Non-invasive evaluation of coronary reserve. Assessment of coronary reserve in patients with coronary artery disease by transesophageal-Doppler echocardiography

The relationship between aortic stiffness and cardiac function in patients with obstructive sleep apnea, independently from systemic hypertension

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate aortic function and its relationship with left ventricular (LV) function in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), with or without systemic hypertension.

METHODS

A total of 29 patients with OSAS, 28 patients with systemic hypertension without OSAS, and 19 patients having both disorders were chosen as a study group, and 29 participants without these two disorders were taken as the control group; none of the patients had a history of cardiac disease. All of them underwent echocardiography and polysomnography. Aortic strain and distensibility were calculated from the aortic diameters measured by echocardiography and blood pressure obtained by cuff-sphygmomanometer. Cardiac functions were determined using echocardiography comprising standard 2-dimensional and conventional Doppler and Doppler tissue imaging.

RESULTS

Aortic strain (mean +/- SD; 6.1 +/- 2.7% vs 6.4 +/- 2.4%, 4.7 +/- 1.8%, and 13.7 +/- 4.5%, P < .001, respectively) and distensibility (mean +/- SD 2.8 +/- 1.6 vs 2.5 +/- 0.9, 1.7 +/- 0.7, and 6.2 +/- 3.2 10(-6) cm(2) dyn(-1)P < .001, respectively) were significantly decreased in the patient groups (OSAS, hypertensive, and OSAS and hypertensive) compared with the control group. LV long-axis and diastolic functions were also impaired in the study group. There were good correlations between the aortic stiffness and LV function parameters. In a multivariate analysis, aortic strain was the parameter found to be most strongly associated both with the Doppler tissue imaging mean peak early/late diastolic velocity ratio and the LV mitral lateral annular plane systolic excursion.

CONCLUSION

Aortic stiffness parameters (aortic strain and distensibility), LV systolic long-axis function indicators (mitral lateral annular plane systolic excursion, peak systolic myocardial velocity at lateral annulus, peak systolic myocardial velocity at septal annulus), and Doppler tissue imaging-derived LV diastolic indices were found abnormal in patients with OSAS, hypertension, or both. Thus, subclinical cardiac dysfunction has been found in patients with OSAS independent from the systemic hypertension.

Coronary flow reserve impairment predicts cardiac events in heart transplant patients with preserved left ventricular function

BACKGROUND

The impact of allograft vasculopathy on the coronary circulation and consequently on cardiac outcome may be expressed by coronary flow reserve (CFR) impairment. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate CFR and its relation to cardiac events in heart transplant patients.

METHODS

Twenty-three patients, 2 female, with left ventricular ejection fraction >45% were studied 76+/-30 months after heart transplantation. They were divided into 2 groups according to coronary angiography: Group A, 10 patients with significant coronary artery disease (stenosis> or =50%) and group B, 13 patients without significant stenosis. Twenty healthy subjects, 13 female, served as controls. Coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) was assessed by transesophageal echocardiography and calculated as the ratio of maximal (i.v. adenosine, 140 microg/kg/min) to baseline coronary velocities. Patients were followed for a mean of 25 months for cardiac events.

RESULTS

Compared to controls, heart transplant groups showed significantly higher baseline coronary flow velocities (51+/-27, 38+/-12 and 32+/-12 cm/s, respectively) and lower maximal coronary velocities (90+/-52, 112+/-33 and 118+/-24 cm/s), resulting in a reduced CFVR (1.9+/-1.0, 3.0+/-0.5 and 3.8+/-1.2). Multivariate analysis identified heart transplantation and epicardial coronary artery disease as the only variables independently related to CFVR. Hypertension was positively related to baseline while diabetes inversely related to maximal coronary flow velocities. A CFVR <2.3 was a marker for cardiac events (4 deaths, 1 heart failure).

CONCLUSION

CFVR impairment, particularly in the presence of epicardial coronary artery disease, follows heart transplantation and is associated with a worse outcome.

Relation between aortic stiffness and left ventricular diastolic function in patients with hypertension, diabetes, or both

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate aortic function and its relation to left ventricular diastolic function in patients with hypertension, diabetes, or both, without coronary artery disease.

METHODS

Study groups were composed of 27 healthy participants and 25 patients with hypertension, 24 with diabetes, and 18 with hypertension and diabetes. Coronary artery disease was excluded in all of the study participants. Aortic strain and distensibility were calculated from the aortic diameters measured by echocardiography and blood pressure obtained by sphygmomanometry.

RESULTS

There were significant differences between the control and the patient groups (hypertensive, diabetic, and diabetic-hypertensive) in aortic strain (mean (SD) 18 (8)% v 11 (7)%, 9 (3)%, and 8 (3)%, respectively, p < 0.001) and distensibility (10 (5.1) v 3.1 (1.5), 5.1 (2.8), and 2 (0.9) cm2/dyn/10(3), respectively, p < 0.001). In a multivariate analysis, the parameter most closely related to the deceleration time in the control group was aortic distensibility (standardised beta coefficient -0.50, p = 0.002, overall R2 = 0.25). In the patient group, the parameter most closely related to deceleration time was also aortic distensibility (standardised beta coefficient -0.36, p = 0.009, overall R2 = 0.13). Even though the study group variable was entered in to the multivariate model, aortic distensibility was found to be the parameter most closely related to deceleration time (standardised beta coefficient -0.48, p < 0.001, overall R2 = 0.22).

CONCLUSION

Aortic stiffness is increased in patients with hypertension, diabetes, or both even after the exclusion of coronary artery disease. Aortic stiffness and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction are also associated in these patients.

Current results and new developments of coronary angiography with use of contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the heart

Electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) is the reference standard for x-ray-based tomographic imaging of the heart because of its high temporal resolution, but it is available in only a few centers. Quantification of coronary calcium is the most widely recognized use of EBCT for cardiac imaging. This technique requires no contrast media and provides an accurate assessment of overall plaque burden in the coronary tree; however, it does not directly identify or localize coronary stenoses. Multislice spiral (helical) CT (MSCT) is a new technology that provides images of the beating heart in diagnostic quality under many circumstances and may facilitate the broader application of cardiac and coronary CT. Currently, for imaging of the heart, much more experience exists with EBCT than with MSCT. Contrast-enhanced CT coronary angiography (CTCA) can be done with EBCT or MSCT to obtain images of the major branches of the coronary tree and to define luminal narrowing. Studies at experienced centers performed with small numbers of patients show that sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value are good with CTCA in the assessment of obstructive coronary artery disease, but CTCA remains an investigational technique for these applications. Computed tomographic coronary angiography can be clinically useful for assessing coronary artery bypass graft patency and congenital coronary abnormalities.