Impact of target volume coverage with Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 98-05 guidelines for transrectal ultrasound guided permanent Iodine-125 prostate implants

Radiation Safety Assessment in Prostate Cancer Treatment: A Predictive Approach for I-125 Brachytherapy

This study uses Monte Carlo simulation and experimental measurements to develop a predictive model for estimating the external dose rate associated with permanent radioactive source implantation in prostate cancer patients. The objective is to estimate the accuracy of the patient's external dose rate measurement. First, I-125 radioactive sources were implanted into Mylar window water phantoms to simulate the permanent implantation of these sources in patients. Water phantom experimental measurement was combined with Monte Carlo simulation to develop predictive equations, whose performance was verified against external clinical data. The model's accuracy in predicting the external dose rate in patients with permanently implanted I-125 radioactive sources was high (R2 = 0.999). A comparative analysis of the experimental measurements and the Monte Carlo simulations revealed that the maximum discrepancy between the measured and calculated values for the water phantom was less than 5.00%. The model is practical for radiation safety assessments, enabling the evaluation of radiation exposure risks to individuals around patients with permanently implanted I-125 radioactive sources.

Automatic CT simulation optimization for radiation therapy: A general strategy

PURPOSE

In radiation therapy, x-ray computed tomography (CT) simulation protocol specifications should be driven by the treatment planning requirements in lieu of duplicating diagnostic CT screening protocols. The purpose of this study was to develop a general strategy that allows for automatically, prospectively, and objectively determining the optimal patient-specific CT simulation protocols based on radiation-therapy goals, namely, maintenance of contouring quality and integrity while minimizing patient CT simulation dose.

METHODS

The authors proposed a general prediction strategy that provides automatic optimal CT simulation protocol selection as a function of patient size and treatment planning task. The optimal protocol is the one that delivers the minimum dose required to provide a CT simulation scan that yields accurate contours. Accurate treatment plans depend on accurate contours in order to conform the dose to actual tumor and normal organ positions. An image quality index, defined to characterize how simulation scan quality affects contour delineation, was developed and used to benchmark the contouring accuracy and treatment plan quality within the predication strategy. A clinical workflow was developed to select the optimal CT simulation protocols incorporating patient size, target delineation, and radiation dose efficiency. An experimental study using an anthropomorphic pelvis phantom with added-bolus layers was used to demonstrate how the proposed prediction strategy could be implemented and how the optimal CT simulation protocols could be selected for prostate cancer patients based on patient size and treatment planning task. Clinical IMRT prostate treatment plans for seven CT scans with varied image quality indices were separately optimized and compared to verify the trace of target and organ dosimetry coverage.

RESULTS

Based on the phantom study, the optimal image quality index for accurate manual prostate contouring was 4.4. The optimal tube potentials for patient sizes of 38, 43, 48, 53, and 58 cm were 120, 140, 140, 140, and 140 kVp, respectively, and the corresponding minimum CTDIvol for achieving the optimal image quality index 4.4 were 9.8, 32.2, 100.9, 241.4, and 274.1 mGy, respectively. For patients with lateral sizes of 43-58 cm, 120-kVp scan protocols yielded up to 165% greater radiation dose relative to 140-kVp protocols, and 140-kVp protocols always yielded a greater image quality index compared to the same dose-level 120-kVp protocols. The trace of target and organ dosimetry coverage and the γ passing rates of seven IMRT dose distribution pairs indicated the feasibility of the proposed image quality index for the predication strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

A general strategy to predict the optimal CT simulation protocols in a flexible and quantitative way was developed that takes into account patient size, treatment planning task, and radiation dose. The experimental study indicated that the optimal CT simulation protocol and the corresponding radiation dose varied significantly for different patient sizes, contouring accuracy, and radiation treatment planning tasks.

A magnetic resonance-based seed localization method for I-125 prostate implants

This study was performed to develop and evaluate a semi-automatic seed localization algorithm from magnetic resonance (MR) images for interstitial prostate brachytherapy. The computerized tomography (CT) and MR images (3 mm-slice thickness) of six patients who had received real-time MR imaging-guided interstitial prostate brachytherapy were obtained. An automatic seed localization method was performed on CT images to obtain seed coordinates, and an algorithm for seed localization from MR images of the prostate was developed and tested. The resultant seed distributions from MR images were then compared to CT-derived distribution by matching the same seeds and calculating percent volume receiving 100% of the prescribed dose and the extent of the volume in 3-dimensions. The semiautomatic seed localization method made it possible to extract more than 90% of the seeds with either less than 8% of noises or 3% of missing seeds. The mean volume difference obtained from CT and MR receiving 100% of the prescribed dose was less than 3%. The maximum extent of the volume receiving the prescribed dose were 0.3, 0.6, and 0.2 cm in x, y, and z directions, respectively. These results indicate that the algorithm is very useful in identifying seeds from MR image for post-implant dosimety.

Tumour and target volumes in permanent prostate brachytherapy: A supplement to the ESTRO/EAU/EORTC recommendations on prostate brachytherapy

The aim of this paper is to supplement the GEC/ESTRO/EAU recommendations for permanent seed implantations in prostate cancer to develop consistency in target and volume definition for permanent seed prostate brachytherapy. Recommendations on target and organ at risk (OAR) definitions and dosimetry parameters to be reported on post implant planning are given.

Quality of interstitial PDR-brachytherapy-implants of head-and-neck-cancers: predictive factors for local control and late toxicity?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Parameters and indices related to the implant geometry in use for describing the quality of volume implants in interstitial brachytherapy were developed on the basis of LDR-brachytherapy. The aim of our study was to evaluate their usefulness for predicting late toxicity and local control in the PDR-brachytherapy of head-and-neck-tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2000 and October 2004, 210 patients were treated with PDR-brachytherapy which was administered either postoperatively or as definitive treatment. Brachytherapy was used as sole treatment in some cases while in others a combination with EBRT was used. For assessment of quality of implants we analyzed the following indices and parameters using the univariate chi2 test and multivariate logistic regression analysis: V85, V120 and V150 (volume enclosed by the surface of the 85%-, 120%- and 150%-isodose), UI (uniformity index), QI (quality index), HI (homogeneity index), VGR (volume gradient ratio), DNR (dose non-uniformity ratio), LD (low dose), HD (high dose), PD (peak dose) and the intersource spacing.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 24 months (4-50) the rate of - usually transient - soft tissue necrosis (STN) was 11%, osteoradionecrosis (ORN) was seen in 7.6% of cases and local relapse occurred in 7% of cases. Univariate analysis shows a significant influence on the development of soft tissue necrosis for V85, and on osteoradionecrosis for HD and PD. In the multivariate analysis a correlation between soft tissue necrosis and QI was found. For local control a correlation with QI, VGR and minimal tube distance was found using univariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Using interstitial PDR-brachytherapy in head-and-neck-tumors the probability of local control and of the development of soft tissue necrosis or osteoradionecrosis is dependent on dose and volume parameter like the volume of the reference isodose, the high and peak dose values, on the homogeneity of the dose distribution, quantified by the quality index or the volume gradient ratio as well on the minimal tube distance.

Importance of the CT/MRI fusion method as a learning tool for CT-based postimplant dosimetry in prostate brachytherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To compare the CT-based and CT/MRI fusion-based postimplant dosimetry after permanent prostate brachytherapy and to evaluate the improvement in CT-based dosimetry by physicians with or without experience in using the CT/MRI fusion method.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight consecutive patients agreed to participate in a prospective study. The prostate contours from CT/MRI fusion are the gold standard for determining the prostate volume and dose volume histogram (DVH). CT-based postimplant dosimetries were performed by two physicians. Observer 1 was a radiologist who had never used CT/MRI fusion method for postimplant dosimetric analysis. Observer 2 was a radiation oncologist experienced in postimplant analysis using the CT/MRI fusion method. The prostate dosimetry was evaluated by prostate D90 and V100.

RESULTS

No significant difference was observed in the mean prostate volumes between the two observers and the CT/MRI fusion data. However, the correlation coefficient value for observer 2 (R(2)=0.932) was greater than that for observer 1 (R(2)=0.793). The D90 and V100 values as evaluated by the two observers were significantly underestimated in comparison to those evaluated using the CT/MRI fusion methods. The DVH related parameters were underestimated more frequently by observer 1 than by observer 2: (prostate D90: 99.56% for observer 1, 102.97% for observer 2, 109.37% for CT/MRI fusion. Prostate V100: 88.12% for observer 1, 90.14% for observer 2, 91.91% for CT/MRI fusion).

CONCLUSIONS

The difference in the mean value in D90 and V100 by observer 1 was significantly greater than that for observer 2. These findings suggest that the CT/MRI fusion method provides accurate feedback which thereby improves CT-based postimplant dosimetry for prostate brachytherapy.

A dosimetric analysis of unstranded seeds versus customized stranded seeds in transperineal interstitial permanent prostate seed brachytherapy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the dosimetric and toxicity results from 272 patients with localized prostate cancer treated consecutively using loose or stranded radioactive seeds by transrectal ultrasound-guided transperineal permanent prostate seed brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Two hundred seventy-two patients with localized prostate cancer treated between February 2002 and June 2004 were analyzed. All patients were treated with radioactive iodine-125 or palladium-103 using unstranded or loose seeds (USS) (159 patients) or customized stranded seeds (CSS) at variable spacing (5-50 mm) (113 patients) (Vari-Strand; BrachySciences, Oxford, CT). A single experienced brachytherapist performed all implants.

RESULTS

There was a slight improvement in the dosimetric parameter D90 between the CSS (101.9%) and USS (99.3%) groups (p = 0.041). However, overall implant quality based on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) guidelines was similar between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the D90 value calculated for CSS is statistically improved when compared to the USS cohort, but without a clinically significant difference. There was no difference in the toxicity scores in either group. Overall quality between groups is comparable in our institution.

Radiation exposure after permanent prostate brachytherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Limited information is available on the true radiation exposure and associated risks for the relatives of the patients submitted to prostate brachytherapy with permanent implant of radioactive sources and for any other people coming into contact with them. In order to provide appropriate information, we analyzed the radiation exposure data from 216 prostate cancer patients who underwent (125)I or (103)Pd implants at the European Institute of Oncology of Milan, Italy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between October 1999 and October 2004, 216 patients with low risk prostate carcinoma were treated with (125)I (200 patients) or (103)Pd (16 patients) permanent seed implantation. One day after the procedure, radiation exposure measurements around the patients were performed using an ionization chamber survey meter (Victoreen RPO-50) calibrated in dose rate at an accredited calibration center (calibration Centre SIT 104).

RESULTS

The mean dose rate at the posterior skin surface (gluteal region) following (125)I implants was 41.3 microSv/h (range: 6.2-99.4 microSv/h) and following (103)Pd implants was 18.9 microSv/h (range 5.0-37.3 microSv/h). The dose rate at 50 cm from the skin decreased to the mean value of 6.4 microSv/h for the (125)I implants and to the mean value of 1.7 microSv/h for the (103)Pd implants. Total times required to reach the annual dose limit (1 mSv/year) recommended for the general population by the European Directive 96/29/Euratom and by the Italian law (Decreto Legislativo 241/2000) at a distance of 50 cm from the posterior skin surface of the implanted patient would be 7.7 and 21.6 days for (125)I and for (103)Pd. Good correlation between the measured dose rates and both the total implanted activity and the distance between the most posteriorly implanted seed and the skin surface of the patients was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that the dose rates at 50 cm away from the prostate brachytherapy patients are very low and that the doses possibly absorbed by the relatives and other members of the general population coming into contact with the treated patients are well below the dose limit set by the European Directive and by the Italian regulation. However, in order to meet the recommendation of the ALARA principle (As Low As Reasonably/Readily Achievable), some advice to the patients should be given, such as to maintain a minimum distance from the patient of 1m, at least for a period equal to one half life of used radionuclide (60 days for (125)I and 15 days for (103)Pd).

A new evaluation method of target volume coverage and homogeneity for IMRT treatment planning

Based on the functional approximation of a target volume DVH (TV-DVH) to a modified step function, we propose a new index that indicates the degrees of dose coverage and homogeneity for target volume reached in clinical routines. Forty-seven IMRT patient plans are included in the analysis to explore the efficiency of the proposed method. The new index, named s-index, was defined to vary from 0:05 for clinically acceptable TV-DVH at our institution and showed the ability to give the user an idea whether the degree of dose coverage and homogeneity for target volume were adequate when the user-defined criteria had been in place. The result shows that the lower value of s-index indecates the higher dose coverage for the tumor volume and/or the higher dose homogeneity showing the faster fall-off rate at the percentage dose higher than 100%. In addition to the quantification of dose coverage and homogeneity is has been also shown that s-index is more accurate in evaluating the dose homogeneity in tumor volume than the conventional method. The proposed method has demonstrated the effectiveness in evaluating TV-DVH in terms of simple index and supplements currently used indices by providing complete information of a DVH curve in a treatment plan.

Impact of selection of post-implant technique on dosimetry parameters for permanent prostate implants

PURPOSE

To investigate the variability of prostate implant quality indices between three different methods of calculating the post-implant dose distribution.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In a study of 9 permanent prostate implant patients, post-implant dosimetry was carried out using three methods of identifying seed positions within the prostate volume: (1) prostate volumes defined by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) immediately following implant were registered with shift-film defined seed positions, (2) seeds were identified directly from the post-implant TRUS images, and (3) CT was used to define seed positions and prostate volumes from images acquired at 41-65 days post-implant. For each method, the volume of prostate receiving 90%, 100%, and 150% of the prescribed dose (V90, V100, V150) and the dose delivered to 90% of the prostate volume (D90) were calculated.

RESULTS

Post-implant TRUS volumes were within 15% of the preimplant TRUS volumes in 8 of the 9 patients investigated. The post-implant CT volume was within 15% of the preimplant (TRUS) volume in only 3 of the 9 cases. The value of the dosimetry parameters was dependent on the method used and varied by 5-25% for V90, 5-30% for V100, 42-134% for V150, and 9-60% for D90. No simple relationship was found between change in volume and the resultant change in dosimetry parameter. Differences in dosimetry parameters due to source localization uncertainties was found to be small (< or = 10% for V100) when comparing methods (1) and (2).

CONCLUSIONS

There are many uncertainties in the calculation of parameters that are commonly used to describe the quality of a permanent prostate implant. Differences in the parameters calculated were most likely a result of a combination of factors including uncertainties in delineating the prostate with different imaging modalities, differences in source identification techniques, and intraobserver variability.

The radiation doses to erectile tissues defined with magnetic resonance imaging after intensity-modulated radiation therapy or iodine-125 brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To report penile bulb (PB) and corporal bodies (CB) doses during intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and permanent (125)I prostate implant alone (BT) for favorable, early stage, clinically localized prostate cancer using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to provide a basis for comparison as the initial report of a comprehensive project to develop erectile tissues sparing techniques.

METHODS AND MATERIAL

Prostate, PB and CB volumes were defined by a fused CT/MRI simulation study performed before treatment in 29 IMRT patients and verification study performed 30 days postimplant in 15 BT patients. The median prescribed prostate dose for the IMRT and BT groups was 74 Gy and 145 Gy, respectively. Dose volume histograms (DVHs) were generated to determine the dose characteristics for the PB, CB, and prostate for each patient. D(90), V(100), and V(50) were used, where D(i) was defined as the dose that covers i% of the prostate volume and V(i) is the fractional volume of the prostate that receives i% of the prescribed dose. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to evaluate significance between the groups.

RESULTS

The median PB D(90), V(100), and V(50) values were 17.5 Gy, 0%, and 31.9% for the IMRT group; and 52.5 Gy, 21.5%, and 89.7% for the BT group. The median CB D(90), V(100), and V(50) values were 7.3 Gy, 0%, and 0.9% for the IMRT group; and 26.9 Gy, 2.4%, and 20.1% for the BT group. The differences between the IMRT vs. BT V(100) values, but not V(50), were statistically significant for the PB (p = 0.001) and CB (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation dose to the PB and CB is low with IMRT or BT. Magnetic resonance imaging is superior to CT for the imaging of erectile tissues. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy may offer further reductions in the doses received by the PB and CB; however, at what cost to prostate coverage and normal tissue sparing will be the subject of a follow-up study.

Transperineal TRUS-guided prostate brachytherapy using loose seeds versus RAPIDStrand: A dosimetric analysis

PURPOSE

An analysis of the effect of stranded (125)I and loose (predominantly (103)Pd) sources on dosimetric outcomes of brachytherapy of the prostate.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between September 1998 and December 2003, 473 patients were treated with brachytherapy for biopsy-proven carcinoma of the prostate. Of these, 337 (71%) procedures were performed using free seeds placed with a Mick applicator. Beginning in April 2002, a program of stranded (125)I sources (RAPIDStrand) was implemented; 136 (29%) patients were treated via this approach. Dosimetric variables were collected, as were events of urinary retention.

RESULTS

Mean V100 values for the stranded (125)I approach were greater than those for free seeds (p < 0.0005), whether (125)I or (103)Pd (p < 0.005). Use of the strand was the most significant determinant of V100 of all variables examined. The stranded (125)I approach was also associated with higher mean D90 values and lower V150-urethral doses.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of stranded (125)I was associated with superior dosimetric outcomes in this group of patients.

Brachytherapy for prostate cancer

The use of prostate brachytherapy for the treatment of early-stage, low-grade, low-volume carcinoma of the prostate continues to rise. Given the prolonged natural history of these early lesions, treatment failures may take many years or even a decade or more before becoming clinically evident. It is therefore likely that as the brachytherapy data mature, clinicians will be asked to help manage a potentially large cohort of men who have failed this local therapy--a scenario that will provide a number of unique challenges for the treatment of the disease and the management of the lower urinary tract. This article offers a contemporary review and suggestions with regard to the follow-up of patients who have undergone prostate brachytherapy, including low-dose rate permanent implants and high-dose rate temporary implants for the management of localized prostate cancer. In addition, current controversies in defining biochemical failure following radioactive implantation--including important data regarding the "prostate-specific antigen bounce" phenomenon--are discussed. Finally, a comprehensive review of the management of local recurrence following brachytherapy is offered.

Incorporating clinical measurements of hypoxia into tumor local control modeling of prostate cancer: implications for the alpha/beta ratio

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The recently obtained low value of approximately 1.5 for the alpha/beta of prostate cancer has led us to reexamine the optimal prostate tumor biology parameters, while taking into account everything known about the radiation response of prostate clonogens for use in a predictive dose-response model.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Averages of the literature values of the alpha- and beta-inactivation coefficients for human prostate cancer cell lines were calculated. A robust tumor local control probability (TLCP) model was used that required average alpha and beta, as well as sigma(alpha), for the interpatient variation in single-hit killing (alpha). Median PO(2) values <or=1 mm Hg in the prostates of Fox Chase Cancer Center brachytherapy patients had been found in 21% of 115 cases. The oxygen enhancement ratios of 1.75 and 3.25 for alpha- and beta-inactivation, respectively, measured for tumor cells in vitro, were incorporated into the TLCP model, together with a clonogen density of approximately 10(5) cells/cm(3). Severe hypoxia and radioresistance were estimated for a proportion of tumors that was increased with PSA level.

RESULTS

For asynchronous human prostate cell lines irradiated in air, alpha(mean) was 0.26 +/- 0.07 (standard error) Gy(-1), sigma(alpha) = 0.06 Gy(-1), and beta(mean) was 0.0312 Gy(-2) +/- 0.0064 (standard error) Gy(-2). The TLCP data indicated that most tumors that contained aerobic cells would be cured, whereas most tumors that contained hypoxic cells would not be cured by total doses of 76 to 80 Gy. Clinical response data from the literature for external beam dose escalation, stratified by PSA value, and for low-dose-rate brachytherapy, were well predicted by the model, where the alpha/beta ratio was 8.5 and 15.5 for well-oxygenated and hypoxic clonogens, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither alpha/beta ratio nor clonogen number need be extremely low to explain the response of prostate cancer to brachytherapy and external beam therapy, contradicting other recent analyses. It is strongly suggested that severe hypoxia in the prostates of certain patients limits the overall cancer cure rate by conventional radiation therapy.