Translocation (X;1) associated with a nonpapillary carcinoma in a young woman: a new definition for an Xp11.2 RCC subtype

Clinical heterogeneity of Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma: impact of fusion subtype, age, and stage

Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinomas harbor chromosome translocations involving the Xp11 breakpoint, resulting in gene fusions involving the TFE3 gene. The most common subtypes are the ASPSCR1-TFE3 renal cell carcinomas resulting from t(X;17)(p11;q25) translocation, and the PRCC-TFE3 renal cell carcinomas, resulting from t(X;1)(p11;q21) translocation. A formal clinical comparison of these two subtypes of Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinomas has not been performed. We report one new genetically confirmed Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma of each type. We also reviewed the literature for all published cases of ASPSCR1-TFE3 and PRCC-TFE3 renal cell carcinomas and contacted all corresponding authors to obtain or update the published follow-up information. Study of two new, unpublished cases, and review of the literature revealed that 8/8 patients who presented with distant metastasis had ASPSCR1-TFE3 renal cell carcinomas, and all but one of these patients either died of disease or had progressive disease. Regional lymph nodes were involved by metastasis in 24 of the 32 ASPSCR1-TFE3 cases in which nodes were resected, compared with 5 of 14 PRCC-TFE3 cases (P=0.02).; however, 11 of 13 evaluable patients with ASPSCR1-TFE3 renal cell carcinomas who presented with N1M0 disease remained disease free. Two PRCC-TFE3 renal cell carcinomas recurred late (at 20 and 30 years, respectively). In multivariate analysis, only older age or advanced stage at presentation (not fusion subtype) predicted death. In conclusion, ASPSCR1-TFE3 renal cell carcinomas are more likely to present at advanced stage (particularly node-positive disease) than are PRCC-TFE3 renal cell carcinomas. Although systemic metastases portend a grim prognosis, regional lymph node involvement does not, at least in short-term follow-up. The tendency for PRCC-TFE3 renal cell carcinomas to recur late warrants long-term follow-up.

Renal translocation carcinomas: clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and gene expression profiling analysis of 31 cases with a review of the literature

We report clinicopathologic features of a large series of renal translocation carcinomas from a multicentric study. Diagnosis was performed by cytogenetic examination of fresh material and/or by immunochemistry with antibodies directed against the C-terminal part of transcription factor E3 (TFE3) and native transcription factor EB (TFEB) proteins. Clinical data, follow-up, and histologic features were assessed. Antibodies against CK7, CD10, vimentin, epithelial membrane antigen, AE1-AE3, E-cadherin, alpha-methylacyl-coenzyme A racemase, melan A, and HMB45 were tested on tissue microarrays. Whole-genome microarray expression profiling was performed on 4 tumors. Twenty-nine cases were diagnosed as TFE3 and 2 as TFEB renal translocation carcinomas, including 13 males and 18 females, mean age 24.6 years. Two patients had a previous history of chemotherapy and 1 had a history of renal failure. Mean size of the tumor was 6.9 cm. Thirteen cases were > or = pT3 stage. Twelve cases were N+ or M+. Mean follow-up was 29.5 months. Three patients presented metastases and 5 have died. Mixed papillary and nested patterns with clear and/or eosinophilic cells represented the most consistent histologic appearance, with common foci of calcifications regardless of the type of translocation. Using a 30 mn incubation at room temperature, TFE3 immunostainings were positive in only 82% of our TFE3 translocation carcinomas. Both TFE3 and TFEB renal translocation carcinomas expressed CD10 and alpha-methylacyl-coenzyme A racemase in all cases. An expression of E-cadherin was observed in two-third of cases. Cytokeratins were expressed in less than one-third of cases. Melanocytic markers were expressed at least weakly in all cases except two. Unsupervised clustering on the basis of the gene expression profiling indicated a distinct subgroup of tumors. TRIM 63 glutathione S-transferase A1 and alanyl aminopeptidase are the main differentially expressed genes for this group of tumors. Our results suggest that these differentially expressed genes may serve as novel diagnostic or prognostic markers.

Molecular mechanisms underlying the MiT translocation subgroup of renal cell carcinomas

Renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) represent a heterogeneous group of neoplasms, which differ in histological, pathologic and clinical characteristics. The tumors originate from different locations within the nephron and are accompanied by different recurrent (cyto)genetic anomalies. Recently, a novel subgroup of RCCs has been defined, i.e., the MiT translocation subgroup of RCCs. These tumors originate from the proximal tubule of the nephron, exhibit pleomorphic histological features including clear cell morphologies and papillary structures, and are found predominantly in children and young adults. In addition, these tumors are characterized by the occurrence of recurrent chromosomal translocations, which result in disruption and fusion of either the TFE3 or TFEB genes, both members of the MiT family of basic helix-loop-helix/leucine-zipper transcription factor genes. Hence the name MiT translocation subgroup of RCCs. In this review several features of this RCC subgroup will be discussed, including the molecular mechanisms that may underlie their development.

[WHO classification 2004: tumors of the kidneys]

New entities, confirmed either by cytogenetic findings or by new molecular markers, have been included in the WHO 2004 renal tumor classification. Moreover, imaging improvements provide a better radiologic description of tumors. In this article, we will discuss the WHO 2004 classification and focus on the new entities and their macroscopic appearance. We will especially insist on the following entities: multilocular clear cell renal carcinoma, Xp11 translocation carcinoma, low-grade mucinous tubular carcinoma, epithelioid angiomyolipoma, and benign mixed epithelial and stromal tumor. We also discuss the new concept of hybrid oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, as well as the Birt-Hogg-Dube syndrome, which is associated with kidney tumors.

[Tumors of the kidneys: new entities]

Since 1998 new entities have surfaced in renal tumor classification and have been included in the WHO 2004 classification. In this article, we will discuss the following entities: multilocular clear cell renal carcinoma, Xp11 translocation carcinoma, low grade mucinous tubular carcinoma, epithelioid angiomyolipoma, benign mixed epithelial and stromal tumor. We will investigate new concepts of hybrid oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and the syndrome of Birt-Hogg-Dube which is associated to kidney tumors. At least, we will touch on new elements in the Bellini carcinoma definition.

Renal cell carcinoma in a pediatric patient with an inherited mitochondrial mutation

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a rare pediatric renal cancer. Recent molecular genetic studies discovered a tumor-specific mutation involving translocation of a transcription factor TFE3 in a subset of pediatric RCC with distinct histopathology. We reported a case of a 2-year-old boy with RCC associated with TFE3 translocation resulting in a PRCC-TFE3 fusion gene. Interestingly, the case carried a maternally inherited mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) alteration at the position which is usually found in MELAS (Mitochondrial Encephalopathy, Lactic Acidosis, and Stroke-like Episodes) syndrome (A3243G). Although evidence of somatic alterations in mtDNA existed in various cancers, association between inherited mtDNA mutation and pediatric renal cancer has not been reported. Our case provided the first evidence of a co-occurrence between a germ line mutation in mtDNA and the somatic mutation of pediatric RCC. With this information, we speculated a role of mitochondria mutation in the pathogenesis of this cancer.

Pediatric renal carcinoma associated with Xp11.2 translocations/TFE3 gene fusions and clinicopathologic associations

Renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) are rare in children and studies of their subtypes and clinicopathologic associations are limited to small series. We identified 8 patients with RCC treated at our institution between 1981 and 2003, reviewed their clinicopathologic features, cytogenetics findings, and evaluated the status of TFE3 expression by immunohistochemistry and numerical chromosomal alterations by interphase fluorescent in situ hybridization on paraffin-embedded tissue. These 8 patients (5 female and 3 male) had diploidy, and 5 had morphologic features compatible with the recently described RCC associated with Xp11.2 translocations/TFE3 gene fusions and demonstrated nuclear labeling for TFE3 protein by immunohistochemistry. The translocation was confirmed in 2 of these 5 patients by conventional cytogenetics. One case was a high-grade nonpapillary RCC and the other was compatible with type 2 papillary RCC. Four patients showed at least 1 chromosomal gain including trisomy 7 and/or trisomy 17. None of the tumors from male patients showed evidence of loss of the Y chromosome, but 2 patients showed numerical abnormalities of X chromosome +add(X). Two patients had sickle cell disease, and 1 of these also had stage IV-S neuroblastoma. This study suggests that many cases of RCC in children reported under the terms "papillary" and "clear cell" likely represent Xp11.2 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion-associated RCC. It also emphasizes the unusual associations of RCC with neuroblastoma and sickle cell hemoglobinopathy, which need further study.

Five new cases of juvenile renal cell carcinoma with translocations involving Xp11.2: a cytogenetic and morphologic study

Two cases of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) carrying a t(X;1)(p11.2;q21) in a 12-year-old boy and a 14 year-old girl, two cases with a t(X;1)(p11.2;p34) in a 9-year-old boy and a 31-year-old woman, and one case with a t(X;17)(p11.2;q25) in a 15-year-old boy are reported. Two are likely papillary RCC, with clear or slightly eosinophilic cells, and two to a clear cell RCC; one shows a mixture of papillary and clear cell RCC architecture. Renal cell carcinomas with translocations involving Xp11.2 form a specific entity characterized by subtle pathologic features and younger age of occurrence, especially for those with the t(X;17).

PRCC-TFE3 renal carcinomas: morphologic, immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, and molecular analysis of an entity associated with the t(X;1)(p11.2;q21)

The reappraisal of genetically defined subsets of renal tumors can help to highlight the key pathologic features of specific neoplastic entities. We report the morphologic, immunophenotypic, ultrastructural, and molecular features of 11 renal carcinomas bearing a t(X;1)(p11.2;q21) and/or the resulting PRCC-TFE3 gene fusion. The male/female ratio was 4:7. Ten patients were in the age range of 9-29 years and one was 64 years old (mean 21.3 years, median 15 years). The predominant histologic pattern was nested, with islands of tumor cells compartmentalized by thin-walled capillary vasculature. Minor variations on this pattern yielded solid, acinar, alveolar, and tubular architecture. Papillary architecture was seen in nine cases, usually as a minor component. Neoplastic cells were typically characterized by irregularly shaped nuclei with vesicular chromatin and small nucleoli not visible with a 10x objective, and cytoplasm that ranged from clear to densely granular and eosinophilic. Mitoses were extremely rare; 5 were found in 900 high power fields examined from the 11 neoplasms. The most distinctive immunohistochemical feature of these neoplasms was moderate to intense nuclear labeling for TFE3 protein. These tumors were also consistently immunoreactive for the RCC antigen (10 of 11) and CD10 (9 of 9), whereas cytokeratin and epithelial membrane antigen were negative in four cases and were positive focally in the others. Ultrastructurally, all of the six neoplasms examined showed features consistent with conventional-type (clear cell) renal carcinoma, although two demonstrated distinctive intracisternal microtubules. Both tumors tested contained PRCC-TFE3 fusion transcripts. The differential diagnosis includes conventional-type papillary renal cell carcinoma, conventional-type (clear cell) renal carcinoma, and the ASPL-TFE3 renal carcinomas associated with the t(X;17)(p11.2;q25), with the latter two being morphologically the most similar to the t(X;1) renal carcinomas. Aside from their distinctive clinicopathologic features described here, there is experimental evidence suggesting that these tumors may show differential sensitivity to certain chemotherapeutic agents.

Renal cancer: cytogenetic and molecular genetic aspects

To date, much progress has been made in the fields of cytogenetics and molecular genetics of renal tumors. The previous and recent findings have delineated the characteristics of the various tumors, particularly the cytogenetic and molecular differences that exist between papillary and nonpapillary clear cell renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). At the same time, new cytogenetic subtypes have emerged [e.g., t(X;1)] in subtypes of RCC, while in others (e.g., Wilms tumors) several new cytogenetic abnormalities and consequent molecular involvement have been found. In addition to Wilms tumor, papillary RCC, and clear-cell RCC, cytogenetic and fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses have been performed on several other tumors of the kidney, including chromophobic carcinoma, metanephric adenoma, collecting duct carcinoma, transitional cell carcinoma, congenital mesoblastic nephroma, and malignant rhabdoid tumors of the kidney. This review is therefore intended to present a concise update on the cytogenetic and molecular data on renal tumors, focusing mainly on the clinical usefulness of the findings reported in the literature.

Unique patterns of allelic imbalance distinguish type 1 from type 2 sporadic papillary renal cell carcinoma

The molecular genetic correlates of a recently proposed subclassification of papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) that designates tumors as type 1 and type 2 based on histological features have not yet been established. Alterations of known genes in PRCC include missense mutations in the MET oncogene (7q31) and rare translocations fusing TFE3 at Xp11.2 with a variety of other loci. Previous cytogenetic and allelic loss studies of PRCC cases revealed gain of chromosome 3q, 7, 8, 12q, 16, 17, and 20q, and loss of 1p, 6q, 9p, 11p, 13q, 14q, 18, 21q, X, and Y. We analyzed a series of sporadic type 1 and type 2 PRCC cases for MET mutations, TFE3 rearrangements, and allelic imbalance (AI) on 3p, 6, 7q, 9p, 11, 13q, 14q, 17q, 18, 20q, and 21q and compared selected results with a series of conventional renal cell carcinomas. A somatic mutation M1149T was identified in MET exon 17 in 1 of 35 PRCC cases whereas TFE3 rearrangements were not detected in 22 PRCC cases examined. Significant differences in AI frequency between PRCCs and conventional renal cell carcinoma cases were seen on 3p (37.5% versus 77.8%, P = 0.01), 7q (42.9% versus 5.6%, P = 0.01), and 17q (54.5% versus 20.0%, P = 0.03). Significant differences in AI frequency between type 1 and type 2 PRCCs were noted on 17q (78.6% versus 12.5%, P = 0.006) and 9p (0% versus 37.5%, P = 0.02). Additional analyses suggested that the relationship between 17q AI and PRCC type may be independent of histological grade and stage. Our findings identify genetic differences between the recently proposed type 1 and type 2 PRCCs, and support the premise that these subtypes arise from distinct genetic pathways.

Impairment of MAD2B-PRCC interaction in mitotic checkpoint defective t(X;1)-positive renal cell carcinomas

The papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC)-associated (X;1)(p11;q21) translocation fuses the genes PRCC and TFE3 and leads to cancer by an unknown molecular mechanism. We here demonstrate that the mitotic checkpoint protein MAD2B interacts with PRCC. The PRCCTFE3 fusion protein retains the MAD2B interaction domain, but this interaction is impaired. In addition, we show that two t(X;1)-positive RCC tumor cell lines are defective in their mitotic checkpoint. Transfection of PRCCTFE3, but not the reciprocal product TFE3PRCC, disrupts the mitotic checkpoint in human embryonic kidney cells. Our results suggest a dominant-negative effect of the PRCCTFE3 fusion gene leading to a mitotic checkpoint defect as an early event in papillary RCCs.

Transformation capacities of the papillary renal cell carcinoma-associated PRCCTFE3 and TFE3PRCC fusion genes

A recurrent chromosomal abnormality associated with a subset of papillary renal cell carcinomas is t(X;1)(p11;q21). This translocation leads to the formation of two fusion genes, TFE3PRCC and the reciprocal product PRCCTFE3. Both fusion genes are expressed in t(X;1)-positive renal cell carcinomas and contain major parts of the coding regions of the parental transcription factor PRCC and TFE3 genes, respectively. To find out whether these fusion genes possess transforming capacity, we transfected NIH3T3 and rat-1 cells with the fusion products, either separately or combined. When using soft agar assays, we observed colony formation in all cases. NIH3T3 cells transfected with PRCCTFE3 or PRCCTFE3 together with TFE3PRCC yielded the highest colony forming capacities. Examination of other characteristics associated with malignant transformation, i.e., growth under low-serum conditions and formation of tumors in athymic nude mice, revealed that cells transfected with PRCCTFE3 exhibited all these transformation-associated characteristics. Upon transfection of the fusion products into conditionally immortalized kidney cells, derived from the proximal tubules of an H-2Kb-tsA58 transgenic mouse, and consecutive incubation under non-permissive conditions, growth arrest was observed, followed by differentiation except for those cells transfected with PRCCTFE3. Therefore, we conclude that PRCCTFE3 may be the t(X;1)-associated fusion product that is most critical for the development of papillary renal cell carcinomas.

Molecular cytogenetics of t(X;1)(p11.2;q21) with complex rearrangements in a renal cell carcinoma

We report a new case of renal cell carcinoma with the translocation (X;1)(p11;q21) and complex structural rearrangements in a female patient of 64 years of age. We analyzed abnormalities using FISH to identify chromosomal rearrangements, and wonder whether the translocation (X;1) could represent a particular subentity in renal cell carcinoma with distinct histologic features.