A pilot study on the efficacy of escalating dosage of alpha-interferon for chronic hepatitis C in HIV-infected patients. The Hepatitis/HIV Spanish Study Group

Hepatitis C viral kinetics during treatment with peg IFN-alpha-2b in HIV/HCV coinfected patients as a function of baseline CD4+ T-cell counts

BACKGROUND

HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfected patients are known to have lower sustained viral response (SVR) rates than HCV monoinfected patients. However, the role of CD4+ T-cell counts on viral kinetics and outcome is not fully understood.

METHODS

HCV RNA kinetics (bDNA v3, lower limit of detection [LD] = 615 IU/mL) was analyzed in 32 HIV/HCV coinfected persons treated with Pegylated-interferon-alpha2b (1.5 microg/kg weekly) and ribavirin (1-1.2 g daily) for 48 weeks and compared with results obtained from 12 HCV monoinfected patients treated with the same regimen.

RESULTS

Baseline CD4+ T-cell counts > or =450 cells/mm3 were significantly (P < 0.002) associated with SVR in coinfected genotype 1 patients. First phase decline was significantly lower among patients with low as compared with high CD4 counts (P < 0.03) and among coinfected compared with monoinfected patients (P < 0.002). Second phase decline slope showed a similar trend for coinfected patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Low baseline CD4+ T-cell count is associated with slower HCV viral kinetics and worse response to treatment among HIV coinfected patients, suggesting HCV treatment response depends on immune status. HCV genotype 1 coinfected patients have slower first phase viral kinetics than HCV monoinfected patients. First phase viral decline (>1.0 log) and second phase viral decline slope (>0.3 log/wk) are excellent predictors of SVR for coinfected patients.

Reduction in liver-related hospital admissions and deaths in HIV-infected patients since the year 2002

Since the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), complications of chronic liver disease (CLD) have emerged as one of the leading causes of hospital admission and death among HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) and/or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections. The impact of CLD on hospital admissions and deaths in HIV-infected patients attended at one reference HIV hospital in Madrid during the last 9 years was analysed. All clinical charts from January 1996 to December 2004 were retrospectively examined. Demographics, discharge diagnosis, complications during inhospital stay and causes of death were recorded. A total of 2527 hospital admissions in 2008 distinct HIV-infected persons were recorded. Overall, 84% were iv drug users; mean age was 37 years and the mean CD4 count was 224 cells/muL. Both mean age and CD4 count significantly increased during the study period (P < 0.01). Overall, 42% of hospitalized patients were on antiretroviral therapy. Decompensated CLD was the cause of admission and/or developed during hospitalization in 345 patients (14%). Admissions caused by decompensated CLD increased significantly from 9.1% (30/329) in 1996 to 26% (78/294) in 2002. A significant steady decline occurred since then, being 11% (29/253) in the year 2004. Similarly, inhospital liver-related deaths were 9% (5/54) in 1996, peaked to 59% (10/17) in 2001 and declined to 20% (3/15) in the year 2004. Chronic hepatitis C was responsible for admissions and/or deaths in 73.5% of CLD cases. In conclusion, the rate of liver-related hospital admissions and deaths among HIV-infected patients peaked in the year 2002 and has steadily declined since then. A slower progression to liver cirrhosis in patients on HAART, avoidance of hepatotoxic antiretroviral drugs and more frequent use of anti-HCV therapy in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients could account for this benefit.

Response to Interferon-Based Therapies in HIV-Infected Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Due to Genotype 4

Background

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype is the main predictor of response to interferon (IFN)-based therapies. HCV genotype 4 is spreading among European intravenous drug users, who are frequently coinfected with HIV. Information about treatment response in this subset of patients is scarce and conflicting results have been reported.

Methods

All HIV-infected patients treated for chronic hepatitis C at our institution with a minimum follow-up of 6 months after discontinuing therapy were retrospectively analysed. They had received one of three HCV treatment modalities: IFN monotherapy, IFN plus ribavirin (RBV) or pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus RBV. Treatment responses were stratified according to HCV genotype.

Results

A total of 390 patients were analysed. Sustained virological response (SVR) to HCV therapy had been reached by 90 (23.1%): 22/119 (18.5%) with IFN monotherapy; 17/106 (16%) with IFN plus RBV; and 51/165 (30.9%) with PEG-IFN plus RBV. SVR was significantly higher among those with HCV genotypes 2 or 3 (40.4%; 61/151) than in patients with either HCV genotype 1 (11.2%; 22/197) or HCV genotype 4 (16.7%; 7/42) ( P<0.0001). In contrast, there were no significant differences in the response rate comparing HCV genotypes 1 and 4 ( P=0.53).

Conclusions

Response to IFN-based therapies in HIV-positive patients with hepatitis C due to HCV genotype 4 is poor, similar to that obtained for HCV genotype 1 and much lower than for HCV genotypes 2 and 3. Therefore, HIV-infected patients with hepatitis C due to genotype 4 should be considered as a particular subset of difficult-to-treat patients. New treatment strategies and drugs for these patients are eagerly awaited.

Long-term follow-up of HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection treated with interferon-based therapies

BACKGROUND

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is frequent among HIV-infected patients. Clearance of serum HCV RNA 6 months after discontinuing HCV therapy is generally interpreted as a cure of HCV infection in HIV-negative subjects. However, the occurrence of liver complications (including hepatocellular carcinoma) and/or HCV relapses in coinfected patients when followed for long periods of time after HCV therapy is not well known.

METHODS

All HIV-infected patients who had been treated for chronic hepatitis C at our institution and had a minimum follow-up of 6 months after discontinuing therapy were retrospectively analysed. They had received one of three HCV treatment modalities: IFN monotherapy, IFN plus ribavirin (RBV) or pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus RBV.

RESULTS

A total of 351 patients were retrospectively analysed. Sustained virological response (SVR) to HCV therapy had been reached by 77 (22%) of them: 22/119 (18.5%) with IFN monotherapy, 17/106 (16%) with IFN plus RBV and 38/126 (30.2%) with PEG-IFN plus RBV. Considering the HCV genotypes, SVR had been reached by 19/184 (10.3%) of patients with genotype 1, 54/138 (39.1%) with genotypes 2 or 3, and 4/29 (13.8%) of those with genotype 4. Within a total of 4466 patient-months follow-up (mean of 58 months), none of the 77 patients with SVR showed HCV-RNA rebounds, elevations in liver enzymes potentially linked to HCV, development of hepatocellular carcinoma or episodes of decompensated cirrhosis. In contrast, all 274 patients who did not reach SVR with HCV therapy showed evidence of persistent serum HCV RNA and 90% of them showed liver enzyme elevations during a total of 15344 patient-months follow-up (mean of 56 months). Moreover, 11 (4%) developed clinical complications of liver cirrhosis and two of them died of end-stage liver disease.

CONCLUSIONS

HCV replication and HCV-related liver disease seem to be permanently halted in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients showing HCV-RNA clearance 6 months after completing any kind of IFN-based therapy. In contrast, complications of liver disease due to persistent HCV infection continue to occur in non-responders. The role of maintenance HCV therapy should be explored in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients.

Treatment of hepatitis C virus in the coinfected patient

Since hepatitis C virus (HCV) was first identified in 1989, the impact of HCV infection on the HIV-infected population has been steadily increasing. It is now known that HCV affects the course and treatment of HIV disease in coinfected individuals (those infected with both HCV and HIV). Although there are significant data regarding the treatment of HCV in non-coinfected individuals, there are numerous questions that still remain regarding how to monitor and treat HCV infection in the coinfected population. This article reviews the available data regarding treatment of HCV in the coinfected population as well as how these individuals should be monitored, before and during HCV therapy, as well as how to address the numerous side effects associated with HCV treatment. To meet the demands of the coinfected population. HIV nurses must be willing to expand their knowledge to support, educate, assess, and advocate for coinfected individuals.

Clinical experiences with interferon as monotherapy or in combination with ribavirin in patients co-infected with HIV and HCV

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) co-infection accelerates progression of hepatitis C virus (HCV) toward cirrhosis. Thus, with the increase of life expectancy observed after introduction of combination antiretroviral treatment, liver disease is becoming an increasing cause of morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected patients. In addition, HCV co-infection blunts CD4 restoration induced by HAART and increases HAART hepatotoxicity. For all these reasons, anti-HCV treatment is mandatory in HIV seropositives. The perfect treatment of hepatitis C should not only be safe and effective, but it should not have any adverse impact on HIV diseases and concurrent anti-HIV therapy. Two drugs are currently licensed for treatment of HCV: interferon alfa (IFNalpha) and ribavirin. Three hundred and thirty-eight patients have been included in pilot studies on the efficacy and tolerability of IFNalpha monotherapy: 16% showed sustained response and 10% dropped out. No significant adverse impact of IFNalpha monotherapy on HIV diseases or antiretroviral treatment has been observed. IFNalpha and ribavirin in combination have been introduced more recently: only 88 patients were included in pilot studies published as full papers with a 25% sustained response and an 11% rate of drop outs. Anemia and cumulative toxicity with didanosine were the most important side effects of combination treatment, but it did not affect HIV disease progression. Higher rates of sustained response (33%) without increase of side effects have been observed in preliminary experiences with the new long-acting pegylated interferons in combination with ribavirin. The search for the perfect treatment continues.

Management of hepatitis C in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients

Hepatitis C virus-related liver disease and its associated complications are steadily emerging health concerns in persons co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus. The increasing number of liver-related deaths in human immunodeficiency virus-hepatitis C virus co-infected individuals supports the compelling argument for more aggressive treatment in these patients. The safety and efficacy of interferon/ribavirin in human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus co-infected patients is currently under evaluation. Despite well-documented concern over highly active antiretroviral therapy-associated hepatotoxicity human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus co-infected patients should be offered antiretroviral therapy. Since management of co-infected patients is complex a multidisciplinary approach is needed in order to facilitate care and help patients to achieve a positive outcome.

Management of chronic viral hepatitis in HIV-infected patients: Spanish Consensus Conference. October 2000

Co-infection by human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B and C viruses is quite common because they share similar routes of transmission. The introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy has significantly improved the life expectancy of HIV-infected patients in the last few years. However, chronic viral hepatitis represents an emerging cause of morbidity and mortality in this population, either as a result of end-stage liver disease or as a consequence of hepatotoxicity induced by antiretroviral drugs. The main goal of the Consensus Conference was to establish specific recommendations for the management of chronic viral hepatitis B and C in HIV-infected patients. The role of orthotopic liver transplantation for co-infected individuals with end-stage liver disease was also assessed.

Hepatitis C in HIV-infected patients--therapeutic approach

The use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has extended the lifespan of patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). As the prognosis of HIV infection has improved, liver disease associated with hepatitis C virus (HCV) has become clinically significant in patients with HIV, liver failure being a frequent cause of death in this population. HIV infection may accelerate the course of liver disease in patients co-infected with HCV, so infection with HCV should be treated like any other opportunistic disease in these patients. Nowadays, combination therapy with interferon-alpha and ribavirin is the standard treatment for chronic hepatitis C in HIV-negative patients. Preliminary results of combination therapy in HIV/HCV co-infected patients have been promising, showing a sustained response rate in 40% of these patients. Patients with higher CD4 counts and lower HCV/HIV viral load and those infected with HCV genotype 3a have a better response to therapy. Potential drug interactions between HAART therapy and interferon and ribavirin treatment emphasize the importance of initiating treatment of HCV infection in HIV-positive individuals as soon as possible and ideally before the need for anti-HIV therapy. Recent case reports have suggested that liver transplantation might be an appropriate procedure in HIV patients with undetectable HIV viral load, high CD4 counts and HCV advanced liver disease. However, the limited amount of available information and the complexities of drug interactions between HAART therapy and immunosuppressive drugs oblige us to be prudent within considering such a procedure.