Leptomeningeal metastasis from a paraspinal rhabdomyosarcoma with a der(13)t(1;13)(q23;q32) in a 14-month-old boy

Retroperitoneal alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma intruding into spinal canal: A case report and literature review

Background

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most frequent soft sarcoma in children and adolescents. Alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS) is a relatively rare subtype that is characterized by aggressive behavior and an unsatisfactory prognosis. An ARMS can arise anywhere but most commonly occurs at extremity sites with a very small fraction in the retroperitoneum. The utility of 2-Deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-D-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET/CT) remains to be established in ARMS.

Case Report

A 3-year-old female child was accidentally found with a large left upper abdominal mass for a day. CT examination indicated a huge soft tissue mass in the left retroperitoneum extending superiorly to the level of the left hilus renalis and inferiorly to the left acetabulum in the pelvic cavity, with intrusion into the lumbar foramens. 18F-FDG PET/CT found a mass in the left retroperitoneum from the level of T12 to the left acetabulum, with the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of about 7.0, and a CT value of about 39 HU, invading the left L3-5 intervertebral foramina and protruding into the spinal canal, with unclear boundary with the spinal cord. Retroperitoneal tumor resection and the repair operation of vascular exploration were performed. An ARMS was confirmed by postoperative biopsy, immunohistochemical staining, and genetic detection with the rupture of the fork head in rhabdomyosarcoma (FKHR). The patient received chemotherapy and was in a good condition with no recurrence and obvious complications.

Conclusion

Retroperitoneal ARMS is rare and indicates a poor outcome with the potential to involve vital organs and intrude into the spinal canal. Accurate diagnosis and staging using PET/CT would contribute to better risk stratifications and appropriate treatment individually.

Central nervous system relapse of rhabdomyosarcoma

PURPOSE

The optimal management of central nervous system (CNS) relapse of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is unclear. We examined diagnosis, management, and outcomes of patients with RMS developing CNS relapse.

METHODS

Records of 23 patients diagnosed with CNS relapse between 1999 and 2016 were reviewed. Median age at presentation of CNS relapse was 15 years (range, 1-34 years). High-risk features at initial presentation were as follows: 16 alveolar patients, 13 Stage IV, and 13 with primary tumor in parameningeal locations.

RESULTS

CNS relapse occurred at a median 12 months (range, 1-23 months) from diagnosis and most common presenting symptoms were headache (n = 9), nausea/vomiting (n = 8), visual difficulty (n = 5), and none (n = 5). Leptomeningeal metastases were detected in 21 patients while only 2 developed parenchymal metastases without leptomeningeal involvement. Fifteen patients received CNS-directed radiation therapy (RT), including craniospinal irradiation to a median 36 Gy (range, 18-36 Gy) and/or whole brain radiotherapy to a median 30 Gy (range, 6-41.4 Gy). Three patients received concurrent chemotherapy. Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging was conducted in 13 patients after RT initiation with 8 demonstrating improvement, 2 with stable disease, and 3 with progression. Twelve patients were tested for reactivity to I-131-labeled monoclonal antibody 8H9, and three tested positive and received at least one intra-Ommaya dose; all three lived >12 months post-CNS relapse. Twenty‐two patients died of CNS disease and one of treatment complications, with metastatic disease at other sites. Median survival post-CNS relapse was 5 months (range, 0.1-49 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis for patients with RMS developing CNS relapse remains poor. Treatment including CNS-directed RT should be considered and investigation into preventative therapies is warranted.

Central nervous system relapse of rhabdomyosarcoma

PURPOSE

The optimal management of central nervous system (CNS) relapse of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is unclear. We examined diagnosis, management, and outcomes of patients with RMS developing CNS relapse.

METHODS

Records of 23 patients diagnosed with CNS relapse between 1999 and 2016 were reviewed. Median age at presentation of CNS relapse was 15 years (range, 1-34 years). High-risk features at initial presentation were as follows: 16 alveolar patients, 13 Stage IV, and 13 with primary tumor in parameningeal locations.

RESULTS

CNS relapse occurred at a median 12 months (range, 1-23 months) from diagnosis and most common presenting symptoms were headache (n = 9), nausea/vomiting (n = 8), visual difficulty (n = 5), and none (n = 5). Leptomeningeal metastases were detected in 21 patients while only 2 developed parenchymal metastases without leptomeningeal involvement. Fifteen patients received CNS-directed radiation therapy (RT), including craniospinal irradiation to a median 36 Gy (range, 18-36 Gy) and/or whole brain radiotherapy to a median 30 Gy (range, 6-41.4 Gy). Three patients received concurrent chemotherapy. Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging was conducted in 13 patients after RT initiation with 8 demonstrating improvement, 2 with stable disease, and 3 with progression. Twelve patients were tested for reactivity to I-131-labeled monoclonal antibody 8H9, and three tested positive and received at least one intra-Ommaya dose; all three lived >12 months post-CNS relapse. Twenty‐two patients died of CNS disease and one of treatment complications, with metastatic disease at other sites. Median survival post-CNS relapse was 5 months (range, 0.1-49 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis for patients with RMS developing CNS relapse remains poor. Treatment including CNS-directed RT should be considered and investigation into preventative therapies is warranted.

Unusual leptomeningeal dissemination in a child with extracranial metastatic alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma

The authors describe a 6-year-old boy diagnosed with alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma located in the thigh, with distal metastases to lungs, bones, and bone marrow. A very good partial response to first-line chemotherapy was obtained, but the child developed fatal leptomeningeal dissemination immediately after complete resection of the primary tumor. This case demonstrates the rapidity with which leptomeningeal spread of extracranial metastatic alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma can occur and underscores the importance of diagnostic lumbar puncture and brain radiological investigations at diagnosis, even when the tumors are not in the parameningeal location.

Leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors (meningeal carcinomatosis)

Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are increasingly recognized as a devastating complication of solid tumors. Improved treatment of primary malignancy and advances in diagnostic imaging have led to an apparent increase in the number of patients diagnosed with LM. Unfortunately, therapeutic options remain limited. Radiotherapy is used to treat bulky tumor and provide symptomatic relief. Intrathecal chemotherapy benefits a selected subset of patients. The challenge to the future is to delineate the molecular mechanisms underlying LM and to develop novel therapeutic or prophylactic modalities to combat LM.

Rhabdomyosarcoma: cytogenetics of five cases using fine-needle aspiration samples and review of the literature

Cytogenetic analyses of fine-needle aspiration samples were performed on five cases of which three were alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas (RMS), one was embryonal RMS and one was RMS of mixed alveolar and embryonal histology. Three cases of alveolar RMS and one case of embryonal RMS showed t(2;13). A del(1)(p11) in a mixed alveolar and embryonal RMS was observed without the presence of t(2;13). add(17)(q25) was present in one of the alveolar RMS along with a t(2;13). Modal number of chromosome in the five cases ranged from hyperdiploid to hypertetraploid. Clinical, cytological, histopathological and cytogenetic findings are correlated. The role of additional abnormalities is discussed with a review of appropriate literature.

Routine brain imaging is unwarranted in asymptomatic patients with rhabdomyosarcoma arising outside of the head and neck region that is metastatic at diagnosis: a report from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group

BACKGROUND

To the authors' knowledge, the incidence of brain metastases at the time of diagnosis in children with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) arising outside the head and neck region is unknown, and routine imaging to identify metastatic brain involvement is costly.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed the results of computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the head, which was mandated by protocol, in patients with metastatic RMS arising outside the head and neck region who were enrolled on the fourth Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS-IV; 1991--1997).

RESULTS

Of 100 eligible patients with metastatic RMS arising outside the head and neck region, 56 (56%) underwent head CT (n = 51) and/or MRI (n = 11) scans. Seven of these 56 patients (12.5%) had abnormal scans. Three patients with physical findings suggesting head or neck pathology underwent imaging that confirmed the presence of metastases in bone (one patient), orbit (one patient), or lymph nodes (one patient). One patient who presented with seizures had imaging findings consistent with cerebral embolic infarctions. Of three asymptomatic patients, one had bone metastases that also were identified on skeletal survey and one had bone metastases in the base of the skull that were not identified on bone scan. The remaining asymptomatic patient had a retroperitoneal paraspinal tumor with spinal canal extension and subsequently developed leptomeningeal disease dissemination.

CONCLUSIONS

Brain metastases are uncommon at the time of initial diagnosis of metastatic RMS arising outside the head and neck region, and the majority of abnormalities detected on head CT or MRI scans are evident clinically or on other imaging studies. Patients with clinical findings suggesting intracranial pathology and those with paraspinal tumors may benefit from brain imaging, but cost savings may be realized by foregoing imaging in patients without these features.