A note on the effect of individual housing conditions on LH secretion in ewes after exposure to a ram

The continuous presence of ewes in estrus in spring influences testicular volume, testicular echogenicity and testosterone concentration, but not LH pulsatility in rams

The continuous presence of active male small ruminants prevents seasonal anestrus in females, but evidence of the same mechanism operating from the females to the males is scarce. This study assessed the effects of the continuous presence of ewes in estrus in spring on ram sexual activity, testicular size and echogenicity, and LH and testosterone concentrations. On 1 March, 20 rams were assigned to two groups (n = 10 each): isolated (ISO) from other sheep, or stimulated (STI) by 12 ewes, which were separated from the rams by an openwork metal barrier, allowing contact between sexes. Each week, four ewes were induced into estrus by intravaginal sponges. Live weight, scrotal circumference, testicular width (TW) and length (TL) were recorded at the beginning and at the end of the experiment, and testicular volume (TV) was calculated; at the same time, testicular ultrasonography and color Doppler scanning were performed. Blood samples (March to May) were collected once per week for testosterone determinations, and at the end of the experiment, blood samples were collected for 6 h at 20-min intervals for LH analysis. Rams were exposed to four estrous ewes in a serving-capacity test. Scrotal circumference, TW and TL were higher in the STI than in the ISO rams (P < 0.05) in May, and TV was higher (P < 0.05) in the STI (391 ± 17 cm3) than in the ISO rams (354 ± 24 cm3). In ISO rams, the number of white pixels was higher (P < 0.01) in May (348 ± 74) than in March (94 ± 21) and differed significantly (P < 0.01) from that of the STI rams in May (160 ± 33). In ISO rams, the number of grey pixels was higher (P < 0.05) in May (107 ± 3) than it was in March (99 ± 1). Stimulated and ISO rams did not differ significantly in mean LH plasma concentrations (0.8 ± 0.5 v. 0.9 ± 0.4 ng/ml), LH pulses (2.1 ± 0.5 v. 2.2 ± 0.2) and amplitude (2.0 ± 0.4 v. 3.2 ± 0.7 ng/ml, respectively). Stimulated rams had significantly higher testosterone concentrations than ISO rams from April to the end of the experiment. Stimulated rams performed more (P < 0.05) mountings with intromission (3.0 ± 0.4) than did ISO rams (1.5 ± 0.5). In conclusion, after 3 months in the continuous presence of ewes in estrus in spring, rams had higher TV and some testicular echogenic parameters were modified than isolated rams. Although exposed rams also had higher levels of testosterone after 2 months in the presence of estrous ewes, their LH pulsatility at the end of the study was not modified.

The use of progesterone intravaginal devices is superior to use of the ram effect at hastening the reproductive performance in transitional Targhee ewes

To compare the use of controlled intravaginal drug release (CIDR, EAZI-BREED™ CIDR^® Sheep, USA, Zoetis) with the ram effect, a combination of CIDR and ram effect and the addition of P.G.600^® to each of these scenarios on their contribution to inducing the onset of cyclicity and their ability to improve reproductive efficiency in a commercial sheep flock, a randomized clinical trial was conducted. Multiparous ewes (n = 283) were randomly assigned to one of six treatments prior to intact male introduction on day 0: only CIDR devices (day -5 to day 0) (n = 40), exposure to two vasectomized rams (d-14 to d0) (n = 55), CIDR (d-5 to d0) and an intramuscular injection of P.G.600^® (d0) (n = 40), exposure to two vasectomized rams (d-14 to d0) and treated with CIDR devices (day -5 to day 0) (n = 40). exposure to vasectomized rams (d-14 to d0), CIDR (d-5 to d0) and an intramuscular injection ofP.G.600^®, (d0) (n = 38), and a control group, without exposure to vasectomized rams, CIDRs or P.G.600^® (n = 70). Ewes were exposed to intact males on day 0. Days to lambing from the earliest expected lambing date at 150 days post introduction of rams was compared between groups with survival analysis. The mean survival time was significantly shorter in all groups that used CIDR compared to the control group (P < 0.003, adjusted for multiple comparisons). The addition of a teaser ram or a P.G.600^® injection did not change survival time. In a Cox proportional hazard model for time to lambing, the use of CIDR had a hazard ratio of 1.62 (95% CI: 1.07, 2.45, P = 0.23), while other variables (teaser ram, P.G.600^®) were not significant. In a Poisson regression for the number of lambs born to each ewe, P.G.600^® was not a significant variable, even when adjusted for age of ewe (P = 0.74). The combination of the ram effect and CIDRs did not have an additive effect. The use of CIDR shortened time to cyclicity in study ewes and may provide an attractive option to advance lambing season. Further studies on the economics of this method are warranted.