Mast cells contribute to PACAP-induced dermal oedema in mice

VPAC1 and VPAC2 receptors mediate tactile hindpaw hypersensitivity and carotid artery dilatation induced by PACAP38 in a migraine relevant mouse model

BACKGROUND

Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP) is a neuropeptide pivotal in migraine pathophysiology and is considered a promising new migraine drug target. Although intravenous PACAP triggers migraine attacks and a recent phase II trial with a PACAP-inhibiting antibody showed efficacy in migraine prevention, targeting the PACAP receptor PAC1 alone has been unsuccessful. The present study investigated the role of three PACAP receptors (PAC1, VPAC1 and VPAC2) in inducing migraine-relevant hypersensitivity in mice.

METHODS

Hindpaw hypersensitivity was induced by repeated PACAP38 injections. Tactile sensitivity responses were quantified using von Frey filaments in three knockout (KO) mouse strains, each lacking one of the PACAP-receptors (Ntotal = 160). Additionally, ex vivo wire myography was used to assess vasoactivity of the carotid artery, and gene expression of PACAP receptors was examined by qPCR.

RESULTS

PACAP38 induced hypersensitivity in WT controls (p < 0.01) that was diminished in VPAC1 and VPAC2 KO mice (p < 0.05). In contrast, PAC1 KO mice showed similar responses to WT controls (p > 0.05). Myograph experiments supported these findings showing diminished vasoactivity in VPAC1 and VPAC2 KO mice. We found no upregulation of the non-modified PACAP receptors in KO mice.

CONCLUSIONS

This study assessed all three PACAP receptors in a migraine mouse model and suggests a significant role of VPAC receptors in migraine pathophysiology. The lack of hypersensitivity reduction in PAC1 KO mice suggests the involvement of other PACAP receptors or compensatory mechanisms. The results indicate that targeting only individual PACAP receptors may not be an effective migraine treatment.

Migraine Treatment: Towards New Pharmacological Targets

Migraine is a debilitating neurological condition affecting millions of people worldwide. Until a few years ago, preventive migraine treatments were based on molecules with pleiotropic targets, developed for other indications, and discovered by serendipity to be effective in migraine prevention, although often burdened by tolerability issues leading to low adherence. However, the progresses in unravelling the migraine pathophysiology allowed identifying novel putative targets as calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). Nevertheless, despite the revolution brought by CGRP monoclonal antibodies and gepants, a significant percentage of patients still remains burdened by an unsatisfactory response, suggesting that other pathways may play a critical role, with an extent of involvement varying among different migraine patients. Specifically, neuropeptides of the CGRP family, such as adrenomedullin and amylin; molecules of the secretin family, such as pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP); receptors, such as transient receptor potential (TRP) channels; intracellular downstream determinants, such as potassium channels, but also the opioid system and the purinergic pathway, have been suggested to be involved in migraine pathophysiology. The present review provides an overview of these pathways, highlighting, based on preclinical and clinical evidence, as well as provocative studies, their potential role as future targets for migraine preventive treatment.

Role of PACAP in migraine: An alternative to CGRP?

Migraine is a widespread and debilitating neurological condition affecting more than a billion people worldwide. Thus, more effective migraine therapies are highly needed. In the last decade, two endogenous neuropeptides, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP), were identified to be implicated in migraine. Recently, introduction of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) blocking the CGRP is the most important advance in migraine therapy for decades. However, 40% of patients are unresponsive to these new drugs. We believe that PACAP may be involved in these patients. Like CGRP, PACAP is located to sensory nerve fibers, it dilates cranial arteries, it causes migraine when infused into patients and it is a peptide that lends itself to antibody therapy. Also, recent studies suggest that the PACAP pathway is independent of the CGRP pathway. Understanding the signaling pathways of PACAP may therefore lead to identification of novel therapeutic targets of particular interest in patients unresponsive to anti-CGRP therapy. Accordingly, neutralizing mAb to PACAP is currently in clinical phase II development. The aim of the present review is, therefore, to give a thorough account of the existing data on PACAP, its receptors and its relation to migraine.

PACAP signaling is not involved in GTN- and levcromakalim-induced hypersensitivity in mouse models of migraine

BACKGROUND

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonizing drugs represents the most important advance in migraine therapy for decades. However, these new drugs are only effective in 50-60% of patients. Recent studies have shown that the pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP38) pathway is independent from the CGRP signaling pathway. Here, we investigate PACAP38 signaling pathways in relation to glyceryl trinitrate (GTN), levcromakalim and sumatriptan.

METHODS

In vivo mouse models of PACAP38-, GTN-, and levcromakalim-induced migraine were applied using tactile sensitivity to von Frey filaments as measuring readout. Signaling pathways involved in the three models were dissected using PACAP-inhibiting antibodies (mAbs) and sumatriptan.

RESULTS

We showed that PACAP mAbs block PACAP38 induced hypersensitivity, but not via signaling pathways involved in GTN and levcromakalim. Also, sumatriptan has no effect on PACAP38-induced hypersensitivity relevant to migraine. This is the first study testing the effect of a PACAP-inhibiting drug on GTN- and levcromakalim-induced hypersensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the findings in our mouse model of migraine using migraine-inducing compounds and anti-migraine drugs, we suggest that PACAP acts via a distinct pathway. Using PACAP38 antagonism may be a novel therapeutic target of interest in a subgroup of migraine patients who do not respond to existing therapies.

Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide: 30 Years in Research Spotlight and 600 Million Years in Service

Emerging from the depths of evolution, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) and its receptors (i.e., PAC1, VPAC1, VPAC2) are present in multicellular organisms from Tunicates to humans and govern a remarkable number of physiological processes. Consequently, the clinical relevance of PACAP systems spans a multifaceted palette that includes more than 40 disorders. We aimed to present the versatility of PACAP1-38 actions with a focus on three aspects: (1) when PACAP1-38 could be a cause of a malfunction, (2) when PACAP1-38 could be the cure for a malfunction, and (3) when PACAP1-38 could either improve or impair biology. PACAP1-38 is implicated in the pathophysiology of migraine and post-traumatic stress disorder whereas an outstanding protective potential has been established in ischemia and in Alzheimer’s disease. Lastly, PACAP receptors could mediate opposing effects both in cancers and in inflammation. In the light of the above, the duration and concentrations of PACAP agents must be carefully set at any application to avoid unwanted consequences. An enormous amount of data accumulated since its discovery (1989) and the first clinical trials are dated in 2017. Thus in the field of PACAP research: “this is not the end, not even the beginning of the end, but maybe the end of the beginning.”

PACAP and migraine headache: immunomodulation of neural circuits in autonomic ganglia and brain parenchyma

The discovery that intravenous (IV) infusions of the neuropeptide PACAP-38 (pituitary adenylyl cyclase activating peptide-38) induced delayed migraine-like headaches in a large majority of migraine patients has resulted in considerable excitement in headache research. In addition to suggesting potential therapeutic targets for migraine, the finding provides an opportunity to better understand the pathological events from early events (aura) to the headache itself. Although PACAP-38 and the closely related peptide VIP (vasoactive intestinal peptide) are well-known as vasoactive molecules, the dilation of cranial blood vessels per se is no longer felt to underlie migraine headaches. Thus, more recent research has focused on other possible PACAP-mediated mechanisms, and has raised some important questions. For example, (1) are endogenous sources of PACAP (or VIP) involved in the triggering and/or propagation of migraine headaches?; (2) which receptor subtypes are involved in migraine pathophysiology?; (3) can we identify specific anatomical circuit(s) where PACAP signaling is involved in the features of migraine? The purpose of this review is to discuss the possibility, and supportive evidence, that PACAP acts to induce migraine-like symptoms not only by directly modulating nociceptive neural circuits, but also by indirectly regulating the production of inflammatory mediators. We focus here primarily on postulated extra-dural sites because potential mechanisms of PACAP action in the dura are discussed in detail elsewhere (see X, this edition).

PACAP38: Emerging Drug Target in Migraine and Cluster Headache

Here, we review the role of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide-38 (PACAP38) in migraine and cluster headache (CH). Mounting evidence implicates signaling molecule PACAP38 in the pathophysiology of migraine. Human provocation studies show PACAP38 induces migraine attacks in migraine patients without aura and marked and sustained dilation of extracerebral arteries. PACAP38 selectively targets the PAC₁ receptor making this receptor a promising candidate for targeted migraine therapy. Randomized clinical trials are warranted to pursue this possible treatment pathway. PACAP38 provocation studies in CH could elucidate possible involvement of PACAP38 in CH pathophysiology and predict efficacy of PACAP38 antagonists in this primary headache.

PACAP and its receptors in cranial arteries and mast cells

Background

In migraineurs pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide1–38 (PACAP1–38) is a potent migraine provoking substance and the accompanying long lasting flushing suggests degranulation of mast cells. Infusion of the closely related vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) either induces headache or flushing. This implicates the pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide type I receptor (PAC1) to be involved in the pathophysiology of PACAP1–38 provoked headaches. Here we review studies characterizing the effects of mainly PACAP but also of VIP on cerebral and meningeal arteries and mast cells.

Discussion

PACAP1–38, PACAP1–27 and VIP dilate cerebral and meningeal arteries from several species including man. In rat cerebral and meningeal arteries the dilation seems to be mediated preferably via vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor type 1 (VPAC1) receptors while, in human, middle meningeal artery dilation induced via vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor type 2 (VPAC2) receptors cannot be ruled out. PACAP1–38 is a strong degranulator of peritoneal and dural mast cells while PACAP1–27 and VIP only have weak effects. More detailed characterization studies suggest that mast cell degranulation is not mediated via the known receptors for PACAP1–38 but rather via a still unknown receptor coupled to phospholipase C.

Conclusion

It is suggested that PACAP1–38 might induce migraine via degranulation of dural mast cells via a yet unknown receptor.

Mast cells are critical for the limitation of thrombin-induced skin inflammation

Thrombin, a key player in coagulation, is widely held to induce and promote inflammation. As of now, the features, kinetics and control of thrombin's proinflammatory effects on the skin remain to be characterized in detail. We, therefore, injected thrombin into the ear skin of mice and observed strong, dose-dependent and transient ear swelling responses as well as mast cell (MC) degranulation. Unexpectedly, thrombin induced even stronger, not reduced, ear swelling in MC-deficient Kit^W-sh/W-sh mice. Prior local reconstitution of Kit^W-sh/W-sh mice with MCs inhibited this effect, indicating that MCs may contribute to the control of thrombin-induced skin inflammation. In line with previous studies, we found that MCs express the thrombin receptors PAR1, PAR3 and PAR4, thrombin induces direct and dose-dependent MC degranulation, and that degranulated MCs inactivate thrombin. Further findings suggested that MC-mediated protection from thrombin-induced inflammation is likely to rely on the effects of MC proteases. We show for the first time that MC-deficient mice and MC protease 4-deficient mice with normal numbers of MCs show markedly increased ear swelling in response to thrombin as compared to wild-type mice. Taken together, these results suggest that thrombin-induced skin inflammation is controlled, in part, by MC protease 4 released from activated MCs. For MC-driven diseases such as chronic spontaneous urticaria, which has been linked to increased thrombin generation, this might mean that MCs may contribute to the resolution of skin inflammatory responses.

Differential regulatory role of pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide in the serum-transfer arthritis model

Objective

Pituitary adenylate cyclase–activating polypeptide (PACAP) expressed in capsaicin-sensitive sensory neurons and immune cells has divergent functions in inflammatory and pain processes. This study was undertaken to investigate the involvement of PACAP in a mouse model of rheumatoid arthritis.

Methods

Arthritis was induced in PACAP^−/− and wild-type (PACAP^+/+) mice by K/BxN serum transfer. General features of the disease were investigated by semiquantitative scoring, plethysmometry, and histopathologic analysis. Mechano- and thermonociceptive thresholds and motor functions were also evaluated. Metabolic activity was assessed by positron emission tomography. Bone morphology was measured by in vivo micro–computed tomography, myeloperoxidase activity and superoxide production by bioluminescence imaging with luminol and lucigenin, respectively, and vascular permeability by fluorescent indocyanine green dye study.

Results

PACAP^+/+ mice developed notable joint swelling, reduced grasping ability, and mechanical (but not thermal) hyperalgesia after K/BxN serum transfer. In PACAP^−/− mice clinical scores and edema were significantly reduced, and mechanical hyperalgesia and motor impairment were absent, throughout the 2-week period of observation. Metabolic activity and superoxide production increased in the tibiotarsal joints of wild-type mice but were significantly lower in PACAP^−/− animals. Myeloperoxidase activity in the ankle joints of PACAP^−/− mice was significantly reduced in the early phase of arthritis, but increased in the late phase. Synovial hyperplasia was also significantly increased, and progressive bone spur formation was observed in PACAP-deficient mice only.

Conclusion

In PACAP-deficient mice with serum-transfer arthritis, joint swelling, vascular leakage, hyperalgesia, and early inflammatory cell accumulation are reduced; in the later phase of the disease, immune cell function and bone neoformation are increased. Elucidation of the underlying pathways of PACAP activity may open promising new avenues for development of therapy in inflammatory arthritis.

PACAP-38 infusion causes sustained vasodilation of the middle meningeal artery in the rat: possible involvement of mast cells

BACKGROUND

In healthy human volunteers and in migraineurs, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide-38 (PACAP-38) infusion caused sustained vasodilation of the middle meningeal artery (MMA) and an immediate as well as a delayed headache. All the study subjects experienced facial flushing. Mast cells (MCs) might have a role in the long-lasting effect of PACAP-38 infusion. We hypothesized that in mast cell-depleted (MCD) rats the vascular responses to PACAP-38 would be lesser than in control rats because of a lack of vasodilatory products released during MC degranulation.

METHODS

MCs were depleted by chronic treatment with compound 48/80. The effect of 20 minutes' intravenous (i.v.) infusion of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), PACAP-38, PACAP(6-38) (PAC-1 receptor antagonist) and PACAP-27 on the diameter of the MMA and on mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) in control and MCD rats was recorded by using the genuine closed-cranial window (CCW) model. Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) infusion was given only in control rats. A combination of the histamine H1 receptor antagonist mepyramine (4 mg kg(-1) i.v.) and the H2 receptor antagonist famotidine (1 mg kg(-1) i.v.) was given 10 minutes prior to PACAP-38 infusion. Increasing doses of PACAP-38, PACAP-27 and VIP were infused through the intracarotid artery (i.c.) in control and MCD rats to see the direct effects of these peptides on MMA diameter change.

RESULTS

There was no significant change in CGRP-induced MMA diameter increase in control and MCD rats, and the dilated MMA immediately returned back to baseline after stopping the infusion. The delayed MMA dilation induced by PACAP-38 was abolished in MCD and antihistamine (AH)-pretreated rats. Compared to PACAP-38, the PACAP-27 i.v. infusion gave smaller peak dilation of MMA in control rats. In MCD rats, PACAP-27 did not induce any significant dilation. VIP i.v. infusion reduced MABP but did not dilate MMA significantly. PACAP(6-38), which is a potent MC degranulator, also gave a significant delayed dilation of MMA. PACAP-38 i.c. responses (direct receptor mediated response) were not affected by MC depletion. Only the maximum response (% E max) value of PACAP-27 (i.c.) was significantly lower in MCD rats compared to control rats.

CONCLUSIONS

The delayed MMA dilatory responses to PACAP-38 infusion were attenuated in MCD and AH-pretreated rats, indicating a role of the MC mediator-histamine in PACAP-38-induced delayed dilation of MA.

Pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide: an important vascular regulator in human skin in vivo

Pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP) is an important neuropeptide and immunomodulator in various tissues. Although this peptide and its receptors (ie, VPAC1R, VPAC2R, and PAC1R) are expressed in human skin, their biological roles are unknown. Therefore, we tested whether PACAP regulates vascular responses in human skin in vivo. When injected intravenously, PACAP induced a significant, concentration-dependent vascular response (ie, flush, erythema, edema) and mediated a significant and concentration-dependent increase in intrarectal body temperature that peaked at 2.7°C. Topical application of PACAP induced marked concentration-dependent edema. Immunohistochemistry revealed a close association of PACAP-immunoreactive nerve fibers with mast cells and dermal blood vessels. VPAC1R was expressed by dermal endothelial cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, mast cells, and keratinocytes, whereas VPAC2R was expressed only in keratinocytes. VPAC1R protein and mRNA were also detected in human dermal microvascular endothelial cells. The PACAP-induced change in cAMP production in these cells demonstrated VPAC1R to be functional. PACAP treatment of organ-cultured human skin strongly increased the number of CD31+ vessel cross-sections. Taken together, these results suggest that PACAP directly induces vascular responses that may be associated with neurogenic inflammation, indicating for the first time that PACAP may be a crucial vascular regulator in human skin in vivo. Antagonists to PACAP function may be beneficial for the treatment of inflammatory skin diseases with a neurogenic component.

Neuronal Control of Skin Function: The Skin as a Neuroimmunoendocrine Organ

This review focuses on the role of the peripheral nervous system in cutaneous biology and disease. During the last few years, a modern concept of an interactive network between cutaneous nerves, the neuroendocrine axis, and the immune system has been established. We learned that neurocutaneous interactions influence a variety of physiological and pathophysiological functions, including cell growth, immunity, inflammation, pruritus, and wound healing. This interaction is mediated by primary afferent as well as autonomic nerves, which release neuromediators and activate specific receptors on many target cells in the skin. A dense network of sensory nerves releases neuropeptides, thereby modulating inflammation, cell growth, and the immune responses in the skin. Neurotrophic factors, in addition to regulating nerve growth, participate in many properties of skin function. The skin expresses a variety of neurohormone receptors coupled to heterotrimeric G proteins that are tightly involved in skin homeostasis and inflammation. This neurohormone-receptor interaction is modulated by endopeptidases, which are able to terminate neuropeptide-induced inflammatory or immune responses. Neuronal proteinase-activated receptors or transient receptor potential ion channels are recently described receptors that may have been important in regulating neurogenic inflammation, pain, and pruritus. Together, a close multidirectional interaction between neuromediators, high-affinity receptors, and regulatory proteases is critically involved to maintain tissue integrity and regulate inflammatory responses in the skin. A deeper understanding of cutaneous neuroimmunoendocrinology may help to develop new strategies for the treatment of several skin diseases.

Neuropeptídeos na pele

Há evidências crescentes de que a inervação cutânea é capaz de modular uma variedade de fenômenos cutâneos agudos e crônicos, interagindo com as células da pele e seus componentes imunes. Essa forma de sinalização local entre tecido nervoso e tecido cutâneo ocorre especialmente por meio dos neuropeptídeos, uma numerosa família de neurotransmissores de natureza química comum e nomenclatura heterogênea presentes em todo o sistema nervoso e secretados pelas fibras nervosas cutâneas. São alvo desta revisão os neuropeptídeos substância P (SP), o peptídeo relacionado ao gene da calcitonina (CGRP), o peptídeo vasoativo intestinal (VIP), o peptídeo ativador da adenilato-ciclase pituitária (PACAP), o neuropeptídeo Y (NPY) e a somatostatina (SOM). Serão discutidas suas ações sobre as células da pele e sistema imune, bem como estudos recentes que sugerem a participação dos neuropeptídeos nas respostas inflamatórias cutâneas, nas reações de hipersensibilidade e em dermatoses humanas, notadamente na psoríase, dermatite atópica, hanseníase e alopecia.