Prognostic factors affecting disease-free survival in patients with Hodgkin's disease stages IA and IIA treated initially with radiotherapy alone in a single centre during 1973 to 1992

Long-term survival after treatment for Hodgkin's disease (1973-2002): improved survival with successive 10-year cohorts

Background:

The Nottinghamshire Lymphoma Registry contains the details of all the patients diagnosed with lymphoma (since 1 January 1973) within a defined geographical area with a population of 1.1 million. It was therefore possible to study the outcome of treatment for Hodgkin’s disease for three 10-year cohorts (1973–1982, 1983–1992 and 1993–2002).

The aims of the study were to compare survival time among the three patient cohorts, to identify prognostic factors and to estimate relative survival.

Methods:

A total of 745 patients diagnosed between 1973 and 2002 were analysed for survival. Survivorship was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and parametric survival models. An accelerated failure-time regression was used for multivariate analysis.

Results:

Overall, patients were observed for 9.8 (0.3–34.82) years (median(range)), on average. One, five and fifteen-year disease-specific survival was found to be 87% (85–90%), 77% (74–80%) and 70% (67–74%), respectively. For those for diagnosed between 1973 and 1982, the 15-year survival was found to be 57% for 1983–1992, it was 74% and for 1993–2002, it was 83% (P<0.001). The difference remained significant after adjusting for prognostic factors. The actuarial risk of developing a second malignancy at 20 years was for the 1973–1982 cohort, 12.4%, and for the 1983–1992 cohort, 18.8%.

Conclusion:

Treatment advances and effective management of toxicities of treatment over time, have resulted in a significantly longer survival for patients with Hodgkin’s disease diagnosed within a defined population.

A Consensus Protocol: Image-improved Therapeutic Guidelines for Limited Adult Hodgkin's Disease

Hodgkin's disease (HD) has greatly benefited from new technologies in terms of less invasive and more accurate staging as well as improved overall and relapse-free survival. However, the likelihood of late adverse effects of treatment, including second tumors, has increased due to the longer survival of patients with HD. Today's trend is to aim at minimal therapeutic exposure while guaranteeing lower therapy-related morbidity. This encourages new research efforts but also leads to less uniformity in treatments, as observed in the Veneto Region in Italy. The Gruppo Veneto Linfomi, composed of representatives of Radiotherapy and Oncology Departments of the Veneto Region, has been analyzing this problem and proposing therapy guidelines since 1995. A set of 10 prognostic factors has been developed to identify three prognostic groups: highly favorable (HF) are patients up to 40 years of age presenting with stage I disease involving only one site of disease with a maximum tumor diameter (TD) of 5 cm and no adverse factors. In this group only mantle field irradiation is recommended if the disease is located in the neck or above, inverted-Y irradiation is recommended for distal subdiaphragmatic lesions, and subtotal nodal irradiation in all other cases. HF cases may also be treated like favorable cases with limited chemoradiation. Favorable (F) cases are patients in stage I with a TD greater than 5 cm and smaller than 10 cm or stage II, up to three sites of disease and negative prognostic factors for systemic disease. All other patients are included in the “not favorable” (NF) group at Ann Arbor stage I or II with any adverse prognostic factor. For the latter two groups, chemotherapy with the ABVD or Stanford V regimen precedes involved-field radiotherapy to sites with a TD of at least 5 cm. The total irradiation dose is determined by local disease extent and level of response to chemotherapy. Images on which the radiation fields are drawn serve as an important reference to improve the homogeneity of treatments. This protocol includes a list of adverse treatment effects (chemo- and/or radiotherapy) together with follow-up guidelines for the early detection of secondary cancers in previously irradiated patients.