DNA replication errors are frequent in mucinous cystadenocarcinoma of the ovary

Frequency of mismatch repair deficiency in ovarian cancer: a systematic review This article is a US Government work and, as such, is in the public domain of the United States of America

Loss of mismatch repair (MMR) capacity may represent an important tumor initiating mechanism in ovarian cancer. We conducted a systematic review to analyze the frequency of microsatellite instability (MSI), immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for MMR proteins, and hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter region in ovarian cancers. Studies examining MSI, loss of MMR gene expression by IHC staining and MLH1 promoter hypermethylation in ovarian cancer were identified by a systematic literature search of the PubMed electronic database through August 31, 2009. Pertinent data was extracted from eligible studies and estimates for pooled proportions were computed using random effects models. The pooled proportion of MSI detection was 0.10 (95% CI, 0.06-0.14) among 1,234 cases in 22 studies. Dinonucleotide markers had a higher frequency of instability than mononucleotide markers. The pooled proportion of MLH1 or MSH2 staining loss was 0.06 (95% CI, 0.01-0.17) among 474 cases in three studies, with a higher frequency of loss in MLH1. The pooled proportion of MLH1 methylation was 0.10 (95% CI, 0.06-0.15) among 672 cases in seven studies. Data reporting MSI and loss of MMR staining in the same cases was limited. Although MMR deficiency was found in all histologic subtypes, endometrioid cancers had the highest proportion. Approximately 10% of unselected ovarian cancers are related to MMR deficiency. While MMR deficiency is associated with improved survival in other MMR-deficiency related cancer sites, epidemiological and clinical factors related to the MMR-deficient phenotype have not been adequately studied in ovarian cancer to date.

Tumor spreading to the contralateral ovary in bilateral ovarian carcinoma is a late event in clonal evolution

Cancer of the ovary is bilateral in 25%. Cytogenetic analysis could determine whether the disease in bilateral cases is metastatic or two separately occurring primary tumors, but karyotypic information comparing the two cancerous ovaries is limited to a single report with 11 informative cases. We present a series of 32 bilateral ovarian carcinoma cases, analyzed by karyotyping and high-resolution CGH. Our karyotypic findings showed that spreading to the contralateral ovary had occurred in bilateral ovarian cancer cases and that it was a late event in the clonal evolution of the tumors. This was confirmed by the large number of similar changes detected by HR-CGH in the different lesions from the same patient. The chromosomal bands most frequently involved in structural rearrangements were 19p13 (n = 12) and 19q13 (n = 11). The chromosomal bands most frequently gained by both tumorous ovaries were 5p14 (70%), 8q23-24 (65%), 1q23-24 (57%), and 12p12 (48%), whereas the most frequently lost bands were 17p11 (78%), 17p13 (74%), 17p12 (70%), 22q13 (61%), 8p21 and 19q13 (52%), and 8p22-23 (48%). This is the first time that 5p14 is seen gained at such a high frequency in cancer of the ovary; possibly oncogene(s) involved in bilateral ovarian carcinogenesis or tumor progression may reside in this band.

A review of the clinical relevance of mismatch-repair deficiency in ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer ranks fifth in both cancer incidence and mortality among women in the United States. Defects in the mismatch-repair (MMR) pathway that arise through genetic and/or epigenetic mechanisms may be important etiologically in a reasonable proportion of ovarian cancers. Genetic mechanisms of MMR dysfunction include germline and somatic mutations in the MMR proteins. Germline mutations cause hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC), which is the third most common cause of inherited ovarian cancer after BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. An epigenetic mechanism known to cause inactivation of the MMR system is promoter hypermethylation of 1 of the MMR genes, mutL homolog 1 (MLH1). Various laboratory methods, in addition to clinical and histopathologic criteria, can be used to identify MMR-deficient ovarian cancers. Such methods include microsatellite instability analysis, immunohistochemistry, MLH1 promoter hypermethylation testing, and germline mutation analysis. In this review, the authors describe the existing literature regarding the molecular, clinical, and histologic characteristics of MMR-deficient ovarian cancers along with the possible effect on survival and treatment response. By further defining the profile of MMR-deficient ovarian cancers and their associated etiologic mechanisms, there may be a greater potential to distinguish between those of hereditary and sporadic etiology. The ability to make such distinctions may be of diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic utility.

Ovarian cancer at young age: the contribution of mismatch-repair defects in a population-based series of epithelial ovarian cancer before age 40

At least one of ten patients with ovarian cancer is estimated to develop their tumor because of heredity with the breast and ovarian cancer syndrome due to mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) being the major genetic causes. Cancer at young age is a hallmark of heredity, and ovarian cancers associated with HNPCC have been demonstrated to develop at a particularly early age. We used the Swedish Cancer Registry to identify a population-based series of 98 invasive epithelial ovarian cancers that developed before 40 years. Mucinous and endometrioid cancers were overrepresented and were diagnosed in 27% and 16% of the tumors, respectively. Immunostaining using antibodies against MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6 was used to assess the mismatch-repair status and revealed loss of expression of MLH1/PMS2 in two cases, loss of MSH2/MSH6 in one case, and loss of MSH6 only in three tumors. A microsatellite instability-high phenotype was verified in five of six tumors. Based on the identified mutations and family history of cancer, several of these individuals are likely to be affected by HNPCC. We conclude that although the causes of the vast majority of epithelial ovarian cancer at young age are unknown, HNPCC should be considered because of the high risk of metachronous colorectal cancer in the individual and the possibility of preventing additional cancers in the family through control programs.

Mismatch repair and treatment resistance in ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

The treatment of ovarian cancer is hindered by intrinsic or acquired resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy. The aim of this study is to determine the frequency of mismatch repair (MMR) inactivation in ovarian cancer and its association with resistance to platinum-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

We determined, microsatellite instability (MSI) as a marker for MMR inactivation (analysis of BAT25 and BAT26), MLH1 promoter methylation status (methylation specific PCR on bisulfite treated DNA) and mRNA expression of MLH1, MSH2, MSH3, MSH6 and PMS2 (quantitative RT-PCR) in 75 ovarian carcinomas and eight ovarian cancer cell lines

RESULTS

MSI was detected in three of the eight cell lines i.e. A2780 (no MLH1 mRNA expression due to promoter methylation), SKOV3 (no MLH1 mRNA expression) and 2774 (no altered expression of MMR genes). Overall, there was no association between cisplatin response and MMR status in these eight cell lines. Seven of the 75 ovarian carcinomas showed MLH1 promoter methylation, however, none of these showed MSI. Forty-six of these patients received platinum-based chemotherapy (11 non-responders, 34 responders, one unknown response). The resistance seen in the eleven non-responders was not related to MSI and therefore also not to MMR inactivation.

CONCLUSION

No MMR inactivation was detected in 75 ovarian carcinoma specimens and no association was seen between MMR inactivation and resistance in the ovarian cancer cell lines as well as the ovarian carcinomas. In the discussion, the results were compared to that of twenty similar studies in the literature including in total 1315 ovarian cancer patients. Although no association between response and MMR status was seen in the primary tumor the possible role of MMR inactivation in acquired resistance deserves further investigation.

The contribution of the hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome to the development of ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

Ovarian cancer has one of the highest fractions of hereditary cases. The hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, primarily due to mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2, is the main cause of heredity, but also the hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) syndrome confers an increased risk of ovarian cancer. In order to clarify the contribution of HNPCC to the development of ovarian cancer, we collected data on family history of cancer and characterized MMR function in a consecutive series of 128 tumors unselected for age at diagnosis and previously characterized for BRCA gene mutations.

METHODS

Expression of the MMR proteins MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and MSH6 was analyzed by immunohistochemistry using tissue microarray sections. Tumors with reduced staining or loss of staining were also analyzed for microsatellite instability (MSI).

RESULTS

Loss of MMR protein expression was identified in 3 ovarian cancers, all of which had a MSI-high phenotype. DNA sequence analysis revealed disease-causing germline mutations (deletions of exons 4-6 in MLH1 and a 1-nucleotide deletion in exon 5 of MSH6) in two patients diagnosed at ages 40 and 49 years, both of whom had family histories suggestive of HNPCC. The genetic defect in the third case, which was a 47-year old woman without knowledge about her family history with loss of MLH1/PMS2 expression in the tumor tissue, remains elusive. A family history suggestive of HNPCC was identified in an additional case, but this tumor showed normal, retained MMR protein expression and a microsatellite stable phenotype.

CONCLUSIONS

About 2% of ovarian cancer is caused by germline mutations in the MMR-genes, a minor proportion as compared to the contribution of the BRCA-genes (11% in the present series). However, identification of HNPCC patients is important since it allows inclusion of high-risk individuals into control programs aimed at preventing the more frequent colorectal and endometrial cancers. Tumors within the HNPCC-spectrum should therefore be included when recording a family history of cancer among patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer.

Microsatellite alterations in hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

A series of 20 hepatocellular carcinomas and 8 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas was screened from the Korean population for microsatellite alterations, including a loss of heterozygosity and replication errors using nine microsatellite markers containing several genes. The microsatellite results and our previous comparative genomic hybridization results of two tumors were compared at each locus, and the correlations between these and clinicopathologic variables were examined. The most characteristic findings were found at 13q. Replication errors were prevalent at D13S160 (13q21.2 approximately q31) and D13S292(13q12). The incidence of loss of heterozygosity, however, was higher at D13S153 (13q14.1 approximately q14.3) and D13S265(13q31 approximately q32). In contrast, there were higher deletion frequencies observed in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and higher amplification frequencies observed in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma at 13q in our previous comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) study. Higher frequencies of replication errors were observed at D16S408 (13q12 approximately q21) and D16S504(13q23 approximately q24) in the HCC. This study found that significant differences in the patterns of genetic instability of microsatellites were dependent on the chromosomal loci. It is believed that certain genes at altered CGH regions, which are relevant to the development and/or progression of these cancers, are activated by different mutation mechanisms.

Involvement of microsatellite instability in lymph node metastasis of endometrial carcinoma

We evaluated microsatellite instability (MSI) in primary lesions and lymph node metastatic lesions in 66 patients with endometrial carcinoma (FIGO stage IIIC) accompanied by lymph node metastasis. DNA was extracted from paraffin-embedded tissue of both the primary and lymph node metastatic lesions of endometrial carcinoma, and MSI was evaluated using microsatellite markers at five loci. Microsatellite instability was positive in the primary lesion in 27 patients (41%). All patients with MSI-positive primary lesions also showed MSI-positive in lymph node metastatic lesions. Of the other 39 patients with MSI-negative primary lesions, 4 showed MSI-positive in lymph node metastatic lesions. As the result of individual identification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using short tandem repeat loci in these 4 patients, PCR profiles of primary and metastatic lesions matched with those of normal controls in all 4 patients. Therefore, it was confirmed that both primary and metastatic lesions developed from the same individual. These results suggest that MSI is also involved in lymph node metastasis in the development and/or progression of endometrial carcinoma in some patients.

Are DNA mismatch repair deficiencies responsible for accumulation of genetic alterations in epithelial ovarian cancers?

To investigate the association of DNA mismatch repair deficiencies in the development and/or progression of epithelial ovarian cancers, the relationship between replication errors (RERs) and genetic alterations in three genes (p53, c-erbB2, K-ras) and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) on 6q27 was investigated in 70 patients with epithelial ovarian cancers. The presence of RERs was examined by PCR using five microsatellite markers. Mutations of p53 were analyzed by PCR-SSCP and sequencing. Amplification of c-erbB2 was analyzed by Southern blot hybridization. Point mutations of K-ras codon 12 were identified by PCR-PHFA, while 6q27LOH was examined by Southern blot hybridization. As a result, 18 of 70 patients with epithelial ovarian cancers (26%) were RER-positive and 52 patients (74%) were RER-negative. Tumors with two or three genetic alterations accounted for 28% and 33% of RER-positive tumors, respectively, and these were significantly more frequent than in the RER-negative tumors (17% and 6%, respectively)(P =.002). These results are consistent with mismatch repair deficiencies being involved in the development and/or progression of a proportion of epithelial ovarian cancers through accumulation of genetic alterations.