From human genes to stem cells: new challenges for patent law?

Threatening cancer with nanoparticle aided combination oncotherapy

Employing combination therapy has become obligatory in cancer cases exhibiting high tumor load, chemoresistant tumor population, and advanced disease stages. Realization of this fact has now led many of the combination oncotherapies to become an integral part of anticancer regimens. Combination oncotherapy may encompass a combination of anticancer agents belonging to a similar therapeutic category or that of different therapeutic categories (e.g. chemotherapy + gene therapy). Differences in the physicochemical properties, pharmacokinetics and biodistribution pattern of different payloads are the major constraints that are faced by combination chemotherapy. Concordant efforts in the field of nanotechnology and oncology have emerged with several approaches to solve the major issues encountered by combination therapy. Unique colloidal behaviors of various types of nanoparticles and differential targeting strategies have accorded an unprecedented ability to optimize combination oncotherapeutic delivery. Nanocarrier based delivery of the various types of payloads such as chemotherapeutic agents and other anticancer therapeutics such as small interfering ribonucleic acid (siRNA), chemosensitizers, radiosensitizers, and antiangiogenic agents have been addressed in the present review. Various nano-delivery systems like liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, polymerosomes, dendrimers, micelles, lipid based nanoparticles, prodrug based nanocarriers, polymer-drug conjugates, polymer-lipid hybrid nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes, nanosponges, supramolecular nanocarriers and inorganic nanoparticles (gold nanoparticles, silver nanoparticles, magnetic nanoparticles and mesoporous silica based nanoparticles) that have been extensively explored for the formulation of multidrug delivery is an imperative part of discussion in the review. The present review features the outweighing benefits of combination therapy over mono-oncotherapy and discusses several existent nanoformulation strategies that facilitate a successful combination oncotherapy. Several obstacles that may impede in transforming nanotechnology-based combination oncotherapy from bench to bedside, and challenges associated therein have also been discussed in the present review.

Intellectual property and the ethical/legal status of human DNA: The (ir)relevance of context

There has been much discussion in recent years about the ethical and legal status of human DNA. This topic is of great relevance and importance to Aboriginal communities because the question of who has the right of access to and control over the DNA of individual persons, or of DNA extracted from human remains, could have implications for an entire community. In another context an individual’s decision to contribute a blood sample for health research could reveal much about the health status of other members of the community. Who has the right to control access to DNA or a community’s narrative of its origins? While some have argued that human DNA should be considered cultural property in order to ensure appropriate control of genetic information, we question the wisdom of this approach. Although we acknowledge that the differing contexts in which DNA is extracted and utilised could require unique approaches in some circumstances, we argue that emphasis should be primarily on the nature of the relationships established and maintained between researchers and descendant communities and only secondarily on the unique status of the DNA itself.

Current Issues in the Regulation of Human Tissue-Engineering Products in the European Union

Tissue engineering (TE) is an emerging technology that combines expertise in life sciences, clinical medicine, and engineering. Current challenges in TE include anticipating and streamlining appropriate regulation with product development. Consequently this study has focused on views of developers, companies, and regulators on biological risks of TE products, aspects of commercial applications, and patentability. Most concerns about TE products focus on risk of cancer formation, infection risk, and rejection risk. Thus, at the present time, product developers should follow guidelines for medicinal products, in order to address product safety at an adequate level. According to the data of the present study, cell and biomaterial products, manipulated cells, and scaffolds appear to be the primary interest for commercial product development. In contrast, producing services were not considered as interesting. Constraints are also imposed by patentability, which stipulates demands for technical performance and highlights ethical issues, which are difficult to address.