Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass: our experience with 32 patients

Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Revival of an Old Technique

The ability to perform surgical procedures on the heart was one of the greatest accomplishments of the 20th century. What was once considered an impossible task has become a routine in daily clinical activity. The in troduction of extracorporeal circulation and myocardial protection strategies opened the doors to what was considered by most an insurmountable barrier— unhin dered access to the coronary circulation and intracar diac structures. In the United States, approximately 85% of coronary artery bypass graft procedures are performed with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). CPB was and remains the gold standard for this type of cardiac surgical intervention. Over the years, investigators have struggled to find ways of lessening or eliminating the adverse physiologic effects of CPB. These efforts have focused on pharmacologic interven tion, monitoring procedures, blood gas management, and temperature management. Another way of avoid ing these effects is inherently obvious — eliminate the main source of the problem.

Finding the LAD during MIDCAB operations

Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) is a new surgical procedure that revascularizes the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) without the need for a median sternotomy or cardiopulmonary bypass. This operation is performed through a small left anterior thoracotomy. With this exposure, it can be difficult to locate the left anterior descending coronary artery. We have identified anatomic features on the surface of the pericardium that can serve as a landmark for finding the left anterior descending coronary artery.

Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting: changes in anesthetic management and surgical procedure

OBJECTIVE

The authors hypothesized that changes in surgical procedures for minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB) have led to changes in anesthetic management with a resultant decrease in the complexity of care.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

SETTING

University teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Review of the records of 60 patients who underwent MIDCAB surgery.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Data included preoperative demographics, perioperative anesthetic management, and postoperative cardiac and noncardiac issues and complications. Two groups were formed: in group I, a coronary stabilizer (CS) was not used, and in group II, it was. With the exception of a greater incidence of those with no preoperative comorbidities in group II (CS), there were no differences between the two groups with respect to demographics or preoperative variables. A surgical design called H-graft was used in a greater number of group II (CS) patients, whereas a direct anastomosis was performed in the majority of group I patients. Use of pharmacologically induced bradycardia/asystole has not been performed after the introduction of the CS. The use of central venous catheters (instead of pulmonary artery catheters) and single-lumen (v double-lumen) endotracheal tubes was greater in group II (CS) patients. Despite changes in intraoperative management, there was no significant change in the incidence of postoperative complications, intensive care unit stay, and hospital stay between groups I and II. New-onset atrial fibrillation was the most common postoperative complication (13 of 56 patients; 23%). Three of 24 patients (12.5%) who received intraoperative magnesium experienced atrial fibrillation compared with 10 of 32 patients (31%) who did not receive magnesium.

CONCLUSIONS

The complexity of anesthetic technique has decreased since the onset of MIDCAB surgery. The decrease in complexity may be related to changes in surgical design and technology.

Atrial fibrillation after minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: A retrospective, matched study

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation after cardiac operations is a source of morbidity and resource consumption. Various factors common to cardiac operations have been cited as causal. Comparison of the incidences of atrial fibrillation after conventional cardiac operations and minimally invasive cardiac operations may provide some insight into the mechanisms of this complication.

METHODS

All patients undergoing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting from January 26, 1996, through September 17, 1997, were evaluated for the occurrence of in-hospital postoperative atrial fibrillation. Data from these 55 patients were compared with data from a control cohort of patients undergoing conventional, solitary coronary artery bypass grafting. Each patient undergoing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting was matched by age (+/- 3 years) and date of operation (+/- 7 days) with a patient undergoing conventional coronary artery bypass grafting.

RESULTS

During the period since the advent of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting at our institution, the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation has been slightly lower among the patients undergoing this form of coronary artery bypass grafting (26%) than among the total population of patients undergoing conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (34%). Comparison of the age-matched groups, however, showed the incidence to be slightly but not significantly greater in the minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting cohort (13/55, 24%) than in the conventional coronary artery bypass grafting cohort (11/55, 20%; P =. 6). The minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting group was less likely to be discharged with antiarrhythmic therapy than was the conventional coronary artery bypass grafting group (6 versus 10; P =.006).

CONCLUSIONS

According to these data, mechanisms traditionally implicated in atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting, such as the use of cardiopulmonary bypass, mechanical manipulation of the atrium, and atrial ischemia, are not causal but may be related to the duration of the arrhythmic complication. Strategies directed toward management and reduction of the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation should be focused accordingly.