Follow-up of head and neck cancer patients post-radiotherapy

Low free triiodothyronine and immune-related hyperthyroidism are associated with overall and progression-free survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab

INTRODUCTION

Thyroid function is frequently impaired in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). In patients treated with pembrolizumab, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of the thyroid are common. However, the prognostic significance of baseline and on-treatment thyroid dysfunction is currently unclear.

METHODS

This study included 95 patients who received pembrolizumab for R/M HNSCC between 2016 and 2022. Baseline thyroid status, according to serum hormone levels, and irAEs were assessed. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Furthermore, the best overall response according to the prognostic groups was examined.

RESULTS

Low fT3 (HR: 2.52, p = 0.006), immune-related hyperthyroidism (HR: 0.11, p = 0.038), ECOG performance status ≥2 (HR: 3.72, p = 0.002), and platinum-refractory disease (HR: 3.29, p = 0.020) were independently associated with OS. Furthermore, immune-related hyperthyroidism was associated with longer PFS (HR: 0.13, p = 0.007), a higher objective response rate (83% vs. 31%, p = 0.018), and a higher disease control rate (100% vs. 43%, p = 0.008). Thyroid-related autoantibodies were elevated in 40% of thyroid irAEs cases with available measurements. Out of 16 thyroid irAEs, 15 occurred in patients with fT3 above the lower limit of normal.

CONCLUSION

Low fT3 was associated with worse OS. Immune-related hyperthyroidism was correlated with both improved OS and PFS. Baseline fT3 assessment and close on-treatment monitoring of serum thyroid levels may be valuable for risk stratification in R/M HNSCC patients receiving pembrolizumab.

Thyroid-optimized and thyroid-sparing radiotherapy in oral cavity and oropharyngeal carcinoma: A dosimetric study

BACKGROUND

Radiation-induced hypothyroidism is a common toxicity of head and neck radiation. Our re-planning study aimed to reduce thyroid dose while maintaining target coverage with IMRT.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients with oral-cavity (n = 5) and oropharyngeal cancer (n = 5). Treatment plans were re-optimized with 45 Gy thyroid mean dose constraint, then we cropped the thyroid out of PTVs and further reduced thyroid dose. Target coverage was delivering 100% dose to ≥ 93% of PTV and 95% of dose to > 99% of PTV.

RESULTS

Originally, average mean dose to thyroid was 5580 cGy. In model I, this dropped to 4325 cGy (p < 0.0001). In model II, average mean dose was reduced to 3154 cGy (p < 0.0001). For PTV low and PTV int, all had acceptable target coverage.

CONCLUSION

In patients with oral-cavity and oropharyngeal cancers, mean dose could be significantly reduced using a thyroid-optimized or thyroid-sparing IMRT technique with adequate coverage.

Costs Associated With Imaging Surveillance After Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer

Importance

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends imaging within 6 months after treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC). Further imaging is recommended only if the patient has symptoms or abnormal findings on physical examination. However, in many instances, asymptomatic patients continue to have imaging evaluations.

Objectives

To assess practice patterns in surveillance imaging in patients with HNC and evaluate the costs associated with these imaging practices.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This single-institution retrospective economic evaluation study screened 435 patients to identify patients newly diagnosed with head and neck mucosal and salivary gland malignant tumors between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2016. Data analyses were performed from October 25, 2018, to November 24, 2020.

Exposure

Imaging practice patterns.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Number and costs of imaging studies during the surveillance period for all patients, patients who remained disease free, and patients who developed recurrence.

Results

A total of 136 patients (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 62 [14] years; 84 [61.8%] male; 106 [77.9%] White) with HNC were included in the study. The oropharynx was the most common subsite (64 [47.1%]), most HNCs were stage IVA (62 [45.6%]), and most patients received definitive radiation-based treatment (71 [52.2%]). During the median surveillance period of 3.2 years (range, 0.3-6.8 years), a mean (SD) of 14 (10) imaging studies were performed for all patients, with a mean (SD) total cost of $36 800 ($24 500). In patients who remained disease free, a mean (SD) of 13 (10) imaging studies were performed during the surveillance period, with a mean (SD) total cost of $35 000 ($21 700). Patients who lacked symptoms had a mean (SD) of 4 (3) studies performed per year, resulting in a mean cost of $9600 ($5900) per year. Patients who developed recurrence had more studies per year of follow-up (mean difference, 5.0; 95% CI, 3.4-6.6) and higher associated mean costs (mean difference, $10 600; 95% CI, $6100-$15 000) than patients who remained disease free.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this economic evaluation study, many patients treated for HNCs received imaging studies beyond what is recommended by National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. These findings suggest that the cost burden of imaging in the asymptomatic patient needs to be considered against the value obtained from routine imaging in this current health care environment.

Comparative effectiveness of posttreatment imaging modalities for Medicare patients with advanced head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Persistent controversy exists with regard to how and when patients with head and neck cancer should undergo imaging after definitive therapy. The current study was conducted to evaluate whether the type of imaging modality used in posttreatment imaging impacts cancer-specific survival for patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

A retrospective study of National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program-Medicare-linked data in patients with an advanced stage of the 3 most common head and neck malignancies (oral cavity, oropharynx, and larynx) was conducted. Hazard ratios and 95% CIs for cancer-specific survival were estimated for patients diagnosed with any of these cancers between 2006 and 2015.

RESULTS

Significant improvement with regard to cancer-specific survival was observed among patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III and stage IVA laryngeal cancer who underwent positron emission tomography (PET) and/or computed tomography (CT) imaging during the first 6 months after receipt of definitive treatment (hazard ratio, 0.517; 95% CI, 0.33-0.811) compared with those who underwent CT. There was a trend toward an improvement in cancer-specific survival among patients with oral cavity or oropharyngeal malignancies who underwent PET/CT imaging, but it did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with CT imaging, posttreatment imaging with PET was associated with improved survival in patients with advanced laryngeal carcinoma.

Predictive Value of Early Post-Treatment Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Recurrence or Tumor Progression of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Chemo-Radiotherapy

Aims: To investigate the predictive capacity of early post-treatment diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for recurrence or tumor progression in patients with no tumor residue after chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and, to assess the predictive capacity of pre-treatment diffusion-weighted MRI for persistent tumor residue post-CRT. Materials and Method: A single center cohort study was performed in one French hospital. All patients with squamous cell carcinoma receiving CRT (no surgical indication) were included. Two diffusion-weighted MRI were performed: one within 8 days before CRT and one 3 months after completing CRT with determination of median tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Main outcome: The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Results: 59 patients were included prior to CRT and 46 (78.0%) completed CRT. A post-CRT tumor residue was found in 19/46 (41.3%) patients. In univariate analysis, initial ADC was significantly lower in patients with residue post CRT (0.56 ± 0.11 versus 0.79 ± 0.13; p < 0.001). When initial ADC was dichotomized at the median, initial ADC lower than 0.7 was significantly more frequent in patients with residue post CRT (73.7% versus 11.1%, p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, only initial ADC lower than 0.7 was significantly associated with tumor residue (OR = 22.6; IC [4.9–103.6], p < 0.0001). Among 26 patients without tumor residue after CRT and followed up until 12 months, 6 (23.1%) presented recurrence or progression. Only univariate analysis was performed due to a small number of events. The only factor significantly associated with disease progression or early recurrence was the delta ADC (p = 0.0009). When ADC variation was dichotomized at the median, patients with ADC variation greater than 0.7 had time of disease-free survival significantly longer than patients with ADC variation lower than 0.7 (377.5 [286–402] days versus 253 [198–370], p < 0.0001). Conclusion and relevance: Diffusion-weighted MRI could be a technique that enables differentiation of patients with high potential for early recurrence for whom intensive post-CRT monitoring is mandatory. Prospective studies with more inclusions would be necessary to validate our results.

Follow-Up of Head and Neck Cancer Survivors: Tipping the Balance of Intensity

The traditional concept of post-treatment surveillance in head and neck cancer patients relies on examinations directed at early detection of disease recurrence and/or second primary tumors. They are usually provided by ear, nose and throat specialists with complementary input from radiation oncologists and medical oncologists. Emerging evidence underscores the importance of monitoring and effective management of late adverse events. One of the major drawbacks is a lack of prospective controlled data. As a result, local institutional policies differ, and practice recommendations are subject to continuing debate. Due to the economic burden and impact on emotional comfort of patients, intensity and content of follow-up visits are a particularly conflicting topic. According to the current evidence-based medicine, follow-up of head and neck cancer patients does not prolong survival but can improve quality of life. Therefore, an approach giving priority to a multidisciplinary care involving a speech and swallowing expert, dietician, dentist, and psychologist may indeed be more relevant. Moreover, on a case-by-case basis, some patients need more frequent consultations supplemented by imaging modalities. Human papillomavirus positive oropharyngeal cancer tends to develop late failures at distant sites, and asymptomatic oligometastatic disease, especially in the lungs, can be successfully salvaged by local ablation, either surgically or by radiation. The deep structures of the skull base related to the nasopharynx are inaccessible to routine clinical examination, advocating periodic imaging supplemented by nasofibroscopy as indicated. Anamnesis of heavy smoking justifies annual low-dose computed tomography screening of the thorax and intensive smoking cessation counseling. Finally, some cancer survivors feel more comfortable with regular imaging, and their voice should be taken into consideration. Future development of surveillance strategies will depend on several variables including identification of reliable predictive factors to select those who could derive the most benefit from follow-up visits, the availability of long-term follow-up data, the results of the first randomized trials, resource allocation patterns, infrastructure density, and the therapeutic landscape of locally advanced and recurrent and/or metastatic disease, which is rapidly changing with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors and better utilization of local approaches.

Usefulness of surveillance imaging in patients with head and neck cancer who are treated with definitive radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The current study was performed to assess the efficacy of surveillance imaging in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) who are treated definitively with radiotherapy.

METHODS

Eligible patients included those with a demonstrable disease-free interval (≥1 follow-up imaging procedure without evidence of disease and a subsequent visit/imaging procedure) who underwent treatment of HNC from 2000 through 2010.

RESULTS

A total of 1508 patients were included. The median overall survival was 99 months, with a median imaging follow-up period of 59 months. Of the 1508 patients, 190 patients (12.6%) experienced disease recurrence (107 patients had locoregional and 83 had distant disease recurrence). A total of 119 patients (62.6%) in the group with disease recurrence were symptomatic and/or had an adverse clinical finding associated with the recurrence. Approximately 80% of patients with locoregional disease recurrences presented with a clinical finding, whereas 60% of distant disease recurrences were detected by imaging in asymptomatic patients. Despite the earlier detection of disease recurrence via imaging, those patients in the group of patients with clinically detected disease recurrence were significantly more likely to undergo salvage therapy compared with those whose recurrence was detected on imaging (odds ratio, 0.35). There was no difference in overall survival noted between those patients with disease recurrences that were detected clinically or with imaging alone. Approximately 70% of disease recurrences occurred within the first 2 years. In those patients who developed disease recurrence after 2 years, the median time to recurrence was 51 months. After 2 years, the average number of imaging procedures per patient for the detection of a salvageable recurrence for the imaging-detected group was 1539.

CONCLUSIONS

Surveillance imaging in asymptomatic patients with HNC who are treated definitively with radiotherapy without clinically suspicious findings beyond 2 years has a low yield and a high cost. Physicians ordering these studies must use judicious consideration and discretion.

Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Oral Cancer: Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery

Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery appointed a Task Force to provide guidance on the implementation of a surgical treatment of oral cancer. MEDLINE databases were searched for articles on subjects related to “surgical management of oral cancer” published in English. Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. The quality of evidence was rated with use RoBANS (Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Nonrandomized Studies) and AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool to Assess the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews). Evidence-based recommendations for practice were ranked according to the American College of Physicians grading system. Additional directives are provided as expert opinions and Delphi questionnaire when insufficient evidence existed. The Committee developed 68 evidence-based recommendations in 34 categories intended to assist clinicians and patients and counselors, and health policy-makers. Proper surgical treatment selection for oral cancer, which is directed by patient- and subsite-specific factors, remains the greatest predictor of successful treatment outcomes. These guidelines are intended for use in conjunction with the individual patient’s treatment goals.

Long-Term Results of Conventional Radiotherapy versus Accelerated Hyperfractionated Radiotherapy versus Concomitant Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy in Locoregionally Advanced Carcinoma of the Oropharynx

AIMS AND BACKGROUND

To compare conventional fractionation (CF) radiation therapy (RT), arm A, versus a split-course accelerated hyperfractionated schedule (S-AHF), arm B, versus CFRT plus concomitant chemotherapy (CT), arm C, in terms of five-year survival and toxicity for squamous cell tumors of the oropharynx.

METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN

Between January 1993 and June 1998, 192 previously untreated patients with stage III and IV oropharyngeal carcinoma (excluding T1N1 and T2N1) were enrolled in a multicenter randomized phase III trial (ORO 93-01). In arms A and C, 66 to 70 Gy in 33 to 35 fractions was administered five days a week for six and a half to seven weeks. In arm B, the dose delivered was 64 to 67.2 Gy in two fractions of 1.6 Gy every day, five days a week, with a planned two-week split at 38.4 Gy. In arm C the CT regimen consisted of three cycles of carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CBDCA 75 mg/m2 on days 1 to 4 and 5-FU 1000 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1 to 4 every 28 days).

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was found in five-year overall survival (P = 0.39): 21% for arm A, 21% for arm B, and 40% for arm C. Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in terms of five-year relapse-free survival: 15% for arm A, 17% for arm B, and 36% for arm C. There was a slight trend towards better five-year locoregional control (P = 0.07) for the combined arm: patients without locoregional relapse were 48% in arm C, 21% in arm A and 18% in arm B. Locoregional control was significantly better when arm C was compared with arms A and B combined (P = 0.02; arm A+B 20%; arm C 48%). Distant metastases were fairly balanced in the three arms (A: 14; B: 9; C: 11), with a tendency towards more frequent isolated distant metastasis development in arm C (8 of 11 [72%] versus 7 of 23 [30%] in arms A+B). Five-year second-tumor-free survival was 85%. The 13 second tumors were equally distributed and were mainly correlated with tobacco and alcohol consumption (five lung, two esophagus, two oral cavity, one larynx, one pancreas, one hepatocarcinoma, one myeloma). Arm C showed slightly more G3+ late side effects involving subcutaneous tissues and mucosa, although significant late sequelae were relatively uncommon and the mucosal side effects were mostly transient. The occurrence of persistent G3 xerostomia was comparable in the three treatment arms.

CONCLUSIONS

The results obtained with the combination of CT and RT compared with RT alone did not reach statistical significance, but combined treatment almost doubled the five-year overall survival, relapse-free survival and locoregional control rate. Patients with advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the oropharynx who are medically suitable for the combined approach should be treated with a combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The occurrence of second tumors is relatively common in these patients and may contribute substantially to the causes of death.

Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Laryngeal Cancer: Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery

Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery appointed a Task Force to develop clinical practice guidelines for the surgical treatment of laryngeal cancer. This Task Force conducted a systematic search of the EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed databases to identify relevant articles, using search terms selected according to the key questions. Evidence-based recommendations were then created on the basis of these articles. An external expert review and Delphi questionnaire were applied to reach consensus regarding the recommendations. The resulting guidelines focus on the surgical treatment of laryngeal cancer with the assumption that surgery is the selected treatment modality after a multidisciplinary discussion in any context. These guidelines do not, therefore, address non-surgical treatment such as radiation therapy or chemotherapy. The committee developed 62 evidence-based recommendations in 32 categories intended to assist clinicians during management of patients with laryngeal cancer and patients with laryngeal cancer, and counselors and health policy-makers.

Follow-up in Head and Neck Cancer: Do More Does It Mean Do Better? A Systematic Review and Our Proposal Based on Our Experience

As the patients population ages, cancer screening increases, and cancer treatments improve, millions more head and neck carcinoma (HNC) patients will be classified as cancer survivors in the future. Change in epidemiology with human papillomavirus related HNC leads to a number of young treated patients. After treatment for HNC intensive surveillance, including ear, nose and throat (ENT) endoscopy, imaging, and serology, confers a survival benefit that became less evident in unresectable recurrence. We performed a comprehensive revision of literature and analyzed the experience of our centre. We revised publications on this topic and added data derived from the interdisciplinary work of experts within medical oncology, ENT, and radiation oncology scientific societies. We retrospectively collected local and distant recurrence of chemoradiation treated patients at Santa Croce and Carle University Hospital. A HNC follow-up program is not already codified and worldwide accepted. There is a need of scheduled follow-up. We suggest adopting a standardized follow-up guideline, although a multidisciplinary approach is frequently requested to tailor surveillance program and treatment on each patient.

A longitudinal study of follow-up activities after curative treatment for head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

To test the hypothesis that head and neck cancer (HNC) patients are in need of specialized follow-up (FU). This was done by an evaluation of the FU activities in a cohort of patients followed longitudinally for five years with focus on optimal duration and interval of post-therapeutic follow-up.

METHODS

The study evaluated a cohort consisting of 197 consecutive patients with HNC treated at Aarhus University Hospital from 1 January to 31 December 2009. The inclusion criteria was that patients should be deemed free of disease two months after completed primary curative intended treatment or after primary curative salvage. It left 141 patients available for analysis. Data were collected through a medical chart review and from the Danish Head and Neck Cancer Group (DAHANCA) database. Parameters recorded were: regular or extraordinary visit, alarm symptoms, late morbidity and the consequences of these.

RESULTS

The 141 patients underwent 1408 FU visits. Only 15 of the 141 patients had no tumor problems or morbidity issues raised at any FU visit. Suspicion of recurrent disease was observed at 207 of the 1408 FU visits, involving 97 patients and resulted in a total of 370 diagnostic procedures; 170 (82%) visits with suspicion of recurrence occurred within 3½ years after end of treatment. A recurrence was verified in 30 patients. Additionally four new primary head and neck cancer was diagnosed during follow-up. There were 1150 visits (82%) involving 135 patients in which late treatment-related morbidity was recorded. Actions taken related to morbidity happened in 71 patients, but no new problems appeared after three years.

CONCLUSION

The study document the need of specialized FU, as 86% of all HNC survivors have tumor or severe morbidity issues during FU. The data suggest that 3½-year FU after ended therapy may be sufficient for the majority of patients.

Clinical and laboratory findings of 21 patients with radiation-induced myopathy

BACKGROUND

Limited data are available on radiation-induced myopathy (RIM) in adult cancer survivors.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical, electrophysiological, serological, radiological and pathological findings of patients with RIM seen in the neurology clinic over a 11-year period (2002-2013).

RESULTS

Out of 251 patients with radiotherapy-induced neuromuscular complications, 21 had RIM (11 men and 10 women). Cancers included: Hodgkin's lymphoma (13), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (one), pinealoblastoma (one), tongue (two), nasopharyngeal (one), thyroid (one) and testicular cancer (two). Various radiotherapy protocols were used but all patients received neck and upper torso radiation. The mean latency between radiation exposure and onset of RIM was 15 years (range 2-45 years). The most common presentation was head drop (43%) followed by neck pain (38%). Axial (86%) and periscapular (81%) muscle weakness and atrophy were frequent findings. Two patients died in follow-up from hypercapnic respiratory failure secondary to neuromuscular weakness. Serum creatine kinase values were usually normal or slightly elevated. EMG revealed predominantly myopathic changes in the axial and periscapular muscles. Half of the muscle biopsies (6/12) showed myopathic changes; increased connective tissue elements were observed in seven of eight muscle biopsies performed in the irradiated field; and mitochondrial dysfunction in two.

CONCLUSIONS

RIM is a potential long-term neuromuscular adverse effect of radiation exposure in Hodgkin's disease and other types of cancer manifesting predominantly as head drop and can be fatal due to neuromuscular respiratory failure. Improved radiotherapy protocols might reduce the risk of RIM and other radiation-induced neuromuscular complications.

European Laryngological Society: ELS recommendations for the follow-up of patients treated for laryngeal cancer

It is accepted that the follow-up of patients who had treatment for laryngeal cancer is a fundamental part of their care. The reasons of post-treatment follow-up include evaluation of treatment response, early identification of recurrence, early detection of new primary tumours, monitoring and management of complications, optimisation of rehabilitation, promotion smoking and excessive alcohol cessation, provision of support to patients and their families, patient counselling and education. Controversies exist in how these aims are achieved. Increasing efforts are being made to rationalise the structure and timing of head and neck cancer follow-up clinics. The aim of this document is to analyse the current evidence for the need to follow up patients who have been treated for LC and provide an up to date, evidence-based statement which is meaningful and applicable to all European Health Care Systems. A working group of the Head and Neck Cancer Committee of the ELS was constituted in 2009. A review of the current published literature on the management and follow-up of laryngeal cancer was undertaken and statements are made based on critical appraisal of the literature and best current evidence. Category recommendations were based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Statements include: length, frequency, setting, type of health professional, clinical assessment, screening investigations, patient's education, second primary tumours, and mode of treatment considerations including radiotherapy, chemo-radiation therapy, transoral surgery and open surgery. It also addresses specific recommendations regarding patients with persistent pain, new imaging techniques, tumour markers and narrow band imaging.

Early detection of recurrent disease by FDG-PET/CT leads to management changes in patients with squamous cell cancer of the head and neck

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of surveillance high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and physical examination/endoscopy (PE/E) with the efficacy of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/HRCT for the detection of relapse in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) after primary treatment.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of contemporaneously performed FDG-PET/HRCT, neck HRCT, and PE/E in 99 curatively treated patients with HNSCC during post-therapy surveillance to compare performance test characteristics in the detection of early recurrence or second primary cancer.

RESULTS

Relapse occurred in 19 of 99 patients (20%) during a median follow-up of 21 months (range: 9-52 months). Median time to first PET/HRCT was 3.5 months. The median time to radiological recurrence was 6 months (range: 2.3-32 months). FDG-PET/HRCT detected more disease recurrences or second primary cancers and did so earlier than HRCT or PE/E. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for detecting locoregional and distant recurrence or second primary cancer were 100%, 87.3%, 56.5%, and 100%, respectively, for PET/HRCT versus 61.5%, 94.9%, 66.7%, and 93.8%, respectively, for HRCT versus 23.1%, 98.7%, 75%, and 88.6%, respectively, for PE/E. In 19 patients with true positive PET/HRCT findings, a significant change in the management of disease occurred, prompting either salvage or systemic therapy. Of the 14 curatively treated patients, 11 were alive with without disease at a median follow-up of 31.5 months.

CONCLUSION

FDG-PET/HRCT has a high sensitivity in the early detection of relapse or second primary cancer in patients with HNSCC, with significant management implications. Given improvements in therapy and changes in HNSCC biology, appropriate modifications in current post-therapy surveillance may be required to determine effective salvage or definitive therapies.

The value of routine follow-up after treatment for head and neck cancer. A national survey from DAHANCA

BACKGROUND

The post-treatment follow-up is well-integrated in the oncologic care tradition, based on the risk of developing recurrent disease or new primary tumors in treated patients. Furthermore, follow-up serves as an opportunity to monitor treatment effects and to provide clinical care of side effects. In this study we measured the activity and effectiveness of routine follow-up in head and neck cancer and assessed the value of follow-up from the perspectives of both physicians and the patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

During a period of six weeks a prospective national cross section cohort of 619 patients attending regular follow-up were enrolled. All patients had received intended curative treatment for head and neck cancer and all were followed according to DAHANCA guidelines. Data were collected by the physician filling in a registration form containing chosen key parameters and patients filling in a validated questionnaire.

RESULTS

The majority (91%) of the 619 visits was planned, and 75% of all visits included either tumor or treatment-related problems. Suspicion of recurrent disease led to further diagnostic work-up in 80 visits (13%). A total of 29 recurrences were found, and of these seven (25%) were asymptomatic, i.e. the "number needed to see" to detect one asymptomatic recurrence was 99. Treatment-related normal-tissue problems were addressed in 72% of all visits, and among these 18% required intervention. Although the majority of problems (either suspicion of recurrent disease or late effects) occurred within a few years after treatment, 39% of patients seen after three years also had problems. The majority of patients (97%) expressed satisfaction with the planned follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Only few relapses are found in asymptomatic patients at routine follow-up, with one silent recurrence detected per 99 visits. However, head and neck cancer survivors have a substantial need for management of sequelae. In this context, a centralized routine follow-up may still be worthwhile.

Current concepts of surveillance and its significance in head and neck cancer

Follow-up in head and neck cancer (hNC) is essential to detect and manage locoregional recurrence or metastases, or second primary tumours at the earliest opportunity. A variety of guidelines and investigations have been published in the literature. This has led to oncologists using different guidelines across the globe. The follow-up protocols may have unnecessary investigations that may cause morbidity or discomfort to the patient and may have significant cost implications. In this evidence-based review we have tried to evaluate and address important issues like the frequency of follow-up visits, clinical and imaging strategies adopted, and biochemical methods used for the purpose. This review summarises strategies for follow-up, imaging modalities and key investigations in the literature published between 1980 and 2009. A set of recommendations is also presented for cost-effective, simple yet efficient surveillance in patients with head and neck cancer.

Hypothyroidism when the thyroid is included only in the low neck field during head and neck radiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

The minimum dose required to electively irradiate all of part of the low neck for squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx is 50 Gy in 25 fractions or its radiobiological equivalent. The purpose of our study is to determine the incidence of hypothyroidism when the thyroid is treated only in the low-neck radiotherapy (RT) field to approximately 50 Gy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

390 patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma received RT between 1990 and 2000, had no prior thyroid disease or surgery, and had RT involving the standard anterior low-neck field including the thyroid with a dose equivalent to 50 Gy at 2Gy/fx with or without a boost to a portion of the field to 60 to 70 Gy. The end point was hypothyroidism defined as thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) above the upper limit of the normal range.

RESULTS

As we did not routinely monitor TSH during this study, it was obtained in 169 of 390 patients. Median follow-up on all 390 patients was 6.1 years. The incidence of hypothyroidism was calculated for 2 groups: 169 patients with TSH data and the total population of 390 patients. For both analyses, patients were censored at last follow-up if the TSH level was normal, or if TSH was not checked. The incidence of hypothyroidism at 5 years was 31% for all 390 patients and 54% for the subset of 169 patients with TSH data. Adjuvant chemotherapy and/or planned neck dissection may be associated with a small increased risk of hypothyroidism.

CONCLUSIONS

Including the thyroid in the low-neck field to 50 Gy results in hypothyroidism in 30% to 50% of patients at 5 years, suggesting that the threshold for this complication is <50 Gy.

Thyroid Function Should Be Monitored Following Radiotherapy to the Low Neck

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the incidence of hypothyroidism following radiotherapy (RT) to the low neck is high enough to justify the routine monitoring of thyroid function in asymptomatic patients. A retrospective study of 504 patients with head and neck cancer whose RT fields included the thyroid gland was conducted. Patients were treated either with definitive or postoperative RT. Hypothyroidism was defined as a thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) level > or =4.5 mIU/L, regardless of whether the patient had clinical symptoms. Of the 504 total patients, 206 had a serum TSH level checked at some point posttreatment. If we assume that patients who had no data did not have hypothyroidism, the actuarial freedom from hypothyroidism in the entire group was 78% at 5 years and 51% at 10 years. Of the 206 patients who had a documented posttreatment TSH, the actuarial freedom from hypothyroidism was 58% at 5 years and 26% at 10 years. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis confirmed treatment modality to be a significant predictive factor. Definitive initial surgery that removed part of the thyroid gland increased the risk of developing hypothyroidism. Overall stage was also predictive on multivariate analysis. Head and neck irradiation results in biochemical hypothyroidism in at least 50% of patients. Thyroid function should be tested on a regular basis following RT to the low-neck region. Serum TSH should be checked every 6 months for the first 5 years and yearly thereafter. Thyroid hormone replacement should be initiated in any patient with a TSH of more than 4.5 mIU/L.

The 100-day PSA: usefulness as surrogate end point for biochemical disease-free survival after definitive radiotherapy of prostate cancer

Overall and biochemical disease-free (bNED) survival data after definitive radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer (CaP) requires decades of patient follow-up. Surrogates involving dynamics of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline, PSA nadir and time thereto have been unrewarding. This study investigated the metric of the PSA value 100 days after RT (PSA(100)), analyzed with respect to 8-y bNED survival. A total of 214 patients with T1-3 CaP were treated with definitive RT (defined as dose >66 Gy) in our institution between 1/1/1988 and 12/31/2000. All were subject to continuous follow-up with routine PSA levels. Biochemical failure (77 patients) was defined by the ASTRO criteria (n=67) or by the date of first hormonal therapy for a rising PSA, which did not meet the ASTRO criteria (n=10). No patients were included if they received postoperative radiation, or if hormones were administered prior to bNED recurrence, if any. Patients were stratified by PSA(100) values </= or >4.0 ng/ml, and </= or <2.5 ng/ml. Median follow-up was 64.3 months: follow-up data were calculated as of time to last PSA, with data collection as of 12/31/02. Patients with PSA(100)</=4.0 ng/ml had 62% 8-y bNED survival, and those with PSA(100)>4.0 ng/ml had 20% 8-y bNED survival (P<0.001). Use of a PSA(100) cutoff of 2.5 ng/ml yielded no significant difference in 8-y bNED survival (P=0.229). Cox proportional analysis revealed that initial PSA (P=0.006), stage (P=0.001) and PSA(100)</=4.0 ng/ml (P=0.002) were significantly related to bNED survival, but that age (P=0.887), race (P=0.500), RT dose (P=0.669), Gleason sum (P=0.091), and PSA(100)</=2.5 ng/ml (P=0.128) were not. In conclusion, PSA(100) using a cutoff of 4 ng/ml is a valuable and reliable surrogate for bNED survival after definitive RT, requiring less follow-up than other metrics. Patients with less values will have only about a 1 in 3 chance of bNED failure at 8 y.