Plasmids for the in vitro analysis of RNA polymerase II-dependent transcription based on a G-free template

Adeno-associated virus rep protein-mediated inhibition of transcription of the adenovirus major late promoter in vitro

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) is a human parvovirus that normally requires a helper virus such as adenovirus (Ad) for replication. The four AAV replication proteins (Rep78, Rep68, Rep52, and Rep40) are pleiotropic effectors of virus integration, replication, transcription, and virion assembly. These proteins exert effects on Ad gene expression and replication. In transient plasmid transfection assays, Rep proteins inhibit gene expression from a variety of transcription promoters. We have examined Rep protein-mediated inhibition of transcription of the Ad major late transcription promoter (AdMLP) in vitro. Rep78/68 are the strongest transcription suppressors and the purine nucleotide binding site in the Rep proteins, and by implication, the ATPase activity or conformational change induced by nucleotide binding is required for full repression. Rep52 has modest effects, and Rep40 exerts no significant effect on transcription. Rep78/68 and their N-terminal 225-residue domain bind to a 55-bp AdMLP DNA fragment in gel shift assays, suggesting that protein-DNA interactions are required for inhibition. This interaction was confirmed in DNase I protection assays and maps to a region extending from the TATA box to the transcription initiation site. Gel shift, DNase I, and chemical cross-linking assays with TATA box-binding protein (TBP) and Rep68 indicate that both proteins interact with each other and with the promoter at adjacent sites. The demonstration of Rep interaction with TBP and the AdMLP suggests that Rep78/68 alter the preinitiation complex of RNA polymerase II transcription. These observations provide new insight into the mechanism of Rep-mediated inhibition of gene expression.

Transcriptional activity among high and low risk human papillomavirus E2 proteins correlates with E2 DNA binding

The full-length E2 protein, encoded by human papillomaviruses (HPVs), is a sequence-specific transcription factor found in all HPVs, including cancer-causing high risk HPV types 16 and 18 and wart-inducing low risk HPV types 6 and 11. To investigate whether E2 proteins encoded by high risk HPVs may function differentially from E2 proteins encoded by low risk HPVs and animal papillomaviruses, we conducted comparative DNA-binding and transcription studies using electrophoretic mobility shift assays and cell-free transcription systems reconstituted with purified general transcription factors, cofactor, RNA polymerase II, and with E2 proteins encoded by HPV-16, HPV-18, HPV-11, and bovine papillomavirus type 1 (BPV-1). We found that although different types of E2 proteins all exhibited transactivation and repression activities, depending on the sequence context of the E2-binding sites, HPV-16 E2 shows stronger transcription activity and greater DNA-binding affinity than those displayed by the other E2 proteins. Surprisingly, HPV-18 E2 behaves more similarly to BPV-1 E2 than HPV-16 E2 in its functional properties. Our studies thus categorize HPV-18 E2 and BPV-1 E2 in the same protein family, a finding consistent with the available E2 structural data that separate the closely related HPV-16 and HPV-18 E2 proteins but classify together the more divergent BPV-1 and HPV-18 E2 proteins.

Alleviation of human papillomavirus E2-mediated transcriptional repression via formation of a TATA binding protein (or TFIID)-TFIIB-RNA polymerase II-TFIIF preinitiation complex

Transcription in human papillomaviruses (HPVs) is mainly regulated by cellular transcription factors and virus-encoded E2 proteins that act as sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins. Although the functions of E2 as a transcriptional activator and a repressor have been well documented, the role of cellular factors involved in E2-mediated regulation of the HPV promoters and the mechanism by which E2 modulates viral gene expression remain unclear. Using reconstituted cell-free transcription systems, we found that cellular enhancer-binding factors and general cofactors, such as TAF(II)s, TFIIA, Mediator, and PC4, are not required for E2-mediated repression. Unlike other transcriptional repressors that function through recruitment of histone deacetylase or corepressor complexes, HPV E2 is able to directly target components of the general transcription machinery to exert its repressor activity on the natural HPV E6 promoter. Interestingly, preincubation of TATA binding protein (TBP) or TFIID with HPV template is not sufficient to overcome E2-mediated repression, which can be alleviated only via formation of a minimal TBP (or TFIID)-TFIIB-RNA polymerase II-TFIIF preinitiation complex. Our data therefore indicate that E2 does not simply work by displacing TBP or TFIID from binding to the adjacent TATA box. Instead, E2 appears to function as an active repressor that directly inhibits HPV transcription at steps after TATA recognition by TBP or TFIID.