Simplified non-looping functional loop technique for HDR brachytherapy

GEC-ESTRO ACROP recommendations for head & neck brachytherapy in squamous cell carcinomas: 1st update - Improvement by cross sectional imaging based treatment planning and stepping source technology

The Head and Neck Working Group of the GEC-ESTRO (Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie - European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology) published in 2009 the consensus recommendations for low-dose rate, pulsed-dose rate and high-dose rate brachytherapy in head & neck cancers. The use of brachytherapy in combination with external beam radiotherapy and/or surgery was also covered as well as the use of brachytherapy in previously irradiated patients. Given the developments in the field, these recommendations needed to be updated to reflect up-to-date knowledge. The present update does not repeat basic knowledge which was published in the first recommendation but covers in a general part developments in (1) dose and fractionation, (2) aspects of treatment selection for brachytherapy alone versus combined BT+EBRT and (3) quality assurance issues. Detailed expert committee opinion intends to help the clinical practice in lip-, oral cavity-, oropharynx-, nasopharynx-, and superficial cancers. Different aspects of adjuvant treatment techniques and their results are discussed, as well the possibilities of salvage brachytherapy applications.

Locally advanced verrucous carcinoma of the oral cavity: treatment using customized mold HDR brachytherapy instead of hemi-maxillectomy

BACKGROUND

Oral verrucous carcinomas are locally invasive but rarely metastasize. Current treatment options include surgery and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). In medical inoperable patients or irresectable tumors, high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy is a valid alternative.

CASE

We present an 85-year-old man with functionally irresectable cT3N0M0 verrucous carcinoma superficially spreading along the upper alveolar ridge to the retro-alveolar triangle, with infiltration of the left soft and hard palate and buccal mucosa. Using a customized intraoral mold, this patient was treated with HDR brachytherapy delivering a dose of 48 Gy in 12 fractions three times per week. Treatment was well tolerated, and after prolonged confluent mucositis the tumor is in complete remission.

REVIEW OF LITERATURE AND CONCLUSION

The scarce literature on customized mold HDR brachytherapy in maxillary tumors is reviewed and recommendations for other head and neck tumors are given.

Perioperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy (PHDRB) in previously irradiated head and neck cancer: Initial results of a Phase I/II reirradiation study

BACKGROUND

This study was undertaken to determine the feasibility of salvage surgery and perioperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy (PHDRB) at the dose/fractionation schedule proposed in patients with previously irradiated, recurrent head and neck cancer or second primary tumors arising in a previously irradiated field.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-five patients were treated with surgical resection and PHDRB. The PHDRB dose was 4 Gy b.i.d. x 8 (32 Gy) for R0 resections and 4 Gy b.i.d. x 10 (40 Gy) for R1 resections. Further external beam radiotherapy or chemotherapy was not given.

RESULTS

Resections were categorized as R0 (negative margins of at least 10 mm) in 3 patients (12.0%) and R1 (negative margins of less than 10 mm or microscopically positive margins) in 22 (88.0%). Twelve patients with R1 resections had microscopically positive margins (48%), and 10 patients had close margins (40%), with a median of 2.0 mm. Ten patients (40.0%) developed Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3 or greater toxicity. Seven patients (28%) presented complications requiring a major surgical procedure. Four of these complications appeared in the immediate postoperative period and were surgical in nature (flap failure, n = 2; fistula, n = 2), and the other three were mainly related to the brachytherapy procedure (n = 2) or the radiation dose delivered (n = 1). One patient died on postoperative day 11 due to bleeding. After a median followup of 14 months, the 4-year local control rate and overall survival were 85.6% and 46.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical salvage and PHDRB at the dose/fractionation proposed are feasible in this high-risk population. Toxicity is high, but not substantially different from other reirradiation series. Four-year local control results are encouraging taking into account that 22 of 25 patients (88%) had either close or microscopically positive margins.

The American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for high-dose-rate brachytherapy for head-and-neck carcinoma

PURPOSE

To develop recommendations for use of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy in patients with head-and-neck cancer.

METHODS

A panel consisting of members of the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) performed a literature review, added information based upon their clinical experience, and formulated recommendations for head-and-neck HDR brachytherapy.

RESULTS

The ABS recommends the use of brachytherapy as a component of the treatment of head-and-neck tumors. However, the ABS recognizes that some radiation oncologists are reluctant to employ brachytherapy in the head-and-neck region because of the complexity of the postoperative management and concerns about radiation safety. In this regard, HDR eliminates unwanted radiation exposure and thereby permits unrestricted delivery of clinical care to these brachytherapy patients. The ABS made specific recommendations for previously untreated and recurrent head-and-neck cancer patients on patient selection criteria, implant techniques, target volume definition, and HDR treatment parameters (such as time, dose, and fractionation schedules). Suggestions were provided for treatment with HDR alone and in combination with external beam radiation therapy. It should be recognized that only limited experiences exist with HDR brachytherapy in patients with head-and-neck cancers. Therefore, some of these suggested doses have not been extensively tested in clinical practice. Hence, these guidelines will be updated as significant new outcome data are available. Any clinician following these guidelines is expected to use clinical judgment to determine an individual patient's treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Little has been published in the clinical literature on HDR brachytherapy in head-and-neck cancer. Based upon the available information and the clinical experience of the panel members, general and site-specific recommendations were offered. Areas for further investigations were identified.

Pulsed dose rate brachytherapy in head and neck cancers. Feasibility study of a French cooperative group

PURPOSE

To prospectively evaluate the feasibility of pulsed dose rate (PDR) brachytherapy to mimic the continuous low dose rate (cLDR) iridium wire technique in head and neck carcinomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A series of 30 patients were included from June 1995 to May 1998. The primaries were located in the oral cavity (four T1, seven T2 and two T3), the velotonsillar arch (eight T1 and eight T2) and the posterior wall (one T3). Thirteen were irradiated by exclusive brachytherapy (dose, > or =45 Gy). The PDR delivered 0.5 Gy/pulse, one pulse/h, day and night, to mimic cLDR irradiation.

RESULTS

The implantation was feasible for all the patients, usually easy and of good quality. The mean duration/pulse was 13 min, with a mean source activity of 171 mCi. Patient tolerance was poor in nine cases. Sixteen patients could receive the whole PDR treatment with a total ranging from 30 to 120 pulses without any problem. Seven had short breakdowns (< or =6 h). Seven had definitive breakdowns, but could end the irradiation by manual afterloading of iridium 192 wires. The radioprotection was better (or complete), except for one patient. Most of the breakdowns were related to kinking or flattering of the tube.

CONCLUSIONS

PDR is feasible in head and neck carcinomas, but necessitates improvement of the quality and control of the plastic tubes.