Chest radiotherapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer: facts, questions, prospects

Carboplatin and Etoposide Followed by Once-Daily Thoracic Radiotherapy in Limited Disease Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Unsatisfactory Results

Aims and background

There has been a trend to replace cisplatin with carboplatin in the treatment of small-cell lung carcinoma. The goal of the present study was to determine the efficacy of carboplatin and etoposide followed by thoracic radiotherapy in patients with previously untreated limited disease small-cell lung carcinoma.

Methods

From February 2001 to March 2007, 47 patients with limited disease small-cell lung cancer were enrolled in the study. Etoposide, 100 mg/m2, was administrated intravenously on days 1-3 in combination with carboplatin, AUC 6, on day 1 every 21 days for 6 cycles. In cases considered to have non-progressive disease following induction chemotherapy, thoracic radiotherapy was given with in a once daily fraction of 2.0 Gy, 5/wk, up to 50-60 Gy.

Results

Forty-one patients were evaluated. Median age was 62 (range, 40-78), 88% of patients were male. ECOG PS was 0-1 in 38 patients. Seven of the 41 patients (17.5%) had pleural effusion (one malignant) and 7 patients (17.5%) had involved supraclavicular lymph nodes. Ninety percent of patients had elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase levels. Median follow-up was 13.5 mo. A total of 209 cycles of chemotherapy was administered (median, 6; range, 1-6). Thoracic irradiation was given to 33 patients. The overall response rate to combined modality on an intention-to-treat basis was 73%. Median survival time was 13.7 months (95% CI, 10.3-17.1), and median progression-free survival was 9.5 months (95% CI, 8.6-10.4). Two- and four-year overall survival was 23% and 7%, respectively. Grade 3-4 neutropenia and leukopenia were the most common adverse events and occurred in 46.0% and 24.0% of the patients, respectively. Six (14%) patients experienced febrile neutropenia. Three patients (7%) died of sepsis and neutropenic fever. Non-hematological toxicities were mild.

Conclusions

Carboplatin and etoposide chemotherapy followed by thoracic radiotherapy in LD-SCLC appears to be unsatisfactory.

Hypo- or conventionally fractionated radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy in patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer

Background

Previous data from our institution showed that hypofractionated thoracic radiotherapy (HypoTRT) with concurrent etoposide/platinum chemotherapy yielded favorable survival in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). The present study retrospectively compared the survival outcomes, failure patterns and toxicities between groups of LS-SCLC patients treated with conventionally fractionated thoracic radiotherapy (ConvTRT) or HypoTRT combined with chemotherapy.

Methods

Medical records of LS-SCLC patients between January 2010 and December 2013 at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center were retrospectively reviewed. All patients treated with chemotherapy and ConvTRT (2 Gy per fraction daily, DT ≥ 56 Gy) or HypoTRT (2.5 Gy per fraction daily, DT = 55 Gy) were eligible for analysis. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were generated for different populations using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Comparisons of failure patterns and toxicity were analyzed using the χ² test.

Results

A total of 170 patients treated with HypoTRT (n = 69) or ConvTRT (n = 101) were eligible for analysis. The median PFS and OS were 13.7 and 25.3 months, respectively, in the ConvTRT cohort, which was similar to the HypoTRT cohort (PFS 18.2 months, p = 0.991, and OS 27.2 months, p = 0.698), with a median follow-up of 30 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that PCI and TNM stage were prognostic factors for PFS and that PCI was prognostic for OS. The patterns of failure (stratified by local-regional recurrence, distant metastasis or both as first relapse) were similar between the dose cohorts (p = 0.693, p = 0.330, p = 0.572). Distant metastasis remained the main failure pattern. The brain was the most frequent remote failure site, followed by bone, liver and adrenal gland. PCI improved the 2-year survival rate from 46.1% to 70.0% and the 2-year PFS rate from 20.9% to 45.3%, respectively (p < 0.001). Grade ≥3 esophagitis and pneumonitis occurred in 9.9% and 11.9%, respectively, of the patients in the ConvTRT cohort and in 11.6% and 10.0%, respectively, of those in the HypoTRT cohort (p = 0.815).

Conclusion

This retrospective analysis demonstrated that HypoTRT or ConvTRT combined with etoposide/platinum chemotherapy yielded statistically similar survival, treatment failure outcomes, and toxicity profiles. PCI correlated with improved PFS and OS.

PET-CT guided curative conformal radiation therapy in limited stage small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has been improving with the advances in diagnostic and therapeutic modalities. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) which has been studied in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for a long time, and it has only recently been applied to SCLC. Therefore we sought to observe firstly the prognostic importance of the FDG uptake in limited disease small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC) patients and secondly the clinical outcomes and toxicity profiles of LD-SCLC patients treated with conformal radiation therapy (RT) using FDG-PET/CT simulation.

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2011, 33 LD-SCLC patients with LD-SCLC underwent disease staging using FDG-PET/CT conformal RT. Thoracic radiation was administered at a daily fraction of 2 Gy. Total dose was prescribed according to the treatment protocol such as, concurrent or sequential chemotherapy and in some patients according to the response of CT. All patients underwent chemotherapy. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 58 years (range, 38-77 years). The median follow-up time was 20 months (range, 6.6-47.6 months). The 3-year overall survival (OS) and locoregional control rates were 23% and 48%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There are few studies examining the impact of PET-CT and the prognostic significance of FDG-uptake on outcomes in patients with LD-SCLC. Higher RT doses in response to higher FDG uptake may be safely applied for the purpose of locoregional control.

The start of chemotherapy until the end of radiotherapy in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Chemotherapy combined with radiation therapy is the standard treatment for limited stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). Although numerous studies indicate that the overall duration of chemoradiotherapy is the most relevant predictor of outcome, the optimal chemotherapy and radiation schedule for LS-SCLC remains controversial. Therefore we analyzed the time from the start of any treatment until the end of radiotherapy (SER) in patients with LS-SCLC.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 29 patients diagnosed histologically with LS-SCLC and divided them into two groups: a short SER group (< 60 days) and a long SER (> 60 days) group. Patients were treated with irinotecan-based chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were in the short SER group and 13 patients were in the long SER group. Short SER significantly prolonged survival rate (p = 0.03) compared with that of long SER. However, no significant differences in side effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Short SER should be considered to improve the outcome of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for LS-SCLC.

Small-cell lung cancer

The incidence and mortality of small-cell lung cancer worldwide make this disease a notable health-care issue. Diagnosis relies on histology, with the use of immunohistochemical studies to confirm difficult cases. Typical patients are men older than 70 years who are current or past heavy smokers and who have pulmonary and cardiovascular comorbidities. Patients often present with rapid-onset symptoms due to local intrathoracic tumour growth, extrapulmonary distant spread, paraneoplastic syndromes, or a combination of these features. Staging aims ultimately to define disease as metastatic or non-metastatic. Combination chemotherapy, generally platinum-based plus etoposide or irinotecan, is the mainstay first-line treatment for metastatic small-cell lung cancer. For non-metastatic disease, evidence supports early concurrent thoracic radiotherapy. Prophylactic cranial irradiation should be considered for patients with or without metastases whose disease does not progress after induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Despite high initial response rates, most patients eventually relapse. Except for topotecan, few treatment options then remain. Signalling pathways have been identified that might yield new drug targets.

The effect of bioequivalent radiation dose on survival of patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer

Background

To investigate the biological radiation dose-response for patients of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) treated with high radiation dose.

Methods

Two hundred and five patients of LS-SCLC treated with sequential chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy with involved-field between 1997 and 2006 were reviewed retrospectively. Biologically effective dose (BED) was calculated for dose homogenization and was corrected with the factor of overall radiation time. Patients were divided into low BED group (n = 70) and high BED group (n = 135) with a cut-off of BED 57 Gy (equivalent to 60 Gy in 30 fractions over 40 days). Outcomes of the two groups were compared.

Results

Median follow-up was 20.7 months for all analyzable patients and 50.8 months for surviving patients. Considering all patients, median survival was 22.9 months (95% confidence interval, 20.6-25.2 months); 2- and 5-year survival rates were 47.2% and 22.3%, respectively. Patients in high BED group had a significantly better local control (p = 0.024), progression-free survival (p = 0.006) and overall survival (p = 0.005), with a trend toward improved distant-metastasis free survival (p = 0.196). Multivariable Cox regression demonstrated that age (p = 0.003), KPS (p = 0.009), weight loss (p = 0.023), and BED (p = 0.004) were significant predictors of overall survival.

Conclusions

Our data showed that a high BED was significantly associated with favourable outcomes in the Chinese LS-SCLC population, indicating that a positive BED-response relationship still existed even in a relatively high radiation dose range.

[A meta-analysis of the timing of chest radiotherapy in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer]

背景与目的

研究结果显示序贯化放疗是小细胞肺癌主要的治疗手段，它可以提高患者的生存率，但是何时开始实施放疗仍然存在争议。本研究旨在探讨放疗实施时间对局限期小细胞肺癌预后的影响。

方法

通过计算机检索Medline、CENTRAL(the Cochrane central register of controlled trials)、中国生物医学文献数据库系统(CBM)、中国期刊全文数据库(CNKI)等收集国内外公开发表的关于早期放疗(化疗开始后30天内开始放疗)对比后期放疗(化疗开始30天以后开始放疗)治疗局限期小细胞肺癌的随机对照研究。应用统计软件Stata 11.0进行数据分析。研究人群为局限期小细胞肺癌；干预措施为胸部放疗+化疗；结局指标为2/3年死亡率和放疗相关副反应。以优势比(odds ratio, OR)及相应的95%置信区间(confidence interval, CI)作为效应指标对结局进行比较。Q统计量的I²检验来检测各研究间的统计学异质性。双侧P＜0.05认为各研究间存在明显的异质性。采用Begg法对发表偏倚进行量化检测。

结果

最终纳入分析的文章6篇，共1 189例患者，其中早期放疗组587例，后期放疗组602例。接受早期放疗与接受后期放疗相比，两者2/3年生存优势差别无统计学意义(OR=0.78, 95%CI: 0.55-1.05, P=0.093)；单独分析放疗性肺炎(OR=1.93, 95%CI: 0.97-3.86, P=0.797)疗性食管炎(OR=1.43, 95%CI: 0.95-2.13, P=0.572)相关血小板减少(OR=1.23, 95%CI: 0.88-1.77, P=0.746)差别均无统计学意义。

结论

接受早期放疗与接受后期放疗相比，2/3年生存优势、放疗相关副反应无明显区别。

Staging of Lung Cancer

Imaging techniques play a vital role in the diagnosis, staging, and follow-up of patients who have lung cancer. For this purpose, PET has become an important adjunct to conventional imaging techniques such as chest radiography, CT, ultrasonography, and MR imaging. The ability of PET to differentiate the metabolic properties of tissues allows more accurate assessment of undetermined lung lesions, mediastinal lymph nodes, or extrathoracic abnormalities, tumor response after induction treatment, and detection of disease recurrence.

Timing of chest radiotherapy in patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

We undertook a systematic review and literature-based meta-analysis to determine whether the timing of chest radiotherapy may influence the survival of patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC).

OBJECTIVES

To establish the most effective way of combining chest radiotherapy with chemotherapy for patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer in order to improve long-term survival.

MATERIALS

Eligible studies were identified according to the Cochrane Collaboration Guidelines and were randomised controlled clinical trials comparing different timing of chest radiotherapy in patients with LS-SCLC. Early chest irradiation was defined as beginning within 30 days after the start of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Seven randomised trials were eligible. The overall survival at 2 years or at 5 years was not significantly different between early or late chest radiotherapy. When only trials were considered that used platinum chemotherapy concurrent with chest radiotherapy, significantly higher 2 and 5-year survival rates were observed when chest radiotherapy (RT) was started within 30 days after the start of chemotherapy (2-year survival: HR: 0.73, 95% CI 0.57-0.94, p=0.01; 5-year survival: HR: 0.65, 95% CI 0.45-0.93, p=0.02). This was even more pronounced when the overall treatment time of chest radiotherapy was less than 30 days. In studies that did not show a survival advantage by early chest radiation, a lower dose-intensity of chemotherapy in the early vs. late arm was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

When platinum-based chemotherapy concurrently with chest RT is used, the 2- and 5-year survival rates of patients with LS-SCLC may be in favour of early chest radiotherapy, with a significant difference if the overall treatment time of chest radiation is less than 30 days.

Omission of elective node irradiation on basis of CT-scans in patients with limited disease small cell lung cancer: a phase II trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the patterns of recurrence when elective node irradiation was omitted in patients with limited disease small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC).

METHODS

A prospective phase II study was undertaken in 27 patients with LD-SCLC without detectable distant metastases on CT scan. Chest radiotherapy to a dose of 45 Gy in 30 fractions in 3 weeks (1.5 Gy BID with 6 - 8 h interval) was delivered concurrently with carboplatin and etoposide chemotherapy. Chest radiation started after a mean time of 17.7 days +/- 9.7 days (SD) (range: 0-33 days) after the beginning of chemotherapy. Only the primary tumour and the positive nodal areas on the pre-treatment CT scan were irradiated. A total of five chemotherapy cycles were administered, followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in patients without disease progression. Isolated nodal failure was defined as recurrence in the regional nodes outside of the clinical target volume, in the absence of in-field failure.

RESULTS

After a median time of 18 months post-radiotherapy, 7 patients (26%, 95% CI 19.5-42.5%) developed a local recurrence. Three patients (crude rate 11%, 95% CI 2.4-29%), developed an isolated nodal failure, all of them in the ipsilateral supraclavicular fossa. The median actuarial overall survival was 21 months (95% CI 15.3-26.7), and the median actuarial progression free survival was 16 months (95% CI 6.5-25.5). Eight patients developed an acute, reversible grade 3 (CTC 3.0) radiation oesophagitis (30%, 95% CI 14-50%).

CONCLUSIONS

Because of the small sample size, no definitive conclusions can be drawn. However, the omission of elective nodal irradiation on the basis of CT scans in patients with LD-SCLC resulted in a higher than expected rate of isolated nodal failures in the ipsilateral supraclavicular fossa. The incidence of acute, reversible oesophagitis was in the same range as reported with elective nodal fields. The safety of selective nodal irradiation in NSCLC should not be extrapolated to patients with LD-SCLC until more data are available. In the mean time, elective nodal irradiation should only be omitted in clinical trials.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised, controlled trials of the timing of chest radiotherapy in patients with limited-stage, small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

We undertook a systematic review and literature-based meta-analysis to determine whether the timing of chest radiotherapy may influence the survival of patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC).

MATERIALS

Eligible randomised controlled clinical trials were identified according to the Cochrane Collaboration Guidelines, comparing different timing of chest radiotherapy in patients with LS-SCLC. Early chest irradiation was defined as beginning within 30 days after the start of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Considering all seven eligible trials, the overall survival at 2 or 5 years was not significantly different between early or late chest radiotherapy. When only trials were considered that used platinum chemotherapy concurrent with chest radiotherapy, a significantly higher 5-year survival was observed when chest radiotherapy was started within 30 days after the start of chemotherapy (2-year survival: OR: 0.73, 95% CI 0.51-1.03, P = 0.07; 5-year survival: OR: 0.64, 95% CI 0.44-0.92, P = 0.02). This was even more pronounced when the overall treatment time of chest radiotherapy was less than 30 days.

CONCLUSIONS

There are indications that the 5-year survival rates of patients with LS-SCLC are in favour of early chest radiotherapy, with a significant difference if the overall treatment time of chest radiation is less than 30 days.

Time between the first day of chemotherapy and the last day of chest radiation is the most important predictor of survival in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To identify time factors for combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy predictive for long-term survival of patients with limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC).

METHODS

A systematic overview identified suitable phase III trials. Using meta-analysis methodology to compare results within trials, the influence of the timing of chest radiation and the start of any treatment until the end of radiotherapy (SER) on local tumor control, survival, and esophagitis was analyzed. For comparison between studies, the equivalent radiation dose in 2-Gy fractions, corrected for the overall treatment time of chest radiotherapy, was analyzed.

RESULTS

The SER was the most important predictor of outcome. There was a significantly higher 5-year survival rate in the shorter SER arms (relative risk [RR] = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.80; P = .0003), which was more than 20% when the SER was less than 30 days (upper bound of 95% CI, 90 days). A low SER was associated with a higher incidence of severe esophagitis (RR = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.42 to 073; P < .0001). Each week of extension of the SER beyond that of the study arm with the shortest SER resulted in an overall absolute decrease in the 5-year survival rate of 1.83% +/- 0.18% (95% CI).

CONCLUSION

A low time between the first day of chemotherapy and the last day of chest radiotherapy is associated with improved survival in LD-SCLC patients. The novel parameter SER, which takes into account accelerated proliferation of tumor clonogens during both radiotherapy and chemotherapy, may facilitate a more rational design of combined-modality treatment in rapidly proliferating tumors.

Examining time intervals between diagnosis and treatment in the management of patients with limited stage small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

To examine time intervals between diagnosis and treatment of limited stage small cell lung cancer (L-SCLC) and to evaluate its effect on clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data on 166 patients with L-SCLC referred to a regional cancer center between January 1991 and December 1999 were analyzed. The time intervals studied were defined as: interval A, first abnormal chest x-ray to pathologic diagnosis: interval B, diagnosis to first oncology consultation; interval C, oncology consultation to first day of thoracic radiotherapy (RT); interval D, oncology consultation to first day of chemotherapy; and interval E, first day of chemo to first day of RT. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine associations between the time intervals and thoracic relapse (TR) and overall survival (OS) outcomes. Logistic regression analysis was used to model associations between time and complete response (CR) rates.

RESULTS

The median time duration of intervals A to E were 20, 12, 63.5, 15, and 48 days, respectively. When time was analyzed as a continuous variable, no statistically significant association between the interval lengths and outcomes studied was observed. Dichotomizing each interval using the median value as cut-off revealed that interval A >20 days was significantly associated with improved CR (odds ratio = 3.573; P = 0.027) whereas interval B >12 days was associated with a trend toward lower CR (odds ratio = 0.348; P = 0.073).

CONCLUSIONS

Short median times from first abnormal chest x-ray to diagnosis and from diagnosis to oncology consultation indicate that L-SCLC patients were diagnosed and referred promptly in the community setting. OS and TR appeared independent of the time intervals analyzed. Individual variations in disease presentation and tumor biology may explain the observed associations between early pathologic diagnosis and inferior CR rates.

Thoracic radiation therapy for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: unanswered questions

The role of thoracic radiation therapy (RT; TRT) is now established in the management of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). There is increasing evidence in the literature in favor of early concurrent chemoradiation therapy, and a gold standard of care for patients with a good performance status is twice-daily TRT (45 Gy in 3 weeks) with concurrent cisplatin/etoposide. Five-year survival rates > 20% can be expected with this combined-modality approach. Although current clinical trials are exploring the efficacy of new chemotherapeutic strategies for the disease, essential questions related to the optimization of TRT remain unanswered. In particular, the optimal RT dose, fractionation, and treatment volume have not been defined. This review highlights the need for well-designed multinational trials aimed at the optimization and standardization of RT for limited-stage SCLC. These trials should integrate translational research studies to investigate the molecular basis of RT resistance and to develop biomarker profiles of prognosis.

Thoracic Radiotherapy for Limited-stage Small-cell Lung Cancer: Controversies and Future developments

Thoracic radiotherapy has an established role in the management of limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LD SCLC). However, essential questions relating to the optimisation of thoracic radiotherapy remain unanswered, including volume of irradiation, optimal total dose, fractionation, timing and sequencing of radiation. This review highlights the need for well-designed multi-national trials aimed at the optimisation and standardisation of radiotherapy for LD SCLC.

Early versus late chest radiotherapy for limited stage small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

It is standard clinical practice to combine chemotherapy and chest radiotherapy in treating patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer. However, the best way to integrate both modalities is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To establish the most effective way of combining chest radiotherapy with chemotherapy for patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer in order to improve long-term survival.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cancerlit and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), reference lists, handsearching of journals and conference proceedings, and discussion with experts were used to identify potentially eligible trials, published and unpublished.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled clinical trials comparing different timing of chest radiotherapy in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Seven randomised trials were reviewed. There were differences in the timing and the overall treatment time of chest radiotherapy, the overall treatment time of , and the type of chemotherapy used.

MAIN RESULTS

No significant differences in the 2-year and the 5-year survival were found, whether chest radiotherapy was delivered within 30 days after the start of chemotherapy or later. When the only study that delivered chest radiotherapy during cycles of non-platinum chemotherapy was excluded, a trend for the 5-year survival was observed (RR:0.93, p=0.07) in favour of early radiation, but not for the 2-year survival. Survival at 5 years, but not at 2 years, was significantly better for those having early chest radiotherapy delivered in an overall treatment time of less than 30 days compared with a longer treatment time (RR: 0.90, p=0.006). These results, however, should be interpreted with caution because the largest trial has follow-up data at three years, but not later. It remains to be seen what the effect of longer follow up will be for 5-year survival rates. Local tumour control was not significantly different between early and late chest radiotherapy. The incidence of severe pneumonitis or severe oesophagitis was not significantly different for early versus late thoracic radiotherapy. However, a trend for a higher chance to develop pneumonitis when early chest radiotherapy was delivered during non-platinum based chemotherapy was observed.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

At present, it is uncertain whether the timing of chest radiotherapy as such is important for survival. The optimal integration of chemotherapy and chest radiotherapy in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer is unknown. Therefore, further research is needed to establish the most effective combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in this disease.

Recent advances in management of small-cell lung cancer

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a smoking-related disease with a poor prognosis. While SCLC is usually initially sensitive to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, responses are rarely long lasting. Frustratingly, most patients ultimately relapse, often with increasingly treatment resistant disease. Many strategies have been developed in an attempt to improve treatment outcomes, which have plateaued since the introduction of combination chemotherapy in the 1980s. These include trials of maintenance therapy, and dose intensification, the latter by means of increasing dose density, growth factor support and high dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue. None have been shown to improve patient survival. On the other hand, the integration of concurrent thoracic radiation and prophylactic cranial irradiation has improved the survival outcomes in patients with limited disease. In extensive disease, irinotecan combined with cisplatin has shown promise in improving survival over conventional platinum/etoposide chemotherapy schedules and a confirmatory study is awaited. The future of SCLC treatment may however lie with molecularly targeted therapies, such as antiangiogenesis agents and signal transduction inhibitors, which are being studied at present.

Shifting from hypofractionated to "conventionally" fractionated thoracic radiotherapy: a single institution's 10-year experience in the management of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer using concurrent chemoradiation

PURPOSE

To perform a retrospective review of a single institution's 10-year experience in treating limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) with a concurrent chemoradiation regimen modeled after the experimental arm of a randomized National Cancer Institute of Canada trial in which hypofractionated radiotherapy started with cycle 2 of chemotherapy. We then looked at the impact on patient outcomes of changing the RT during the course of the decade to a "conventionally" (2 Gy) fractionated regimen, with a focus on toxicity and survival rates.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1989 and 1999, 215 LS-SCLC patients received six cycles of chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine alternating with etoposide and cisplatin every 3 weeks. Thoracic RT was administered concurrently with etoposide and cisplatin (at cycle 2 or 3) only and consisted of either 40 Gy in 15 fractions for 3 weeks or 50 Gy in 25 fractions for 5 weeks. RT fields encompassed gross and suspected microscopic disease with 2-cm margins. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) was offered to complete responders according to clinician preference. RT interruption during concurrent chemoradiation was used as the "marker" for treatment toxicity. The analysis compared the RT schedules for differences in toxicity, survival, and recurrence patterns.

RESULTS

The overall survival rate for 215 patients at 2 and 5 years was 22.7% and 7.2%, respectively, with a median survival of 14.7 months. Thoracic RT consisted of 40 Gy in 3 weeks for 122 patients (57%) and 50 Gy in 5 weeks for 92 patients (43%). PCI was administered to 21 (44%) and 47 (56%) patients receiving 40 Gy and 50 Gy, respectively. The patient- and treatment-related variables were comparable between the two cohorts treated with the different RT prescriptions. RT interruptions during concurrent chemoradiation were recorded in 56 cases (26%), with a median duration of 5 days (range 1-18). No differences in treatment-related toxicity rates were demonstrated between the two dose cohorts (p = 0.35). The overall and disease-free survival rates (patients stratified by PCI use) at 5 years for the 40- and 50-Gy schedules were 14.3% and 12.0% (p = 0.71) and 20.7% and 22.2% (p = 0.76), respectively. Sites of first failure were recorded in 132 patients (61%). Comparing the 40-Gy and 50-Gy cohorts, the rate of any first relapse was 40% vs. 42% and the chest as the first relapse site was 34% vs. 45% (patients stratified by PCI use), respectively. The brain failure rate reflected PCI use and was not related to the thoracic RT schedule.

CONCLUSION

Changing from a hypofractionated to a conventionally fractionated RT thoracic prescription did not alter outcomes because the survival, thoracic control, and toxicity rates were statistically similar. This suggests that the hypofractionated schedule remains practicable and should be considered in the setting of randomized clinical trials. In view of the benefits that accelerated schedules provide for both patients and cost containment, clinicians may opt to use this tolerable regimen in managing LS-SCLC. Regarding the future development of novel chemoradiation programs, the most critical factor in ensuring improved outcomes for LS-SCLC may be limiting the duration of RT and overall treatment time.

Lung cancer 5: state of the art radiotherapy for lung cancer

Radiotherapy has a key role in curative and palliative treatments of patients with lung cancer. Important advances are described in the technique of treatment delivery and its integration with chemotherapy.

Long-term results of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemotherapy and thoracic irradiation in limited small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a chemoresponsive tumor but overall survival remains poor even in limited disease (LD). With the aim of eradicating chemoresistant tumor cells and reducing toxicity, we investigated in this phase II trial the feasibility and outcome of a sequential approach of induction chemotherapy (CT) followed, in responding patients with LD-SCLC, by intensified platinum-based CT and concurrent thoracic irradiation (TI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We treated 55 consecutive LD-SCLC patients with three 21-day cycles of cyclophosphamide, epiadriamycin and vincristine (CEV) as induction CT. In 44 (80%) patients there was an objective response and they received treatment intensification consisting of TI and concomitant CT with carboplatin and etoposide plus recombinant granulocite colony stimulating factor. Twenty-five (57%) patients were submitted to twice-daily thoracic irradiation (TDTI; 1.5 Gy per fraction, to a total dose of 45 Gy) and 19 (43%) to once-daily thoracic irradiation (ODTI; 2 Gy per fraction, to a total dose of 50 Gy).

RESULTS

Median follow up was 75 months (range, 42-102). Of 44 patients submitted to intensification with TI plus CT, 32 (73%) had a complete and 12 (27%) a partial response. Median overall survival of all 55 patients was 17 months with actuarial survival probabilities of 2 and 5 years, 32 and 25%, respectively. Analysis of patient sub-groups showed a 5-month median survival in non-responders, 19 in TDTI and 17 in ODTI patients, respectively. Two and 5 year survival probabilities were 0% in non-responders, 40 and 35% in TDTI and 39 and 21% in ODTI patients, respectively. At present, 13 of 44 responders are still alive, of which nine (20%) have been progression-free from 45 to 93 months (median 60). Treatment failure was registered in 31 (70%) of 44 patients who received both induction and intensification treatment. One-half of patients had intrathoracic recurrence, eight of which only local and the remaining seven local and distant. Fourteen (32%) patients had brain metastases. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 24 (55%) patients with no differences between treatment groups. Grade 3 esophagitis was registered in four (9%) patients: in 3/25 (12%) and 1/19 (5%) of those who received TDTI and ODTI, respectively (P=not significant). Acute radiation pneumonitis occurred in three (12%) patients submitted to TDTI. No clinically debilitating pulmonary fibrosis, permanent esophageal stricture or toxic death was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

In LD-SCLC patients late concurrent CT plus TI is feasible and effective. Our long-term results are similar to the best reported in the literature. Despite the high incidence of complete response obtained, however, one-half of the patients had intrathoracic relapse and one-third brain metastases.

Management of small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer is a tumor that has a very poor prognosis without treatment. It is however, highly responsive to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Pretreatment clinical and laboratory parameters--in addition to staging--can prognosticate outcome and help define the aim of treatment. Different schedules of chemotherapy have been developed and varied strategies, such as chemotherapy dose intensification have been tried to improve outcomes. New agents, such as irinotecan, gemcitabine and topotecan have also been tested. Clinical trials have helped to define strategies of integrating thoracic radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial radiotherapy into management of those patients with limited disease to improve survival further. Despite good initial responses to treatment, most patients eventually relapse. Maintenance strategies with ongoing chemotherapy or novel agents, such as interferon, matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors, thalidomide and vaccines are discussed.

Gemcitabine plus etoposide in chemonaive extensive disease small-cell lung cancer: a multi-centre phase II study

BACKGROUND

Both gemcitabine and etoposide are active in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), and are characterised by mild toxicity profiles. The combination of both drugs was found to be feasible and active in a phase I dose-finding study in solid tumours. Therefore, a phase II trial was initiated to examine the activity and toxicity of this schedule in extensive disease SCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-two chemo-naïve extensive disease SCLC patients were enrolled to receive gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, days 1, 8 and 15, and etoposide 80 mg/m2, days 8, 9 and 10 of a 28-day cycle.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients were evaluable for efficacy (five received less than one cycle). No complete responses were observed, but partial responses were seen in 17 patients, yielding an overall response rate of 46%. The median duration of response was 5.8 months. Disease stabilisation was obtained in another 10 patients (27%). The median survival of the 37 protocol-qualified patients was 10.5 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.5-12.0). The levels of WHO grade 3 and 4 toxicities were low and clinically manageable.

CONCLUSION

In comparison with standard platinum-based regimens, this combination of gemcitabine and etoposide resulted in a somewhat lower response rate, but a similar median survival time. Haematological toxicity was more pronounced than expected from the toxicity data of each agent individually. However, because of its mild non-haematological toxicity, and its ability to be administered in an outpatient setting, this combination provides a reasonable palliative option for patients with extensive disease SCLC.