Cytogenetic analysis of 11 renal oncocytomas: further evidence of structural rearrangements of 11q13 as a characteristic chromosomal anomaly

Next-Generation Sequencing to Detect Deletion of RB1 and ERBB4 Genes in Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Potential Role in Distinguishing Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma from Renal Oncocytoma

Overlapping morphologic, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural features make it difficult to diagnose chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC) and renal oncocytoma (RO). Because ChRCC is a malignant tumor, whereas RO is a tumor with benign behavior, it is important to distinguish these two entities. We aimed to identify genetic markers that distinguish ChRCC from RO by using next-generation sequencing (NGS). NGS for hotspot mutations or gene copy number changes was performed on 12 renal neoplasms, including seven ChRCC and five RO cases. Matched normal tissues from the same patients were used to exclude germline variants. Rare hotspot mutations were found in cancer-critical genes (TP53 and PIK3CA) in ChRCC but not RO. The NGS gene copy number analysis revealed multiple abnormalities. The two most common deletions were tumor-suppressor genes RB1 and ERBB4 in ChRCC but not RO. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed on 65 cases (ChRCC, n = 33; RO, n = 32) to verify hemizygous deletion of RB1 (17/33, 52%) or ERBB4 (11/33, 33%) in ChRCC, but not in RO (0/32, 0%). In total, ChRCCs (23/33, 70%) carry either a hemizygous deletion of RB1 or ERBB4. The combined use of RB1 and ERBB4 fluorescence in situ hybridization to detect deletion of these genes may offer a highly sensitive and specific assay to distinguish ChRCC from RO.

Exploring Multiphoton Microscopy as a Novel Tool to Differentiate Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma From Oncocytoma in Fixed Tissue Sections

Context.—

Distinguishing chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC), especially in the presence of eosinophilic cytoplasm, from oncocytoma on hematoxylin-eosin can be difficult and often requires time-consuming ancillary procedures that ultimately may not be informative.

Objective.—

To explore the potential of multiphoton microscopy (MPM) as an alternative and rapid diagnostic tool in differentiating oncocytoma from chRCC at subcellular resolution without tissue processing.

Design.—

Unstained, deparaffinized tissue sections from 27 tumors (oncocytoma [n = 12], chRCC [n = 12], eosinophilic variant of chRCC [n = 1], and atypical oncocytic renal neoplasm [n = 2]) were imaged with MPM. Morphologic evaluation and automated quantitative morphometric analysis were conducted to distinguish between chRCC and oncocytoma.

Results.—

The typical cases of oncocytomas (12 of 12) and chRCC (12 of 12) could be readily differentiated on MPM based on the morphologic features similar to hematoxylin-eosin. The most striking MPM signature of both of the tumors was the presence of autofluorescent intracytoplasmic granules, which are not seen on hematoxylin-eosin–stained slides. Although we saw these granules in both types of tumors, they appeared distinct, based on their size, shape, cytoplasmic distribution, and autofluorescence wavelengths, and were valuable in arriving at a definitive diagnosis. For oncocytomas and chRCC, high diagnostic accuracies of 100% and 83.3% were achieved on blinded MPM and morphometric analysis, respectively.

Conclusions.—

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of MPM to distinguish chRCC from oncocytoma in fixed tissues. Our study was limited by small sample size and only a few variants of oncocytic tumors. Prospective studies are warranted to assess the utility of MPM as a diagnostic aid in oncocytic renal tumors.

Genetic and Chromosomal Aberrations and Their Clinical Significance in Renal Neoplasms

The most common form of malignant renal neoplasms is renal cell carcinoma (RCC), which is classified into several different subtypes based on the histomorphological features. However, overlaps in these characteristics may present difficulties in the accurate diagnosis of these subtypes, which have different clinical outcomes. Genomic and molecular studies have revealed unique genetic aberrations in each subtype. Knowledge of these genetic changes in hereditary and sporadic renal neoplasms has given an insight into the various proteins and signalling pathways involved in tumour formation and progression. In this review, the genetic aberrations characteristic to each renal neoplasm subtype are evaluated along with the associated protein products and affected pathways. The potential applications of these genetic aberrations and proteins as diagnostic tools, prognostic markers, or therapeutic targets are also assessed.

Renal oncocytoma revisited: a clinicopathological study of 109 cases with emphasis on problematic diagnostic features

AIM

To evaluate problematic diagnostic features in renal oncocytoma.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred and nine cases of oncocytoma were reviewed and the problematic gross and microscopic features recorded. Multifocal and bilateral neoplasms were found in 12 (11%) and five (4.6%) cases, respectively. Haemorrhage was seen grossly in 30 (27.5%) neoplasms and a central scar was identified in 35 (32.1%). On microscopy, perinephric fat extension was present in 17 (15.6%) neoplasms and vascular extension was identified in four (3.7%) oncocytomas. Rare mitoses and focal coagulative necrosis were identified in two (1.8%) cases each. Focal clear cell changes were found in 16 (14.7%) oncocytomas, typically within hyalinized areas. Limited foci with chromophobe-like histology (not exceeding 5% of the neoplasm) were found in 13 (11.9%) oncocytomas. In 12 (11%) oncocytomas, rare papillary formations were noted in the lumina of microcysts. Significant nuclear atypia, oncoblasts and entrapped tubules were identified in 27 (24.8%), 41 (37.6%) and 40 (36.7%) neoplasms, respectively. After a median follow-up of 52 months (range 1-113 months), there was no disease recurrence, progression or death attributed to oncocytoma.

CONCLUSIONS

The recognition of the spectrum of morphological changes observed in renal oncocytoma should help pathologists establish a diagnosis of oncocytoma in problematic cases.

Molecular pathology of renal oncocytoma: a review

Differentiating renal oncocytoma from its renal cell carcinoma (RCC) mimics, particularly chromophobe RCC, can be difficult, especially when limited tissue is available for evaluation and requires sophisticated microscopic, ultrastructural and immunohistochemical evaluation. In this review, the relevant literature has been reviewed, and supporting data obtained by applying modern microarray-based technologies are discussed with a focus on molecular pathology of renal oncocytoma. The high resolution whole-genome DNA-microarray based analyses excluded with all certainty the occurrence of small specific alterations. Renal oncocytomas are characterized by variable chromosomal patterns. The number of genes selected by global gene expression analyses and their usefulness in the diagnostic pathology based on immunohistochemical evaluation is far below the expectations. The conflicting staining patterns, together with the poor specificity of proposed antibodies, leads us to believe that these candidate immunomarkers might not help in the separation of these tumors. Applying DNA based tools might help in the diagnosis of renal oncocytoma with uncertain histology. However, only the combination of all available techniques could give reliable information.

A new translocation between chromosomes 6 and 9 helps to establish diagnosis of renal oncocytoma

Renal oncocytomas are benign epithelial tumors of the kidney. Histologically, they resemble certain malignant renal tumors, such as chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and the eosinophilic or granular form of clear cell renal carcinoma. It is, therefore, important to be able to differentiate among these tumors. Cytogenetic analysis is an important adjunct to the diagnosis of renal tumors, as the various subtypes have specific acquired chromosome abnormalities. Oncocytomas present either with loss of chromosome 1 and a sex chromosome, or with recurring translocations involving chromosome 11. We describe 2 patients with renal oncocytoma and a new translocation between chromosomes 6 and 9. The tumors in both patients were histologically virtually identical. The t(6;9)(p21;p23) may be a new translocation associated with renal oncocytomas.

The Evolving Concept of Renal Neoplasia: Impact of Emerging Molecular and Electron Microscopic Studies

The classification of renal tumors has evolved from one that initially encompassed only 2 types of tumors, i.e., clear and granular cell carcinomas, to the markedly expanded recent classification that incorporates new entities, some of which are primarily defined by specific molecular abnormalities. Despite these advances, a single tumor category, clear cell carcinoma, still incorporates the majority (approximately 70%) of renal tumors. It is, however, postulated that this single category is likely to encompass several different tumor types that are, at present, undifferentiated. Electron microscopic studies have been pivotal in defining the spectrum of oncocytoma-chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Cytoplasmic eosinophilia found in some renal cell carcinomas currently classified as clear cell type is under intense study. Tumors that have recently emerged from this group include tumors with translocations involving chromosome Xp11.2, carcinomas associated with neuroblastoma and epithelioid angiomyolipoma. The spectrum of renal tumors seen in younger patients is wider than among older patients, with rare and unusual tumors being more likely seen in younger patients. The author concludes that although the routine application of electron microscopy to kidney tumor diagnosis may not be practical, systematic ultrastructural studies of these tumors may aid in the definition of new entities.

Papillary renal cell carcinoma within a renal oncocytoma: case report of an incidental finding of a tumour within a tumour

The most common renal tumours are clear cell, papillary, chromophobe and collecting duct renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), and benign oncocytomas and angiomyolipomas. Tumours with hybrid features between some of these entities have been recognised; in particular, tumours with features of both chromophobe RCC and oncocytoma. Case reports describing one distinct type of primary renal tumour actually within another are very rare. The incidental finding of a papillary RCC located in an oncocytoma in a nephrectomy specimen from a 75-year-old man is described. Morphological criteria for each tumour type were completely satisfied and fluorescence in situ hybridisation detected the expected number of copies of chromosome 7 in the cells of each tumour type. The cells in the papillary tumour contained three copies, whereas the oncocytoma cells contained only two per nucleus. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a papillary RCC being identified within an oncocytoma.

Zytogenetische Veränderungen bei Nierentumoren

The WHO classification of renal cell carcinomas (RCC) takes into account chromosomal alterations. New cytogenetic techniques such as comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) offer alternative methods to the classic cytogenetic banding technique. Clear cell (classic) RCC frequently show the loss of 3p. Papillary RCC are characterized by trisomies and tetrasomies as well as loss of the Y chromosome. CGH analysis demonstrates that DNA copy increase is more common in type I papillary RCC compared to type II. Chromophobe RCC are characterized by losses in chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, 13, 17, and 21. Oncocytomas can be divided into cases with rearrangements in the 11q13 region and those with loss of chromosome 1 and the sex chromosomes. Translocations involving chromosome 3, such as t(3;8)(p14;q24.13) and t(2;3)(q35;q21) have been described in familial clear cell RCC. The most recent class of RCC, seen only in men, is referred to as translocation tumors. These tumors demonstrate a tubulopapillary growth pattern and have a t(X;1)(p11.2;q21.2) translocation. Although not required for most clinical diagnoses, CGH and FISH complement the standard histologic diagnosis of RCC and may provide a definitive diagnosis in a small number of challenging cases.

Insertion (8;11) in a renal oncocytoma with multifocal transformation to chromophobe renal cell carcinoma

We report the case of a 43-year-old male with multiple tumor foci showing microscopic features of chromophobe renal carcinoma (ChRCC) arising in an oncocytoma. Conventional cytogenetics of fresh tumor cells and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) revealed the following abnormal karyotype: 46,XY,der(8)ins(8;11)(p?;q13),der(11)ins(8;11)inv(11)(q12?p15) with CCND1 (11q13) rearrangement. To our knowledge, chromosome 8 has not been reported as a partner involved in structural rearrangements of 11q13 in oncocytomas. FISH in paraffin tissue sections revealed a rearrangement of CCND1 (11q13) in the oncocytoma cells. The multiple foci of chromophobe carcinoma presented multiple copies of CCND1, suggesting that they represented a transformation from oncocytoma into ChRCC. There was immunohistochemical overexpression of CCND1 in both oncocytoma and chromophobe carcinoma cells. In this case, the correlation of the microscopic findings with changes in CCND1 gene associated to CCND1 overexpression in both components suggest that the ChRCC would have originated from the preexisting oncocytoma. It is not possible to detect, by cytogenetic techniques alone, if the ChRCC component have also the CCND1 rearrangement in addition to the detected polysomy. FISH techniques on paraffin tissue sections may help to identify genetic aberrations such as CCND1 rearrangement in order to establish a diagnosis of oncocytoma.

Losses of 1p and chromosome 14 in renal oncocytomas

We performed cytogenetic analyses of 8 renal oncocytomas to identify chromosomal regions involved in the tumorigenesis of oncocytomas. All cases showed chromosomal findings corresponding to established cytogenetic subsets of renal oncocytomas: 3 cases with normal karyotypes, 1 case with rearrangement of 11q, and 4 cases with losses of chromosome 14. In the latter cytogenetic subgroup, monosomy 14 was additionally accompanied by either monosomy 1 in 2 cases or loss of 1p in a third case, providing insights in the cytogenetic evolution of this subgroup.

Renal oncocytosis

Renal oncocytosis is a rare disorder in which numerous oncocytic nodules develop in the kidney. An additional case is reported here. The patient was a 51-year-old woman who had received hemodialysis for 27 years. Nineteen years previously she had developed a tumorous lesion in the right kidney, which had been diagnosed as oncocytoma with laparotomic biopsy. Recently the kidney was removed because of enlargement of the tumor. The renal parenchyma was entirely replaced with numerous brownish nodules. Histologically, the nodules were composed of nests of uniform oncocytic cells. Ultrastructurally, the oncocytic cells contained numerous mitochondria. Immunohistochemical features of the nodules were identical to those of sporadic oncocytomas, that is, immunophenotypes similar to the distal nephron and reactivity with antimitochondrial antigen. Based on these findings, the lesion was diagnosed as renal oncocytosis. It was not possible to determine whether the larger nodules should be diagnosed as oncocytoma or a part of oncocytosis. Additionally, the germ line mutation of the Birt-Hogg-Dubé (BHD) syndrome gene was examined using the genomic DNA obtained from the peripheral lymphocytes, which failed to show any gene alteration. Despite the rare occurrence pathologists and urologists should be aware of renal oncocytosis, as a precursor lesion of renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.

Renal Tumor With Overlapping Distal Nephron Morphology and Karyotype

Although most renal epithelial tumors are derived from the proximal nephron, approximately 10% are believed to originate in the distal nephron. This latter group encompasses oncocytoma, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, and several rare types, including collecting duct carcinoma and renal medullary carcinoma. Despite progress in the classification of renal tumors, a small subset of renal carcinomas remains unclassified (ie, renal cell carcinoma, not otherwise specified). We describe a metastatic tumor consisting of cells with overlapping distal nephron morphologies, including foci of oncocytoma, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, and collecting duct carcinoma, as well as sarcomatoid dedifferentiation. Special stains were inconclusive, and ultrastructural study demonstrated abundant mitochondria and no microvesicles. The karyotype was hypodiploid with 41 chromosomes and abnormalities reported in all 3 phenotypes present. Rearrangements of 1p and of 11q13 previously seen in divergent subsets of oncocytomas were concomitantly present in the current tumor. Thus, this malignancy has features consistent with distal nephron derivation and demonstrates the convergence of the varied tumor morphologies arising within this site. Furthermore, this case exemplifies the value of cytogenetic analysis in the characterization of renal cell carcinoma, not otherwise specified. In view of recent advances in treatment approach, especially for collecting duct carcinoma, further categorization of this nondescript and heterogeneous group of renal cell carcinomas, not otherwise specified, at least by its derivation in relationship to the renal nephron (distal vs proximal), may be of value in the choice of treatment modality.

Renal oncocytomas with 11q13 rearrangements: cytogenetic, molecular, and immunohistochemical analysis of cyclin D1

Two groups of renal oncocytomas have been cytogenetically defined by the loss of one or both of chromosomes Y and 1 or by structural rearrangement involving 11q12~q13. We report five renal oncocytomas with structural chromosomal rearrangements involving 11q13 with previously unreported partner chromosomes (namely, 1, 6, and 7). For two of the five cases, a t(6;11)(p21;q13) translocation was revealed; the others had t(1;11)(p13;q13), t(7;11)(q11.2;q13), and t(5;11)(q35; q13). Fluorescence in situ hybridization confirmed translocation of CCND1 at 11q13 to partner chromosomes 5, 6, and 7. Overexpression of cyclin D1, the protein product of CCND1, was detected in three of the five cases (60%) by means of immunohistochemical staining of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor sections. In three cases for which fresh tissue was available, Southern blot analysis using the MDL-5 probe for the BCL1 breakpoint did not reveal rearrangement of BCL1. In addition, six consecutive renal oncocytomas diagnosed at our institution between 1999 and 2002 whose karyotypes did not show 11q13 translocations were all negative for cyclin D1 overexpression under immunohistochemical analysis. The findings of CCND1 rearrangement with FISH and correlation with cyclin D1 overexpression under immunohistochemical analysis suggest that cyclin D1 alterations play a role in the subset of renal oncocytomas with 11q translocations, although other genes may also be involved.

Renal oncocytomas with rearrangements involving 11q13 contain breakpoints near CCND1

Oncocytomas are typically benign epithelial tumors whose predominant feature is a massive accumulation of mitochondria in the cytoplasm. With the goal of identifying genes controlling mitochondrial proliferation, we studied three oncocytomas belonging to the cytogenetic subgroup with 11q13 rearrangements. Fluorescence in situ hybridization using bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones showed that the 11q13 breakpoints in all three tumors were near the CCND1 (previously BCL1) gene and did not disrupt any other known gene. The rearrangement in one tumor consisted of a segmental duplication that included 11q13, suggesting that known mitochondrially targeted genes immediately distal to CCND1 may be involved in oncocytic proliferation.

Cytogenetic Analysis of a Series of 13 Renal Oncocytomas

PURPOSE

Only about 50 renal oncocytomas have been studied cytogenetically. They fall into 3 categories, namely 1-normal karyotype, 2-monosomy 1, often with Y chromosome loss, and 3-structural abnormalities of 11q13. Additional abnormalities may occur with transformation to chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, although exactly which one is unclear. We expanded the oncocytoma data base to shed light on changes that characterize transformation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 14 oncocytomas from 12 patients were collected in 2(1/2) years. One tumor failed to grow but 13 were successfully karyotyped.

RESULTS

Seven tumors (53.8%), including 2 from 1 kidney, had normal karyotypes or abnormalities characteristic of normal kidney tissue. A total of 6 tumors from 5 individuals (46.2%) had chromosome 1 abnormalities. Monosomy 1 was detected in 2 single tumors and in both tumors in a bilateral case. Structural anomalies resulting in loss of the short arm of chromosome 1 were found in an additional 2 patients. Other abnormalities, including Y chromosome loss and monosomy 14, were observed but no abnormalities of 11q13 were seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Our series confirms that 1p loss is the most common anomaly in oncocytoma. Additional studies are required to understand the transformation potential of this usually benign tumor, identify the putative 1p tumor suppressor gene and determine whether karyotypically normal tumors have molecular abnormalities of 1p.

Genomic alterations in renal tumours: what have we learned in the era of comparative genomic hybridisation?

One of the major challenges in cancer research is to generate molecular profiles of tumours and establish correlations between genetic changes and clinical parameters by screening technologies. The identification of tumour-specific gene targets has potential diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Metaphase comparative genomic hybridisation has been used to detect relative DNA-sequence copy number gains (including high-level amplifications of chromosomal regions) and copy number losses in human neoplasms. In the past, metaphase comparative genomic hybridisation has been shown to be a powerful genome-wide screening method and this has considerably advanced our understanding of renal cancer biology. Novel molecular technologies, including array-based comparative genomic hybridisation, fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH), cDNA and tissue microarrays will serve to facilitate further characterisation of candidate genes residing in chromosomal regions defined by metaphase comparative genomic hybridisation. This review concentrates on the application of metaphase comparative genomic hybridisation in the area of renal cancer research and summarises data obtained from comparative genomic hybridisation studies.

Renal cancer: cytogenetic and molecular genetic aspects

To date, much progress has been made in the fields of cytogenetics and molecular genetics of renal tumors. The previous and recent findings have delineated the characteristics of the various tumors, particularly the cytogenetic and molecular differences that exist between papillary and nonpapillary clear cell renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). At the same time, new cytogenetic subtypes have emerged [e.g., t(X;1)] in subtypes of RCC, while in others (e.g., Wilms tumors) several new cytogenetic abnormalities and consequent molecular involvement have been found. In addition to Wilms tumor, papillary RCC, and clear-cell RCC, cytogenetic and fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses have been performed on several other tumors of the kidney, including chromophobic carcinoma, metanephric adenoma, collecting duct carcinoma, transitional cell carcinoma, congenital mesoblastic nephroma, and malignant rhabdoid tumors of the kidney. This review is therefore intended to present a concise update on the cytogenetic and molecular data on renal tumors, focusing mainly on the clinical usefulness of the findings reported in the literature.

A distinctive pediatric renal neoplasm characterized by epithelioid morphology, basement membrane production, focal HMB45 immunoreactivity, and t(6;11)(p21.1;q12) chromosome translocation

We report two cases of a hitherto undescribed pediatric renal neoplasm that is distinctive at the morphological, immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, and cytogenetic levels. On light microscopy, the tumors are composed of nests of polygonal, clear to eosinophilic cells associated with a subpopulation of smaller cells that surround hyaline material. Despite their epithelioid morphology, these tumors do not label immunohistochemically for epithelial markers but instead label focally for melanocytic markers HMB45 and Melan A. The hyaline material is positive with periodic acid-Schiff and methenamine-silver histochemical stains, and labels immunohistochemically for type 4 collagen. Ultrastructural examination confirms that it represents basement membrane material. Cytogenetic analysis reveals the identical t(6;11)(p21.1;q12) chromosome translocation as the sole abnormality in these two tumors, confirming their identity and distinctive nature.

Bilateral renal oncocytosis with renal failure

Oncocytosis is a term recently used to describe diffuse renal involvement by numerous oncocytic nodules. We report herein a case of a 53-year-old man with end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis. His kidneys were involved by numerous tumors. Histologic examination revealed more than 100 oncocytomas and an associated papillary renal cell carcinoma in the right kidney.

Expression profiling of renal epithelial neoplasms: a method for tumor classification and discovery of diagnostic molecular markers

The expression patterns of 7075 genes were analyzed in four conventional (clear cell) renal cell carcinomas (RCC), one chromophobe RCC, and two oncocytomas using cDNA microarrays. Expression profiles were compared among tumors using various clustering algorithms, thereby separating the tumors into two categories consistent with corresponding histopathological diagnoses. Specifically, conventional RCCs were distinguished from chromophobe RCC/oncocytomas based on large-scale gene expression patterns. Chromophobe RCC/oncocytomas displayed similar expression profiles, including genes involved with oxidative phosphorylation and genes expressed normally by distal nephron, consistent with the mitochondrion-rich morphology of these tumors and the theory that both lesions are related histogenetically to distal nephron epithelium. Conventional RCCs underexpressed mitochondrial and distal nephron genes, and were further distinguished from chromophobe RCC/oncocytomas by overexpression of vimentin and class II major histocompatibility complex-related molecules. Novel, tumor-specific expression of four genes-vimentin, class II major histocompatibility complex-associated invariant chain (CD74), parvalbumin, and galectin-3-was confirmed in an independent tumor series by immunohistochemistry. Vimentin was a sensitive, specific marker for conventional RCCs, and parvalbumin was detected primarily in chromophobe RCC/oncocytomas. In conclusion, histopathological subtypes of renal epithelial neoplasia were characterized by distinct patterns of gene expression. Expression patterns were useful for identifying novel molecular markers with potential diagnostic utility.

Pax-2 expression in adult renal tumors

To assess the expression of the homeogene Pax-2 in adult renal cell carcinomas, we did a retrospective immunohistochemical analysis of 56 frozen tumor samples representing all major histologic subtypes of renal tumors. There were 33 conventional renal cell carcinomas (58.9%), 12 papillary renal cell carcinomas (21.4%), 4 chromophobe cell renal carcinomas, 4 urothelial cell renal carcinomas, and 3 oncocytomas. Forty-five tumors (62.5%) were localized, and 21 tumors had extrarenal involvement. Eight patients (14%) had metastatic disease at the end of the follow-up. We searched for relationships between Pax-2 expression and nuclear grading, TNM staging, Ki-67 proliferation index, expression of transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta 1), an in vitro down-regulator of Pax-2 expression, and finally cytogenetic abnormalities. All histologic subtypes expressed Pax-2 protein, except urothelial renal carcinomas. The highest expression was in papillary renal cell carcinomas. In this subtype, all tumors and 83.3% +/- 12.3% of tumor cells were immunoreactive for Pax-2. All but 2 conventional renal cell carcinomas expressed Pax-2, but with 26.3% +/- 29.6% of immunoreactive cells (P <.001). Pax-2 expression was not correlated with nuclear grading (P =.6), tumor size (P =.3), and TGF-beta 1 expression (P =.1). Nevertheless, Pax-2 expression correlated with the Ki-67 proliferation index only for the conventional histologic subtype (P =.03). In this histologic subtype, Pax-2 expression was higher in patients with metastatic disease than in those without (P =.02). Pax-2 expression was not associated with specific cytogenetic abnormalities like trisomy 7 (P =.1), 3p deletion (P =.5), and hyperdiploidy (P =.2). TGF-beta 1 expression, positive in 33 tumors (59%), was not correlated with either Pax-2 expression (P =.1) or current prognostic factors such as nuclear grading (P =.2). Interestingly, we also observed an expression of TGF-beta RI and TGF-beta RII in the tumors with high nuclear grading (P =.005). We conclude that Pax-2 protein is expressed in all major histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinomas. The pattern of expression differs between these subtypes. Pax-2 expression in conventional renal cell carcinomas is correlated with the proliferation index and is significantly higher in patients with metastatic disease. HUM PATHOL 32:282-287.

Genomic structure and in vivo expression of the human organic anion transporter 1 (hOAT1) gene

The human organic anion transporter 1 (hOAT1) plays a key role in the secretion of an array of potentially toxic organic anions including many clinically important drugs. Here we report on the genomic cloning of hOAT1. A human genomic library was used for screening of a PAC (P1 artificial chromosome) clone applying PCR techniques. Sequencing of several restriction subclones and of a PCR-generated clone revealed that the hOAT1 gene spans 8.2 kb and is composed of 10 exons divided by 9 introns. RT-PCR studies in a human kidney specimen led to the detection of two new splice variants, hOAT1-3 and hOAT1-4, showing a 132-bp in-frame deletion. Using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) we mapped the hOAT1 gene as a single signal to chromosome 11q13.1-q13.2. Additionally, 600 bp of the 5' flanking region was analyzed, illustrating the probable transcription start site at nt -280, a NF-kappaB-site at nt -397 and several putative transcription factor binding sites.

Construction of a 350-kb sequence-ready 11q13 cosmid contig encompassing the markers D11S4933 and D11S546: mapping of 11 genes and 3 tumor-associated translocation breakpoints

Previously, we located three novel human tumor-associated translocation breakpoints in the chromosome 11q13 region between the markers D11S4933 and D11S546. To facilitate the molecular analysis of these breakpoints, we have constructed a continuous sequence-ready cosmid and PAC contig of approximately 350 kb, including the markers D11S4933 and D11S546. In addition, a detailed transcript map was generated. This resulted in the precise positioning of 11 genes and ESTs within the contig, including 4 genes already known to map in the 11q13 region. Three other genes that we positioned within the contig showed homologies to unmapped genes from human and/or other species. Three ESTs were novel. Partial cosmid sequencing resulted in the establishment of the direction of transcription of several of the reported genes. This contig will be instrumental for the detailed characterization of the tumor-associated chromosomal breakpoints and the identification of other 11q13-associated disease genes.

Use of antibodies to RCC and CD10 in the differential diagnosis of renal neoplasms

The majority of renal neoplasms can be distinguished on the basis of histologic examination alone; however, there are morphologic similarities between clear cell renal carcinoma and chromophobe cell carcinoma, as well as between the granular/eosinophilic variants of these tumors and renal oncocytoma. Only a limited number of histochemical markers are available to aid in the differential diagnosis of these neoplasms. Hale's colloidal iron usually yields strong, diffuse cytoplasmic staining of chromophobe cell carcinomas whereas clear cell carcinomas are generally negative; however, interpretation of this stain is not always straightforward. By immunohistochemistry, vimentin is detectable in most clear cell carcinomas and is absent from most chromophobe cell tumors and oncocytomas, but reliance on a single antibody can be misleading. In this report we examine the use of commercially available monoclonal antibodies to RCC and CD10 in the differential diagnosis of common renal tumors. Eighty-five percent of clear cell carcinomas (53 of 62) had detectable surface membrane staining for RCC, and 94% (58 of 62) were positive for CD10. Papillary carcinomas were likewise strongly positive for RCC and CD10 in nearly all cases (13 of 14 each). In contrast, all 19 chromophobe cell carcinomas examined were completely negative for surface membrane staining with both of these markers. Oncocytomas were also negative for RCC (0 of 9), but CD10 was detectable in some cases (3 of 9). These results suggest that the presence of surface membrane staining for RCC and CD10 may be used to confirm a diagnosis of suspected clear cell or papillary renal carcinoma. Chromophobe cell carcinomas should be negative for both markers. The absence of RCC staining may also be helpful in the diagnosis of renal oncocytoma.