse events were related to the eye and were consistent with known adverse events associated with latanoprost and timolol.

Conclusions

These results support the use of latanoprost/timolol FC in patients whose IOP is insufficiently controlled on beta-blocker monotherapy. Patients with higher baseline IOP levels and who do not experience adverse events while on therapy are most likely to achieve a positive response to latanoprost/timolol FC.

Trial Registration

Study registration number: NCT00230763

First-line latanoprost therapy in ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma patients: a 3-month efficacy analysis stratified by initial intraocular pressure

Background

Prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-masked trials have shown latanoprost instilled once daily to be at least as effective as and generally superior to timolol administered twice daily and to be as effective as other frequently prescribed prostaglandin analogues. This study prospectively assessed the efficacy of latanoprost monotherapy in a large cohort of treatment-naive patients with a broad range of baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) levels treated in actual clinical practice settings.

Methods

This prospective, open-label, multicenter, uncontrolled, phase IV study included treatment-naive ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma subjects initiating latanoprost once daily (evening). IOP levels were measured at baseline and after 1 and 3 months. The primary efficacy outcome was mean change in IOP from baseline to month 3. Analyses were stratified by baseline IOP: ≥ 20 and <24 mmHg vs ≥ 24 mmHg.

Results

Efficacy analyses (intent to treat) included 572 subjects: 20 to <24 mmHg group, N = 252; ≥ 24 mmHg group, N = 320. Mean baseline IOP levels were 22.2 ± 0.9 mmHg and 26.7 ± 2.8 mmHg, respectively. At month 3, significant IOP reductions were seen in both groups (p < 0.0001, within-group differences); reductions were smaller in the 20 to <24 mmHg group (-6.3 ± 2.4 vs -9.2 ± 3.7 mmHg, respectively; -28.0 ± 10.6% vs -34.1 ± 11.9%, respectively). An IOP reduction of ≥ 30% from baseline to month 3 was noted in 48.4% and 65.6% of subjects, respectively (p < 0.0001). At month 3, targets IOPs of ≤ 18 mmHg were achieved by ≥ 70% of subjects in both groups. Latanoprost was well tolerated with an adverse event profile similar to that reported in the literature.

Conclusions

This "real world" study found once-daily latanoprost to be effective and safe in treatment-naive ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma patients. Patients with baseline IOP levels of 20 to <24 mmHg as well as ≥ 24 mmHg benefitted from initial latanoprost therapy.

Trial Registration

Trial Registration Number: NCT00647101

WITHDRAWN: Interventions for normal tension glaucoma

BACKGROUND

Normal tension glaucoma is a clinical condition in which the optic nerve is pathologically excavated and the visual field is disturbed. Nevertheless it has been assumed that intraocular pressure plays a role in the progression of visual field defects in this disease, but other, mainly vascular factors, have been discussed as well.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review is to assess the effects of medical and surgical treatments for normal tension glaucoma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were identified from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group trials register), MEDLINE, EMBASE and BIOSIS Previews. Bibliographies of identified trials were searched to find additional trials. In addition, investigators and pharmaceutical companies were contacted. Date of last search: January 2001.

SELECTION CRITERIA

This review includes randomised controlled trials in which medical or surgical interventions were compared to no treatment, placebo or other treatment in people with normal tension glaucoma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted by two reviewers and results were compared for differences. Discrepancies were resolved by discussion. The heterogeneity of interventions, follow-up periods and outcomes did not allow for statistical combinations of the study results.

MAIN RESULTS

According to the selection criteria on visual field loss, eight studies were included in this review. Only three studies focussed on patient relevant outcomes. In one trial a beneficial effect of lowering intraocular pressure was found, but only if data were corrected for cataract development. In two small studies a beneficial effect on visual field loss of brovincamine, a calcium antagonist was reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In one study the effect of intraocular pressure lowering on visual field outcome was only significant when data were corrected for cataract development. The results for calcium antagonists are promising, but larger trials have to be performed. Studies that focussed on reduction of intraocular pressure or haemodynamic variables are not necessarily relevant for the outcome in people with normal tension glaucoma.

Neuroprotection for treatment of glaucoma in adults

BACKGROUND

Glaucoma is a heterogeneous group of conditions involving progressive damage to the optic nerve, deterioration of retinal ganglion cells and ultimately visual field loss. It is a leading cause of blindness worldwide. Open angle glaucoma (OAG), the commonest form of glaucoma, is a chronic condition that may or may not present with increased intraocular pressure (IOP). Neuroprotection for glaucoma refers to any intervention intended to prevent optic nerve damage or cell death. The treatment can target extracellular factors such as reducing IOP, or cellular factors derived from the optic nerve itself such as blocking intracellular death signals.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to systematically examine the evidence regarding the effectiveness of neuroprotective agents, either topical or oral, for slowing the progression of OAG in adults.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2009), MEDLINE (January 1960 to January 2010), EMBASE (January 1980 to January 2010), Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS) (January 1982 to January 2010) and ClinicalTrials.gov (http://clinicaltrials.gov). (5 January 2010). There were no language or date restrictions in the search for trials. The electronic databases were last searched on 5 January 2010.

SELECTION CRITERIA

This review was limited to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which topical or oral treatments were used to prevent retinal ganglion cell death. Our population of interest was adults with OAG. As the primary outcome for this review was the proportion of participants who developed any progression of visual field loss at five years post intervention, only trials with at least five years of follow-up were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently reviewed titles and abstracts from the literature searches. Full text copies of relevant or potentially relevant studies were obtained and re-evaluated for inclusion. There were no trials identified for this review, thus we performed no data extraction or meta-analysis. Two studies comparing memantine to placebo are currently awaiting classification until additional study details are provided. Reasons for excluding studies from the review were documented.

MAIN RESULTS

In accordance with the selection criteria for inclusion, we identified no studies relevant for this review. The results of short-term trials and other studies are discussed in this review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Although neuroprotective agents are intended to act as pharmacological antagonists to prevent cell death, the evidence that they are effective in preventing retinal ganglion cell death, and thus preserving vision in patients with OAG, has not been demonstrated. Long-term RCTs are needed to determine whether or not neuroprotective agents may be beneficial for individuals with OAG.

Latanoprost in pediatric glaucoma--pediatric exposure over a decade

BACKGROUND

Although numerous studies of latanoprost in adult glaucoma have shown it to be an effective hypotensive agent with a low incidence of side effects, these issues have not been well studied in pediatric glaucomas. The purpose of the current study is to evaluate the safety and intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering effect of latanoprost in various pediatric glaucomas over a long period.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included all children treated with latanoprost at our institution from 1996 to 2007. Demographic, glaucoma-related, and side-effect information was recorded for each subject. Duration of latanoprost exposure was calculated in child-months (1 child exposed for 1 month). If interpretable IOP data were available, the presence or absence of a treatment response (IOP reduction > or =15% from baseline) was determined for each subject.

RESULTS

A total of 115 subjects with latanoprost exposure were identified, with a collective exposure of 2,325 child-months. Exposure for > or =1 year occurred in 52 subjects. Side effects were mild and infrequently reported. Of the 115 subjects, 63 had interpretable IOP data, and 22 (35%) were treatment responders. Predictors of a response included a diagnosis of juvenile open-angle glaucoma, monotherapy, and older age.

CONCLUSIONS

This large study of latanoprost-treated children confirms the excellent safety profile of the drug in the treatment of pediatric glaucoma. The study also confirms latanoprost's IOP-lowering ability in older children with juvenile open-angle glaucoma and in some children with aphakic glaucoma. Prospective studies are needed to better define the optimal role of latanoprost in the treatment of pediatric glaucoma, especially congenital glaucoma.

Meta-analysis of medical intervention for normal tension glaucoma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction achieved by the most frequently prescribed antiglaucoma drugs in patients with normal tension glaucoma (NTG).

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifteen randomized clinical trials reported 25 arms for peak IOP reduction, 16 arms for trough IOP reduction, and 13 arms for diurnal curve IOP reduction.

METHODS

Pertinent publications were identified through systematic searches of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. The patients had to be diagnosed as having NTG. Methodological quality was assessed by the Delphi list on a scale from 0 to 18. The pooled 1-month IOP-lowering effects were calculated using the 2-step DerSimonian and Laird estimate method of the random effects model.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Absolute and relative reductions in IOP from baseline for peak and trough moments.

RESULTS

Quality scores of included studies were generally high, with a mean quality score of 12.7 (range, 9-16). Relative IOP reductions were peak, 15% (12%-18%), and trough, 18% (8%-27%) for timolol; peak, 14% (8%-19%), and trough, 12% (-7% to 31%) for dorzolamide; peak, 24% (17%-31%), and trough, 11% (7%-14%) for brimonidine; peak, 20% (17%-24%), and trough, 20% (18%-23%) for latanoprost; peak, 21% (16%-25%), and trough, 18% (14%-22%) for bimatoprost. The differences in absolute IOP reductions between prostaglandin analogues and timolol varied from 0.9 to 1.0 mmHg at peak and -0.1 to 0.2 mmHg at trough.

CONCLUSIONS

Latanoprost, bimatoprost, and timolol are the most effective IOP-lowering agents in patients with NTG.

Effect of travoprost on intraocular pressure during 12 months of treatment for normal-tension glaucoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect of travoprost in normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) over a 12-month follow-up.

METHODS

Forty-five eyes of 45 patients with unilateral NTG were treated with travoprost (0.004%) once a day for 12 months. Mean IOP and the IOP reduction from baseline were assessed at 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the initiation of the treatment. Adverse ocular event frequency and the frequency of discontinuation of treatment due to adverse events were evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean IOP during 12 months of travoprost treatment ranged from 11.17 to 11.82 mmHg, and the mean IOP reduction in relation to baseline IOP from -2.71 to -3.71 mmHg (-18.3% to -25.1%). Mean IOP and IOP changes in the travoprost-treated and control groups were significantly different at every follow-up (P < 0.05 in each case). Both the magnitude (r = 0.6992) and percentage (r = 0.5464) of IOP reductions correlated positively with baseline IOP values. Ocular adverse events were usually mild to moderate and resolved without treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Travoprost was well tolerated and significantly reduced IOP in NTG patients. In addition, initial IOP reductions were maintained throughout follow-up. Travoprost was found to be more effective in patients with greater baseline IOP.

The additive effects on intraocular pressure of combining nipradilol 0.25% and latanoprost 0.005% ophthalmic solutions: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study

PURPOSE

To investigate the effectiveness of combining nipradilol 0.25% and latanoprost 0.005% ophthalmic solutions in improving the intraocular pressures (IOPs) in glaucoma patients.

METHODS

We divided the 53 patients into two groups, those who had been treated with latanoprost and those who had been treated with nipradilol. We administered to the first group one dose of latanoprost daily for 12 weeks and to the second group one dose of nipradilol daily for 12 weeks. Each group then received both solutions for another 12 weeks; the latanoprost group received nipradilol and the nipradilol group received latanoprost. IOPs were measured at each 4-week visit.

RESULTS

In the patients previously treated with latanoprost, the mean IOP was 19.6+/-2.5 mmHg at baseline, and 14.9+/-2.4 mmHg (23.7% reduction) after 12 weeks of latanoprost monotherapy. The addition of nipradilol decreased the IOP to 13.8+/-1.9 mmHg (29.0% reduction). In the group previously treated with nipradilol, the mean IOP was 20.2+/-3.1 mmHg at baseline, and 16.7+/-3.5 mmHg (17.1% reduction) after 12 weeks of nipradilol monotherapy. Addition of latanoprost decreased the IOP to 14.2+/-3.2 mmHg (29.5% reduction).

CONCLUSION

Latanoprost and nipradilol are more effective as a combination therapy than each one by itself.

Clinical experience in the treatment of normal tension glaucoma with latanoprost in Germany

AIMS

The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the general ophthalmologist's experience in using latanoprost to treat normal tension glaucoma (NTG) patients.

METHODS

NTG patients included in this study were part of an observational cohort of patients that were changed from previous therapy to latanoprost in Germany.

RESULTS

This study included 200 NTG glaucoma patients who were being treated with latanoprost monotherapy (average duration, 1.2 +/- 1.4 years) and had 6 months of follow-up. At the beginning of the observation period, patients had an average intraocular pressure (IOP) of 15.2 +/- 2.5 mmHg and after 6 months, 15.0 +/- 2.4 mmHg (P = 0.769). Eight (8) patients (4.0%) were discontinued from latanoprost during the observation period, with the most common reason noted as the need for further IOP reduction (n = 7; 3.5%). Twenty-four (24) patients (12.0%) noted at least one ocular adverse event during the observation period, with the most common reason noted as burning/stinging (n = 9; 4.5%) or conjunctival hyperemia (n = 9; 4.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that patients with NTG who are already treated with latanoprost monotherapy should continue to have, over a short-term follow-up, generally stable IOPs, low side-effect incidence, and discontinuations, as well as "very good" to "excellent" physician ratings of patient efficacy, tolerability, and satisfaction.

Predictive value of the efficacy of glaucoma medications in regulatory trials: Phase I-III to post-marketing studies

PURPOSE

To determine the predictive value of early Phase trials (I-II) for the ocular hypotensive efficacy observed in Phases III and IV.

DESIGN

A review of published literature.

METHODS

This study evaluated 12 medicines in 65 articles in the literature with at least two phases available.

RESULTS

For medicines with Phase I results available (n=3), the average reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP) from untreated baseline was 16%, 26% for Phase II, 26% for Phase III, and 24% for Phase IV. For medicines with Phase II results available (n=6), the average reduction in IOP was 23%, 24% for Phase III, and 23% for Phase IV. For medicines with Phase III results available (n=11), the average reduction in IOP was 25% and 24% for Phase IV.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that early phase trials usually approximated the results of later regulatory studies and post-commercialization trials.

Effect of Concomitant Use of Latanoprost and Brinzolamide on 24-hour Variation of IOP in Normal-tension Glaucoma

PURPOSE

To study the effect of the concomitant use of latanoprost and brinzolamide on the 24-hour variation in the intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG).

METHODS

We studied a total of 44 eyes from 22 NTG patients. Mean 24-hour IOP variation was determined after a washout period of > or =4 weeks. Latanoprost monotherapy was continued in both eyes for 8 weeks. Thereafter, patients were randomized to continue latanoprost monotherapy in 1 eye whereas brinzolamide was added as an adjunct to latanoprost therapy in the other eye. Eight weeks after the initiation of brinzolamide treatment, the 24-hour IOP variation was remeasured. IOP was measured in the sitting position 8 times daily using a Goldmann applanation tonometer before and after treatment.

RESULTS

The eyes treated with latanoprost monotherapy and those treated with latanoprost and brinzolamide showed a significant decrease in IOP at all time points. Percent reductions in the diurnal mean IOP (mean IOP at 10 AM, 1 PM, and 4 PM) and in nocturnal mean IOP (mean IOP at 10 PM, 1 AM, and 3 AM) were significantly greater in the eyes treated with the combination of latanoprost and brinzolamide than those with latanoprost alone (diurnal mean IOP: latanoprost and brinzolamide=19.8%, latanoprost=14.1%, P<0.001; nocturnal mean IOP: latanoprost and brinzolamide=13.4%, latanoprost=10.0%, P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

For the treatment of NTG, the combination of latanoprost and brinzolamide demonstrated additive effects in lowering IOP, not only during the day, but also at night.

Association between genetic polymorphisms of the prostaglandin F2alpha receptor gene and response to latanoprost

PURPOSE

To evaluate the relationship between polymorphisms of the prostaglandin F(2alpha) receptor (FP receptor) gene and the effectiveness of topical latanoprost treatment in normal volunteers.

DESIGN

Prospective nonrandomized trial.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred normal volunteers were recruited into the study.

METHODS

Baseline intraocular pressures (IOPs) of both eyes of 100 normal subjects were measured at 3 time points. Latanoprost (0.005%) was applied to one eye once daily for 7 days. Diurnal IOP was measured again on day 7. Response to latanoprost was evaluated by percent IOP reduction in the treated eye minus IOP fluctuations of the nontreated eye. We classified subjects by the mean diurnal percent IOP reduction (%DeltaIOP) into 3 groups: low responders (%DeltaIOP<10), medium responders (10< or =%DeltaIOP<25), and high responders (%DeltaIOP> or =25). Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the FP receptor gene were searched, and the genotype was determined mainly by direct DNA sequencing. A promoter assay with a reporter luciferase gene was also performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mean diurnal percent IOP reduction and genotyping of SNPs in the FP receptor gene.

RESULTS

Ten SNPs were identified in this study. One, rs3753380, was located in the promoter region of the FP receptor gene and was significantly correlated with %DeltaIOP (CC, 20.3%+/-1.5% [mean +/- standard error]; CT + TT, 15.6%+/-1.2%; P = 0.0316). Mean diurnal percent IOP reduction was not associated with the other SNPs. When the category classified by %DeltaIOP was analyzed, not only rs3753380 but also rs3766355, an SNP in intron 1, were associated with the degree of response to latanoprost. The promoter assay revealed that the C allele of rs3766355 and T allele of rs3753380 were found in constructs with lower transcriptional activity of the FP receptor gene.

CONCLUSIONS

rs3753380 and rs3766355, SNPs in the promoter and intron 1 regions of the FP receptor gene, correlate with a response to short-term latanoprost treatment in normal volunteers. The genotype of these SNPs may be an important determinant of variability in response to latanoprost.

Effects of bimatoprost 0.03% on ocular hemodynamics in normal tension glaucoma

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of bimatoprost 0.03% on ocular hemodynamics in patients with normal tension glaucoma (NTG).

METHODS

Twenty-two (22) patients with NTG were consecutively recruited. After basic eye examination and diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement, color Doppler imaging was used to measure the peak systolic and end diastolic velocities and resistive index of the central retinal, lateral posterior ciliary, and medial posterior ciliary arteries. Patients received bimatoprost 0.03% for 4 weeks, and these measurements were then repeated. The worse eye of each NTG patient was used in the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Bimatoprost 0.03% significantly reduced mean IOP from 15.1 +/- 3.8 mmHg at baseline to 12.0 +/- 2.9 mmHg after treatment in our sample of NTG patients (P < 0.001). No significant changes in blood velocities or resistance indices were observed in the retrobulbar vessels after the 4-week treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical bimatoprost 0.03% significantly reduced IOP in our NTG patients without causing significant hemodynamic changes in the retrobulbar vessels.

Effect of Latanoprost on the Diurnal Variations in the Intraocular and Ocular Perfusion Pressure in Normal Tension Glaucoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of latanoprost on the diurnal variations in the intraocular pressure (IOP) combined with the ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) in patients with normal tension glaucoma (NTG).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-two eyes from 22 patients with NTG were used for the study. The diurnal variations in the IOP and blood pressure (BP) were measured every 3 hours without therapy, and then the patients were treated with latanoprost (0.005%) once daily for more than 12 weeks. The diurnal variations in the IOP and BP under medication were again measured every 6 hours. The diurnal variation of IOP for 24 hours, mean diurnal IOP, maximum IOP, minimum IOP, range of variation in IOP, OPP, and BP were compared between the baseline and after treatment by means of a paired t test.

RESULTS

At 3 months after the start of the latanoprost treatment regimen, the IOP showed a statistically significant decrease at every assessed time point over 24 hours (P<0.001). Latanoprost significantly reduced the mean diurnal IOP, maximum IOP, minimum IOP, and mean range of variation in the IOP values from baseline (P<0.001, <0.001, <0.001, and 0.009, respectively). OPP after treatment showed no significant difference at any assessed time points from the baseline (P>0.1). Latanoprost did not significantly alter the mean diurnal OPP (P>0.1), and BP (P>0.5) from the baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Latanoprost was thus found to significantly reduce IOP over 24 hours, whereas it does not affect OPP and BP in NTG patients. Therefore, it may be a useful medication for NTG.

Latanoprost Nonresponders with Open-Angle Glaucoma in the Japanese Population

PURPOSE

As some patients show little response to latanoprost, one of the most powerful topical glaucoma medications, we investigated the incidence and clinical profiles of latanoprost nonresponders (LNR) in the Japanese population.

METHODS

We examined 62 glaucoma patients (62 eyes) who had received only latanoprost for more than 3 months. Their mean age was 63.8 +/- 1.8 years; the mean observation period was 9.7 +/- 0.4 months. At 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, their intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured, and the IOP reduction rate (RR) and the rate of LNR, defined as RR of 10% or less, were calculated. We statistically analyzed clinical factors involved in the LNR status of our study population.

RESULTS

At 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, RR was 20.1 +/- 2.0%, 18.8 +/- 2.3%, 21.1 +/- 2.8%, and 23.0 +/- 2.6%, respectively. At the same time points, the LNR incidence was 23.1%, 28.1%, 23.5%, and 31.8%, respectively, and significantly higher in patients whose baseline IOP was less than 15 mmHg. Patient sex and age and the glaucoma type played no significant role in the LNR status.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of LNR in the Japanese population, including normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) patients, is higher than among European or American patients. Only low baseline IOP was a significant clinical factor among LNR.

The effect of latanoprost on intraocular pressure during 12 months of treatment for normal-tension glaucoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy of latanoprost in normal-tension glaucoma (NTG).

METHODS

One-hundred and seventeen eyes of 63 NTG patients treated with 0.005% latanoprost once a day were enrolled in this study. Of these, 85 eyes of 47 patients were treated for 12 months. Mean IOPs were analyzed, and the mean IOP reductions from the untreated baseline were assessed after two weeks and after 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of treatment.

RESULTS

The mean untreated baseline IOP was 15.0 +/- 2.7 mmHg. After two weeks of latanoprost treatment, the mean IOP reduction from the baseline value was 2.6 +/- 0.2 mmHg (17.3%, p<0.05), and after 6 and 12 months, the reduction was 2.4 +/- 0.2 mmHg (16.0%, p<0.05) and 2.4 +/- 0.2 mmHg (16.0%, p<0.05), respectively. Patients with a baseline IOP of > or = 15 mmHg achieved significantly higher IOP reductions than those with a baseline IOP of <15 mmHg at all follow-ups (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Latanoprost was found to be well tolerated and to significantly reduce IOP in NTG patients.

Correlation between individual differences in intraocular pressure reduction and outflow facility due to latanoprost in normal-tension glaucoma patients

PURPOSE

The amount of intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction achieved by the use of latanoprost eyedrops varies among patients, and there are even nonresponders. This report examines whether there is any correlation between the amount of individual variability in IOP reduction and the uveoscleral outflow facility after latanoprost eyedrop instillation in normal-tension glaucoma patients.

METHODS

Sixteen normal-tension glaucoma patients (mean age, 56.4 years) were enrolled in the study to investigate the relationship between the amount of IOP reduction and outflow facility. Before treatment, subjects underwent circadian IOP measurement and then tonography, and the outflow facility was calculated. Subsequently, patients began treatment once daily with latanoprost instillation in one eye. After 4 weeks of daily latanoprost treatment, circadian IOP was measured again.

RESULTS

Mean pretreatment outflow facility was 0.23 +/- 0.05 microl/min per mmHg. On average, latanoprost instillation decreased IOP by 2.8 mmHg, but the reduction varied among individuals from -0.3 mmHg to 5.8 mmHg. No significant correlation was noted between the outflow facility and the IOP decline associated with latanoprost.

CONCLUSION

Because there was no significant correlation between individual IOP reduction by latanoprost and outflow facility, the differences in substantial change in uveoscleral outflow after latanoprost administration may be one explanation for the individual variation in IOP reduction after treatment with this drug.

Clinical Predictors of Latanoprost Treatment Effect

PURPOSE

To determine the relationship between latanoprost efficacy and clinical features of glaucoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Study design was retrospective, observational case series. The charts of all patients who underwent a one-eyed therapeutic trial of latanoprost during the course of their clinical care between 1997 and 2001 were reviewed. Intraocular pressures of both eyes prior to and one month after initiation of latanoprost were recorded. Latanoprost treatment effect was calculated by subtracting the change in intraocular pressure (IOP) in the fellow eye from the change in the treated eye. The effect of optic disc stage, age, race, sex, diagnosis, involved eye, type and number of other glaucoma medications, pattern of cupping (concentric, focal, or indeterminate), and pre-treatment IOP was correlated with the treatment effect. The stage of glaucoma was determined by determining the disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS) stage.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-six cases were included. Latanoprost treatment effect was 4.5 +/- 5.7 mm Hg, was moderately correlated with pre-treatment IOP (Pearson's r = 0.527, P < 0.01), and was weakly inversely correlated with advancing disc stage (Pearson's r = -0.194, P < 0.01) and age (Pearson's r = -0.175, P < 0.05). It was independent of the other variables studied (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Most clinical parameters examined in this study were not correlated with latanoprost treatment response. A moderate direct correlation was noted with pre-treatment IOP and a weak inverse correlation was noted with optic disc stage and age.

Advances in glaucoma therapeutics

Glaucoma is a major cause of irreversible blindness in the world. The prevalence of glaucomatous loss in vision will continue to grow as our populations age. Ocular hypertension is a major risk factor for the development of glaucoma and current glaucoma therapy is directed at lowering intraocular pressure. Several new ocular hypotensive agents have been introduced in the past several years providing a variety of treatment options. In addition, various classes of neuroprotective agents demonstrating activity in a wide variety of animal models have been proposed as potential new glaucoma therapeutics. Although these approaches will slow the progression of vision loss, they do not directly intervene in the disease process(es). Advances have been made attempting to understand the pathogenic pathways involved in glaucomatous damage to the eye and in methods to clinically measure glaucoma damage. An increased understanding of the pathophysiology of glaucoma will lead to the development of new therapeutic agents that intervene and perhaps even reverse glaucomatous damage to the eye. There also is a need to develop new methods to clinically measure glaucoma damage because, currently, considerable damage occurs before glaucoma is diagnosed and glaucoma remains underdiagnosed in the general population.

Efficacy of Latanoprost in Patients with Chronic Angle-Closure Glaucoma and No Visible Ciliary-Body Face: A Preliminary Study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 0.005% latanoprost in lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with chronic angle-closure glaucoma (CACG) and no visible ciliary-body face. Fourteen eyes of 14 Korean patients with CACG with 360 degrees of peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS) and an IOP greater than 21 mmHg without medication were treated with 0.005% latanoprost once-daily. All patients completed 3 months of treatment with latanoprost. The IOP, which was 30.3 +/- 4.5 (mean +/- standard deviation) mmHg at baseline, decreased to 22.6 +/- 4.9 mmHg after 1 week, 19.6 +/- 5.5 mmHg after 1 month, 19.4 +/- 4.9 mmHg after 2 months, and 21.5 +/- 5.9 mmHg after 3 months of treatment with latanoprost (P < 0.01 for each). Ultrasound biomicroscopy of the anterior chamber angle showed anterior bowing of the iris with total occlusion of the angle by PAS, except for 5 eyes with focal microscopic openings to the ciliary-body face at various angles. Adverse ocular events were well-tolerated and transient. In this preliminary study, treatment with 0.005% latanoprost once-daily resulted in a significant reduction in IOP in CACG patients with 360 degrees of PAS on gonioscopy. Our results suggest that latanoprost may be considered as a therapy of choice in these rare cases.

A three-year prospective, randomized and open comparison between latanoprost and timolol in Japanese normal-tension glaucoma patients

PURPOSE

To compare the longitudinal effects of treatment on intraocular pressure (IOP) and visual field performance in Japanese normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) between latanoprost and timolol.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is an open-label, randomized, study. A total of 62 NTG patients were prospectively, consecutively enrolled. All study subjects were randomly assigned to 0.005% latanoprost instillation once daily in the morning or 0.5% timolol instillation twice daily for a prospective 3-year follow-up, and underwent a routine ocular examination every month. Automated perimetry was performed every 6 months using Humphrey field analysers. Stereophotographs of optic discs were also obtained every 6 months.

RESULTS

Percentage of IOP reduction or the magnitude of IOP reduction showed no intergroup differences either at any time point (13-15%). In the visual field, the estimated rate of change in the MD value (dB/year) was -0.34+/-0.17 (SE) for the latanoprost group, and -0.10+/-0.18 (SE) for the timolol group. The estimated rate of change in MD showed no significant difference from zero in both groups, and there were no statistical intergroup differences. No changes in the optic nerve head topography in the vertical cup-to-disc ratio and rim area measured by image-analysis techniques were observed in either group. There were no patients who dropped out due to the side effects of treatment regimens.

CONCLUSION

Both latanoprost and timolol single treatments reduced IOP by 13-15% at their trough effects for 3 years in Japanese NTG patients; both showed similar effects on visual field performance.

Latanoprost : an update of its use in glaucoma and ocular hypertension

Latanoprost (Xalatan) is an ester analogue of prostaglandin F2alpha that reduces intraocular pressure (IOP) by increasing uveoscleral outflow. The IOP-lowering efficacy of latanoprost 0.005% lasts for up to 24 hours after a single topical dose, which allows for a once-daily dosage regimen. In patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma, a single drop of latanoprost 0.005% solution (about 1.5 microg) administered topically once daily reduced diurnal IOP by 22 to 39% over 1 to 12 months' treatment in well-controlled trials; efficacy was maintained during treatment periods of up to 2 years. At this dosage, latanoprost was significantly more effective than timolol 0.5% twice daily in 3 of 4 large, double-blind, randomised studies, was generally as effective as bimatoprost or travoprost, and was significantly more effective than dorzolamide, brimonidine or unoprostone. Furthermore, in patients whose IOP was poorly controlled with timolol, switching to latanoprost monotherapy was at least as effective at lowering IOP as adding dorzolamide or pilocarpine to the regimen. Latanoprost has also shown significant additive effects when used in combination with one or more other glaucoma medications. The fixed combination of latanoprost plus timolol was significantly more effective than either of its individual components in two double-blind randomised studies and more effective than the fixed combination of dorzolamide and timolol in a 3-month, evaluator-masked study. Data in patients with angle-closure glaucoma are limited, but in patients with elevated IOP after undergoing iridotomy, latanoprost 0.005% once daily was significantly more effective than timolol 0.5% twice daily at reducing IOP over 12 weeks of treatment in a large double-blind, randomised study. Latanoprost is generally well tolerated and, unlike timolol, induces minimal systemic adverse events. In well-controlled, 6-month trials, the most commonly occurring drug-related ocular events in latanoprost recipients were mild to moderate conjunctival hyperaemia (3 to 15%) and iris colour change (2 to 9%); these seldom required patient withdrawal although the latter may be permanent. Latanoprost 0.005% as a single daily drop has shown good IOP-lowering efficacy in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension and does not produce the cardiopulmonary adverse effects associated with beta-blockers. Thus, latanoprost is a valuable addition to the first-line treatment options for patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. In addition, adjunctive treatment with latanoprost in patients who are refractory to beta-blocker therapy is a viable, second-line treatment option. Although preliminary findings are promising, wider clinical experience is required to define the place of latanoprost in the treatment of angle-closure glaucoma.

Long term effect of latanoprost on intraocular pressure in normal tension glaucoma

AIM

To determine the long term effect of latanoprost on the intraocular pressure (IOP) of patients with normal tension glaucoma (NTG).

METHODS

Newly diagnosed patients with NTG were recruited into the study and had their baseline IOPs measured hourly between 8 am and 5 pm using a handheld electronic Tonopen. Patients with fixation threatening field defects were placed immediately into the treatment group while those with non-fixation threatening field defects were randomised into either the treatment group or the control group (no treatment). Treatment consisted of once daily topical latanoprost 0.005%. After a minimum period of 6 months, the patients underwent a second period of IOP phasing.

RESULTS

76 newly diagnosed patients with NTG were recruited-26 had fixation threatening disease, 25 were randomised to treatment, and 25 randomised to the control group. The average duration of treatment was 11 months. The average and maximum diurnal IOP for the patients randomised to treatment were statistically significantly lower than for the control patients at follow up (p<0.05). The treated group as a whole demonstrated a 17% decrease in the average diurnal IOP and a 19% decrease in the maximum diurnal IOP when compared to baseline IOP. 41% of those treated achieved a decrease of at least 20%, but only 10% of patients achieved a decrease of at least 30%.

CONCLUSION

Latanoprost had a sustained hypotensive effect in eyes with NTG and 41% of treated patients achieved a reasonable response. However, in the majority of eyes with NTG, latanoprost monotherapy may be insufficient in producing a desirable 30% reduction in IOP.

Four years later: a clinical update on latanoprost

PURPOSE

Almost five years have elapsed since the introduction of latanoprost on several markets and considering the large number of publications dealing with it, the authors felt that it was worth re-evaluating the drug.

METHODS

The criterion used to select trials for inclusion in the review was: all articles mentioning the drug in common electronic data-bases; these were then screened and considered, on the basis of methodological quality.

RESULTS

Experimental data suggest that latanoprost acts by remodeling the extracellular matrix in the ciliary muscle, thus increasing the flow of aqueous humor through the ciliary muscle bundles of the uveoscleral pathway. POAG: Latanoprost persistently improves the pulsatile ocular blood flow in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). Recent trials confirmed the greater IOP-lowering efficacy of latanoprost vs. timolol, dorzolamide, brimonidine and unoprostone. Trials lasting up to 24 months showed that latanoprost is effective in long-term treatment of POAG and ocular hypertension (OH), with no signs of loss of efficacy when compared to timolol or dorzolamide. Latanoprost provides better control of circadian IOP. Non-responders to beta-blockers should preferably be switched to latanoprost monotherapy before a combination therapy is started. The possibility of a fixed combination of latanoprost and timolol has been explored, with promising results. NTG: Latanoprost is effective in normal tension glaucoma (NTG), lowering IOP, improving pulsatile ocular blood flow and increasing ocular perfusion pressure. OTHER GLAUCOMAS: Latanoprost may provide effective IOP control in angle-closure glaucoma after iridectomy, in pigmentary glaucoma, glaucoma after cataract extraction and steroid-induced glaucoma. However, latanoprost was effective in only a minority of pediatric cases of glaucoma and is contraindicated in all forms of uveitic glaucoma.

SAFETY

In the articles reviewed, new or duration-related adverse events were reported.

Interventions for normal tension glaucoma

BACKGROUND

Normal tension glaucoma is a clinical condition in which the optic nerve is pathologically excavated and the visual field is disturbed. Nevertheless it has been assumed that intraocular pressure plays a role in the progression of visual field defects in this disease, but other, mainly vascular factors, have been discussed as well.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review is to assess the effects of medical and surgical treatments for normal tension glaucoma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were identified from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group trials register), MEDLINE, EMBASE and BIOSIS Previews. Bibliographies of identified trials were searched to find additional trials. In addition, investigators and pharmaceutical companies were contacted. Date of last search: January 2001.

SELECTION CRITERIA

This review includes randomised controlled trials in which medical or surgical interventions were compared to no treatment, placebo or other treatment in people with normal tension glaucoma. Two reviewers independently assessed the full text copies of the possibly relevant trials. Trial quality was assessed according to the methods set out in Section 6 of the Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook (Clarke 2000).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted by two reviewers and results were compared for differences. Discrepancies were resolved by discussion. The heterogeneity of interventions, follow-up periods and outcomes did not allow for statistical combinations of the study results.

MAIN RESULTS

According to the selection criteria on visual field loss, eight studies were included in this review. Only three studies focussed on patient relevant outcomes. In one trial a beneficial effect of lowering intraocular pressure was found, but only if data were corrected for cataract development. In two small studies a beneficial effect on visual field loss of brovincamine, a calcium antagonist was reported.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

In one study the effect of intraocular pressure lowering on visual field outcome was only significant when data were corrected for cataract development. The results for calcium antagonists are promising, but larger trials have to be performed. Studies that focussed on reduction of intraocular pressure or haemodynamic variables are not necessarily relevant for the outcome in people with normal tension glaucoma.

Changes in intraocular pressure and ocular perfusion pressure after latanoprost 0.005% or brimonidine tartrate 0.2% in normal-tension glaucoma patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare the effects of latanoprost 0.005% once daily and brimonidine tartrate 0.2% twice daily in patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG).

DESIGN

A randomized, open-label, crossover study.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-eight NTG patients with progressive visual field defects/optic disc excavation, new disc hemorrhage, or field defects that threatened fixation.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups. Patients in group 1 were treated with latanoprost, lubricant, and brimonidine for 4 weeks each, whereas patients in group 2 were treated with brimonidine, lubricant, and latanoprost for 4 weeks each.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Intraocular pressure (IOP), pulse rate, and blood pressure were measured at 8 am, 12 noon, and 4 pm after each 4-week treatment. Ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) was calculated.

RESULTS

Latanoprost and brimonidine reduced the average IOP by 3.6 +/- 1.9 mmHg (P < 0.001) and 2.5 +/- 1.3 mmHg (P < 0.001), respectively, with a significant difference between the two regimens (P = 0.009). Both drugs significantly reduced IOP at each time point. Latanoprost decreased IOP significantly more than did brimonidine at 8 am (11.7 +/- 2.2 mmHg vs. 13.7 +/- 2.1 mmHg, P = 0.004) and 4 pm (11.4 +/- 2.1 mmHg vs. 13.2 +/- 2.9 mmHg, P = 0.004), but IOP was equal between the two agents at 12 noon (11.5 +/- 2.6 mmHg vs. 11.5 +/- 2.3 mmHg, P = 0.967). IOP was maintained at 12 mmHg or lower in 18 (66.7%) of 27 patients after treatment with latanoprost and in 9 (33.3%) of 27 patients after treatment with brimonidine. Latanoprost monotherapy reduced IOP by 30% in 8 patients (29.6%), but brimonidine monotherapy did not reduce IOP by that much in any of the patients. OPP increased after latanoprost treatment (P < 0.001) but did not increase after brimonidine treatment (P = 0.355). There was no significant change in pulse rate or blood pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

Both latanoprost and brimonidine reduce IOP in NTG patients. Brimonidine has a peak IOP-lowering effect equal to that of latanoprost but produces a higher mean diurnal IOP than does latanoprost because of its shorter effect. Latanoprost might favorably alter optic disc blood perfusion by increasing OPP.

Low-concentration homogenized castor oil eye drops for noninflamed obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction

OBJECTIVE

We developed low-concentration homogenized castor oil eye drops for the treatment of patients with noninflamed obstructive meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD), a major cause of lipid-deficiency dry eye, and assessed the safety, stability, and efficacy of the eye drops.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled crossover clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty eyes of 20 patients with noninflamed MGD.

METHODS

After a preliminary study of eye drops containing castor oil, 2% castor oil and 5% polyoxyethylene castor oil (emulsifier) were mixed to formulate homogenized oil eye drops. The patients were assigned randomly to receive oil eye drops or placebo six times daily for 2 periods of 2 weeks each.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

At the end of each treatment period, we assessed symptoms, tear interference grade, tear evaporation, fluorescein and rose bengal scores, tear break-up time (BUT), and meibomian gland orifice obstruction. Safety and stability tests were also performed.

RESULTS

Symptom scores, tear interference grade, tear evaporation test results, rose bengal scores, tear BUT, and orifice obstruction scores after the oil eye drop period showed significant improvement compared with the results after the placebo period. No complications attributable to the eye drops were observed. The oil eye drops were stable when stored at 4 degrees C.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that castor oil eye drops are effective and safe in the treatment of MGD. The possible mechanisms of this treatment are improvement of tear stability as a result of lipid spreading, ease of meibum expression, prevention of tear evaporation, and the lubricating effect of the oil eye drops.

Singlet molecular oxygen generation and quenching by the antiglaucoma ophthalmic drugs, Timolol and Pindolol

The dye sensitized photooxidation in water (pH 6), of the pharmaceutical topical antiglaucoma drugs, Timolol and Pindolol, which act as beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists, were studied by means of static and time-resolved spectroscopic methods and polarographic determinations. O2(1delta(g))-mediated photooxidation of Timolol and Pindolol takes place with quantum efficiencies of 0.035 and 0.16, respectively, which raises concern about the possible daylight-mediated photodamaging of the drugs, in the presence of sensitizing agents. Pindolol behaves kinetically as a typical indole derivative, for which the intermediacy of a polar complex is proposed. Solvent effects on the kinetics of photooxidation suggests that the same mechanism could operate for the case of Timolol. Upon direct ultraviolet-light irradiation Timolol and Pindolol generate O2(1delta(g)), with quantum yields of 0.027 and 0.11 respectively. The former comprises three desirable properties for an external-use ocular drug: a reduced efficiency of O2(1delta(g)) photooxidation, a relatively high power as O2(1delta(g)) physical deactivator and a relatively low propensity to O2(1delta(g)) generation upon direct light irradiation.

Current status of prostaglandin therapy: latanoprost and unoprostone

Latanoprost, a prostaglandin F(2alpha) analog prodrug, and unoprostone, an analog of a prostaglandin metabolite, have been shown to be effective in decreasing intraocular pressure when used alone or in combination with other ocular hypotensive agents. The increase in the uveoscleral outflow and some of the side effects are probably FP-receptor mediated, which may account for some differences between the cited drugs. This article reviews the recent literature available on the clinical efficacy of these prostanoids, as well as the studies directly comparing these drugs.

Medical treatment of normal tension glaucoma

Normal-tension glaucoma was previously thought to be pressure insensitive, as medical treatment hardly reduced intraocular pressure and it did not prevent visual field loss. In the last decade, however, evidence has shown that the treatment of normal-tension glaucoma by lowering intraocular pressure can slow the deterioration of visual fields, hence the glaucomatous process. It was shown that a reduction of IOP of at least 30% is needed to induce a favorable alteration in the course of normal-tension glaucoma. New agents, such as prostaglandin analogs, the alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist brimonidine, and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, have become available and may be of use in the treatment of normal-tension glaucoma. Monotherapy with prostaglandin analogs may meet the target of a reduction of IOP with 30%, but combination therapy will be needed in many cases. Few studies have been performed with brimonidine, travoprost, and bimatoprost, and it is suggested that more attention should be given to studies with these agents, as about 30% of patients with open angles and glaucomatous visual field defects have normal-tension glaucoma. Although neuroprotection is the goal of the future, no hard data are available yet which demonstrate that treatment with these agents will indeed result in preservation of visual fields.