The modulation of the dorsal immobility response in the adult male Wistar rat: the opposite effects of ACTH4-10 and [D-Phe7]ACTH4-10

Neurochemical anatomy of dorsal and tonic immobility responses

The dorsal immobility response (DIR) and the tonic immobility response (TIR) are cutaneo-motor reflexes typically triggered when a prey is seized. The neurochemical basis of the DIR appears to pass through the basal ganglia via dopaminergic fibers, while the neurochemical basis of the TIR appears to include a circuit comprising the amygdala, the periaqueductal gray (PAG), the dorsal raphe, and the nucleus magnus raphe (NMR) via glutamatergic, serotonergic, cholinergic, GABAergic, and opioid fibers. For the DIR, the basal ganglia also seem to be involved in regard to estradiol, while for the TIR, the HPA axis appears involved at the level of the amygdala and the oral pontine reticular nucleus.

Administered peptides inhibit the degradation of endogenous peptides. The dilemma of distinguishing direct from indirect effects

Virtually all peptides are biologically active following central administration as a consequence of both direct and indirect cellular actions. Direct effects are mainly interactions with specific membrane receptors but may include unions with other components of the receptor/effector complex. Significant indirect biological effects of exogenous peptides, including apparent secretagogue effects on endogenous peptides largely overlooked in practice, result from extensive competition with endogenous peptides for degradative enzymes (peptidases). A consequence of this competition is enhancement of tonic or intermittent activity of endogenous peptides. The pharmacological profile of any peptide reflects or includes, therefore, the spectrum of endogenous peptides that is protected from peptidase action. It is likely that certain pharmacologically active peptides, including a large number of di-, tri- and oligo-peptides, elicit responses mainly or exclusively by competing for peptidases. Therefore, reliable estimates of the relative contributions of direct and indirect actions of exogenous peptides may be difficult, if not impossible, to obtain.