Performance of an automated system for quantitation of hepatitis C virus core antigen

Who to test and how to test for chronic hepatitis C infection - 2016 WHO testing guidance for low- and middle-income countries

Testing and diagnosis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the gateway for access to both treatment and prevention services, and crucial for an effective hepatitis epidemic response. In contrast to HIV, a systematic approach to hepatitis C testing has been fragmented and limited to a few countries, and there remains a large burden of undiagnosed cases globally. Key challenges in the current hepatitis testing response, include lack of simple, reliable, and low cost diagnostic tests, laboratory capacity, and testing facilities; inadequate data to guide country-specific hepatitis testing approaches and who to test; stigmatization and social marginalization of some groups with or at risk of viral hepatitis; and lack of international or national guidelines on hepatitis testing for resource-limited settings. New tools to support the hepatitis global response include the 2016 Global Hepatitis Health Sector Strategy which include targets for testing and diagnosis, and World Health Organization (WHO) 2016 hepatitis testing guidelines for adults, adolescents, and children in low- and middle-income countries. The testing guidance complements recent published WHO guidance on the prevention, care and treatment of chronic hepatitis C and hepatitis B infection. These testing guidelines outline the public health approach to strengthening and expanding current testing practices for HCV and HBV and address what serological and virological assays to use, and who to test, as well as interventions to promote linkage to prevention and care after testing. They are intended for use across all age groups and populations. See boxes for key recommendations. Future directions and innovations in viral hepatitis testing include use of point-of-care assays for nucleic acid testing (NAT) and core antigen; validation of dried blood spots specimens with different commercial serological and NAT assays; multiplex and polyvalent platforms for integrated testing of HIV, HBV and HCV; and potential for self-testing.

Hepatitis C Core Antigen Testing for Diagnosis of Hepatitis C Virus Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection requires both a positive HCV antibody screen and confirmatory nucleic acid testing (NAT). Testing for hepatitis C virus core antigen (HCVcAg) is a potential alternative to NAT.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the accuracy of diagnosis of active HCV infection among adults and children for 5 HCVcAg tests compared with NAT.

DATA SOURCES

EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from 1990 through 31 March 2016.

STUDY SELECTION

Case-control, cross-sectional, cohort, or randomized trials that compared any of 5 HCVcAg tests with an NAT reference standard.

DATA EXTRACTION

2 independent reviewers extracted data and assessed quality using an adapted QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2) tool.

DATA SYNTHESIS

44 studies evaluated 5 index tests. Studies for the Abbott ARCHITECT HCV Ag assay had the highest quality, whereas those for the Ortho HCV Ag enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) had the lowest quality. From bivariate analyses, the sensitivity and specificity of the assays were as follows: Abbott ARCHITECT, 93.4% (95% CI, 90.1% to 96.4%) and 98.8% (CI, 97.4% to 99.5%); Ortho ELISA, 93.2% (CI, 81.6% to 97.7%) and 99.2% (CI, 87.9% to 100%); and Hunan Jynda Bioengineering Group HCV Ag ELISA, 59.5% (CI, 46.0% to 71.7%) and 82.9% (CI, 58.6% to 94.3%). Insufficient data were available for a meta-analysis about the Fujirebio Lumipulse Ortho HCV Ag and Eiken Lumispot HCV Ag assays. In 3 quantitative studies using Abbott ARCHITECT, HCVcAg correlated closely with HCV RNA levels greater than 3000 IU/mL.

LIMITATIONS

Insufficient data were available on covariates, such as HIV or hepatitis B virus status, for subgroup analyses. Few studies reported genotypes of isolates, and data for genotypes 4, 5, and 6 were scant. Most studies were conducted in high-resource settings and reference laboratories.

CONCLUSION

The HCVcAg assays with signal amplification have high sensitivity, high specificity, and good correlation with HCV RNA levels greater than 3000 IU/mL and have the potential to replace NAT in settings with high HCV prevalence.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

National Institutes of Health.

A new sensitive and automated chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay for quantitative determination of hepatitis C virus core antigen

A new sensitive and automated chemiluminescent assay was developed for the quantitative determination of hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen (Ag) in human sera or plasma: the Abbott ARCHITECT HCV Ag test. The assay sensitivity was determined by testing 10 commercial HCV seroconversion panels. Without exception, a positive result for HCV core Ag was observed before anti-HCV detection, resulting in an average reduction in the period between exposure and detection of 35.8 days. Both HCV core Ag and HCV RNA were detected in the panels at the same time, indicating equivalent sensitivity and detectability. A total of 197 HCV specimens comprising genotypes 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 3a, 3k, 4a, 5a and 6a were evaluated. Among these, 196 (99.5%), 191 (97%) and 193 (98%) were reactive using the HCV Ag, the immunoradiometric HCV Ag and the Amplicor HCV Monitor 2 assays, respectively. A comparison with the Amplicor HCV Monitor 2 showed a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.74. The specificity of the assay was established at 99.8% by testing 5403 specimens from US volunteer blood donors, hospitalized patients and individuals with medical conditions unrelated to HCV infection, in addition to specimens containing potentially interfering substances.

Long-term evolution of serum and liver viral markers in patients treated for chronic hepatitis C and sustained response

Few studies have analysed the evolution of HCV markers in chronic hepatitis C (CHC)-treated patients. We have evaluated the presence or absence of serum and liver HCV-RNA, the core antigen (HCV-cAg) and the loss of specific antibodies (anti-HCV), in long-term sustained responders (SR). One hundred and seventy-six patients (132 SR and 44 nonresponders (NR) were included in the study. HCV-RNA was determined in serum and liver by a commercial PCR-kit. HCV-Ag was determined by ELISA and specific antibodies against HCV by means of a commercial line immunoblot assay (LIA) technique. Serum HCVcAg was found positive in three (4.2%) SR and in one (4%) NR (NS). Four SR (3.6%) and 44 NR (100%) were also HCV-RNA (+) in liver tissue. Two patients were HCV-cAg (+). A good correlation was found between the serum levels of HCV-cAg and HCV-RNA (r = 0.847, P < 0.001). Specific antibodies (anti-HCV) were determined by LIA in 45 patients. A decrease was found in the number of patients who presented reactivity to bands E2 and NS4 when we compared SR with a follow-up of more than 5 years with NR and SR with a follow-up <5 years (P < 0.01 and 0.005). A good correlation was found between the HCV-cAg and HCV-RNA serum levels in CHC-treated patients (P < 0.001). Few SR (3.6%) had HCV-RNA in the liver, and HCV-cAg (1.8%) in serum. In SR with more than 5 years of follow-up a clear tendency exists in the trend to clarify the bands E2 and NS4 of anti-HCV in serum.

The role of core antigen detection in management of hepatitis C: a critical review

Several assays in research format and two commercial assays for the detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) core protein or HCV core antigen have been developed in recent years. In order to elucidate the role and significance of HCV core antigen detection in the diagnosis and management of hepatitis C, we reviewed 56 studies published in peer-reviewed journals until September 2004. Evaluations in transfusion settings showed that the HCV core antigen assay detects HCV infection, similarly as nucleic acid techniques (NAT), between 40 and 50 days earlier than the current third generation HCV antibody screening assays. HCV core antigen levels closely track HCV RNA dynamics, and allow clinical monitoring of a patient's therapy, independently of HCV genotype, however, mainly in the samples with HCV RNA levels above 20,000 IU/ml. Considering the lower sensitivity of HCV core antigen detection in comparison to NAT, the HCV core antigen assay is not practical for the determination of the end of treatment response and sustained viral response, but could be useful for the determination of early viral response in the pegylated interferon-alpha and ribavirin treated patients infected with HCV genotype 1. The HCV core antigen detection is a viable tool for study of hepatitis C pathogenesis. The HCV core antigen can be used as a marker of HCV replication in anti-HCV positive individuals in the areas of the world that cannot afford NAT and/or in the settings that are not equipped or competent to perform HCV RNA testing. Because the manufacturer of HCV core antigen assays recently stopped an active marketing of these assays in several countries, it will, unfortunately and probably, never be possible to determine the actual potential and usefulness of HCV core antigen testing in the management of hepatitis C.