Detection of coronary artery disease in the presence of left ventricular atrophy

A meta-analytic comparison of echocardiographic stressors

BACKGROUND

The relative performance of alternative stressors for stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) is not well established.

METHODS

All studies published between 1981 to December 2001 who met inclusion criteria were included in this analysis. We performed a summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) analysis and calculated weighted mean of the likelihood ratio and sensitivity/specificity. A covariate analysis using meta-regression methods was also performed.

RESULTS

Forty-four studies presented data on Exercise, 11 on Adenosine, 80 on Dobutamine, 40 on Dipyridamole, 16 on transatrial pacing transesophageal echocardiography (Tap-TEE), and 7 on transatrial pacing transthorasic echocardiography (Tap-TTE). SROC analysis showed that the following order of most discriminatory to least: Tap-TEE, Exercise, Dipyridamole, Dobutamine and Adenosine. Weighted means sensitivity/specificity were Exercise: 82.6/84.4%, Adenosine: 68.4/80.9%, Dobutamine: 79.6/85.1%, Dipyridamole: 71.0/92.2%, Tap-TTE: 90.7/86.1%, and Tap-TEE: 86.2/91.3%. Covariate analysis showed that the discriminatory power of Exercise decreased with increasing mean age.

CONCLUSIONS

Tap-TEE is a very accurate test for both ruling in and ruling out CAD although its invasiveness may limit its clinical acceptability. Exercise is a well-balanced satisfactory test for both ruling in and ruling out but performance might be lower for the elderly. Dobutamine offers a reasonable compromise for Exercise. Dipyridamole might be good for ruling in but not for ruling out CAD. The incapability in ruling-out CAD was a major problem in clinical application of the stress. Adenosine was the least useful stressor in diagnosing CAD.

Exercise echocardiography versus exercise electrocardiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease in hypertension

In hypertension, coronary artery disease (CAD) can be overestimated by stress electrocardiography (ECG) and scintigraphy due to frequent false-positive results. Exercise tests are also limited by an excessive blood pressure increase, and pharmacologic pressure normalization decreases the accuracy of the test. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of exercise echocardiography as an alternative test for CAD detection in hypertension, both before and after adequate blood pressure control. We studied 59 hypertensive and 59 normotensive patients undergoing coronary angiography for chest pain. Upright bicycle exercise ECG and echocardiographic tests were performed in each group in the absence of therapy; in hypertensives, the tests were repeated a day apart after blood pressure normalization with sublingual nifedipine. Significant CAD (lumen narrowing >50%) was detected in 22 hypertensive and 41 normotensive patients. In the two groups, sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of exercise echocardiography performed before treatment were not statistically different (95%, 94%, 94% in hypertensives and 82%, 77%, 83% in normotensives, respectively), but were significantly higher than for the exercise ECG test (68%, 70%, and 69%, respectively). After blood pressure lowering, exercise echocardiography sensitivity slightly decreased (91%), whereas specificity (100%) and diagnostic accuracy (96%) did not vary; on the contrary, exercise ECG sensitivity decreased to 45%. Therefore, according to our data, exercise echocardiography can be an accurate test and more reliable than exercise ECG to detect CAD in normotensives as well as in hypertensives. Normalization of blood pressure with nifedipine does not affect its accuracy, but markedly reduces the sensitivity of exercise ECG.