Cytogenetic studies in patients with mastocytosis

Precision Medicine in Systemic Mastocytosis

Mastocytosis is a rare hematological neoplasm characterized by the proliferation of abnormal clonal mast cells (MCs) in different cutaneous and extracutaneous organs. Its diagnosis is based on well-defined major and minor criteria, including the pathognomonic dense infiltrate of MCs detected in bone marrow (BM), elevated serum tryptase level, abnormal MCs CD25 expression, and the identification of KIT D816V mutation. The World Health Organization (WHO) classification subdivides mastocytosis into a cutaneous form (CM) and five systemic variants (SM), namely indolent/smoldering (ISM/SSM) and advanced SM (AdvSM) including aggressive SM (ASM), SM associated to hematological neoplasms (SM-AHN), and mast cell leukemia (MCL). More than 80% of patients with SM carry a somatic point mutation of KIT at codon 816, which may be targeted by kinase inhibitors. The presence of additional somatic mutations detected by next generation sequencing analysis may impact prognosis and drive treatment strategy, which ranges from symptomatic drugs in indolent forms to kinase-inhibitors active on KIT. Allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) may be considered in selected SM cases. Here, we review the clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic issues of SM, with special emphasis on the translational implications of SM genetics for a precision medicine approach in clinical practice.

The Prognostic Role of Cytogenetics Analysis in Philadelphia Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal stem cell disorders characterized collectively by clonal proliferation of myeloid cells with variable morphologic maturity and hematopoietic efficiency. Although the natural history of these neoplasms can be measured sometimes in decades more than years, the cytogenetics analysis can offer useful information regarding the prognosis. Cytogenetics has a well-established prognostic role in acute leukemias and in myelodysplastic syndromes, where it drives the clinical decisions. NGS techniques can find adverse mutations with clear prognostic value and are currently included in the prognostic evaluation of MPNs in scores such as MIPSS, GIPSS, MIPSS-PV, and MIPSS-ET. We suggest that cytogenetics (considering its availability and relative cost) has a role regarding prognostic and therapeutic decisions.

Incidence and prognostic impact of cytogenetic aberrations in patients with systemic mastocytosis

The clinical behavior of systemic mastocytosis (SM) is strongly associated with activating mutations in KIT (D816V in >80% of cases), with the severity of the phenotype influenced by additional somatic mutations, for example, in SRSF2, ASXL1, or RUNX1. Complex molecular profiles are frequently associated with the presence of an associated hematologic neoplasm (AHN) and an unfavorable clinical outcome. However, little is known about the incidence and prognostic impact of cytogenetic aberrations. We analyzed cytogenetic and molecular characteristics of 109 patients (KIT D816V+, n = 102, 94%) with indolent (ISM, n = 26) and advanced SM (n = 83) with (n = 73, 88%) or without AHN. An aberrant karyotype was identified in SM-AHN (16/73, 22%) patients only. In patients with an aberrant karyotype, additional somatic mutations were identified in 12/16 (75%) patients. Seven of 10 (70%) patients with a poor-risk karyotype, for example, monosomy 7 or complex karyotype, and 1/6 (17%) patients with a good-risk karyotype progressed to secondary acute myeloid leukemia (n = 7) or mast cell leukemia (n = 1) within a median of 40 months (range 2-190, P = .04). In advanced SM, the median overall survival (OS) of poor-risk karyotype patients was significantly shorter than in good-risk/normal karyotype patients (4 vs 39 months; hazard ratio 11.7, 95% CI 5.0-27.3; P < .0001). Additionally, the shortened OS in patients with poor-risk karyotype was independent from the mutation status. In summary, a poor-risk karyotype is an independent prognostic variable in advanced SM. Cytogenetic and molecular analyses should be routinely performed in all patients with advanced SM ± AHN because these investigations greatly support prognostication and treatment decisions.

Systemic mast cell activation disease: the role of molecular genetic alterations in pathogenesis, heritability and diagnostics

Despite increasing understanding of its pathophysiology, the aetiology of systemic mast cell activation disease (MCAD) remains largely unknown. Research has shown that somatic mutations in kinases are necessary for the establishment of a clonal mast cell population, in particular mutations in the tyrosine kinase Kit and in enzymes and receptors with crucial involvement in the regulation of mast cell activity. However, other, as yet undetermined, abnormalities are necessary for the manifestation of clinical disease. The present article reviews molecular genetic research into the identification of disease-associated genes and their mutational alterations. The authors also present novel data on familial systemic MCAD and review the associated literature. Finally, the importance of understanding the molecular basis of inherited mutations in terms of diagnostics and therapy is emphasized.

Systemic mastocytosis

Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a clonal disorder of hematopoietic system characterized by abnormal growth and accumulation of mast cells in various tissues. Its clinical spectrum ranges from mild disease to an aggressive course with life-threatening conditions. Some of the clinical signs or symptoms of SM (hyperhidrosis, syncope and hypotensive/tachycardiac attacks) require consideration of pheochromocytoma and carcinoid syndrome in the differential diagnosis. The diagnosis relies on the demonstration of mast cell aggregates in bone marrow or extracutaneous tissues. The World Health Organization categorizes SM into 6 variants: indolent SM, SM with associated clonal hematological nonmast cell lineage disease, aggressive SM, mast cell leukemia, mast cell sarcoma and extracutaneous mastocytosis. Patients with indolent SM have a favorable prognosis with a life expectancy comparable with the healthy population, and symptomatic treatment is usually sufficient. However, more aggressive forms may be life threatening, and cytoreductive treatment is indicated in most cases.

World health organization classification, evaluation, and genetics of the myeloproliferative neoplasm variants

There is no single category in the fourth edition (2008) of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms that encompasses all of the diseases referred to by some authors as the myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) "variants." Instead, they are considered as distinct entities and are distributed among various subgroups of myeloid neoplasms in the classification scheme. These relatively uncommon neoplasms do not meet the criteria for any so-called "classical" MPN (chronic myelogenous leukemia, polycythemia vera, primary myelofibrosis, or essential thrombocythemia) and, although some exhibit myelodysplasia, none meets the criteria for any myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). They are a diverse group of neoplasms ranging from fairly well-characterized disorders such as chronic myelomonocytic leukemia to rare and thus poorly characterized disorders such as chronic neutrophilic leukemia. Recently, however, there has been a surge of information regarding the genetic infrastructure of neoplastic cells in the MPN variants, allowing some to be molecularly defined. Nevertheless, in most cases, correlation of clinical, genetic, and morphologic findings is required for diagnosis and classification. The fourth edition of the WHO classification provides a framework to incorporate those neoplasms in which a genetic abnormality is a major defining criterion of the disease, such as those associated with eosinophilia and abnormalities of PDGFRA, PDGFRB, and FGFR1, as well as for those in which no specific genetic defect has yet been discovered and which remain clinically and pathologically defined. An understanding of the clinical, morphologic, and genetic features of the MPN variants will facilitate their diagnosis.

[Prognostic effect of cytoplasmic CD79a expression in acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21)]

BACKGROUND

Although cytoplasmic CD79a (cytCD79a) is a highly lineage-specific marker of B lymphoid cells and plays an important role in the diagnosis of acute leukemia, its clinical significance is not fully understood. We aimed to investigate the relationship between cytCD79a positivity and survival probability, and to evaluate the prognostic value of cytCD79a expression in AML with t(8;21) (q22;q22).

METHODS

A total of 68 cases of AML with t(8;21)(q22;q22) were diagnosed based on conventional morphology, cytochemistry, flow cytometrty, and cytogenetic and molecular genetic analysis. Immunohistochemistry of cytCD79a was performed retrospectively. Laboratory and clinical findings were reviewed.

RESULTS

Five patients among 68 AML with t(8;21)(q22;q22) revealed cytCD79a positive reaction; scores for myeloid lineage/B-lymphoid lineage were 5/3-3.5. Among the five cytCD79a positive patients, only one patient was a child. Three patients were with refractory AML or relapsed, and two patients died within 10 months. Median survival time of cytCD79a positive group was shorter (8.0 months) than that (61.3 months) of cytCD79a negative group. The survival probability of the cytCD79a expression group was significantly lower than classical AML with t(8;21)(q22;q22) (P=0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings emphasize the necessity of investigating cytCD79a, especially in AML with t(8;21)(q22;q22), for a different clinical prognostic value.

Phase II study of dasatinib in Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute and chronic myeloid diseases, including systemic mastocytosis

PURPOSE

Molecular characterization of Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph-) chronic myeloproliferative disorders, such as systemic mastocytosis (SM), has provided a clear rationale for investigating novel targeted therapies. The tyrosine kinase (TK) inhibitor dasatinib is 325-fold more potent against Bcr-Abl TK than imatinib in vitro, significantly inhibiting wild-type KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta TKs, and is active against cells carrying the mutant KIT-D816V gene.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In this phase 2, open-label study, the efficacy of dasatinib (140 mg/d) was investigated in 67 patients with various Ph- myeloid disorders, including SM (n = 33; 28 KIT-D816V positive).

RESULTS

The overall response rate to dasatinib in patients with SM was 33%. Only two patients, one with SM-myelofibrosis and one with SM-chronic eosinophilic leukemia, achieved complete response (elimination of mastocytosis) lasting for 5 and 16 months, respectively. Both patients were negative for KIT-D816V mutation, had low tryptase levels, abnormal WBC counts, and anemia, and had failed prior therapy with erythropoietin. Additional nine SM patients had symptomatic response, lasting 3 to 18+ months. Complete responses were achieved in two other patients (acute myeloid leukemia and hypereosinophilic syndrome). No responses were observed among patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and primary myelofibrosis. The majority of adverse events were grade 1/2.

CONCLUSION

These data show that dasatinib therapy may benefit a selected group of SM patients, primarily by improving their symptoms, but it does not eliminate the disease in the patients with KIT-D816V mutation.

Diagnostic evaluation and classification of mastocytosis

During the past few years, mastocytosis research has reached important milestones, including the formulation of diagnostic criteria, definition of markers, and targeting of mutated KIT. Important aims for the future are to standardize diagnostic assays and techniques, and to achieve harmonization among centers as a basis for the design of multicenter clinical trials in SM, including the rare ASM and MCL subvariants.

Novel approaches in the treatment of systemic mastocytosis

In the absence of curative options, therapy for aggressive forms of systemic mastocytosis (SM) has relied in the use of cytoreductive agents, mainly interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) and cladribine. However, responses are transient and only occur in a subset of patients. Gain-of-function mutations at codon 816 of the KIT protooncogene lead to constitutively active Kit receptor molecules, which are central to the pathogenesis of SM. Recent advances in the understanding of the molecular underpinnings of SM have led to the development of small molecules targeting mutant Kit tyrosine kinase isoforms that significantly have widened the range of therapeutic options for patients with SM. Some of these promising agents, such as dasatinib, AMN107, and PKC412, currently are under investigation in clinical trials whereas, others are at different stages of preclinical development. In addition, monoclonal antibodies directed to neoplastic mast cell-restricted surface antigens constitute a viable option for the treatment of SM that warrants further investigation.

Mastocytosis: pathology, genetics, and current options for therapy

Mast cell disorders are defined by an abnormal accumulation of tissue mast cells (MCs) in one or more organ systems. Symptoms in mastocytosis result from MC-derived mediators and, less frequently, from destructive infiltration of MCs. Cutaneous mastocytosis (CM) is a benign disease of the skin and may regress spontaneously. Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a persistent disease in which a somatic c-kit mutation at codon 816 is usually detectable in MCs and their progenitors. The clinical course in these patients is variable ranging from asymptomatic for years to highly aggressive and rapidly devastating. The WHO discriminates five categories of SM: indolent SM (ISM), aggressive SM (ASM), SM with associated clonal hematological non-MC-lineage disease (AHNMD), and mast cell leukemia (MCL). The c-kit mutation D816V is quite common and may be found in all SM-categories. In SM-AHNMD, additional genetic abnormalities have been reported, whereas no additional defects are yet known for ASM or MCL. Patients with ISM and CM are treated with "mediator-targeting" drugs, whereas patients with ASM or MCL are candidates for cytoreductive therapy. The use of "Kit-targeting" tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as STI571 (Imatinib, Gleevec), has also been suggested. However, the D816V mutation of c-kit is associated with relative resistance against STI571. Therefore, these patients require alternative targeted drugs or new drug-combinations. In patients with SM-AHNMD, separate treatment plans for the SM-component and the AHNMD should be established. Examples include the use of STI571 in patients with SM plus hypereosinophilic syndrome (SM-HES) and the FIPL1/PDGFRA fusion gene target, or chemotherapy for eradication of AML in patients with SM-AML.

Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia and Myeloproliferative Disease

In Section I, Dr. Stephen O’Brien reviews the latest data on the clinical use of imatinib (STI571, Gleevec, Glivec) in CML. His review focuses on the use of imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic phase patients and summarizes cytogenetic and molecular response data, as well as use of the agent at high doses and in combination with other drugs. A brief summary of the prospective international Phase III studies that are currently ongoing is also provided, and the issues of resistance and definition of suboptimal therapeutic response are also covered. Finally, therapeutic decision-making and treatment strategy are considered.

In Section II, Dr. Ayalew Tefferi considers the latest developments in the biology and therapy of myeloid metaplasia/myelofibrosis. Dr. Tefferi covers what is currently understood of the biology of the disease and reviews established therapies for the condition as well as novel agents that are being used in clinical trials. The development of optimal management strategies for the disease is considered.

In Section III, Dr. Peter Valent reviews the classification of mast cell proliferative disorders and covers the clinical and pathological presentation of this group of neoplasms. He reviews the state-of-the-art regarding the molecular biology of mastocytosis along with diagnostic criteria and novel treatment concepts.

Trisomies 8 and 9 not detected with fish in patients with mastocytosis

Mastocytosis is a rare disease characterized by proliferation of mast cells in one or several organs. With conventional cytogenetics about 35% of the patients have chromosomally abnormal clones in bone marrow cells. It has been proposed to include the mast cell disease among the myeloproliferative disorders, in which trisomy for chromosome 8 and 9 can appear in the bone marrow cells. In this study bone marrow cells from eight patients with mastocytosis, two had as well an associated hematological disease, have been examined with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for enumeration of chromosome no8 and 9. In conventional cytogenetics two patients had clones with del(20) and 47,XY,+14/45, X,-Y, respectively. None of the patients with mastocytosis had clones with trisomy 8 or 9 with either cytogenetics or FISH.

Mastocytosis

Mastocytosis is defined by a pathological increase in mast cell numbers in tissues. Recent clinical observations on rare manifestations highlight the diversity of this disease. The diagnosis is now aided by new surrogate markers. At the molecular level, recent studies have reinforced the role of activating mutations in KIT in the etiology of mastocytosis. These findings provide a conceptual basis for the development for new therapeutic strategies.

Mastocytosis: review of clinical and experimental aspects

Mastcytosis is a rare disease characterized by an abnormal increase of mast cells in tissues. The skin is the organ most frequently involved, but mast cells also accumulate in the bone marrow, gastrointestinal tract, lymph nodes, spleen, and liver. Recent studies suggest that activating mutations of c-kit, a protooncogene encoding for the receptor (kit) of stem cell factor, are a possible cause of some forms of mastocytosis. In addition, an increased rate of chromosomal aberrations has been found. Despite significant advances in research on mastocytosis, curative treatment is not yet available. Current management is based on avoidance of mediator-releasing triggers and symptomatic treatment.