Comparative treatment planning between proton and X-ray therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Proton Beam Therapy Compared to Conventional Radiotherapy in Non-Metastatic Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes

Background and Objectives: Conventional radiotherapies used in the current management of rectal cancer commonly cause iatrogenic radiotoxicity. Proton beam therapy has emerged as an alternative to conventional radiotherapy with the aim of improving tumour control and reducing off-set radiation exposure to surrounding tissue. However, the real-world treatment and oncological outcomes associated with the use of proton beam therapy in rectal cancer remain poorly characterised. This systematic review seeks to evaluate the radiation dosages and safety of proton beam therapy compared to conventional radiotherapy in patients with non-metastatic rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: A computer-assisted search was performed on the Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central databases. Studies that evaluated the adverse effects and oncological outcomes of proton beam therapy and conventional radiotherapy in adult patients with non-metastatic rectal cancer were included. Results: Eight studies were included in this review. There was insufficient evidence to determine the adverse treatment outcomes of proton beam therapy versus conventional radiotherapy. No current studies assessed radiotoxicities nor oncological outcomes. Pooled dosimetric comparisons between proton beam therapy and various conventional radiotherapies were associated with reduced radiation exposure to the pelvis, bowel and bladder. Conclusions: This systematic review demonstrates a significant paucity of evidence in the current literature surrounding adverse effects and oncological outcomes related to proton beam therapy compared to conventional radiotherapy for non-metastatic rectal cancer. Pooled analyses of dosimetric studies highlight greater predicted radiation-sparing effects with proton beam therapy in this setting. This evidence, however, is based on evidence at a moderate risk of bias and clinical heterogeneity. Overall, more robust, prospective clinical trials are required.

PTCOG Gastrointestinal Subcommittee Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Malignancies Consensus Statement

Purpose

Radiotherapy delivery in the definitive management of lower gastrointestinal (LGI) tract malignancies is associated with substantial risk of acute and late gastrointestinal (GI), genitourinary, dermatologic, and hematologic toxicities. Advanced radiation therapy techniques such as proton beam therapy (PBT) offer optimal dosimetric sparing of critical organs at risk, achieving a more favorable therapeutic ratio compared with photon therapy.

Materials and Methods

The international Particle Therapy Cooperative Group GI Subcommittee conducted a systematic literature review, from which consensus recommendations were developed on the application of PBT for LGI malignancies.

Results

Eleven recommendations on clinical indications for which PBT should be considered are presented with supporting literature, and each recommendation was assessed for level of evidence and strength of recommendation. Detailed technical guidelines pertaining to simulation, treatment planning and delivery, and image guidance are also provided.

Conclusion

PBT may be of significant value in select patients with LGI malignancies. Additional clinical data are needed to further elucidate the potential benefits of PBT for patients with anal cancer and rectal cancer.

Preoperative short-course radiation therapy with PROtons compared to photons in high-risk RECTal cancer (PRORECT): Initial dosimetric experience

Background and purpose

Neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) followed by full-dose systemic chemotherapy is an established treatment modality in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Until recently, SCRT has been exclusively delivered with photons. Proton beam therapy (PBT) may minimize acute toxicity, which in turn likely impacts favorably on the tolerability to subsequent chemotherapy. The aim of this study is a dosimetric comparison between SCRT with photons and protons in the randomized phase II trial PRORECT (NCT04525989).

Materials and methods

From June 2021 to June 2022, twenty consecutive patients with LARC have been treated according to study protocol. For each patient, both a VMAT and a PBT treatment plans have been generated and compared pairwise.

Results

Dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis revealed that SCRT with protons significantly reduced radiation dose to pelvic organs at risk including bladder, bones, and bowel in comparison to SCRT with photons. Photon and proton treatment plans had equivalent conformity and homogeneity indexes.

Conclusion

Preoperative SCRT with protons offers a significant reduction of radiation dose to normal tissues compared with current photon-based radiotherapy technique. Demonstrated dosimetric advantages may translate into measurable clinical benefits in patients with LARC. Clinical implications of the dosimetric superiority of SCRT with protons will be presented in the coming reports from the PRORECT trial.

Sensitization of Patient-Derived Colorectal Cancer Organoids to Photon and Proton Radiation by Targeting DNA Damage Response Mechanisms

Pathological complete response (pCR) has been correlated with overall survival in several cancer entities including colorectal cancer. Novel total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) in rectal cancer has achieved pathological complete response in one-third of the patients. To define better treatment options for nonresponding patients, we used patient-derived organoids (PDOs) as avatars of the patient's tumor to apply both photon- and proton-based irradiation as well as single and combined chemo(radio)therapeutic treatments. While response to photon and proton therapy was similar, PDOs revealed heterogeneous responses to irradiation and different chemotherapeutic drugs. Radiotherapeutic response of the PDOs was significantly correlated with their ability to repair irradiation-induced DNA damage. The classical combination of 5-FU and irradiation could not sensitize radioresistant tumor cells. Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase was activated upon radiation, and by inhibition of this central sensor of DNA damage, radioresistant PDOs were resensitized. The study underlined the capability of PDOs to define nonresponders to irradiation and could delineate therapeutic approaches for radioresistant patients.

Proton Therapy in the Management of Luminal Gastrointestinal Cancers: Esophagus, Stomach, and Anorectum

While the role of proton therapy in gastric cancer is marginal, its role in esophageal and anorectal cancers is expanding. In esophageal cancer, protons are superior in sparing the organs at risk, as shown by multiple dosimetric studies. Literature is conflicting regarding clinical significance, but the preponderance of evidence suggests that protons yield similar or improved oncologic outcomes to photons at a decreased toxicity cost. Similarly, protons have improved sparing of the organs at risk in anorectal cancers, but clinical data is much more limited to date, and toxicity benefits have not yet been shown clinically. Large, randomized trials are currently underway for both disease sites.

Optimization of Field Design in the Treatment of Rectal Cancer with Intensity Modulated Proton Beam Radiation Therapy: How Many Fields Are Needed to Account for Rectal Distension Uncertainty?

Purpose

Preoperative chemoradiation represents the standard of care in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Robustness is often compromised in the setting of proton beam therapy owing to the sensitivity of proton particles to tissue heterogeneity, such as with intestinal gas. The ideal beam arrangement to mitigate the anatomic uncertainty caused by intestinal gas is not well defined.

Methods and Materials

We developed pencil beam scanning plans using (1) 1-beam posteroanterior (PA) plans, (2) 2-beam with right and left posterior oblique (RPO and LPO) plans, (3) 3-beam with PA and opposed lateral plans, and (4) 5-beam with PA, RPO, LPO, and opposed lateral plans. We created 12 plans with robustness optimization and ran a total of 60 plan evaluations for varying degrees of intestinal gas distension to evaluate which plans would maintain clinical goals to the greatest degree.

Results

A single PA beam resulted in considerable loss of target coverage to the clinical target volume prescribed 50 Gy (volume receiving 100% of the prescribed dose [V_100%] < 90%) with rectal distension ≥3 cm in diameter in the short axis. In contrast, the other field designs maintained coverage with up to 5 cm of distension. On plans generated based on a 5-cm distended rectum with air medium, the 1-beam, 3-beam, and 5-beam arrangements resulted in loss of target coverage (V_100% < 90%) with rectal contraction ≤3 cm, whereas the 2-beam arrangement maintained coverage to as low as 2 cm. On plans generated based on a 3-cm distension of the rectum, both the 2-beam and 3-beam arrangements maintained V_100% > 90% even with collapsed rectum to as low as 1 cm, simulating a patient treatment scenario without any rectal gas.

Conclusions

A single PA beam should be avoided when using proton beam therapy for rectal cancer. RPO/LPO and PA/opposed lateral arrangements may both be considered; RPO/LPO is favored to reduce integral dose and avoid beams traversing the hips. In patients for whom the plan CT has rectal distension of ≥3 cm, resimulation or strategies to reduce intestinal gas should be strongly considered.

Proton beam therapy in rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Locally advanced rectal cancer is often treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery. Radiotherapy carries significant risk of toxicity to organs at risk (OAR). Proton beam therapy (PBT) has demonstrated to be effective in other cancers, delivering equivalent dosimetric radiation but with the benefit of improved sparing of OAR. This review compares dosimetric irradiation of OAR and oncological outcomes for PBT versus conventional photon-based radiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS

An electronic literature search was performed for studies with comparative cohorts receiving proton beam therapy and photon-based radiotherapy for rectal cancer.

RESULTS

Eight articles with a total of 127 patients met the inclusion criteria. There was significantly less irradiated small bowel with PBT compared to three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) (MD -17.01, CI [-24.06, -9.96], p < 0.00001 and MD -6.96, CI [-12.99, -0.94], p = 0.02, respectively). Similar dosimetric results were observed for bladder and pelvic bone marrow. Three studies reported clinical and oncological results for PBT in recurrent rectal cancer with overall survival reported as 43 %, 68 % and 77.2 %, and one study in primary rectal cancer with 100 % disease free survival.

CONCLUSION

PBT treatment plans revealed significantly less irradiation of OAR for rectal cancer compared to conventional photon-based radiotherapy. Trials for recurrent rectal cancer and PBT have shown promising results. There are currently no ongoing clinical trials for primary rectal cancer and PBT. More research is required to validate its potential role in dose escalation, higher complete response rate and organ preservation without increasing toxicity.

Proton beam radiotherapy for anal and rectal cancers

Gastrointestinal cancers are bordered by radiosensitive visceral organs, resulting in a narrow therapeutic window. The search for more efficacious and tolerable therapies raises the possibility that proton beam therapy's (PBT) physical and dosimetric differences from conventional therapy may be better suited to treat both primary and recurrent disease, which carries its own unique challenges. Currently, the maximal efficacy of radiation plans for primary and recurrent anorectal cancer is constrained by delivery techniques and modalities which must consider feasibility challenges and toxicity secondary to exposure of organs at risk (OARs). Studies using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) demonstrate that more precise dose delivery to target volumes improves local control rates and reduces complications. By reducing the low-to-moderate radiation dose-bath to bone marrow, small and large bowel, and skin, PBT may offer an improved side-effect profile. The potential to reduce toxicity, increase patient compliance, minimize treatment breaks, and enable dose escalation or hypofractionation is appealing. In cases where prognosis is favorable, PBT may mitigate long-term morbidity such as secondary malignancies, femoral fractures, and small bowel obstruction.

Optimization of Physical Dose Distributions with Hadron Beams: Comparing Photon IMRT with IMPT

Intensity modulated radiotherapy with high enengy photons (IMRT) and with charged particles (IMPT) refer to the most advanced development in conformal radiation therapy. Their general aim is to increase local tumor control rates while keeping the radiation induced complications below desired thresholds. IMRT is currently widely introduced in clinical practice. However, the more complicated IMPT is still under development. Especially, spot-scanning techniques integrated in rotating gantries that can deliver proton or light ion-beams to a radiation target from any direction will be available in the near future.

We describe the basic concepts of intensity modulated particle therapy (IMPT). Starting from the potential advantages of hadron therapy inverse treatment planning strategies are discussed for various dose delivery techniques of IMPT. Of special interest are the techniques of distal edge tracking (DET) and 3D-scanning. After the introduction of these concepts a study of comparative inverse treatment planning is presented. The study aims to identify the potential advantages of achievable physical dose distributions with proton and carbon beams, if different dose delivery techniques are employed. Moreover, a comparison to standard photon IMRT is performed.

The results of the study are summarized as: i) IMRT with photon beams is a strong competitor to intensity modulated radiotherapy with charged particles. The most obvious benefit observed for charged particles is the reduction of medium and low doses in organs at risk. ii) The 3D-scanning technique could not improve the dosimetric results achieved with DET, although 10–15 times more beam spots were employed for 3D-scanning than for DET. However, concerns may arise about the application of DET, if positioning errors of the patient or organ movements have to be accounted for. iii) Replacing protons with carbon ions leads to further improvements of the physical dose distributions. However, the additional degree of improvement due to carbon ions is modest. The main clinical potential of heavy ion beams is probably related to their radiobiological properties.

A comparison of the dose distributions from three proton treatment planning systems in the planning of meningioma patients with single-field uniform dose pencil beam scanning

With the number of new proton centers increasing rapidly, there is a need for an assessment of the available proton treatment planning systems (TPSs). This study compares the dose distributions of complex meningioma plans produced by three proton TPSs: Eclipse, Pinnacle³, and XiO. All three systems were commissioned with the same beam data and, as best as possible, matched configuration settings. Proton treatment plans for ten patients were produced on each system with a pencil beam scanning, single‐field uniform dose approach, using a fixed horizontal beamline. All 30 plans were subjected to identical dose constraints, both for the target coverage and organ at risk (OAR) sparing, with a consistent order of priority. Beam geometry, lateral field margins, and lateral spot resolutions were made consistent across all systems. Few statistically significant differences were found between the target coverage and OAR sparing of each system, with all optimizers managing to produce plans within clinical tolerances (D2<107% of prescribed dose, D5<105%, D95>95%, D99>90%, and OAR maximum doses) despite strict constraints and overlapping structures.

PACS number: 87.55.D‐

Integrated peripheral boost in preoperative radiotherapy for the locally most advanced non-resectable rectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Few studies have explored the potential clinical advantages of dose escalation and integrated boosts for patients with non-resectable locally advanced rectal cancer. The possibility of escalating dose to non-resectable regions in these patients was the aim of this study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seven patients with locally very advanced rectal tumours (sacrum overgrowth or growth into pelvic side walls) were evaluated. Intensity modulated photon and pencil beam scanning proton plans with simultaneously integrated boosts (45 Gy to elective lymph nodes, 50 Gy to tumour and 62.5 Gy to boost area in 25 fractions) were compared.

RESULTS

Target coverage was achieved with both photon and proton plans. Estimated risks of acute side effects put the two patients with the largest tumours at unacceptable risk for intestinal toxicity, regardless of modality. The remaining five patients had beneficial sparing of dose to the small intestine with protons.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding boost to areas where rectal tumours infiltrate adjacent non-resectable organs is an attractive option which appears possible using both photon and proton irradiation. Proton plans reduced dose to organs at risk. Integrated peripheral boosts should be considered more frequently in these very advanced tumours.

Irradiation with protons for the individualized treatment of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a planning study with clinical implications

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Ongoing clinical trials aim to improve local control and overall survival rates by intensification of therapy regimen for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. It is well known that whenever treatment is intensified, risk of therapy-related toxicity rises. An irradiation with protons could possibly present an approach to solve this dilemma by lowering the exposure to the organs-at-risk (OAR) without compromising tumor response.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty five consecutive patients were treated from 04/2009 to 5/2010. For all patients, four different treatment plans including protons, RapidArc, IMRT and 3D-conformal-technique were retrospectively calculated and analyzed according to dosimetric aspects.

RESULTS

Detailed DVH-analyses revealed that protons clearly reduced the dose to the OAR and entire normal tissue when compared to other techniques. Furthermore, the conformity index was significantly better and target volumes were covered consistent with the ICRU guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

Planning results suggest that treatment with protons can improve the therapeutic tolerance for the irradiation of rectal cancer, particularly for patients scheduled for an irradiation with an intensified chemotherapy regimen and identified to be at high risk for acute therapy-related toxicity. However, clinical experiences and long-term observation are needed to assess tumor response and related toxicity rates.

Analytical investigation of the possibility of parameter invariant TCP-based radiation therapy plan ranking

PURPOSE

To analytically investigate the possibility of a parameter invariant ranking of radiotherapy (RT) plans based on comparing the tumor control probabilities (TCPs) produced by the competing plans for different values of the radiobiological model parameters determining the radiation response.

METHOD

Individual TCP models based on the Single hit model of cell kill and on the linear-quadratic (LQ) model of cell damage, with and without repopulation, are considered. The tumor dose distributions in case of heterogeneous dose irradiation are described by a Gaussian distribution function on the basis of which a TCP expression is derived depending only on the mean dose to the tumor and its standard deviation and the TCP model parameters.

RESULTS

It is shown that in case of homogeneous dose to the tumor the plan ranking in terms of TCP is parameter invariant. In case of heterogeneous dose to the tumor there are cases when the plan ranking is parameter invariant and cases when the parameter invariance is violated. An interesting dependence of the extent of the parameter invariance violation on the model of cell kill as well as on the size and repopulation rate of the tumor is noted.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that in many cases RT plan ranking in terms of TCP is parameter invariant. However, since there exist cases where the parameter invariance is lost an investigation of the specific plans to be ranked should be performed applying the proposed approach.

Do we have enough evidence to implement particle therapy as standard treatment in lung cancer? A systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

The societal burden of lung cancer is high because of its high incidence and high lethality. From a theoretical point of view, radiotherapy with beams of protons and heavier charged particles, for example, carbon ions (C-ions), should lead to superior results, compared with photon beams. In this review, we searched for clinical evidence to justify implementation of particle therapy as standard treatment in lung cancer.

METHODS

A systematic literature review based on an earlier published comprehensive review was performed and updated through November 2009.

RESULTS

Eleven fully published studies, all dealing with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), mainly stage I, were identified. No phase III trials were found. For proton therapy, 2- to 5-year local tumor control rates varied in the range of 57%-87%. The 2- and 5-year overall survival (OS) and 2- and 5-year cause-specific survival (CSS) rates were 31%-74% and 23% and 58%-86% and 46%, respectively. Radiation-induced pneumonitis was observed in about 10% of patients. For C-ion therapy, the overall local tumor control rate was 77%, but it was 95% when using a hypofractionated radiation schedule. The 5-year OS and CSS rates were 42% and 60%, respectively. Slightly better results were reported when using hypofractionation, 50% and 76%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The present results with protons and heavier charged particles are promising. However, the current lack of evidence on the clinical (cost-)effectiveness of particle therapy emphasizes the need to investigate the efficiency of particle therapy in an adequate manner. Until these results are available for lung cancer, charged particle therapy should be considered experimental.

Number of patients potentially eligible for proton therapy

A group of Swedish radiation oncologists and hospital physicists have estimated the number of patients in Sweden suitable for proton beam therapy in a facility where one of the principal aims is to facilitate randomized and other studies in which the advantage of protons can be shown and the magnitude of the differences compared with optimally administered conventional radiation treatment, also including intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and brachytherapy, can be shown. The estimations have been based on current statistics of tumour incidence in Sweden, number of patients potentially eligible for radiation treatment, scientific support from clinical trials and model dose planning studies and knowledge of the dose-response relations of different tumours together with information on normal tissue complication rates. In Sweden, it is assessed that between 2200 and 2500 patients annually are eligible for proton beam therapy, and that for these patients the potential therapeutic benefit is so great as to justify the additional expense of proton therapy. This constitutes between 14-15% of all irradiated patients annually.

The potential of proton beam radiation therapy in gastrointestinal cancer

A group of Swedish oncologists and hospital physicists have estimated the number of patients in Sweden suitable for proton beam therapy. The estimations have been based on current statistics of tumour incidence, number of patients potentially eligible for radiation treatment, scientific support from clinical trials and model dose planning studies and knowledge of the dose-response relations of different tumours and normal tissues. In gastrointestinal cancers, it is assessed that at least 345 patients, mainly non-resectable rectal cancers, oesophageal and liver cancers, are eligible. Great uncertainties do however exist both in the number of patients with gastrointestinal cancers suitable for radiation therapy, and in the proportion of those where proton beams may give sufficiently better results.

Comparison of fixed-beam IMRT, helical tomotherapy, and IMPT for selected cases

A growing number of advanced intensity modulated treatment techniques is becoming available. In this study, the specific strengths and weaknesses of four techniques, static and dynamic multileaf collimator (MLC), conventional linac-based IMRT, helical tomotherapy (HT), and spot-scanning proton therapy (IMPT) are investigated in the framework of biological, EUD-based dose optimization. All techniques were implemented in the same in-house dose optimization tool. Monte Carlo dose computation was used in all cases. All dose-limiting, normal tissue objectives were treated as hard constraints so as to facilitate comparability. Five patient cases were selected to offer each technique a chance to show its strengths: a deep-seated prostate case (for 15 MV linac-based IMRT), a pediatric case (for IMPT), an extensive head-and-neck case (for HT), a lung tumor (for HT), and an optical neurinoma (for noncoplanar linac-based IMRT with a miniMLC). The plans were compared by dose statistics and equivalent uniform dose metrics. All techniques delivered results that were comparable with respect to target coverage and the most dose-limiting normal tissues. Static MLC IMRT struggled to achieve sufficient target coverage at the same level of dose homogeneity in the lung case. IMPT gained the greatest advantage when lung sparing was important, but did not significantly reduce the risk of nearby organs. Tomotherapy and dynamic MLC IMRT showed mostly the same performance. Despite the apparent conceptual differences, all four techniques fare equally well for standard patient cases. The absence of relevant differences is in part due to biological optimization, which offers more freedom to shape the dose than do, e.g., dose volume histogram constraints. Each technique excels for certain classes of highly complex cases, and hence the various modalities should be viewed as complementary, rather than competing.

Particle therapy in lung cancer: where do we stand?

BACKGROUND

From a theoretical point of view, charged particles should lead to superior results compared to photons. In this review, we searched for clinical evidence that protons or C-ions are really beneficial to patients with lung cancer.

METHODS

A systematic literature review based on an earlier published comprehensive review was performed and updated until November 1st 2007.

RESULTS

Ten fully published series, all dealing with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), mainly stage I, were identified. No phase III trials were found. On proton therapy, 2-5 year local tumor control rates varied between 87% and 57%. The 2 year/5 year overall survival and 2 year/5 year cause specific survival varied between 31-74%/23% and 58-86%/46%, respectively. Late side effects were observed in about 10% of the patients. For C-ion therapy, the local tumor control rate was 77%, while 95% when using a hypofractionated radiation schedule. The 5 year overall survival and cause specific survival rates were 42% and 60%, respectively. Slightly better results were reported when using hypofractionation, 50% and 76%, respectively. The reported late side effects for C-ions were 4%.

CONCLUSION

The results with charged particles, at least for stage I disease, seem to be promising. A gain can be expected in reduction of late side effects, especially after treatment with C-ions. Available data demonstrate that particle therapy in general is a safe and feasible treatment modality. Although current results are promising, more evidence is required before particle therapy can become internationally the standard treatment for (subsets of) lung cancer patients.

A treatment planning comparison of combined photon-proton beams versus proton beams-only for the treatment of skull base tumors

PURPOSE

To compare treatment planning between combined photon-proton planning (CP) and proton planning (PP) for skull base tumors, so as to assess the potential limitations of CP for these tumors.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Plans for 10 patients were computed for both CP and PP. Prescribed dose was 67 cobalt Gray equivalent (CGE) for PP; 45 Gy (photons) and 22 CGE (protons) for CP. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were calculated for gross target volume (GTV), clinical target volume (CTV), normal tissues (NT), and organs at risk (OARs) for each plan. Results were analyzed using DVH parameters, inhomogeneity coefficient (IC), and conformity index (CI).

RESULTS

Mean doses delivered to the GTVs and CTVs with CP (65.0 and 61.7 CGE) and PP (65.3 and 62.2 Gy CGE) were not significantly different (p > 0.1 and p = 0.72). However, the dose inhomogeneity was drastically increased with CP, with a mean significant incremental IC value of 10.5% and CP of 6.8%, for both the GTV (p = 0.01) and CTV (p = 0.04), respectively. The CI(80%) values for the GTV and CTV were significantly higher with PP compared with CP. Compared with CP, the use of protons only led to a significant reduction of NT and OAR irradiation, in the intermediate-to-low dose (< or =80% isodose line) range.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the use of CP results in levels of target dose conformation similar to those with PP. Use of PP significantly reduced the tumor dose inhomogeneity and the delivered intermediate-to-low dose to NT and OARs, leading us to conclude that this treatment is mainly appropriate for tumors in children.

Advanced radiation therapy technologies in the treatment of rectal and anal cancer: intensity-modulated photon therapy and proton therapy

Intensity-modulated photon radiation therapy (RT; IMRT) and proton therapy are advanced radiation technologies that permit improved conformation of radiation dose to target structures while limiting irradiation of surrounding normal tissues. Application of these technologies in the treatment of rectal and anal cancer is attractive, based on the potential reduction in radiation treatment toxicities that are frequently incurred in the pelvis and perineum. Furthermore, conformal RT might also allow for dose escalation to target areas, leading to improved tumor control. This review discusses the underlying principles of IMRT. In addition, the rationale and clinical data regarding the efficacy of radiation dose escalation for rectal and anal cancer will be highlighted, as well as tolerance of pelvic organs to RT and chemotherapy. Finally, preliminary results of IMRT in the treatment of lower gastrointestinal tract cancers will be reviewed. The potential and rationale for proton therapy in treatment of these malignancies are also discussed.

Potential outcomes of modalities and techniques in radiotherapy for patients with hypopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To determine potential improvements in treatment outcome for patients with hypopharyngeal carcinoma, T4N0M0, using proton and intensity modulated photon radiotherapy (IMRT) compared to a standard 3D conformal radiotherapy treatment (3D-CRT) in terms of local tumour control probability, TCP, and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for the spinal cord and the parotid glands using.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using the three-dimensional treatment-planning system, Helax-TMS, 5 patients were planned with protons, IMRT, and 3D-CRT plans. The prescribed dose used was 30 fractions x 2.39 Gy for the protons and IMRT and 35 fractions x 2.00 Gy for 3D-CRT. The treatment plans were evaluated using dose volume data and dose response models were used to calculate TCP and NTCP. The target volumes were delineated to spare the parotid glands. A dose escalation was made for protons and IMRT using NTCP constraints to the spinal cord.

RESULTS

On average, protons and IMRT increase TCP by 17% compared to 3D-CRT. For the spinal cord NTCP values are zero for all methods and patients. Average NTCP values for the parotid glands were >90% for 3D-CRT and significantly lower for protons and IMRT varying from 43-65%. The average parotid gland dose was 33 Gy for the protons, 38 Gy for IMRT and 48 Gy for 3D-CRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Protons and IMRT gave a significant TCP increase compared to 3D-CRT while no significant difference between protons and IMRT was found. Protons generally show lower non-target tissue doses, which indicates a possibility for further dose escalation. Large individual dose differences between protons and IMRT for parotid glands indicate that some patients may benefit more from protons and others from IMRT.

Significance and implementation of RBE variations in proton beam therapy

Key to radiation therapy is to apply a high tumor-destroying dose while protecting healthy tissue, especially near organs at risk. To optimize treatment for ion therapy not the dose but the dose multiplied by the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) is decisive. Proton therapy has been based on the use of a generic RBE, which is applied to all treatments independent of dose/fraction, position in the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP), initial beam energy or the particular tissue. Dependencies of the RBE on various physical and biological properties are disregarded. The variability of RBE in clinical situations is believed to be within 10-20%. This is in the same range of effects that receive high attention these days, i.e., patient set-up uncertainties, organ motion effects, and dose calculation accuracy all affecting proton as well as conventional radiation therapy. Elevated RBE values can be expected near the edges of the target, thus probably near critical structures. This is because the edges show lower doses and, depending on the treatment plan, may be identical with the beam's distal edge, where dose is deposited in part by high-LET protons. We assess the rationale for the continued use of a generic RBE and whether the magnitude of RBE variation with treatment parameters is small relative to our abilities to determine RBE's. Two aspects have to be considered. Firstly, the available information from experimental studies and secondly, our ability to calculate RBE values for a given treatment plan based on parameters extracted from such experiments. We analyzed published RBE values for in vitro and in vivo endpoints. The values for cell survival in vitro indicate a substantial spread between the diverse cell lines. The average value at mid SOBP over all dose levels is approximately 1.2 in vitro and approximately 1.1 in vivo. Both in vitro and in vivo data indicate a statistically significant increase in RBE for lower doses per fraction, which is much smaller for in vivo systems. The experimental in vivo data indicate that continued employment of a generic RBE value of 1.1 is reasonable. At present, there seems to be too much uncertainty in the RBE value for any human tissue to propose RBE values specific for tissue, dose/fraction, etc. There is a clear need for prospective assessments of normal tissue reactions in proton irradiated patients and determinations of RBE values for several late responding tissues in animal systems, especially as a function of dose in the range of 1-4 Gy. However, there is a measurable increase in RBE over the terminal few mm of the SOBP, which results in an extension of the bio-effective range of the beam of a few mm. This needs to be considered in treatment planning, particularly for single field plans or for an end of range in or close to a critical structure. To assess our ability to calculate RBE values we studied two approaches, which are both based on the track structure theory of radiation action. RBE calculations are difficult since both the physical input parameters, i.e., LET distributions, and, even more so, the biological input parameters, i.e., local cellular response, have to be known with high accuracy. Track structure theory provides a basis for predicting dose-response curves for particle irradiation. However, designed for heavy ion applications the models show weaknesses in the prediction of proton radiation effects. We conclude that, at present, RBE modeling in treatment planning involves significant uncertainties. To incorporate RBE variations in treatment planning there has to be a reliable biological model to calculate RBE values based on the physical characteristics of the radiation field and based on well-known biological input parameters. In order to do detailed model calculations more experimental data, in particular for in vivo endpoints, are needed

A treatment planning comparison of intensity modulated photon and proton therapy for paraspinal sarcomas

PURPOSE

A comparative treatment planning study has been undertaken between intensity modulated (IM) photon therapy and IM proton therapy (IMPT) in paraspinal sarcomas, so as to assess the potential benefits and limitations of these treatment modalities. In the case of IM proton therapy, plans were compared also for two different sizes of the pencil beam. Finally, a 10% and 20% dose escalation with IM protons was planned, and the consequential organ at risk (OAR) irradiation was evaluated.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Plans for 5 patients were computed for IM photons (7 coplanar fields) and protons (3 coplanar beams), using the KonRad inverse treatment planning system (developed at the German Cancer Research Center). IMPT planning was performed assuming 2 different sizes of the pencil beam: IMPT with a beam of full width at half-maximum of 20 mm, and IMPT with a "mini-beam" (IMPT(M), full width at half-maximum = 12 mm). Prescribed dose was 77.4 Gy or cobalt Gray equivalent (CGE) for protons to the gross tumor volume (GTV). Surface and center spinal cord dose constraint for all techniques was 64 and 53 Gy/CGE, respectively. Tumor and OAR dose-volume histograms were calculated. Results were analyzed using dose-volume histogram parameters, inhomogeneity coefficient, and conformity index.

RESULTS

Gross tumor volume coverage was optimal and equally homogeneous with both IM photon and IM proton plans. Compared to the IM photon plans, the use of IM proton beam therapy leads to a substantial reduction of the OAR total integral dose in the low-level to mid-dose level. Median heart, lung, kidney, stomach, and liver mean dose and dose at the 50% volume level were consistently reduced by a factor of 1.3 to 25. Tumor dose homogeneity in IMPT(M) plans was always better than with IMPT planning (median inhomogeneity coefficient, 0.19 vs. 0.25). IMPT dose escalation (to 92.9 CGE to the GTV) was possible in all patients without exceeding the normal-tissue dose limits.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the use of IM photon therapy, when compared to IM protons, can result in similar levels of tumor conformation. IM proton therapy, however, reduces the OAR integral dose substantially, compared to IM photon radiation therapy. As a result, tumor dose escalation was always possible with IM proton planning, within the maximal OAR dose constraints. In IM proton planning, reducing the size of the proton pencil beam (using the "mini-beam") improved the dose homogeneity, but it did not have a significant effect on the dose conformity.

[Treatment with charged particles beams: hadrontherapy part I: physical basis and clinical experience of treatment with protons]

Protons have physical characteristics, which differ from those of photons used in conventional radiotherapy. Better shielding of critical organs is obtained by using their particular ballistic (Bragg peak and lateral narrow penumbra). Some indications as ocular melanoma, chordoma and chondrosarcoma of the base of skull are now strongly accepted by the radiation oncologist community. Others are still in evaluation: meningioma, locally advanced nasopharynx tumor and paediatric tumors. The aim of this review is to present the clinical results of a technic which seems "confidential" because of the rarety and the cost of equipments.

Estimation of parameters of dose-volume models and their confidence limits

Predictions of the normal-tissue complication probability (NTCP) for the ranking of treatment plans are based on fits of dose-volume models to clinical and/or experimental data. In the literature several different fit methods are used. In this work frequently used methods and techniques to fit NTCP models to dose response data for establishing dose-volume effects, are discussed. The techniques are tested for their usability with dose-volume data and NTCP models. Different methods to estimate the confidence intervals of the model parameters are part of this study. From a critical-volume (CV) model with biologically realistic parameters a primary dataset was generated, serving as the reference for this study and describable by the NTCP model. The CV model was fitted to this dataset. From the resulting parameters and the CV model, 1000 secondary datasets were generated by Monte Carlo simulation. All secondary datasets were fitted to obtain 1000 parameter sets of the CV model. Thus the 'real' spread in fit results due to statistical spreading in the data is obtained and has been compared with estimates of the confidence intervals obtained by different methods applied to the primary dataset. The confidence limits of the parameters of one dataset were estimated using the methods, employing the covariance matrix, the jackknife method and directly from the likelihood landscape. These results were compared with the spread of the parameters, obtained from the secondary parameter sets. For the estimation of confidence intervals on NTCP predictions, three methods were tested. Firstly, propagation of errors using the covariance matrix was used. Secondly, the meaning of the width of a bundle of curves that resulted from parameters that were within the one standard deviation region in the likelihood space was investigated. Thirdly, many parameter sets and their likelihood were used to create a likelihood-weighted probability distribution of the NTCP. It is concluded that for the type of dose response data used here, only a full likelihood analysis will produce reliable results. The often-used approximations, such as the usage of the covariance matrix, produce inconsistent confidence limits on both the parameter sets and the resulting NTCP values.

Node-positive left-sided breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery: potential outcomes of radiotherapy modalities and techniques

PURPOSE

To determine how much proton and intensity modulated photon radiotherapy (IMRT) can improve treatment results of node-positive left-sided breast cancer compared to conventional radiation qualities (X-rays and electrons) after breast-conserving surgery in terms of lower complication risks for cardiac mortality and radiation pneumonitis.

METHODS AND MATERIAL

For each of 11 patient studies, one proton plan, one IMRT, and two conventional (tangential and patched) plans were calculated using a three-dimensional treatment-planning system, Helax-TMS(). The evaluation of the different treatment plans was made by applying the normal tissue complication probability model (NTCP) proposed by Källman (also denoted the relative seriality model) on the dose distributions in terms of dose-volume histograms. The organs at risk are the spinal cord, the left lung, the heart, and the non-critical normal tissues (including the right breast).

RESULTS

The comparison demonstrated that the proton treatment plans provide significantly lower NTCP values for the heart and lung when compared to conventional radiation qualities including IMRT for all 11 patients. At a prescribed dose of 50 Gy in the PTV, the calculated mean NTCP value for the patients decreased, on the average, from 14.7 to 0.6% for the lung (radiation pneumonitis) for the proton plans compared with the best plan using conventional radiation qualities. The corresponding figures for the heart (cardiac mortality) were from 2.1 to 0.5%. The figures for cardiac mortality for IMRT, tangential technique and the patched technique were 2.2, 6.7, and 2.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Protons appear to have major advantages in terms of lower complication risks when compared with treatments using conventional radiation qualities for treating node-positive left-sided breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery.

The role of proton therapy in the treatment of large irradiation volumes: a comparative planning study of pancreatic and biliary tumors

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine the potential benefit of proton therapy for abdominal tumors. Extensive comparative planning was conducted investigating the most up-to-date photon and proton irradiation technologies.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A number of rival plans were generated for four patients: two inoperable pancreatic tumors, one inoperable and one postoperative biliary duct tumor. The dose prescription goal for these large targets was 50 Gy, followed by a boost dose up to 20 Gy to a smaller planning target volume (PTV). Photon plans were developed using "forward" planning of coplanar and noncoplanar conformal fields and "inverse" planning of intensity-modulated (IM) fields. Proton planning was simulated as administered using the so called spot-scanning technique. Plans were evaluated on the basis of normal tissues' dose-volume constraints (Emami B, Lyman J, Brown A, et al. Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1990;21:109-122) and coverage of treatment volumes with prescribed doses.

RESULTS

For all cases, none of the forward calculated photon plans was able to deliver 50 Gy to large PTVs at the same time respecting the dose-volume constraints on all critical organs. Nine evenly spaced IM fields achieved or nearly achieved all maximum dose constraints to critical structures for two out of three inoperable patients. IM plans also obtained good results for the postoperative patient, even though the dose to the liver was very close to the maximum allowed. In all cases, photon irradiation of large PTV1s to 50 Gy followed by a 20 Gy boost entailed a risk very close to or higher than 5% for serious complications to the kidneys, liver, or bowel. Simple arrangements of 2, 3, and 4 proton fields obtained better dose conformation to the target, allowing the delivery of planned doses including the boost to all patients, without excessive risk of morbidity. Dose homogeneity inside the targets was also superior with protons.

CONCLUSION

For the irradiation of large PTVs located in the abdominal cavity, where multiple, parallel structured organs surround the target volumes, proton therapy, delivered with a sophisticated isocentric technique, has the potential to achieve superior dose distributions compared with state-of-the-art photon irradiation techniques. IM photon plans obtain better results in the postoperative case, because the reduced volume lessens the effect of the unavoidable increase of integral dose to surrounding tissues.

Implementation of pencil kernel and depth penetration algorithms for treatment planning of proton beams

The implementation of two algorithms for calculating dose distributions for radiation therapy treatment planning of intermediate energy proton beams is described. A pencil kernel algorithm and a depth penetration algorithm have been incorporated into a commercial three dimensional treatment planning system (Helax-TMS, Helax AB, Sweden) to allow conformal planning techniques using irregularly shaped fields, proton range modulation, range modification and dose calculation for non-coplanar beams. The pencil kernel algorithm is developed from the Fermi Eyges formalism and Molière multiple-scattering theory with range straggling corrections applied. The depth penetration algorithm is based on the energy loss in the continuous slowing down approximation with simple correction factors applied to the beam penumbra region and has been implemented for fast, interactive treatment planning. Modelling of the effects of air gaps and range modifying device thickness and position are implicit to both algorithms. Measured and calculated dose values are compared for a therapeutic proton beam in both homogeneous and heterogeneous phantoms of varying complexity. Both algorithms model the beam penumbra as a function of depth in a homogeneous phantom with acceptable accuracy. Results show that the pencil kernel algorithm is required for modelling the dose perturbation effects from scattering in heterogeneous media.

Comparison of proton therapy and conformal X-ray therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

This study compares the performance of one proton and four conformal X-ray planning techniques in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The treatment volumes for 13 NSCLC patients undergoing radical radiotherapy were planned using the five different techniques and dose-volume histograms (DVH) were used extensively in the comparative analysis. The minimum dose to the phase 2 target volume was escalated to 90 Gy, or until the point at which pre-set tolerance limits of spinal cord or lung were exceeded. The proton plan could treat nine of the 13 patients up to a dose of 90 Gy. Among the four X-ray techniques, performance varied enormously. One of them could not treat any of the patients, even to the conventional 60 Gy level, without failing to meet one or more of the criteria, whilst another one could treat 10 out of the 13 patients, although with this technique only four were permitted to have the dose escalated to 90 Gy. It was also found that two of the 13 patients could not be treated by any of the proton or X-ray plans to the conventional level, and were therefore considered unsuitable for radical radiotherapy. Various issues in conformal NSCLC radiotherapy including organ movement, tumour control, other possible organs at risk etc., are also discussed.

Potential gains using high-energy protons for therapy of malignant tumours

High-energy protons have physical properties that virtually always will result in geometrically better dose distributions than can be achieved using photons or electrons. The clinical gains in terms of the probability of higher tumour control and/or the reduced probability of normal tissue complications are, however, not completely known. Comparative model dose planning studies using real patients offer the possibility of estimating the potential gains using a new technique. Several recently completed model studies, including clinically relevant endpoints, indicate that protons may have advantages, even when compared with the conventional treatment that is likely to be introduced at the most advanced hospitals world-wide within the next decade. These advantages can be seen not only in well-demarcated targets close to risk organs, but also when irradiating extended irregular tissue volumes at risk of containing tumour cells.

Perioperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer

Local failure of rectal cancer is one of the principal causes of morbidity and mortality. In order to lower unacceptably high local failure rates, pre- or postoperative radiotherapy has been extensively investigated. The collected information from all controlled trials reported so far shows that the proportion of local recurrences is reduced to less than half when radiotherapy up to moderately high doses is given preoperatively. This reduction is smaller after postoperative radiotherapy, even if higher doses are used. In addition, there is a positive influence on survival from preoperative radiotherapy. Improved survival has also been seen in trials using postoperative radiotherapy, but only when combined with chemotherapy. With proper radiation techniques, sufficiently high doses can be given preoperatively with little, if any, increase in postoperative mortality and morbidity. Furthermore, late toxicity can be anticipated to be low provided the technique is optimal. The beneficial effects noted so far have been achieved in trials where 'standard' surgery has been used, followed by a local recurrence rate of more than 20% (average 29%, range 23-46%) of the patients. It is, however, possible that the reduction in local failure rates is proportionally even greater added to 'optimal' surgery, although the absolute number of failures prevented is lower.

Comparative treatment planning between proton and x-ray therapy in esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

Conformal treatment planning with megavoltage x-rays and protons for five patients with esophageal cancer has been studied in an attempt to determine if there are advantages of using protons instead of x-rays.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

For each of the five patients, two different proton plans, one x-ray plan, and one mixed plan with x-rays and protons were made. A three-dimensional treatment planning system, TMS, was used. The evaluation of the different plans was made by applying the tumor control probability (TCP) model proposed by Nahum and Webb and the normal tissue complication (NTCP) model proposed by Lyman on the dose distributions in terms of dose-volume histograms (DVHs).

RESULTS

The comparison shows advantages of using protons instead of x-rays for all five patients. The dose-limiting organs at risk are the spinal cord, the lungs, and the heart, but the proton plans also spare the kidneys better than the x-ray plan does. At 5% NTCP in any risk organ, the calculated mean TCP value for the five patients is increased by an average of 20%-units (from 2 to 23%-units) with the best proton plan compared with x-rays only. However, if we assume maximally a 1% risk in the spinal cord and a total NTCP for the two lungs of 100%, the mean TCP value for the five patients is increased from 6 to 49% with the best proton plan compared with x-rays only. The corresponding figure for the mixed plan is 27%. These gains are relatively insensitive to variations within reasonable limits in the biological parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Protons appear to have clear therapeutic advantages over conventional external radiotherapy when treating esophageal carcinoma.

Potential advantages of protons over conventional radiation beams for paraspinal tumours

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Conformal treatment planning with megavoltage X-rays and protons was studied in an attempt to determine if there are advantage of boost therapy with protons instead of X-rays for a patient with a tumour growing around the cervical spinal cord.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A patient with a Ewing sarcoma was selected for the model study. The proton boost plan was realised with a six beam patched technique. Several X-ray boost techniques were planned, some not yet practically realisable. The techniques giving the best dose distributions and the best tumour control probabilities in the absence of significant late toxicity were looked for. The boost techniques were added to two large lateral X-ray beams covering the planning target volume (PTV) and the main risk organ, the spinal cord. The evaluation was made with two biological models, i.e. the tumour control probability (TCP) model, proposed by Webb and Nahum (Webb, S. and Nahum, A.E. A model for calculating tumour control probability in radiotherapy including the effect of inhomogeneous distributions of dose and clonogenic cell density. Phys. Med. Biol. 38: 653-666, 1993), and the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model, first derived by Lyman (Lyman, J.T. Complication probability as assessed from dose-volume histograms. Radiat. Res. 104: s13-s19, 1985).

RESULTS

The comparison showed small but clear advantages of protons for the boost. At 1% NTCP in the spinal cord, the calculated TCP was on average 5% higher. However, depending on the values of the parameters chosen in the biological models, the gain for protons varied from 0-10%. The smallest gains were seen in radiosensitive tumours for which the TCP was close to 100% with any of the techniques and in radioresistant tumours for which neither technique resulted in any appreciable probability of local cure.

CONCLUSION

Protons appear to have therapeutic advantages over conventional radiotherapy in tumours with relatively high radiosensitivity situated close to the spinal cord.