A competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detecting Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin and its application to clinical isolates

Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin (STa)-biotin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (STa-biotin ELISA)

We have previously shown that an Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin (STa)-biotin conjugate binds to polystyrene microtitre plates coated with avidin (Germani et al., 1992). In the present study the STa-biotin ELISA, based on inhibition of binding of anti-STa antibodies to avidin-bound STa-biotin conjugates, was compared with the conventional suckling mouse assay for the identification of STa from Biken agar extracts and from culture supernatants, using 150 E. coli isolates (50 STa-positive and 100 ST-negative). Pieces of Biken agar were a good source of toxin, 142 of 150 strains gave consistent results by both tests: 100 were negative and 42 were positive; seven of the remaining eight E. coli gave questionable but positive results in the STa-biotin ELISA and were positive by the suckling mouse test; the last E. coli gave negative result by both tests. The STa-biotin ELISA was 85.7% sensitive and 100% specific; the negative predictive value was 0.935 and the positive predictive value was 1. All the 150 strains tested for STa production from standard liquid cultures gave consistent results by both techniques. The STa-biotin ELISA detected 20 pg of partly purified STa compared to 15 pg in the suckling mouse assay.

Comparison of a competitive enzyme immunoassay kit and the infant mouse assay for detecting Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin

A commercial competitive enzyme immunoassay kit, Escherichia coli ST EIA, was compared with the conventional infant mouse assay for sensitivity and specificity in detecting E. coli heat-stable enterotoxin. Thirty-one of 46 strains of E. coli tested were positive by both assays, while 15 strains were negative. The sensitivity of the ST EIA kit was up to 64-fold lower than the infant mouse assay.

Comparison of three assay systems for detection of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin

In this study, a commercial DNA-DNA hybridization kit for the detection of Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin is compared with a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the suckling mouse bioassay. Taking the suckling mouse assay as the "gold standard," the gene probe was the more specific and the ELISA was the more sensitive of the assays. The ELISA and the suckling mouse test are semiquantitative. The ELISA was the most rapid method, most amenable to automation, and most suitable for the examination of large numbers of specimens. The gene probe is particularly applicable in relatively primitive laboratory conditions. The suckling mouse assay was the least suitable system for the examination of large numbers of specimens.

Comparison of the synthetic oligonucleotide gene probe and infant mouse bioassay for detection of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli

A commercial DNA/DNA hybridisation kit for the detection of Escherichia coli heat stable enterotoxin gene sequences was compared to the suckling mouse bioassay using 183 isolates of Escherichia coli from clinical specimens. The gene probe assay had a specificity of 99% and a sensitivity of 90.4% compared to the infant mouse method. Using the colony blot method of preparing the bacterial DNA and a hybridisation temperature of 50 degrees C optimal results were obtained. The gene probe method is not affected by the incubation conditions of the test organisms. It is technically straightforward and can be applied to large numbers of specimens with fewer logistic difficulties than with the bioassay.