Rearrangement of the long arm of chromosome 10 in the prostate adenocarcinoma cell line LNCaP

Cytogenetically balanced translocations are associated with focal copy number alterations

Current cytogenetic methods (e.g., G-banding and multicolor chromosomal painting) allow detection of translocation events but lack the resolution to (a) locate the breakpoints precisely at the chromosome band level or (b) discriminate balanced translocations from translocations with copy number alterations not previously reported, or imperfectly balanced translocations. In this study, we demonstrate that cytogenetically balanced translocations are in fact frequently associated with segmental gain or loss of DNA. The recent development of a whole genome tiling path BAC array has enabled tiling resolution analysis of genomic segmental copy number status. Combining tiling resolution BAC array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) with G-Banding analysis and multicolor chromosomal painting approaches such as spectral karyotyping (SKY) facilitates high-resolution mapping of genomic alterations associated with imperfectly balanced translocations. Using a refined version of our CGH array we have deduced the copy number status throughout the genomes of three cytogenetically well-characterized prostate cancer cell lines (PC3, DU145, LNCaP) to determine whether translocations are associated with focal gains and losses of DNA. At 78 kb tiling resolution we identified the boundaries of 170, 80, and 34 known and novel copy number alterations (CNA) in these cell line genomes, respectively. Thirty-three of the 36 known translocations (92%, P < 0.001) in DU145 were associated with segmental CNA. Likewise, 80% (P < 0.001) of the known translocations showed association in LNCaP. Although many translocation breakpoints exhibit segmental alteration in PC3, the pattern of chromosomal rearrangements is too complex for use in comprehensive association with CNA boundaries. Our results reveal that imperfectly balanced translocations in tumor genomes are a phenomenon that occurs at frequencies much higher than previously demonstrated.

Translocation (5;10)(q22;q24) in a case of acute lymphoblastic leukemia

The activation of genes important to acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) may be evidenced by somatically acquired chromosomal translocations found recurrently in different patient subgroups. It is for this reason that research efforts have focused on the molecular dissection of recurring chromosomal rearrangements. However, even though a large number of leukemia-causing genes have been identified, the genetic basis of many ALL cases remains unknown. We and others have reasoned that novel translocations found in the leukemic cells of ALL patients may mark the location of more frequent gene rearrangements that are otherwise hidden submicroscopically within normal or complex karyotypes. Towards this end, we here describe the first reported association of a t(5;10)(q22;q24) with adult ALL. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and Southern blot hybridization studies have eliminated likely involvement of the candidate genes APC and MCC on chromosome 5, and PAX2, TLX1, and NFKB2 on chromosome 10. Results further suggest that the breakpoint on chromosome 5 lies centromeric of APC and the chromosome 10 breakpoint is centromeric of PAX2. The genomic regions disrupted by this t(5;10)(q22;q24) have not previously been associated with leukemia.

Refined physical map of the human PAX2/HOX11/NFKB2 cancer gene region at 10q24 and relocalization of the HPV6AI1 viral integration site to 14q13.3-q21.1

BACKGROUND

Chromosome band 10q24 is a gene-rich domain and host to a number of cancer, developmental, and neurological genes. Recurring translocations, deletions and mutations involving this chromosome band have been observed in different human cancers and other disease conditions, but the precise identification of breakpoint sites, and detailed characterization of the genetic basis and mechanisms which underlie many of these rearrangements has yet to be resolved. Towards this end it is vital to establish a definitive genetic map of this region, which to date has shown considerable volatility through time in published works of scientific journals, within different builds of the same international genomic database, and across the differently constructed databases.

RESULTS

Using a combination of chromosome and interphase fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), BAC end-sequencing and genomic database analysis we present a physical map showing that the order and chromosomal orientation of selected genes within 10q24 is CEN-CYP2C9-PAX2-HOX11-NFKB2-TEL. Our analysis has resolved the orientation of an otherwise dynamically evolving assembly of larger contigs upstream of this region, and in so doing verifies the order and orientation of a further 9 cancer-related genes and GOT1. This study further shows that the previously reported human papillomavirus type 6a DNA integration site HPV6AI1 does not map to 10q24, but that it maps at the interface of chromosome bands 14q13.3-q21.1.

CONCLUSIONS

This revised map will allow more precise localization of chromosome rearrangements involving chromosome band 10q24, and will serve as a useful baseline to better understand the molecular aetiology of chromosomal instability in this region. In particular, the relocation of HPV6AI1 is important to report because this HPV6a integration site, originally isolated from a tonsillar carcinoma, was shown to be rearranged in other HPV6a-related malignancies, including 2 of 25 genital condylomas, and 2 of 7 head and neck tumors tested. Our finding shifts the focus of this genomic interest from 10q24 to the chromosome 14 site.

Clinical significance of chromosome 8p, 10q, and 16q deletions in prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

We lack simple and reliable diagnostic tools to predict pathological staging as well as further progression of prostate cancer in individual cases.

METHODS

We studied deletions on 8p (8p22 and 8p23-pter), 10q (10q24-qter), and 16q (16q24) by fluorescence in situ hybridization in 53 specimens from patients with prostate cancer, and compared the status of these deletions with various clinical parameters. Forty-five cases were further evaluated regarding disease progression with a median follow-up period of 62 months.

RESULTS

The overall frequencies of deletions for 8p, 10q, and 16q were 74, 55, and 55%, respectively. The frequency of 8p and 16q deletions increased significantly in parallel with tumor grade (P < 0.01 and < 0.05, respectively), while that of 10q deletions did not. Patients whose tumors showed 8p22 deletions had a significantly higher frequency in pT3 or metastatic tumors than in pT2 tumors. Patients whose tumors showed both 8p22 and 16q24 deletions had a significantly higher frequency of nodal metastases than non-metastases. A Cox hazard proportional model revealed 8p22 deletion to be the strongest parameter predictive of disease progression (hazard ratio = 6.624; P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Estimation of 8p22 and 16q24 deletions may serve as a genetic diagnosis for predicting pathological staging as well as disease progression in prostate cancer.

The use of multicolor fluorescence technologies in the characterization of prostate carcinoma cell lines: a comparison of multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization and spectral karyotyping data

Recent studies have identified several chromosome regions that are altered in primary prostate cancer and prostatic carcinoma cell lines. These targeted regions may harbor genes involved in tumor suppression. We used multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization (M-FISH) to screen for genetic rearrangements in four prostate cancer cell lines, LNCaP, LNCaP.FCG, DU145, and PC3, and compared our results with those recently obtained using spectral karyotyping (SKY). A number of differences was noted between abnormalities characterized by SKY and M-FISH, suggesting variation in karyotype evolution and characterization by these two methodologies. M-FISH analysis showed that hormone-resistant cell lines (DU145 and PC3) contained many genetic alterations (> or =15 per cell), suggesting high levels of genetic instability in hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Most chromosome regions previously implicated in prostate cancer were altered in one or more of these cell lines. Several specific chromosome aberrations were also detected, including a del(4)(p14) and a del(6)(q21) in the hormone-insensitive cell lines, a t(1;15)(p?;q?) in LNCaP, LNCaP, and PC3, and a i(5p) in LNCaP.FCG, DU145, and PC3. These clonal chromosome abnormalities may pinpoint gene loci associated with prostate tumourigenesis, cancer progression, and hormone sensitivity.

Identification and characterization of human DNA polymerase beta 2, a DNA polymerase beta -related enzyme

The BRCA1 COOH terminus (BRCT) motif is present in many nuclear proteins that contribute to cell cycle regulation or DNA repair. Polymerase chain reaction-based screening with degenerate primers targeted to the BRCT motif resulted in the isolation of a human cDNA for a previously unidentified DNA polymerase (designated DNA polymerase beta2) that is closely related to DNA polymerase beta (Pol beta). The predicted Pol beta2 protein contains a BRCT motif in its NH(2)-terminal region; its COOH-terminal region exhibits 33% sequence identity to a corresponding region of human Pol beta. The Pol beta2 gene is expressed in a tissue-specific manner, with transcripts being most abundant in testis. A fusion construct comprising Pol beta2 and green fluorescent protein exhibited a predominantly nuclear localization in transfected HeLa cells. Recombinant human Pol beta2 from insect cells exhibited substantial DNA polymerase activity, but it did not possess terminal deoxyribonucleotidyl transferase activity. A truncated Pol beta2 mutant lacking the BRCT motif retained substantial DNA polymerase activity, whereas a mutant Pol beta2 with two alanine point mutations within the DNA polymerase active site did not. These results indicate that Pol beta2 is a Pol beta-related DNA polymerase with a BRCT motif that is dispensable for its polymerase activity.

Identification of a high frequency of chromosomal rearrangements in the centromeric regions of prostate cancer cell lines by sequential giemsa banding and spectral karyotyping

BACKGROUND

Currently, prostate cancer (CaP) cytogenetics is not well defined, largely because of technical difficulties in obtaining primary tumor metaphases.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We examined three CaP cell lines (LNCaP, DU145, PC-3) using sequential Giemsa banding and spectral karyotyping (SKY) to search for a common structural aberration or translocation breakpoint. No consistent rearrangement common to all three cell lines was detected. A clustering of centromeric translocation breakpoints was detected in chromosomes 4, 5, 6, 8, 11, 12, 14, and 15 in DU145 and PC-3. Both these lines were found to have karyotypes with a greater level of complexity than LNCaP.

CONCLUSION

The large number of structural aberrations present in DU145 and PC-3 implicate an underlying chromosomal instability and subsequent accumulation of cytogenetic alterations that confer a selective growth advantage. The high frequency of centromeric rearrangements in these lines indicates a potential role for mitotic irregularities associated with the centromere in CaP tumorigenesis.

Chromosomal basis of adenocarcinoma of the prostate

Prostate cancer is the most frequent malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer deaths among males in the Western world. The clinical course of the disease is highly complex, and genetic factors underlying tumorigenesis are poorly understood. The challenge that lies ahead is to identify the important gene(s) that causes adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Chromosomal findings by cytogenetic and molecular methods, including Southern blotting, microsatellite analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and comparative genomic hybridization, revealed a high frequency of chromosomal aberrations of heterogeneous nature, including: -1, +1, -1q, +4, -6q, -7, +7, -8, -8p, -8q, +i(8q), -9, -9p, -10, +10, +11, -12, -13q, -16, -16q, +16, -17, +17, +17q, -18, +18, -18q, +19p, +20q, +X, -Xq, -Y, and +Y. Specific chromosomal regions of alterations were 1q24-25, 2cen-q31, 5cen-q23.3, 6q14-23.2, 7q22-q31, 8p12-21, 8p22, 8q24-qter, 10q22.1, 10q23-25, 11p11.2, 16q24, 17p13.1, 18q12.2, and Xq11-12. Recently, a predisposing gene for early onset has been localized on 1q42.2-43. The losses of heterozygosity at specific chromosomal loci from chromosomes 5q, 6q, 7q, 8p, 8q, 10q, 13q, 16q, 17p, 17q, and 18q are generally correlated with poor prognosis in advanced tumor stage. In addition, an abnormal function of known tumor suppressor genes from these regions have been observed in prostate cancer. Although, the amplification of the androgen receptor gene at Xq11-13 and HER-2/neu gene at 17q11.2-q12 are novel findings, no single gene has been implicated in harboring prostate cancer. Frequent inactivation of PTEN/MMAC1 tumor suppressor gene at 10q23, MXI-1 at 10q25, KAI-1 at 11p11.2, Rb at 13q14.2, and p53 at 17p13.1 and deregulation of c-myc oncogene at 8q24 have recently been the subject of intense scrutiny and debate.