Interphasic analysis of aneuploidy in cancer cell lines using primed in situ labeling

Pathogenesis of human enterovirulent bacteria: lessons from cultured, fully differentiated human colon cancer cell lines

Hosts are protected from attack by potentially harmful enteric microorganisms, viruses, and parasites by the polarized fully differentiated epithelial cells that make up the epithelium, providing a physical and functional barrier. Enterovirulent bacteria interact with the epithelial polarized cells lining the intestinal barrier, and some invade the cells. A better understanding of the cross talk between enterovirulent bacteria and the polarized intestinal cells has resulted in the identification of essential enterovirulent bacterial structures and virulence gene products playing pivotal roles in pathogenesis. Cultured animal cell lines and cultured human nonintestinal, undifferentiated epithelial cells have been extensively used for understanding the mechanisms by which some human enterovirulent bacteria induce intestinal disorders. Human colon carcinoma cell lines which are able to express in culture the functional and structural characteristics of mature enterocytes and goblet cells have been established, mimicking structurally and functionally an intestinal epithelial barrier. Moreover, Caco-2-derived M-like cells have been established, mimicking the bacterial capture property of M cells of Peyer's patches. This review intends to analyze the cellular and molecular mechanisms of pathogenesis of human enterovirulent bacteria observed in infected cultured human colon carcinoma enterocyte-like HT-29 subpopulations, enterocyte-like Caco-2 and clone cells, the colonic T84 cell line, HT-29 mucus-secreting cell subpopulations, and Caco-2-derived M-like cells, including cell association, cell entry, intracellular lifestyle, structural lesions at the brush border, functional lesions in enterocytes and goblet cells, functional and structural lesions at the junctional domain, and host cellular defense responses.

Rapid detection of chromosome X, Y, 13, 18, and 21 aneuploidies by primed in situ labeling/synthesis technique

AIMS AND OBJECTIVE:

Primed in situ labeling/synthesis (PRINS) technique is an alternative to fluorescent in situ hybridization for chromosome analysis. This study was designed to evaluate the application of PRINS for rapid diagnosis of common chromosomal aneuploidy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

We have carried out PRINS using centromere specific oligonucleotide primers for chromosome X, Y, 13, 18 and 21 on lymphocyte metaphase and interphase cells spread. Specific primer was annealed in situ, followed by elongation of primer by Taq DNA polymerase in presence of labeled nucleotides. Finally, reaction was stopped and visualized directly under fluorescent microscope.

RESULTS:

Discrete centromere specific signals were observed with each primer.

CONCLUSION:

PRINS seems to be a rapid and reliable method to detect common chromosome aneuploidy in peripheral blood lymphocyte metaphase and interphase cells.

Multicolor PRINS and multicolor PNA

Both PRimed IN Situ (PRINS) and Peptide Nucleic Acid (PNA) technologies have emerged as research techniques, but they have quickly evolved to applications in biological diagnosis assays. The two procedures now constitute efficient alternatives to the conventional fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) procedure for in situ chromosome identification and aneuploidy detection. They present several advantages (specificity, speed, discriminating ability) that make them very attractive for a number of cytogenetic purposes. Multicolor PRINS and PNA protocols have been described for the specific identification of human chromosomes. Various applications have already been developed in human genetics and new adaptations are ongoing.

Cytogénétique des ovocytes humains : 40 ans de progrès

Chromosomal abnormalities account for the majority of pre- and post- implantation embryo wastage in humans. Most of these abnormalities result from maternal meiotic errors, which preferentially occur during the first meiotic division. Consequently, the cytogenetic analysis of human oocytes has then been considered as a highly valuable source of data for the investigation of both the occurrence and the origin of chromosomal abnormalities in human. During the last 4 decades, the cytogenetic analysis of human oocytes has never stopped progressing, according to the advents of new technologies. Both karyotyping and molecular cytogenetic studies have been reported to date, providing a large body of data on the incidence and the distribution of chromosomal abnormalities in human female gametes. However, these studies display a great variability in results, which may be essentially attributable to the limitations of these techniques when applied to human oocytes. The most relevant analysis have led to the estimate that 15-20% of human oocytes present chromosome abnormalities, and they have emphasized the implication of both whole chromosome non-disjunction and chromatid separation in the occurrence of aneuploidy in human oocytes. The effect of advanced maternal age on the incidence of aneuploidy in human oocytes has also been clearly evidenced by recent reports based on large sample of oocytes or polar bodies.

The chromosomal analysis of human oocytes. An overview of established procedures

The cytogenetic survey of mature human oocytes has been and remains a subject of great interest because of the prevalence of aneuploidy of maternal origin in abnormal human conceptuses, and the lack of understanding about the non-disjunction processes in human meiosis. The first attempts to analyse the chromosomal content of human female gametes were made in the early 1970s, and led to limited data because of the paucity of materials and the inadequacy of the procedure used. The years to follow brought a resurgence of interest in this field, because of the development of human IVF techniques which made oocytes unfertilized in vitro available for cytogenetic analysis. Numerous studies have since been performed. However, the difficulties in obtaining good chromosome preparations and of performing accurate chromosome identification have reduced the viability of these studies, resulting in large variations in the reported incidences of chromosomal abnormalities. The further introduction of new procedures for oocyte fixation and the screening of large oocyte samples have allowed more reliable data to be obtained and to identify premature chromatid separation as a major mechanism in aneuploidy occurrence. The last decade has been privileged to witness the adaptation of molecular cytogenetic techniques to human oocytes, and thus various powerful procedures have been tried not only on female gametes, but also on polar bodies, involving sequential and multicolour fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) labelling, comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), spectral karyotyping and alternative methods such as primed in situ labelling (PRINS) and peptide nucleic acid (PNA) techniques. A large body of data has been obtained, but these studies also display a great variability in the frequency of abnormalities, which may be essentially attributable to the technical limitations of these in situ methods when applied to human oocytes. However, molecular cytogenetic approaches have also evidenced the co-existence of both whole chromosome non-disjunction and chromatid separation in maternal aneuploidy. In addition, the extension of these techniques to oocyte polar body materials has provided additional data on the mechanism of meiotic malsegregation. Improvements of some of these techniques have already been reported. The further development of new approaches for the in situ analysis of human meiosis will increase the impact of cytogenetic investigation of human oocytes in the understanding of aneuploidy processes in humans.

[From the conception of the PRINS to its coronation]

As a non-isotopic molecular cytogenetic technique, the primed in situ (PRINS) labelling reaction represents a major technological progress achieved in the past decade. It has become a routine technique for the microscopic visualization of specific DNA sequences in cells and nuclei and constitutes a good alternative to the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) procedure. Among the multiple advantages that characterize the PRINS technique, specificity, rapidity, reliability, reproducibility, and cost-effectiveness can be mentioned. PRINS can be in addition associated with other techniques like FISH, indirect immunofluorescence, and nick translation. The most recent developments show the great potential of this technique. Now PRINS can be used to study single-copy genes and, consequently, can be routinely used to investigate deletions associated with microdeletion syndromes. Therefore, the PRINS technique has the potential to become a widely used molecular cytogenetic tool in clinics and research. This short review presents how the PRINS technique contributed to further the understanding of biological phenomena and describes the different possibilities and applications of the PRINS method in several biological and clinical fields (pre-implantation testing, prenatal, constitutional and oncologic genetic diagnosis).

Combined use of PRINS and FISH in the study of the dystrophin gene

The efficacy of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) may be limited in specific applications by low-resolution sensitivity. Primed in situ labeling (PRINS) is based on specific hybridization of an unlabeled oligonucleotide with a denatured template and synthesis of a single-strand DNA in situ. This method may represent a powerful alternative to FISH for gene mapping because of its ability to generate multiple independent signals within the same gene segment. We investigated the specificity of signals produced by a modified PRINS protocol combining a centromeric probe for the X-chromosome with specific primers for 3'- and 5'-terminal regions of the dystrophin gene. In approximately 70% of nuclei from male and female subjects, we detected one or two large signals (X-chromosome centromere) and two or four smaller signals (the two regions of the dystrophin gene). Specific hybridization of the oligonucleotides on Xp was demonstrated by localization of the smaller (dystrophin) and larger (X-centromere) signals on the same chromosome. Simultaneous hybridization with a centromeric probe and gene-specific oligonucleotides allowed localization of PRINS signals, and assessment of the specificity of the primers used for hybridization. This approach could facilitate identification of female carriers of small intragenic deletions in the dystrophin gene.

PRINS, the other in situ DNA labeling method useful in cellular biology

PRINS has proven to be an attractive alternative to FISH for in situ DNA labeling. PRINS is specific, simple, and rapid. We review some applications of PRINS involving primers specific for telomeric, human Alu, and centromeric alpha-satellite sequences. Bicolor labeling, PRINS-FISH, or PRINS-immunofluorescent combinations have been developed to enable investigations in numerous applications.

Prader Willi/Angelman and DiGeorge/velocardiofacial syndrome deletions: diagnosis by primed in situ labeling (PRINS)

A recently developed methodology-primed in situ labeling (PRINS)-can be used in place of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to diagnose microdeletions. To demonstrate the efficiency, sensitivity, and specificity of PRINS in the diagnosis of microdeletions, we studied groups of patients with Prader Willi/Angelman (PWS/AS) syndrome and DiGeorge/velocardiofacial syndrome (DGS/VCFS). Results obtained by PRINS were then confirmed with the results obtained with FISH. Oligonucleotide primers specific for SNRPN and GABRB3 were used for PWS/AS syndromes. For DGS/VCFS, the primers used were DGCR2/TUPLE1 loci. Labeling patterns obtained by PRINS and FISH were analyzed and scored under a fluorescence microscope. Five normal subjects served as controls and were used for standardization of the PRINS protocol. In all, 20 study patients were involved: 10 PWS/AS and 10 DGS/VCFS. Five of the 10 patients referred with the clinical diagnosis of PWS/AS showed absence of labeling for SNRPN and GABRB3 on one chromosome 15, confirming deletion of the two loci. Similarly, 6 of the 10 patients referred for DGS/VCFS showed deletion for the DGCR2/TUPLE1 loci on one chromosome 22. The remaining patients and controls had normal patterns for all the loci as indicated by FISH and PRINS. Concordant FISH and PRINS results were obtained in all patients and controls studied.

Primed in situ labeling (PRINS) for evaluation of gene deletions in cancer

Rearrangements involving the 13q14 and 17p13 chromosomal regions are often observed in leukemias and lymphomas. These rearrangements are not always identifiable cytogenetically. In more than 50% of cases, deletions occur at the submicroscopic level and the karyotypes appear normal. Molecular cytogenetic techniques such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) have accordingly contributed to the identification of a variety of subtle rearrangements such as those involving submicroscopic deletions. However, FISH is expensive, time consuming, technically burdensome, and requires cloned DNA probes. A newer technique, primed in situ labeling (PRINS), has been tested as a possible alternative to FISH. To assess the utility and efficiency of the PRINS method in the detection of RB1 and p53 deletions, we evaluated 10 patients with hematological disorders and known rearrangements, i.e., deletions involving 13q14 and 17p13 regions. The data in these cases were validated against data obtained with standard FISH probes. Our results indicate that PRINS could be used with relative ease in cytogenetics laboratories and could serve as an alternative to conventional FISH for defining deletions involving unique sequences.

Application of the primer in situ DNA synthesis (PRINS) technique to titer recombinant virus and evaluation of the efficiency of viral transduction

Titration is an important and critical step in dosing recombinant virus for gene therapy. We present a relatively fast, convenient, and sensitive method that allows for precise quantification of recombinant retrovirus. The method is based on PCR amplification of a foreign gene by the PRINS (primer in situ DNA synthesis) technique. The PRINS technique is based on the sequence-specific annealing of unlabeled oligonucleotide DNA in situ. This oligonucleotide operates as a primer for in situ chain elongation catalyzed by the Taq I polymerase. Using digoxygenin-labeled nucleotides as a substrate for chain elongation, the neo-synthetic DNA is labeled by an FITC-conjugated anti-digoxygenin antibody. To avoid the possibility of false positives, we amplified the puromycin-resistance gene, which is associated with the transgene in the same viral vector and is not normally present in mammalian cells. The retroviral titer was evaluated by counting fluorescein isothiocyanate-positive cells after PRINS labeling, while knowing the number of plated cells that were transduced with different amounts of viral supernatant. A comparable viral concentration of 1 x 10(7) infectious units/mL was found among the retroviruses.