External glycopeptide binding to MHC class-I in relation to expression of TAP transporters, beta 2-microglobulin and to pH

Does Antigen Glycosylation Impact the HIV-Specific T Cell Immunity?

It is largely unknown how post-translational protein modifications, including glycosylation, impacts recognition of self and non-self T cell epitopes presented by HLA molecules. Data in the literature indicate that O- and N-linked glycosylation can survive epitope processing and influence antigen presentation and T cell recognition. In this perspective, we hypothesize that glycosylation of viral proteins and processed epitopes contribute to the T cell response to HIV. Although there is some evidence for T cell responses to glycosylated epitopes (glyco-epitopes) during viral infections in the literature, this aspect has been largely neglected for HIV. To explore the role of glyco-epitope specific T cell responses in HIV infection we conducted in silico and ex vivo immune studies in individuals with chronic HIV infection. We found that in silico viral protein segments with potentially glycosylable epitopes were less frequently targeted by T cells. Ex vivo synthetically added glycosylation moieties generally masked T cell recognition of HIV derived peptides. Nonetheless, in some cases, addition of simple glycosylation moieties produced neo-epitopes that were recognized by T cells from HIV infected individuals. Herein, we discuss the potential importance of these observations and compare limitations of the employed technology with new methodologies that may have the potential to provide a more accurate assessment of glyco-epitope specific T cell immunity. Overall, this perspective is aimed to support future research on T cells recognizing glycosylated epitopes in order to expand our understanding on how glycosylation of viral proteins could alter host T cell immunity against viral infections.

Immunotherapy as an Antifungal Strategy in Immune Compromised Hosts

Purpose of Review

IFIs cause high morbidity and mortality in the immunocompromised host worldwide. Although highly effective, conventional antifungal chemotherapy faces new challenges due to late diagnosis and increasing numbers of drug-resistant fungal strains. Thus, antifungal immunotherapy represents a viable treatment option, and recent advances in the field are summarized in this review.

Recent Findings

Antifungal immunotherapies include application of immune cells as well as the administration of cytokines, growth factors, and antibodies. Novel strategies to treat IFIs in the immunocompromised host target intracellular signaling pathways using SMTs such as checkpoint inhibitors.

Summary

Studies using cytokines or chemokines exerted a potential adjuvant role to conventional antifungal therapy, but issues on toxicity for some agents have to be resolved. Cell-based immunotherapies are very labor-intense and costly, but NK cell transfer and CAR T cell therapy provide exciting strategies to combat IFIs. Antibody-mediated protection and checkpoint inhibition are additional novel immunotherapeutic approaches.

Processing of exogenous antigens for presentation by class I MHC molecules involves post-Golgi peptide exchange influenced by peptide-MHC complex stability and acidic pH

Vacuolar alternate class I MHC (MHC-I) Ag processing allows presentation of exogenous Ag by MHC-I molecules with binding of antigenic peptides to post-Golgi MHC-I molecules. We investigated the role of previously bound peptides and their dissociation in generating peptide-receptive MHC-I molecules. TAP1-knockout macrophages were incubated overnight with an initial exogenous peptide, producing a large cohort of peptide-K(b) complexes that could influence subsequent peptide dissociation/exchange. Initial incubation with FAPGNYPAL, KVVRFDKL, or RGYVYQGL enhanced rather than reduced subsequent binding and presentation of a readout peptide (SIINFEKL or FAPGNYPAL) to T cells. Thus, K(b) molecules may be stabilized by an initial (stabilizing) peptide, enhancing their ability to bind readout peptide and implicating peptide dissociation/exchange. In contrast, incubation with SIINFEKL as stabilizing peptide reduced presentation of readout peptide. SIINFEKL-K(b) complexes were more stable than other peptide-K(b) complexes, which may limit their contribution to peptide exchange. Stabilizing peptides (FAPGNYPAL, KVVRFDKL, or RGYVYQGL) enhanced alternate MHC-I processing of HB101.Crl-OVA (Escherichia coli expressing an OVA fusion protein), indicating that alternate MHC-I Ag processing involves peptide dissociation/exchange. Stabilizing peptide enhanced processing of HB101.Crl-OVA more than presentation of exogenous OVA peptide (SIINFEKL), suggesting that peptide dissociation/exchange may be enhanced in the acidic phagosomal processing environment. Furthermore, exposure of cells to acidic pH increased subsequent binding and presentation of readout peptide. Thus, peptide dissociation/exchange contributes to alternate MHC-I Ag processing and may be influenced by both stability of peptide-MHC-I complexes and pH.