Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: value of atrial programmed electrical stimulation in patients with or without syncope with special reference to the role of atrial arrhythmias

Syncope in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (part I): An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

To describe the proportion of patients with syncope among those affected by hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and the relevance of syncope as risk factor for sudden cardiac death and life-threatening arrhythmic events.

METHOD AND RESULTS

Systematic review of original articles that assessed syncope in HCM patients. Literature search of PubMed including all English publications from 1973 to 2021.We found 57 articles for a total of 21.791 patients; of these, 14 studies reported on arrhythmic events in the follow-up. Syncope was reported in 15.8% (3.452 of 21.791) patients. It was considered unexplained in 91% of cases. Life-threatening arrhythmic events occurred in 3.6% of non-syncopal patients and in 7.7% of syncopal patients during a mean follow-up of 5.6 years. A relative risk of 1.99 (95%CI 1.39 to 2.86) was estimated for syncope patients by the random effect model using Haldane continuity correction for 0 events.

CONCLUSIONS

In the current practice, the cause of syncope remained unexplained in most patients affected by HCM. The management of patients seems mainly driven by risk stratification rather than identification of the aetiology of syncope. There is a need of precise instructions how to apply the recommendations of current guidelines to this disease, which tests are indicated and how to interpret their findings. The protocol was registered in Prospero (ID: 275963).

Atrial fibrillation in patients with inherited cardiomyopathies

Atrial fibrillation (AF) often complicates the course of inherited cardiomyopathies and, in some cases, may be the presenting feature. Each inherited cardiomyopathy has its own peculiar pathogenetic characteristics that can contribute to the development and maintenance of AF. Atrial fibrillation may occur as a consequence of disease-specific defects, non-specific cardiac chamber changes secondary to the primary illness, or a combination thereof. The presence of AF can denote a turning point in the progression of the disease, promoting clinical deterioration and increasing morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, the management of AF can be particularly challenging in patients with inherited cardiomyopathies. In this article, we review the current information on the prevalence, pathophysiology, risk factors, and treatment of AF in three different inherited cardiomyopathies: hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy, familial dilated cardiomyopathy, and left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy.

Clinical, pathological, and molecular analyses of cardiovascular abnormalities in Costello syndrome: a Ras/MAPK pathway syndrome

Cardiovascular abnormalities are important features of Costello syndrome and other Ras/MAPK pathway syndromes ("RASopathies"). We conducted clinical, pathological and molecular analyses of 146 patients with an HRAS mutation including 61 enrolled in an ongoing longitudinal study and 85 from the literature. In our study, the most common (84%) HRAS mutation was p.G12S. A congenital heart defect (CHD) was present in 27 of 61 patients (44%), usually non-progressive valvar pulmonary stenosis. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), typically subaortic septal hypertrophy, was noted in 37 (61%), and 5 also had a CHD (14% of those with HCM). HCM was chronic or progressive in 14 (37%), stabilized in 10 (27%), and resolved in 5 (15%) patients with HCM; follow-up data was not available in 8 (22%). Atrial tachycardia occurred in 29 (48%). Valvar pulmonary stenosis rarely progressed and atrial septal defect was uncommon. Among those with HCM, the likelihood of progressing or remaining stable was similar (37%, 41% respectively). The observation of myocardial fiber disarray in 7 of 10 (70%) genotyped specimens with Costello syndrome is consistent with sarcomeric dysfunction. Multifocal atrial tachycardia may be distinctive for Costello syndrome. Potentially serious atrial tachycardia may present in the fetus, and may continue or worsen in about one-fourth of those with arrhythmia, but is generally self-limited in the remaining three-fourths of patients. Physicians should be aware of the potential for rapid development of severe HCM in infants with Costello syndrome, and the need for cardiovascular surveillance into adulthood as the natural history continues to be delineated.

Electrophysiologic characteristics of atria in patients without heart disease

BACKGROUND

The significance of atrial fibrillation or tachycardia (AF) induction remains debatable. Some believe that the presence of heart disease (HD) increases the sensitivity and decreases the specificity of programmed atrial stimulation (PAS). There are few data in patients without HD. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the results of PAS in asymptomatic patients without HD and in those with documented spontaneous AF, but without HD, to know the diagnosis value of the technique.

METHODS

A total of 4,900 PAS were consecutively performed. The control group (I, N=67) was defined by the absence of preexcitation syndrome, dizziness/syncope, hypertension, history of tachycardia, or other documented HD together with a normal 2D echocardiogram and 24-hour Holter monitoring. They were compared to a group (II) of 54 patients with documented paroxysmal AF and without HD. PAS used one and two extrastimuli, delivered during sinus rhythm and two drive rates (600, 400 ms). Atrial-effective refractory periods (ARP), their adaptation to cycle length, and conduction times were noted. AF induction was defined as the induction of AF lasting more than 1 minute.

RESULTS

Group I patients (1.4% of 4,900) were younger than group II (51 +/- 17 vs 65 +/- 11 years, P < 0.001). A single extrastimulus never induced sustained AF in group I, but did so in 11 group II patients (20%); sustained AF was induced by two extrastimuli in 15 group I patients (22%) and in 31 group II patients (57%) (P < 0.001). There were no ARP and conduction time differences in group I patients with and without inducible AF, but there was a longer sinus cycle length in patients with inducible AF (977 +/- 164 vs 838 +/- 141 ms, P < 0.02). There were no electrophysiological differences in group II patients with and without inducible AF. No group I patient developed spontaneous AF (follow-up 4 +/- 2 years). The sensitivity of PAS with one extrastimulus was 20% and the specificity 100%; the sensitivity of PAS with two extrastimuli was 57% and the specificity 78%.

CONCLUSION

Sustained AF was not induced by one extrastimulus in control patients without symptoms, nor heart disease, but sustained AF was induced by two extrastimuli in 22% of these patients. The induction of a sustained AF by two extrastimuli should be interpreted cautiously, particularly in patients with a relative sinus bradycardia. However, the sensitivity of PAS with one extrastimulus was very low and two extrastimuli were required in patients with spontaneous AF to induce the tachycardia. Other electrophysiological parameters were not useful to differentiate patients with and without inducible AF.

Influence of age on atrial fibrillation inducibility

The prevalence of AF is known to increase in the elderly. Some electrophysiological changes were reported in these patients, but the effects of age on AF inducibility and other electrophysiological signs associated with atrial vulnerability are unknown. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effects of age on atrial vulnerability and AF induction. The study consisted of 734 patients (age 16-85 years, mean 61 +/- 15 years) without spontaneous AF who were admitted for electrophysiological study. Study was indicated for dizziness or ventricular tachyarrhythmia. Programmed atrial stimulation was systematically performed. One and two extrastimuli were delivered in sinus rhythm and atrial driven rhythms (600, 400 ms). Univariate and multivariate analysis of several clinical and electrophysiological data were performed. AF inducibility, defined as the induction of an AF lasting > 1 minute, was paradoxically and significantly decreased in elderly (> 70 years) patients compared to younger patients (< 70 years) (P < 0.01). AF inducibility was present in 40% of 62 patients < 40 years, 39% of 99 patients age 40-50 years, 37% of 130 patients age 50-60 years, 38% of 222 patients age 60-70 years, and only 28% of 221 patients > 70 years. There was no significant correlation with the sex, the presence of dizziness, the presence or not of an underlying heart disease, the left ventricular ejection fraction, and the presence of salvos of atrial premature beats on 24-hour Holter monitoring. There was a significant correlation with a longer atrial effective refractory period in the elderly (226 +/- 41 ms) than in younger patients (208 +/- 31 ms) (P < 0.001). Other electrophysiological parameters of atrial vulnerability did not change significantly. Increased atrial refractory period and age >70 years were independent factors of decreased AF inducibility. Programmed atrial stimulation should be interpreted cautiously before the age of 70 years. AF induction is facilitated by the presence of a short atrial refractory period in these patients. Surprisingly, AF inducibility decreases in patients > 70 years because their atrial refractory period increases. Therefore, increased AF prevalence in these patients should be explained by nonelectrophysiological causes.

Reproducibility of response to programmed atrial stimulation

The induction of atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATAs) is used to guide the medical or ablative treatment of these tachycardias. To date no information is available regarding the reproducibility of programmed atrial stimulation (PAS) induced ATA. The purpose of the study was to look for the reproducibility of PAS. Two baseline electrophysiological tests were performed in the drug-free state and within 6 months to 3 years of one another (mean 18 months) in 62 patients. Twenty-six patients had spontaneous documented ATAs (group I); 36 patients did not have spontaneous ATAs (group II). PAS used one and two extrastimuli delivered during three cycle lengths (sinus rhythm, 600 ms, 400 ms). The results were as follows. In group I, sustained (> 1 minute) ATA was induced in 23 patients on the first PAS and remained inducible in 22 patients in the second study. In three patients with noninducible ATA, PAS remained negative in only one; the reproducibility of PAS was 88%. In 17 (47%) group II patients, a sustained ATA was induced in the first study, and the ATA remained inducible in 10 patients in the second study. Nineteen other patients did not have inducible ATA on the first study, but 10 of them had an inducible ATA on the second PAS; the reproducibility of PAS was 53%. In conclusion, long-term reproducibility of PAS induced ATA in patients with spontaneous and documented ATA was good. In patients without spontaneous ATA, the reproducibility of PAS induced ATA was low and the induction of ATA in these patients should be interpreted cautiously in light of this observed variability in induced atrial arrhythmias.