Cytogenetic report of a male breast cancer

Chromosome alterations associated with positive and negative lymph node involvement in breast cancer

Genetic heterogeneity is high in breast cancer, and hence it is difficult to link a specific chromosome alteration to a specific clinicopathologic feature. We examined clonal chromosome alterations in 45 breast carcinomas and statistically correlated the findings with clinical-histopathological parameters of the patients. The most common abnormalities were losses of chromosomes 19, 22, 21, X, and 17 and gains of chromosomes 9 and 18. A statistically significant correlation was found between clonal aberrations in chromosomes 17, 20, and 21 and positive lymph node involvement (LN+) and between clonal aberrations in chromosomes X and 6 and negative involvement (LN-). The average number of chromosome abnormalities was the same for both LN- and LN+ groups, and numerical and structural alterations were equally distributed. The mean number of chromosome aberrations did not differ significantly among tumor grades, but when aberrations were analyzed as monosomies, trisomies, and structural aberrations, a heterogeneous distribution was observed. Further cytogenetic investigation of breast tumors and their variable pathological features is undoubtedly necessary. The recognition and ultimately the molecular understanding of these abnormalities may improve breast cancer taxonomy and provide important prognostic information for both the patient and clinician.

Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of benign and invasive male breast neoplasms

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analysis was performed for the identification of chromosomal imbalances in two benign gynecomastias and one malignant breast carcinoma derived from patients with male breast disease and compared with cytogenetic analysis in two of the three cases. CGH analysis demonstrated overrepresentation of 8q in all three cases. One case of gynecomastia presented gain of 1p34.3 through pter, 11p14 through q12, and 17p11.2 through qter, and loss of 1q41 through qter and 4q33 through qter. The other gynecomastia presented del(1)(q41) as detected by both cytogenetic and CGH analysis. CGH analysis of the invasive ductal carcinoma confirmed a gain of 17p11.2 through qter previously detected by cytogenetic analysis. These regions showed some similarity in their pattern of imbalance to the chromosomal alterations described in female and male breast cancer.

Comprehensive cytogenetic evaluation of a mature ovarian teratoma case

Mature ovarian teratomas are benign ovarian germ cell tumors that usually present with a normal karyotype. There are very few reports describing chromosomal abnormalities in these tumors, none of which are recurrent. In this study we report on a mature teratoma case with clonal chromosomal alterations which include monosomies of chromosomes 6, 14, 16, and 21; trisomies of chromosomes 14 and 21; and deletions of Xq, 5p, 16p, and 17p. Comparative genomic hybridization evaluation of the sample revealed a normal profile. These findings are discussed together with the cytogenetic reports on other cases of ovarian teratomas described in the literature.

Karyotypic findings in two cases of male breast cancer

Male breast cancer is uncommon; so far, only 10 cases with chromosome banding analysis have been published. We report the cytogenetic findings of two invasive breast cancers in two Caucasian men lacking a history of familial breast cancer and more than 70 years of age. Both had ductal carcinomas with lymphangiosis carcinomatosa and positive lymph nodes at diagnosis. Strong expression of estrogen receptor, weak expression of progesterone receptor, and lack of expression of androgen receptor by both tumors were demonstrated by immunohistochemistry, as well as lack of expression of p53 and C-ERB-B-2. The karyotypes were 45 approximately 46,XY,-Y[4],-7[2],+8[2],t(8;12)(q21;q24)[3], del(9)(q22)[3],del(11)(p11p14)[5],del(18)(q21)[7], t(19;20)(p10;q10)[8] [cp13] and 61 approximately 69,XXXY,-Y[3], del(2)(p21)[4],del(3)(p22q26)[3],-4,-4[5],+5,+5[5], dic(5;11)(p14;q23)[3],del(6)(q23)[4],del(8)(p21)[3],-9[4],-11[4],+ i(12)(p10)[4],-16[3],del(17)([13)[5],del(18)(q21)[4],+19[5], +20[4][cp7], respectively. Although the available data on male breast cancer are still very limited, our findings confirm that gain of an X chromosome, loss of the Y chromosome, gain of chromosome 5, and loss of material from chromosomes 17 and 18 are nonrandom aberrations in male breast cancer. Trisomy 8, characteristic of ductal carcinomas, was found in one case.

Clonal karyotypic abnormalities in gynecomastia

Gynecomastia is a benign condition that frequently occurs in the male breast gland; however, the cytogenetic data on this entity are very limited. To our knowledge, three cases have been reported in the literature, and the only one with an abnormal karyotype had a concomitant breast carcinoma. In this study we report clonal chromosomal alterations in a gynecomastia sample without any signs of adjacent malignant tissue. The nonrandom abnormalities observed were a deletion of 12p, monosomies of chromosomes 9, 17, 19, and 20, and the presence of a marker chromosome. Most of these alterations have been previously described in the literature in other breast lesions, including benign and malignant (male and female) tumors, indicating their recurrence and nonrandomness in abnormal processes of the mammary gland.

Chromosome banding analysis of gynecomastias and breast carcinomas in men

Male breast cancer is 100 times less frequent than its female counterpart and accounts for less than 1% of all cancers in men. Although men with breast cancer also often have gynecomastia, it is still unknown whether gynecomastia per se predisposes the male breast to malignant disease. We describe the cytogenetic analysis of three gynecomastias and four breast cancers in men. No chromosome abnormalities were detected in two cases of gynecomastia, with no other concomitant breast disease. The third gynecomastia sample, taken from a site where a breast carcinoma had previously been removed, had a t(2;11)(p24;p13) as the sole chromosome change; this is the first time that an abnormal karyotype has been described in gynecomastia. All four cancers had clonal chromosome abnormalities. Several cytogenetically unrelated clones were found in the breast tumor and in a metastasis from case 1. In the carcinoma of case 2, a single abnormal clone was found, characterized by loss of the Y chromosome, monosomy 17, and a deletion of the long arm of chromosome 18. In the carcinoma of case 3, a clone with loss of the Y chromosome as the sole change dominated, accompanied by the gain of an X chromosome in a subclone. In the lymph node metastasis examined from case 4, a single clone carrying trisomies for chromosomes 5 and 16 was detected. Our findings, especially when collated with data on the six karyotypically abnormal breast carcinomas in men described previously, indicate that gain of the X chromosome, gain of chromosome 5, loss of the Y chromosome, loss of chromosome 17, and del(18)(q21) are nonrandom abnormalities in male breast carcinomas.

Cytogenetic evaluation of 20 primary breast carcinomas

Chromosome analysis was performed on samples from 20 Brazilian patients with breast cancer. All the samples were from untreated patients who presented the clinical symptoms for months or years before surgical intervention. Six cases showed axillary lymph node metastases. Clonal chromosome abnormalities were detected in all cases. The numerical alterations most frequently observed involved the loss of chromosomes X, 19, 20, and 22 followed by gain of chromosomes 9 and 8. Among the structural anomalies observed, there was preferential involvement of chromosomes 11, 6, 1, 7, 3, and 12, supporting previous reports that these chromosomes may harbour genes of importance in the development of breast tumors. Two cases with a family history of breast cancer had in common total or partial trisomy 1.

A subset of gestational trophoblastic disease characterized by abnormal chromosome 8 copy number detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization

The present paper describes the results of research conducted to ascertain whether the report by Mark et al. [1], describing the concurrence of congenital trisomy 8 mosaicism and gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) in a 42 year-old Gravida IV, Para IV patient was an isolated event. In contrast to other cases described in the literature, the patient described in Mark et al. [1] had no additional confounding chromosomal abnormalities other than trisomy 8. To the best of our knowledge, ours was the only reported case of constitutional trisomy 8 mosaicism associated with gestational trophoblastic disease, a rare gynecological disease entity. The question arises whether there exists a subset of patients with GTD characterized by an abnormal chromosome 8 copy number. The implicit hypothesis is that an abnormal number of chromosome 8 somehow predisposes to cancer. A pilot study of 10 cases of GTD was conducted using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and a commercial chromosome 8-specific alpha-satellite probe on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded patient tissues. Among eight informative cases successfully completed, two cases (25%) were found to be trisomic, when a cut-off point of 10% trisomic cells is adopted. Another two cases (25%) were found to be triploid. The results of our FISH study indicated that an abnormal chromosome 8 copy number found in Mark et al. [1] is unlikely to be an isolated event. Our data are consistent with the hypothesis that a subset of GTD indeed may exist which is characterized by more than two copies of chromosome 8. The present findings corroborate those recently found in breast, prostate, and other cancers.