Clinical features of dysthymia and age: a clinical investigation

Antidepressant use, depressive symptoms, and incident frailty in women aged 65 and older from the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study

OBJECTIVES

To examine the associations between depressive symptoms, antidepressant use, and duration of use with incident frailty 3 years later in nonfrail women aged 65 and older.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study (WHI-OS), a prospective cohort study.

SETTING

WHI-OS was conducted in 40 U.S. clinical centers.

PARTICIPANTS

Women aged 65 to 79, not frail at baseline.

MEASUREMENTS

Antidepressant use was assessed through medication container inspection at baseline. Four groups were created according to baseline use and Burnam depression screen (range 0-1, 0.06 cutoff): antidepressant nonusers without depressive symptoms (reference group), antidepressant nonusers with depressive symptoms, antidepressant users without depressive symptoms, and antidepressant users with depressive symptoms. Frailty components included slowness or weakness, exhaustion, low physical activity, and unintended weight loss, ascertained through self-report and physical measurements at baseline and Year 3.

RESULTS

Of 27,652 women at baseline, 1,350 (4.9%) were antidepressant users and 1,794 (6.5%) were categorized as depressed. At Year 3, 4,125 (14.9%) were frail. All groups had a greater risk of incident frailty than the reference group. Odds ratios (ORs) ranged from 1.73 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.41-2.12) in antidepressant users who were not depressed to 3.63 in antidepressant users who were depressed (95% CI = 2.37-5.55). All durations of use were associated with incident frailty (<1 year OR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.41-2.68; 1-3 years OR = 1.99, 95% CI = 1.45-2.74; >3 years OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.20-2.14).

CONCLUSION

In older adult women, depressive symptoms and antidepressant use were associated with frailty after 3 years of follow-up.

Evidence-based practice guideline: wheelchair biking for the treatment of depression

Depression is a problem that will continue to burden older adults and challenge health care providers. Failing to recognize and effectively treat depression in institutionalized older adults is sanctioning these members of society to live their final years in despair and emotional suffering. The wheelchair biking program described in this evidence-based practice guideline provides a refreshing, safe, innovative tool to address depression and improve quality of life in older adults.

The impact of comorbid dysthymic disorder on outcome in personality disorders

OBJECTIVE

The goal of our study was to investigate the impact of dysthymic disorder (DD), a form of chronic depression, on naturalistic outcome in individuals with personality disorders (PDs).

METHOD

The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study is a cohort initially including 573 subjects with 4 targeted PDs (borderline, avoidant, schizotypal, and obsessive-compulsive) and 95 subjects with major depression but no PD. At baseline, 115 subjects were diagnosed with coexisting DD, of whom 109 (94.8%) were PD subjects. Regression analyses were performed to predict 3 classes of broad clinical outcome after 2 years of prospective follow-up. We hypothesized that DD diagnosis at baseline would be associated with worse outcome on (1) persistence of a PD diagnosis, (2) impairment in psychosocial functioning (as measured by the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation), and (3) crisis-related treatment utilization.

RESULTS

Baseline DD diagnosis was associated with persistence of PD diagnosis at 2 years, particularly for borderline and avoidant PDs. It was associated with worse outcome on global social adjustment, life satisfaction, recreation, and friendships, but not employment or relationship with spouse. Contrary to expectation, DD did not increase suicide attempts, emergency room visits, or psychiatric hospitalizations.

CONCLUSIONS

Comorbidity of DD is associated with persistence of PD diagnosis and with worse outcome on many, but not all, measures of psychosocial functioning.

Antidepressant use in nonmajor depression: secondary analysis of a program to encourage active, rewarding lives for seniors (PEARLS), a randomized controlled trial in older adults from 2000 to 2003

BACKGROUND

It is estimated that major depressive disorder affects 0.9% of community-dwelling older adults in the United States. However, as many as 18% of older US adults reportedly suffer from depressive symptoms that do not necessarily fit the criteria for major depressive disorder (eg, dysthmia, minor depression).

OBJECTIVES

The goals of this study were to describe patterns of antidepressant medication use in older adults with dysthymia or minor depression and to examine factors associated with the use of antidepressants at baseline.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis using cross-sectional data collected during a randomized controlled trial conducted from 2000 through 2003. It involved community senior service agencies and in-home visits in Seattle, Washington. Adults aged >or=60 years who had minor depression or dysthymia and were receiving services through community senior service agencies or living in senior public housing were included. Study participants were classified as users or nonusers of antidepressants. Prescription medication use in the past 2 weeks was assessed at baseline and 6 and 12 months. Medication name, dose, and directions were recorded from the medication label. Logistic regression was used to examine variables associated with baseline antidepressant use.

RESULTS

A total of 138 patients (mean age, 73.00 years) were included; the majority of study participants were female (779.00%). Overall, 42.33% were nonwhite (34.3% black, 4.4% Asian, 1.5% American Indian/Alaskan Native, 0.7% Hispanic, and 1.5% other). At baseline, 36.2% of study participants (n = 50) were using antidepressants. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were the most common class of antidepressants, used by 62.00%, 70.22%, and 71.11% of antidepressant users at baseline, 6, and 12 months, respectively. However, nortriptyline was the most common antidepressant at baseline, taken by 20.00% of antidepressant users. Use of other prescription medications was associated with antidepressant use at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

We found antidepressant use to be low in these relatively poor, community-dwelling, ethnically diverse older adults with dysthymia and minor depression in 2000 through 2003, with 36.22% of participants using antidepressants at baseline. Antidepressant users were more likely to be taking other prescription medications than nonusers.

The course of depressive symptoms in older adults with comorbid major depression and dysthymia

OBJECTIVE

To examine the course of depressive symptoms in older patients with comorbid major depression and dysthymia.

DESIGN

Secondary data analysis using both proportional hazards modeling and a repeated measures mixed model.

SETTING

Clinical Research Center for the Study of Depression in Later Life conducted at Duke University.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred fifty inpatients and outpatients age 60 and older with major depression enrolled in a naturalistic treatment study and followed up for 10 years.

MEASUREMENTS

The Diagnostic Interview Schedule was used to confirm a clinical diagnosis of major depression and to identify patients with comorbid dysthymia at the time of study enrollment. Patients were administered the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) every 3 months. For the proportional hazards models, partial remission was defined as a MADRS score <16 and full remission as a score <7.

RESULTS

A total of 34.8% of the patients had comorbid major depression and dysthymia at baseline enrollment. Compared with those with major depression alone, they had longer time to both partial (median number of days = 175 versus 106) and full remission (median number of days = 433 versus 244) from major depression. In the repeated measures mixed model predicting MADRS score over 3 years of follow-up and controlling for the effects of potential confounders, the effect of having comorbid dysthymia was not consistent over time, with patients with both disorders having higher predicted scores after initial response.

CONCLUSIONS

Older patients with comorbid major depression and dysthymia have a less favorable trajectory of recovery compared with those with major depression alone.