Possible impact of iridium-192 source centering on restenosis rate after femoro-popliteal angioplasty and endovascular brachytherapy in Vienna-2 study

Intravascular brachytherapy for peripheral vascular disease

BACKGROUND

Interventional treatment of arteries that are narrowed and obstructed by atherosclerosis involves either bypassing the blockage using a graft; widening the artery from the inside with a balloon, a procedure known as percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA); or providing a strut to hold the vessel open, known as a stent. All of these treatments are, however, limited by the high numbers that fail within a year. Intravascular brachytherapy is the application of radiation directly to the site of vessel narrowing. It is known to inhibit the processes that lead to restenosis (narrowing) of vessels and grafts after treatment. This is an update of a review first published in 2002.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of, and complications associated with, intravascular brachytherapy (IVBT) for maintaining patency after angioplasty or stent insertion in native vessels or bypass grafts of the iliac or infrainguinal arteries.

SEARCH METHODS

For this update the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Trials Search Co-ordinator searched their Specialised Register (last searched August 2013) and CENTRAL (2013, Issue 7).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of the use of brachytherapy as an adjunct to the endovascular treatment of people with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) or stenosed bypass grafts of the iliac or infrainguinal arteries versus the procedure without brachytherapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and two other review authors independently extracted the data. Adverse event information was collected from the trials.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight trials with a combined total of 1090 participants were included in this review. All included studies used the femoropopliteal artery. We did not identify any studies that used the iliac arteries. All studies compared PTA with or without stenting plus IVBT versus PTA with or without stenting alone. No trials were found comparing IVBT to technologies such as drug eluting stents or balloons, or cryoplasty. Follow-up ranged from six months to five years. The quality of the included trials was moderate with our concerns relating to the difficulty of blinding due to the nature of the procedures and the small sample sizes for some studies. Primary outcomes (patency or restenosis and need for re-intervention) were reported in the majority of the trials, but reporting at various time points and the use of multiple definitions of the outcomes by the included studies meant that not all data were available for pooling. The secondary outcomes were not reported in many of the included studies.For brachytherapy, cumulative patency was higher at 24 months (odds ratio (OR) 2.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.36 to 4.10, n = 222, P = 0.002). A statistically significant difference was found for restenosis at six months (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.66, n = 562, P = 0.004), 12 months (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.68, n = 375, P = 0.0002) and 24 months (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.78, n = 164, P = 0.007) in favour of IVBT. No difference was found after five years as measured in one study. The need for re-interventions was reported in six studies. Target lesion revascularisation was significantly reduced in trial participants treated with IVBT compared with angioplasty alone (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.97, P = 0.04) at six months after the interventions. No statistically significant difference was found between the procedures on the need for re-intervention at 12 and 24 months after the procedures.A statistically significant lower number of occlusions was found in the control group at more than three months (OR 11.46, 95% CI 1.44 to 90.96, n = 363, P = 0.02) but no differences were found at less than one month nor at 12 months after the procedures making the clinical significance uncertain. Ankle brachial index was statistically significantly better for IVBT at the 12 month follow-up (mean difference 0.08, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.14, n = 100, P = 0.02) but no statistically significant differences were found at 24 hours and at six months.Quality of life, complications, limb loss, cardiovascular deaths, death from all causes, pain free walking distance and maximum walking distance on a treadmill were similar for the two arms of the trials with no statistically significant difference found between the treatment groups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence for using peripheral artery brachytherapy as an adjunct to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty to maintain patency and for the prevention of restenosis in people with peripheral vascular disease is limited, mainly due to the inconsistency of assessment and reporting of clinically relevant outcomes. More data are needed on clinically relevant outcomes such as health related quality of life (HRQOL) or limb salvage and longer-term outcomes, together with comparisons with other techniques such as drug eluting balloons and stents. Adequately powered randomised controlled trials, health economics and cost-effectiveness data are required before the procedure could be recommended for widespread use.

Beta endovascular brachytherapy using CO2-filled centering catheter for treatment of recurrent superficial femoropopliteal artery disease

BACKGROUND

Recurrent disease (restenosis) after endovascular treatment of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) remains a major problem. We evaluated the efficacy of beta-endovascular brachytherapy using the CORONA centering catheter in patients with SFA restenosis in a single-arm Phase II trial.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 28 patients (mean age 70 years; 16 female, 12 male) with recurrent SFA stenosis were treated, and in-stent restenosis was present in 17 patients (61%). Brachytherapy was performed with strontium-90 beta source using a 7-French CO(2)-filled one-segment centering catheter. New stents had to be applied in two cases. Mean interventional length was 129 mm (range 20-240 mm). A dose of 14 Gy in vessel radius (postinterventional) plus 2 mm was applied in 24 patients and 18.4 Gy in four patients. Treatment time was 7 min 32 s per radiation segment. No major adverse events occurred. Patients were followed by ankle-brachial index and duplex sonography for a median of 42 months. Cumulative restenosis rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 9%, 28%, and 40%, respectively. Target vessel revascularization was performed in seven cases (25%).

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison to literature data, the treatment of SFA restenosis with beta brachytherapy may improve long-term patency.

Radiation therapy for the treatment of benign vascular, skeletal and soft tissue diseases

The concept of radiation therapy for the treatment of benign diseases refers to the use of moderate to high-energy ionising radiation as part of the treatment of non-malignant, but not necessarily harmless, diseases. The usefulness of radiation therapy, based on the anti-inflammatory properties of ionising radiation, has long been known. Apart from the treatment of intracranial benign tumours, such as meningiomas and neurinomas, the prevention of cardiovascular restenosis or treatment of skeletal degenerative diseases are, without doubt, the main fields of action for radiation therapy in benign conditions. Nonetheless, many other non-cancer entities may benefit from ionising radiation therapy treatment. The purpose of this review is to highlight and update indications for treatment with radiation therapy in benign conditions, focusing on skeletal degenerative processes, vascular conditions and soft tissue diseases.

External Beam Irradiation and Restenosis Following Femoral Stenting: Long-Term Results of a Prospective Randomized Study

PURPOSE

To assess the long-term outcome of external beam irradiation (EBI) for the prevention of restenosis due to neointimal hyperplasia, following percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stenting of the superficial femoral artery.

METHODS

Sixty consecutive patients with peripheral arterial disease, who were treated with "bail-out" stent implantation in the superficial femoral artery due to suboptimal PTA, were included in this study. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups, receiving either external beam irradiation (6 MV photons, total dose 24 Gy in a hypofractionated schedule) plus antiplatelet therapy (EBI group) or antiplatelet therapy alone (control group).

RESULTS

No procedure-related complications occurred, and all patients of the EBI group received the full dose of 24 Gy. During the long-term follow-up, an overall statistically significant difference was demonstrated in favor of the EBI group patients, regarding both the in-stent (log-rank test, p = 0.0072) and the in-segment binary restenosis (log-rank test, p = 0.0103). The primary patency rates were also significantly better in the EBI group at specific time-points, such as in the first (74.2% vs 46.5%, p = 0.019), second (62.5% vs 33.8%, p = 0.020), and third (54.6% vs 29.0%, p = 0.039) year, respectively. Moreover, the overall clinically driven reintervention rate was significantly lower among patients of the irradiated group (log-rank test, p = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

Our long-term follow-up analysis revealed that EBI following femoral artery PTA and stenting significantly reduces restenosis and reintervention rates, while improving primary patency.

Endovascular brachytherapy prevents restenosis after femoropopliteal angioplasty: results of the Vienna-3 randomised multicenter study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The aim of the trial was to investigate the effect of Iridium-192 gamma endovascular brachytherapy on reduction of restenosis after femoropopliteal angioplasty.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between Oct, 1998 and Jul, 2001 a total of 134 patients have been randomized after successful angioplasty to brachytherapy or sham irradiation in a prospective, randomized, multicenter, double blind controlled trial. Patients with de novo lesion of at least 5 cm or recurrent lesion of any length after prior angioplasty have been enrolled. Brachytherapy was performed with 7F centering catheter. Mean lesion length was 9.1cm (1.5-25 cm) and mean intervention length 13.6 cm (4-27.5 cm) in brachytherapy cohort.

RESULTS

In placebo cohort mean lesion length was 10.3 cm (2-25 cm) and mean intervention length 14.1 cm (2-29 cm). A dose of 18 Gy was prescribed 2 mm from the surface of centering balloons. Analyzed (based on angiography) on intention to treat basis the binary restenosis rate at 12 months was 41.7% (28/67) in brachytherapy cohort and 67.1% (45/67) in placebo cohort (chi2 test, P<0.05). Corresponding data for as treated analysis (A total of 38 patients was excluded from analysis due to lack of follow-up, early recurrence within 30 days and >30% residual stenosis after angioplasty) have been 23.4% in the brachytherapy and 53.3% in the placebo group (P<0.05), respectively. The cumulative patency rates after 24 months on intention to treat analysis were 54% in the brachytherapy and 27% in the placebo group (P<0.005). Corresponding data for as treated analysis were 77% in the brachytherapy and 39% in the placebo group (P<0.001). Late thrombosis was not seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant reduction of restenosis rate was obtained with endovascular gamma brachytherapy after femoropopliteal angioplasty.

External beam radiation therapy reduces the rate of re-stenosis in patients treated with femoral stenting: results of a randomised study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of external beam irradiation (EBI) for the prevention of re-stenosis due to neointimal hyperplasia, after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and stent placement of the superficial femoral artery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 60 patients with the diagnosis of superficial femoral artery stenoses or occlusions due to peripheral arterial obstructive disease underwent PTA and implantation of a self-expandable stent at their superficial femoral artery. After the procedure, patients were randomised and 30 of them received EBI (6 MV photons, total dose 24 Gy in six fractions in 2 weeks), while the rest 30 received no radiation therapy.

RESULTS

EBI was technically feasible in all patients, without serious radiation related side effects. Overall, a statistically significant difference was observed in stenosis categories between the two groups at 6 months follow-up (P=0.04). More specifically, significantly more patients in the control group presented with stenosis greater or equal than 70% [EBI group 30% (9/30); control group 66.7% (20/30); P=0.009]. This difference in the percentage of re-stenosis had as a consequence significantly lower re-intervention rates among the patients of the irradiated group [17% (5/30) versus 47% (14/30); P=0.025] during the 6 months follow-up period. We also observed that the irradiated patients had re-stenosis at the stent ends, while the non-irradiated had re-stenosis at the stent ends and the lumen. Three of the irradiated patients, who discontinued the anti-platelet treatment, have shown thrombosis of the irradiated artery during the first month from the completion of the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

It is our belief that EBI is a feasible, safe and effective method for the prevention of neointimal hyperplasia at the superficial femoral artery. Further studies are deemed necessary to optimise the radiotherapy schedule.

Treatment parameters for beta and gamma devices in peripheral endovascular brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To determine dosimetric parameters, such as radial and longitudinal dose profiles, for beta and gamma devices in peripheral endovascular brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

An (192)Ir high-dose rate stepping source, a (90)Sr source train, and a (32)P-coated radiation balloon were investigated. The treatment-planning software PLATO, Monte Carlo code EGSnrc, and GafChromic film dosimetry were used to analyze the dose distribution of these devices.

RESULTS

For a 5-mm-diameter vessel, the ratio between the dose at 2 mm depth and the dose at the lumen surface was 1.8, 3.4, and 16.2 for the (192)Ir, (90)Sr, and (32)P devices, respectively. The dose variation at the reference depth of 2 mm into the vessel wall was 7-18 Gy, for different analyzed dose prescriptions. The reference lumen dose was different by a factor >8. For all three devices, the reference isodose length was not <5 mm on the proximal and distal edge of the active source length.

CONCLUSIONS

A complete set of dose parameters for beta and gamma sources has to be considered for appropriate treatment planning and performance, including reporting of reference depth dose, reference lumen dose, and reference isodose length.

Intravascular brachytherapy: indications and management of adverse events

Intravascular brachytherapy has become the standard of care for the treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis after repeat angioplasty. More than 5000 patients have been treated as part of various clinical trials. Based on the results of the GAMMA I trial, the START ((90)Sr Treatment of Angiographic Restenosis Trial), and the INHIBIT (INtimal Hyperplasia Inhibition with Beta In-stent restenosis Trial), the Checkmate system using (192)Ir, the Betacath system using (90)Sr/Y, and the Galileo system using (32)P, have been approved for the treatment of in-stent restenosis. With a better understanding and application of radiation oncology concepts to vascular brachytherapy, problems such as edge failure are being overcome. The complication of late thrombosis has also become less significant with the elimination of restenting at the brachytherapy procedure, and the prolonged use of antiplatelet therapy. There are other competing modalities in the early phases of clinical trials. The durability of results, lack of any significant long-term complications and the confirmation of the efficacy in other sites will further consolidate the role of radiation in treating in-stent restenosis.

Catheter-based 32P beta-radiation after stent implantation in porcine coronary arteries: role of source-centering and geographical miss

The present study examined the role of source-centering and geographical miss in vascular brachytherapy. After implantation of 13 mm long stents, 38 coronary arteries in 13 pigs were randomly assigned to centered brachytherapy (n = 13), eccentric brachytherapy (n = 13), or no radiation (n = 12). Geographical miss was avoided by careful placement of a 27 mm (32)P beta-radiation source. Restenosis was quantified by angiography, histomorphometry, and intravascular ultrasound at 28 days. Source-centering led to a significant (P < 0.001) reduction of in-stent area stenosis (centered radiation, 12% +/- 5%; eccentric radiation, 37% +/- 21%; control arteries, 41% +/- 13%). Despite 7 mm coverage of the edge segments, radiation was found to induce edge stenosis due to neointima formation and constrictive vascular remodeling. We conclude that centered radiation was superior to eccentric radiation in reducing in-stent luminal narrowing while radiation-induced edge stenosis was still observed despite extension of the radiation zone to 7 mm beyond the stent edges.

Endovascular Brachytherapy in Peripheral Arteries: Solution for Restenosis or False Hope?

Endovascular brachytherapy with gamma-radioactive source ((192)iridium ) significantly reduces the restenosis after femoropopliteal angioplasty for both de novo and recurrent lesions. Increased arterial patency after additional stenting and brachytherapy was also achieved with the same approach. This was found as a result of single-center studies performed in Frankfurt, Germany, Vienna, Austria, and Bern, Switzerland. However, until recently, only one multicenter investigation was published that also underlined this positive effect of brachytherapy. A definitive role of radiotherapy in restenosis prevention should be established after the results of three multicenter, phase III trials (ie, Paris, Vienna-3, and Swiss) are presented in early 2003. These investigations recruited approximately 630 patients with recurrent and de novo lesions without stent placement. Another important phase III study, the results of which are also expected at the beginning of 2003, is the Vienna-5 trial. This study had the same inclusion criteria as the Paris and Vienna-3 trials, but angioplasty was combined in all patients with stenting. The patients were then randomized for brachytherapy or sham irradiation. Endovascular brachytherapy has shown to be a safe treatment modality. The only clinically relevant impediment was the late sudden thrombosis or occlusion that occurred after stenting and radiation. These events can present up to 1 year after brachytherapy, and in some cases even later. Prolonged antiplatelet medication with clopidogrel (at least 12 months) has solved this problem completely. No other major adverse effects were seen. If gamma radiation is used, the patients must be transported after intervention to the brachytherapy suite, owing to radiation safety regulations. Although no negative consequences during transportation were observed in all performed studies, this represents an additional risk. To shorten the whole procedure, studies using beta sources ((32)phosphorus, (90)strontium) are ongoing, whereas those with beta-radioactive sources of brachytherapy can be performed in the catheterization laboratory. Emerging approaches using drug-eluting stents with antiproliferative substances such as rapamycin and paclitaxel are being investigated as well; however, the safety and efficacy for restenosis prophylaxis must be proven in large clinical trials.