An analysis of 900 consecutive admissions to a regional infection unit

Modeling economic implications of alternative treatment strategies for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections

OBJECTIVE

The economic implications from the US Medicare perspective of adopting alternative treatment strategies for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) are substantial. The objective of this study is to describe a modeling framework that explores the impact of decisions related to both the location of care and switching to different antibiotics at discharge.

METHODS

A discrete event simulation (DES) was developed to model the treatment pathway of each patient through various locations (emergency department [ED], inpatient, and outpatient) and the treatments prescribed (empiric antibiotic, switching to a different antibiotic at discharge, or a second antibiotic). Costs are reported in 2012 USD.

RESULTS

The mean number of days on antibiotic in a cohort assigned to a full course of vancomycin was 11.2 days, with 64% of the treatment course being administered in the outpatient setting. Mean total costs per patient were $8671, with inpatient care accounting for 58% of the costs accrued. The majority of outpatient costs were associated with parenteral administration rather than drug acquisition or monitoring. Scenarios modifying the treatment pathway to increase the proportion of patients receiving the first dose in the ED, and then managing them in the outpatient setting or prescribing an oral antibiotic at discharge to avoid the cost associated with administering parenteral therapy, therefore have a major impact and lower the typical cost per patient by 11-20%. Since vancomycin is commonly used as empiric therapy in clinical practice, based on these analyses, a shift in treatment practice could result in substantial savings from the Medicare perspective.

CONCLUSIONS

The choice of antibiotic and location of care influence the costs and resource use associated with the management of ABSSSIs. The DES framework presented here can provide insight into the potential economic implications of decisions that modify the treatment pathway.

Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin for hospitalized patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections in France

Studies have shown similar clinical cure rates and shorter length of hospitalization when using linezolid compared to vancomycin in patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections due to suspected or proven methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

OBJECTIVE

This study had for aim to compare the cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin in French healthcare settings.

METHOD

A decision-analytic model followed an average patient from the initiation of an empiric treatment until cure, death or second-line treatment failure. A clinical data probability was obtained from clinical trials, resource utilization data (including treatment duration and length of hospitalization) and prevalence of MRSA was obtained from a Delphi panel, and costs from published sources.

RESULTS

First-line cure rate for linezolid-treated patients was 90.7% versus 85.5% for vancomycin; the total cure rates after two lines of treatment were 98.5% and 98.0%, respectively. The average total cost was 7,778euro for linezolid versus 8,777euro for vancomycin. The mean estimated length of hospitalization after two lines of treatment was 10.7 days for linezolid versus 13.3 days for vancomycin. The increased effectiveness and reduced cost lead to more frequent prescription. This did not change after one-way sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

Linezolid may be considered as a cost-effective treatment for patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections suspected to be MRSA related in France.

Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin for hospitalised patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections in Germany

This study used a decision analytic model approach to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin in the empirical treatment of complicated skin and soft-tissue infection (cSSTI) due to suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from the German hospital and health care system perspective. Clinical probabilities were obtained from trial data, resource utilisation and MRSA prevalence rates were obtained through German physician interviews, and costs from published sources were applied to resource units. Outcomes included total cost/patient and cure. The estimated first-line cure rate for linezolid-treated patients was 90.1% versus 85.5% for vancomycin; total cure rates after two lines of treatment were 98.4% and 98.1%, respectively. Average total cost/episode was 8,232 euro for linezolid versus 9,206 euro for vancomycin. The model outcomes were sensitive to changes in length of stay (LOS), isolation days, rate of confirmed MRSA and price of linezolid. Linezolid was expected to result in a shorter intravenous treatment duration and shorter LOS that offset its higher acquisition cost versus vancomycin in cSSTI in Germany.

Epidemiology and antibiotic susceptibility of bacteria causing skin and soft tissue infections in the USA and Europe: a guide to appropriate antimicrobial therapy

Susceptibility data for all organisms associated with a range of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) in hospitalised patients were studied. Data were reported by clinical laboratories in the USA, France, Germany, Italy and Spain during 2001 which participate in The Surveillance Network (TSN). Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus spp. and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS), Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were the most prevalent pathogens in all countries. MRSA was detected in 44.4, 34.7, 12.4, 41.8 and 32. 4% of S. aureus in each country, respectively. The majority of MRSA were cross resistant to other compound classes tested except for vancomycin (100% susceptible) trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole with range 1.7% (France) to 15.9% (Italy) resistant, and gentamicin with range 12.2% (France) to 87.0% (Italy) resistant. More than 99.0% of MSSA tested susceptible to ceftriaxone and >94.9% to trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole. 87.2% (France) to 94.6% of MSSA (Germany) were ciprofloxacin susceptible; 73.2% (USA) to 86.6% (Spain) were erythromycin susceptible; 85.4% (Italy) to 99.2% (France) were gentamicin susceptible. MSSA were more frequently found and generally more antibiotic susceptible from out patients. Overall, 100% of Streptococcus agalactiae and Streptococcus pyogenes were susceptible to penicillin, ceftriaxone and cefotaxime. Macrolide resistance was common among S. agalactiae (20.7%, Germany to 10%, Italy and Spain), S. pyogenes (19.2%, France to 11.1%, USA) and viridans streptococci (25.7%, France to 14.1%, Germany). Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp. were uncommon outside the USA (17.5%) and Italy (7.4%). For all countries susceptibility of E. coli was 100% to imipenem, >98.7% to amikacin, >96.0% to ceftriaxone and cefotaxime. Susceptibility of E. coli isolates to ciprofloxacin was 77.6% in Spain to 94.3% in Germany. Klebsiella spp., Proteus spp., Citrobacter spp. and Enterobacter spp. displayed varying susceptibilities between countries to drugs tested. Putative extended spectrum beta-lactamase expression in E. coli remained rare comprising 4-5% of isolates in USA, Italy and Spain and in France and Germany <2%. For P. aeruginosa piperacillin-tazobactam, amikacin, imipenem and ceftazidime were the most active compounds tested irrespective of region. Surveillance data should be considered when selecting empirical therapy for treating SSTI.

Increasing incidence of acute hepatitis B virus infection referrals to the Aberdeen Infection Unit: a matter for concern

OBJECTIVES

To assess the epidemiology and clinical outcomes of acute hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections presenting to a regional Infection Unit over a ten year period--with reference to the issues of injection drug use and strategies aimed at reducing transmission, notably needle exchange and immunisation programmes.

METHODS

A retrospective casenote review of all patients with acute HBV managed at the Infection Unit in Aberdeen between 1991-2000.

RESULTS

One hundred and nineteen (119) patients with acute HBV infection were managed during the period of review. The annual number of patients increased from a mean of 3.3/year during the years 1991-96 to 46 in 2000. The risk factors associated with HBV infection were being an injection drug user (IDU) in 57 (47.9%), heterosexual sex in 22 (18.5%), sex with an IDU in 4 (3.4%), men who had sex with men in 10 (8.4%), tattooing in 1 (0.8%), a needle stick injury in 1 (0.8%), trauma 1 (0.8%) and unknown in 23 (19.3%). Many of these patients had "dabbled" in drug use. Thirty-one (54.4%) of the IDU patients had previously been hospitalised with drug-related medical problems. Eighteen (31.6%) of the IDUs were receiving methadone at the time of presentation.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an epidemic of HBV infection in the Grampian region of Scotland currently. Forty-six (65.7%) of the 70 infected patients diagnosed during 2000 were seen at the Infection Unit. The remainder had mild or asymptomatic disease and were managed in the community. This epidemic has occurred despite extensive use of local needle exchange facilities and might reflect missed opportunities to immunise IDUs against HBV infection. A co-ordinated approach is now in place to immunise IDUs and other high-risk groups, but the use of universal immunisation demands consideration.

The use of adult isolation facilities in a UK infectious diseases unit

The emergence and re-emergence of communicable infections, especially those due to antibiotic resistant nosocomial pathogens, is likely to increase the burden on the limited isolation facilities of the UK. It was our perception, however, that isolation beds are not always used optimally; with patients requiring isolation sometimes being housed in open-bay beds, whilst other non-communicable patients are unnecessarily isolated. The main aim of this study was to test this hypothesis in a regional infectious diseases (ID) unit. A secondary aim was to provide useful data in the development of guidelines for the admission of patients to the new Dundee ID unit. One-third of patients (32% of all patients and 34% of total bed days) admitted to an isolation room in the current Dundee ID unit over a four-month period, were found to have low-risk or non-communicable conditions. In addition, 21 patients initially considered an infection risk, used 102 bed days following resolution of their infection. Evidence for the presence of patients with 'alert' infections housed in the open-bay beds of other wards, whilst low-risk or non-communicable patients are unnecessarily exposed to isolation in the ID unit, is presented. The findings suggest suboptimal use of the current Tayside University Hospitals' isolation facilities. Given the likelihood of high demand for the isolation of patients in the new Dundee ID unit, it is vital that these facilities are used appropriately, thereby minimizing the risk of nosocomial infection transmission and the unnecessary isolation of low-risk patients.

Economic evaluation of linezolid, flucloxacillin and vancomycin in the empirical treatment of cellulitis in UK hospitals: a decision analytical model

Standard antibiotic treatment of infections has become more difficult and costly due to treatment failure associated with the rise in bacterial resistance. New antibiotics that can overcome such resistant pathogens have the potential for great clinical and economic impact. Linezolid is a new antibiotic that is effective in the treatment of both antibiotic-susceptible and antibiotic-resistant Gram-positive bacterial infections, including those resistant to other available antibiotics. This breadth of activity is unique in existing antibiotics for Gram-positive bacteria and serves as the rationale for exploring the hypothesis that linezolid is an appropriate choice when considering empirical treatment of cellulitis in complicated or compromised patients in the nosocomial setting. A decision-modelling approach was used to compare the predicted first-line treatment efficacy and direct medical costs of linezolid with standard treatment of cellulitis among hospitalized patients. For the purposes of this analysis, standard care is defined along two main pathways: (1) initiating care with intravenous (iv) flucloxacillin, switching to vancomycin if the pathogen is found to be resistant to flucloxacillin, or maintaining flucloxacillin if the pathogen is found susceptible, or when culture and sensitivity analysis is inconclusive; or (2) initiating care with vancomycin, switching to iv flucloxacillin if the pathogen is found susceptible to flucloxacillin, maintaining vancomycin if the infection is found resistant, or when culture and sensitivity are inconclusive. For those patients taking iv flucloxacillin, a switch to oral flucloxacillin was allowed when clinically appropriate. We hypothesized that the cost of care of initiating treatment with linezolid would be less than that for both vancomycin and flucloxacillin in resistance risk ranges typically encountered in UK hospitals. In addition, while the registration trials showed equivalence of linezolid with the comparators in known or suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and in known or suspected methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) (vancomycin and oxacillin) respectively, we hypothesized that first-line success rates would be higher in empiric treatment with linezolid. Efficacy data were obtained from recent clinical trials with linezolid and standard treatment, and medical resource utilization was obtained from an expert panel of clinicians who were questioned regarding resistant and susceptible infections separately. UK hospital direct medical costs of treatment were determined using standard costing techniques. Base case analyses assumed a residual 80% unknown pathogen rate after culture and susceptibility based on a physician survey and supported in the literature. The analysis in this model predicts that initiating empirical treatment of cellulitis with linezolid will (1) result in higher overall success rates than flucloxacillin for first-line treatment, regardless of resistance risk and (2) be less costly than initiating treatment with flucloxacillin when the likelihood of a patient being infected by a resistant pathogen is greater than 24.1%. Furthermore, initiating treatment with linezolid is predicted to result in higher overall success rates and be less costly than vancomycin across the entire spectrum of the patients' risk of being infected by a resistant pathogen.

Presenting clinical features and C-reactive protein in the prediction of a positive stool culture in patients with diarrhoea

OBJECTIVES

To devise a scoring system by which clinical features and C-reactive protein (CRP) can be used to predict a positive stool culture in patients admitted with acute diarrhoea.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty-two patients admitted to the Regional Infection Unit with diarrhoea thought to be due to bacterial gastroenteritis were included. Clinical features, CRP and outcome of stool culture were recorded, together with the final diagnosis.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients had bacterial gastroenteritis characterized by the isolation of a bacterial enteropath (BGE). Sixty-three patients had non-specific gastroenteritis, defined as more than three loose stools per day with no bacterial enteropath isolated (NSGE). In 28 patients another diagnosis was made (Others). More of the patients with BGE (91%) had abdominal pain as compared with those with NSGE (67%) and Others (61%) (P=0.01). The mean duration of symptoms was longer in the Others group (6.14 days) as compared with patients with BGE (3.29) and NSGE (3.25) (P=0.01). The mean CRP was significantly higher in those with BGE (113.9mg/l) and Others (116.9mg/l) as compared to the NSGE patients (38.9mg/l) (P=0.001). A scoring system was devised which incorporated the presence or absence of abdominal pain (+10 or 0), the duration of symptoms (-10, for 5 or more days, 0 for less than 5 days of symptoms) and the CRP (CRP<50=0, CRP>50=5). A score of 15 or more predicted 79% of patients with BGE, while a score of <15 predicted 87% of those with NSGE and 86% of those with another diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This simple scoring system may be useful in predicting the positivity of stool culture, and therefore may be helpful in targeting those small number of patients who require antimicrobial therapy after hospital admission. We would not, however, favour reliance on this scoring system alone to choose whom to treat with antimicrobials.