Concurrent weekly carboplatin and radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: report of a joint phase II study

Real-world evidence of cisplatin versus carboplatin in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy: A multicenter analysis

BACKGROUND

Though concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with cisplatin remains a standard of care for patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC), carboplatin has alternatively been used without sufficient supportive evidences. Thus, we evaluated an efficacy and tolerability of carboplatin CCRT compared with cisplatin in LA-NPC patients.

METHODS

Patients with LA-NPC treated with CCRT were identified through the Thai multicenter head and neck cancer database. Patient tolerability and survival were analyzed and compared between regimens. Survivals were calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method, and compared by the log-rank test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 135 of 980 patients (13.8%) were treated with carboplatin. Patients treated with carboplatin were significantly associated with older age (p < 0.001), smoking (p = 0.003), more comorbidity (p = 0.014), kidney disease (p = 0.016), and lower baseline creatinine clearance (p < 0.001). Intensity-modulated radiation therapy was used significantly more in the cisplatin group than carboplatin group (p < 0.001). Patients who received carboplatin were associated with delay (p = 0.049) and hospitalization (p = 0.006), whereas cisplatin CCRT had more dose reduction (p = 0.001). Patients treated with cisplatin had CCRT interruption from grade 3-4 mucositis (p = 0.019) more than carboplatin, whereas carboplatin had more grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (p < 0.001). The 5-year overall survival (OS) of patients treated with cisplatin and carboplatin was 59% and 49%, respectively (p = 0.128). Cisplatin or carboplatin CCRT was not a significant predictor for OS and locoregional recurrence-free survival in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Carboplatin CCRT provided acceptable efficacy and tolerability profiles in real-world practice. Carboplatin should be considered as an alternative regimen, particularly in cisplatin-ineligible patients with LA-NPC treated with CCRT.

Efficacy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent carboplatin in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Background.

The aim of the prospective phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicities of concurrent carboplatin with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

Patients and methods.

Between October 2005 and November 2011, 73 stage II–IVB NPC patients received IMRT 70 Gy concurrently with three cycles of carboplatin (AUC 5) every three weeks, followed by three cycles of adjuvant carboplatin (AUC 5) and 5-FU (1,000 mg/m²/day for four days) every four weeks. All patients were evaluated for tumour response using response evaluation criteria in solid tumour (RECIST) criteria, survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier methods, and toxicities according to common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 4.0.

Results.

At three months after chemoradiation, 82.2% and 17.8% of patients achieved complete and partial response, respectively. With a median follow-up of 48.1 months (1.3–97.8 months), 9.6% and 17.8% had local recurrence and distant metastasis, respectively. The median survival was not reached. A three-year overall survival was 83.6% and a progression-free survival was 65.3%. Regarding treatment compliance, 97.2%, 68.5% and 69.8% completed radiation treatment, concurrent carboplatin and adjuvant chemotherapy, respectively. Grade 3–4 acute toxicities were oral mucositis (16.4%), dysphagia (16.4%), xerostomia (15.1%) and haematotoxicity (6.8%).

Conclusions.

Carboplatin concurrently with IMRT provided excellent tumour response, manageable toxicities and good compliance. This should be considered as an alternative treatment for NPC patients.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with carboplatin followed by carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Background

This study aimed to evaluate acute major toxicities, the response rate, 3-year overall survival and progression-free survival rate of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients on concurrent carboplatin chemoradiotherapy followed by carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil.

Methods

A prospective study of fifty patients diagnosed with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma received conventional radiation therapy with a total dose of 6600-7000 cGy in 6-7 weeks and concurrent chemotherapy of three cycles of carboplatin during radiotherapy, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy using carboplatin plus 5-fluorouracil for two cycles.

Results

Weight loss and mucositis were the two most common acute major grades 3-4 toxicities (42%). Myelosuppression occurred subsequently, including leukopenia (30%), neutropenia (20%), anemia (12%), and thrombocytopenia (6%). Only 8% of patients developed grades 3-4 nausea and vomiting. No patients had renal and electrolyte abnormalities. Regarding the response evaluation, 100% of patients achieved an objective response rate of the primary tumor (92% complete response, and 8% partial response). Similarly, all patients also achieved an objective response rate of the neck node (64% complete response and 36% partial response). The 3-year overall survival rate and progression-free survival rate were 89.7% and 72.7%, respectively.

Conclusions

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with carboplatin followed by carboplatin and 5- fluorouracil could be considered as an alternative regimen for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients pertaining to a good overall response rate, 3-year overall survival and progression-free survival rate with good tolerability.

Impact of diabetes mellitus on treatment outcomes in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To determine the influence of diabetes mellitus on stages and long-term outcomes among patients with nasopharyngeal cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study summarized 37 patients who were diagnosed as having diabetes mellitus and nasopharyngeal cancer and treated by radiotherapy between January 1999 and December 1999. With a median follow-up of 34.6 mo, we analyzed differences in RFS, MFS, DFS, and OS between the diabetes and the non-diabetes group.

RESULTS

37 patients were involved in our study. According to the Chinese Fuzhou staging system for NPC, which was modified in 1992, 2 patients belong to stage I, 9 stage II, 17 stage III, and 6 stage IV. The 4-yr RFS of diabetes group and non-diabetes group was 52.1% vs 68.2%, the 4-yr MFS was 73.0% vs 72.0%, the 4-yr DFS was 35.1% vs 65.1%, and the OS was 67.6% vs 75.7%. The Wilcoxon (Gehan) test showed there was no significant difference between the two groups of RFS, MFS, and OS, while the diabetes group had a worse DFS than non-diabetes group (Wilcoxon p = 0.0047).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with diabetes had a worse DFS than non-diabetes, but statistic tests did not show significant differences in RFS, MFS, and OS; further studies should be continue to find out the results in the future.

Treatment of Stage IV(A-B) nasopharyngeal carcinoma by induction-concurrent chemoradiotherapy and accelerated fractionation: impact of chemotherapy schemes

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of different chemotherapy regimens in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) treated by induction-concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1998 and 2003, 75 Stage IV(A-B) NPC patients were treated with 3 cycles of induction chemotherapy with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (PF) (n = 41) or cisplatin plus gemcitabine (PG) (n = 34), followed by accelerated radiotherapy in concurrence with 2 cycles of cisplatin. In 18 (24%) patients, cisplatin was completely replaced by carboplatin in both concurrent cycles, mainly because of borderline renal functions.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 3.6 years. The 3-year locoregional failure-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival of the whole group were 80%, 68%, and 80% respectively. No significant difference was found between patients treated with either induction regimens. However, patients with only carboplatin in the 2 concurrent cycles had significantly inferior 3-year locoregional failure-free survival (56% vs. 86%, p = 0.014), progression-free survival (39% vs. 72%, p = 0.001), and overall survival (61% vs. 87%, p = 0.046) when compared with the rest of the group. In multivariate analysis, the complete replacement of cisplatin by carboplatin during concurrent chemoradiotherapy was still an independent adverse factor in locoregional failure-free survival (hazard ratio, 3.662; 95% CI, 1.145-11.765; p = 0.029) and progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 3.390; 95% CI, 1.443-7.937; p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

The more convenient PG regimen is as effective as the PF regimen as induction chemotherapy for patients with advanced NPC. Replacing cisplatin with carboplatin in the concurrent phase carries a poor prognosis.

Concurrent chemo-radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Because of the low incidence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in Japan, few studies have reported on the use of concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) for treatment of this disease. The present study investigated the efficacy and toxicity of CCRT with Carboplatin (CBDCA) and UFT for NPC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

CCRT with injection of CBDCA and oral administration of UFT was given to 21 patients in our institution during 1996-2000. We compared the patients treated with CCRT with those treated with RT alone from 1976 to 1995 or those treated with RT after chemotherapy (Pre-RT chemotherapy) from 1985 to 1995. Overall survival rate (OS), progression free survival rate (PFS) and cause specific survival (CSS) rate were analyzed.

RESULTS

The actual 2-year OS, PFS, and CSS of CCRT were 85.7, 66.7 and 90%, respectively. The rates were improved compared to RT alone (37.9, 31.0, and 56.6%) and Pre-RT chemotherapy (58.8, 41.2, and 64.7%). The most frequent and severe acute toxicities were leukopenia (42.9%) and mucositis with grade 3-4 (28.6%), both of which eventually resolved.

CONCLUSION

CCRT with CBDCA and UFT is considered to be an effective, convenient, and tolerable treatment, which improves survival rates for NPC patients. Therefore, we recommend this CCRT method for the treatment of NPC.

Preoperative radiotherapy for vaccine associated sarcoma in 92 cats

Medical records for 92 cats with a vaccine associated sarcoma receiving preoperative irradiation, with or without chemotherapy, between December 1985 and September 1998 were reviewed. The purposes were to quantify response to treatment and to attempt identification of factors associated with favorable response. Variables evaluated for a relationship to outcome included signalment, tumor location, presence of gross vs. microscopic tumor, radiation field size, irradiation technique, type of surgical procedure, completeness of excision, and chemotherapy (none, carboplatin alone, and others). Time to first event was calculated for the first day of treatment until local tumor recurrence or metastasis, or the date of euthanasia or death. Median time to first event for all 92 cats was 584 days. Only completeness of surgical excision was related to the time to first event. Median time to first event in cats having complete surgical excision was 986 days compared to 292 days for cats with incomplete excision (P = 0.004). Cats requiring bone removal to effect tumor removal had earlier failure than cats having other types of surgery. There was not a significant relationship between administration of chemotherapy or chemotherapy type and time to first event although outcome in cats receiving carboplatin was better than all other treatment groups. Carboplatin addition to preoperative irradiation appears worthy of further study. Preoperative irradiation is an effective treatment for cats with vaccine associated sarcoma, especially if complete excision can be accomplished following irradiation.

Radiotherapy alone in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer: comparison with an intergroup study. Is combined modality treatment really necessary?

PURPOSE

To examine the outcome of radiotherapy (RT) alone in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) and to compare the results with those reported by the Intergroup study 0099 (IGS) comparing RT to combined modality therapy (CMT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During the period 1985-1992, 198 NPC patients presenting without distant metastatic disease were treated for cure. Of these, 172 had stage III/IV (UICC 1987, 1992). Planned RT was 2 Gy/day fraction to 60-66 Gy to the primary tumor, with 50 and 60 Gy to the node negative and to palpable nodes, respectively. Outcomes included overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), defined from the time of registration at our institution.

RESULTS

The TNM categories and other prognostic factors were similar to the IGS, though 80% had stage IV compared to 91% in IGS. The 5 year OS and DFS for the 172 patients with stage III/IV disease were 62 and 48%, respectively, as compared to the IGS results of OS 37% and DFS 29% for RT alone, and OS 67% and DFS 58% for the CMT arm of IGS. When the distribution of adverse prognostic factors was balanced between both studies the comparative results were unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

The early results for RT alone of this single institution experience are superior to those of the IGS control arm (RT), while somewhat inferior to those reported in the chemo-radiotherapy arm. The surprisingly poor outcome of the IGS/RT control arm may have resulted by chance, suggesting the need for a confirmatory randomized trial to fully establish the role of combined chemotherapy and radiation, as used in the IGS.