Preserved widespread N18 and progressive loss of P13/14 of median nerve SEPs in a patient with unilateral medial medullary syndrome

Differential changes in somatosensory evoked potentials and motor performance: pursuit movement task versus force matching tracking task

Force modulation relies on accurate proprioception, and force-matching tasks alter corticocerebellar connectivity. Corticocerebellar (N24) and corticomotor pathways are impacted following the acquisition of a motor tracing task (MTT), measured using both somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) and transcranial magnetic stimulation. This study compared changes in early SEP peak amplitudes and motor performance following a force-matching tracking task (FMTT) to an MTT. Thirty (18 females) right-handed participants, aged 21.4 ± 2.76, were electrically stimulated over the right-median nerve at 2.47 Hz and 4.98 Hz (averaged 1,000 sweeps/rate) to elicit SEPs, recorded via a 64-channel electroencephalography cap, before, and after task acquisition using the right abductor pollicis brevis muscle. Retention was measured 24 h later. Significant time-by-group interactions occurred for the N20 SEP: 6.3% decrease post-FMTT versus 5.5% increase post-MTT (P = 0.013); P25 SEP: 4.0% decrease post-FMTT versus 10.3% increase post-MTT (P = 0.006); and N18 SEP: 113.4% increase post-FMTT versus 4.4% decrease post-MTT (P = 0.006). N18 and N30 showed significant effect of time (both P < 0.001). Motor performance: significant time-by-group interactions-postacquisition: FMTT improved 15.3% versus 24.3% for MTT (P = 0.025), retention: FMTT improved 17.4% and MTT by 30.1% (P = 0.004). Task-dependent differences occurred in SEP peaks associated with cortical somatosensory processing (N20 and P25), and cerebellar input (N18), with similar changes in sensorimotor integration (N30), with differential improvements in motor performance, indicating important differences in cerebellar and sensory processing for tasks reliant on proprioception.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study demonstrates neurophysiological differences in cerebellar and somatosensory cortex pathways when learning a motor task requiring visuomotor tracking versus a task that requires force-matching modulation, in healthy individuals. The clear neurophysiological differences in early somatosensory evoked potentials associated with cortical somatosensory processing, cerebellar input, and sensorimotor integration between these two tasks demonstrate some of the neural correlates of force modulation and validate the force-matching task for use in future work.

Contribution of different somatosensory afferent input to subcortical somatosensory evoked potentials in humans

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the subcortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to electrical stimulation of either muscle or cutaneous afferents.

METHODS

SEPs were recorded in 6 patients suffering from Parkinson's disease (PD) who underwent electrode implantation in the pedunculopontine (PPTg) nucleus area. We compared SEPs recorded from the scalp and from the intracranial electrode contacts to electrical stimuli applied to: 1) median nerve at the wrist, 2) abductor pollicis brevis motor point, and 3) distal phalanx of the thumb. Also the high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) were analysed.

RESULTS

After median nerve and pure cutaneous (distant phalanx of the thumb) stimulation, a P1-N1 complex was recorded by the intracranial lead, while the scalp electrodes recorded the short-latency far-field responses (P14 and N18). On the contrary, motor point stimulation did not evoke any low-frequency component in the PPTg traces, nor the N18 potential on the scalp. HFOs were recorded to stimulation of all modalities by the PPTg electrode contacts.

CONCLUSIONS

Stimulus processing within the cuneate nucleus depends on modality, since only the cutaneous input activates the complex intranuclear network possibly generating the scalp N18 potential.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our results shed light on the subcortical processing of the somatosensory input of different modalities.

Re-evaluation of short latency somatosensory evoked potentials (P13, P14 and N18) for brainstem function in children who once suffered from deep coma

One of the major clinical features of brain death is deep coma. Therefore, we re-evaluated retrospectively electrophysiological examinations of brainstem function in about 31 children who had once suffered from deep coma in order to reveal its pathophysiological characteristics. The patient age at coma ranged from 1 month to 10 years (mean 2 years 1 month). The electrophysiological examinations were performed, including any of short-latency somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP), brainstem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) and blink reflexes. We first compared results between the fair and poor prognostic groups, and then re-evaluated SSEP results on a few severely impaired patients with persistent vegetative state (PVS). Subsequently, SSEP clarified more specific findings for a deep coma condition than BAEP and blink reflex. A lack of P14, N18 and N20, and an amplitude reduction or vagueness of P13 in SSEP in these children strongly suggested high risk in their future neurological prognosis. In conclusion, electrophysiological examinations, especially SSEP (P13, P14 and N18), might be very useful in obtaining a long-term neurological prognosis after deep coma in children.

Lower cervical origin of the P13-like potential in median SSEPS

The authors studied the origin of the scalp P13-like potential in median somatosensory evoked potentials, which have been reported to be preserved in patients with cervicomedullary lesions or in brain death. There were five patients with high to middle cervical lesions (C2/3 or C3/4 level). Small P13-like potentials after P11 were identified for all patients with a noncephalic reference but not with an ear reference. Their onset latencies were slightly earlier than the expected latency of the true P13/14 onset. In two patients, delayed true P13/14s followed by N18s were identified with both noncephalic and ear references. The authors argue that the P13-like potential observed in these patients is a different entity from scalp P13 in normal subjects. Because the C3/4 vertebral level corresponds to the C5 cord level, the origin of the P13-like potential must be below C5, contradicting the previous opinion that it is generated at the cervicomedullary junction or at the high cervical dorsal column. The authors named this potential lower cervical P13 (or lcP13), and present an opinion that it is generated by the beginning of the second spinal ascending volley, which has been described by direct-recording studies in humans.

Anatomic origin of P13 and P14 scalp far-field potentials

After median nerve stimulation, noncephalic or earlobe reference montages enable one to record over the scalp a well-defined, positive far-field response, which has been labeled the P14 or P13-P14 complex. It has been ascertained that this wave is generated in the caudal brainstem. Its use is reliable and sometimes mandatory in assessing a number of diseases that affect primarily the brainstem, such as multiple sclerosis or coma. Because of its complex shape as well as discrepant findings in the literature, it is still debated whether this potential is produced by a single or by multiple serial generators. The authors present these different views and summarize the different recording methods, while bearing in mind that some recording techniques are more suitable for routine purposes and others are preferred in selected cases, when more information regarding caudal brainstem function is required.

Sensory and motor interfering influences on somatosensory evoked potentials

The interfering influences by which the different components of the early somatosensory evoked potentials are modified are reviewed from both neurophysiologic and clinical perspectives. Special consideration is given to the specific differences between sensory and motor interferences. In this context, the specific effect of the mental movement simulation task on the frontal N30 component is discussed in relation to the involvement of this evoked wave as a physiologic index of the dopaminergic motor pathways. Relevant interfering approaches, including concurrent events ranging from tactile stimulation to locomotion, are reviewed and discussed insofar as these data provide insights into the neurophysiologic processes of interaction between competing internal models controlling motor acts and sensory information.

Anatomic origin and clinical application of the widespread N18 potential in median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials

N18 is a broad negativity, with a duration of approximately 20 msec after positive far-field potentials and is recorded widely over the scalp using a noncephalic reference. Its origin has been controversial but its preservation after pontine or upper medullary lesion while loss after high cervical lesions suggested its medullary origin. Comparison with animal studies and direct recording studies in humans leads the authors to conclude that N18 is most likely generated at the cuneate nucleus by primary afferent depolarization. Namely, dorsal column afferents send collaterals to interneurons within the cuneate nucleus, which in turn synapse on presynaptic terminals of dorsal column fibers and depolarize them as a mechanism of presynaptic inhibition. In this way, an electrical sink is formed on presynaptic terminals, whereas their dorsocaudally situated axons serve as a source. The ventrorostral negative pole of the resultant dipolar potential must correspond to N18. The authors obtained a measure to evaluate medullary function objectively, and therefore N18 may be useful as a diagnostic tool for brain death. Usage of a C2S reference is essential for the accurate estimation of N18. Origins of other somatosensory evoked potential components related to the cuneate nucleus are also discussed.

Neuroanatomic substrates of lower extremity somatosensory evoked potentials

After stimulation of the lower extremity nerve (tibial nerve), N21 and N23 are recorded from L4 and T12 spine respectively. The far-field potentials of P31 and N35 are registered from Fpz-C5s (fifth cervical spine) or CPi (ipsilateral with respect to the side of stimulation)-ear derivation. Additional far-field potentials of P17 and P24 may be recorded from the scalp when a noncephalic (knee) reference is used. The major positive peak, P40, is registered at the vertex and the CPi. Preceding P40, there is a small negative peak, N37, recorded at the contralateral (CPc) hemisphere. Neuroanatomic substrates of these somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) components are less well clarified compared with those of upper extremity (median nerve) SSEPs, primarily because clinical application of lower extremity SSEPs is more difficult, and all of the aforementioned potentials but one (P40) are not obligatory components. The concept of "paradoxical lateralization" complicates the issue further. Accumulating evidence, however, suggests that the far-field potentials of P17 and P31 arise from the distal portion of the sacral plexus and brainstem respectively. These correspond to P9 and P14 of the median nerve SSEPs respectively. The spinal potential of N23 is equivalent to the N13 cervical potential of the median nerve SSEP. N35 recorded from the ipsilateral hemisphere is analogous to N18 of the median nerve. Paradoxically lateralized P40 has been thought to represent the positive end of a dipole field, reflected by the negativity at the mesial surface of the contralateral hemisphere, and has commonly been considered to be equivalent to the first cortical potentials (N20) of the median nerve SSEP. However, more recent evidence suggests that the primary positivity is at the mesial cortical surface, and it more likely corresponds to P26 of the median nerve SSEP. Thus the first cortical potential corresponding to N20 is probably a small and inconsistent N37 recorded on the contralateral hemisphere. These assumptions need to be verified further by more extensive clinical studies applied to various neurologic disorders.

N18 in median somatosensory evoked potentials: a new indicator of medullary function useful for the diagnosis of brain death

OBJECTIVES

To record N18 in median somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) for deeply comatose or brain dead patients and to demonstrate the usefulness of N18 for the diagnosis of brain death in comparison with auditory brain stem responses (ABRs) and P13/14 in median SEPs, which have been conventionally used as complementary tests for the diagnosis of brain death.

METHODS

Subjects were 19 deeply comatose or brain dead patients. Thirteen recordings were performed in deeply comatose but not brain dead conditions, and 12 recordings were performed in brain death. N18 was evaluated in the CPi-C2S lead (or other scalp-C2S leads) to obtain a flat baseline.

RESULTS

N18 was preserved in 12 of 13 non-brain dead comatose recordings whereas it was completely lost for all of the 12 brain death recordings. P13/14 in median SEPs was preserved for all the comatose recordings, whereas apparent P13/14-like potentials, usually of low amplitude, were seen in nine of 12 brain death recordings-that is, frequent false positives. The ABRs already showed features which were characteristic for brain death (loss of components other than wave 1 or small wave 2) for four comatose recordings, in three of which N18 was preserved. The last result not only corresponds with the fact that ABRs can evaluate pontine and midbrain functions and not medullary function, but further supports the medullary origin of N18. In the four patients followed up for the course of progression from coma to brain death, N18s preserved in normal size during the comatose state were completely lost after brain death was established.

CONCLUSIONS

The N18 potential is generated by the cuneate nucleus in the medulla oblongata in the preceding studies. N18 is suggested to be a promising tool for the diagnosis of brain death because there were no false positives and rare false negatives in the present series for detecting the remaining brain stem function.

Median nerve SEP after a high medullary lesion. Preserved N18 and absent P14 components. Case report

Median nerve SEPs recorded from a patient with a high medullary lesion are described. The lesion involved the anteromedial and anterolateral right upper third of the medulla, as documented by MRI. Forty one days after the lesion, left median nerve SEP showed preserved N18 and absent P14 and N20 components; stimulation of the right median nerve evoked normal responses. These findings agree with the proposition that low medullary levels are involved in the generation of the N18 component of the median nerve SEP.

The N18 component of the median nerve SEP is not reduced by vibration

OBJECTIVE

To study the interference of mechanical vibration of the palm of the hand on the median nerve short-latency SEP components.

METHODS

Electrically-elicited short-latency median nerve SEP were obtained before and during mechanical vibration (120 Hz) of the palm in two groups of normal individuals (6 in group I and 9 in group II). The amplitude of the different components was compared between the two conditions through non-parametric statistical tests.

RESULTS

A significant reduction in the amplitude of the N9, P13/14 and N20 components was detected, however no overall significant changes were detected for the N18 component.

CONCLUSIONS

Vibration interference reduced all studied components except the N18, these findings are interpreted as supporting evidence for the proposed association between the N18 component and the inhibitory activities elicited in the dorsal column nuclei.

Detailed analysis of the latencies of median nerve somatosensory evoked potential components, 2: Analysis of subcomponents of the P13/14 and N20 potentials

Detailed analysis of P13/14 and N20 wavelets was performed for 62 normal subjects and patients with various lesions along the somatosensory pathway. A histogram of the latencies of all the identified P13/14 wavelets (measured from P13/14 onset) demonstrated three latency-groups, which were named P13, P14a and P14b subcomponents. The relationship between the three newly identified subcomponents and the conventional naming of P13 and P14 was inconstant, indicating the ambiguity of the latter. P14b was most prominent in the contralateral central region, and therefore a P15 positivity slightly after P14b was often recorded in the CPc-Fz and CPc-CPi leads (CPc and CPi are centroparietal electrodes contralateral and ipsilateral to the stimulation). P14b/P15 was lost even in patients with cortical lesions, and thalamocortical fibers were assumed for its origin. The CPc-Fz and CPi-Fz leads registered a low negativity named broad N13', suggesting frontal predominance of the overall P13/14 complex. Both P13 and P14a were identified in a patient with a pontine lesion, and a caudal brainstem origin for both was suspected due to the onset of two repetitive bursts of the ascending lemniscal volley. We refuted the presynaptic origin of the scalp P13 potential and pointed out that a prolonged and/or polyphasic P11 frequently observed in patients with high cervical lesions can be mistaken as scalp P13. A histogram of the latencies of all the identified negative wavelets of N20 in the CPc-Fz lead (measured from N20 onset) revealed five definite latency-groups, which were named N20a, N20b, N20c, N20d and N20e subcomponents. The highest peak of N20 actually corresponded to either N20b, N20c or N20d, and this uncertainty, which must be related to intracortical processes, resulted in a large instability of the N20 peak latency as well as the age and sex dependence of the N20 onset-peak interval, both of which were demonstrated by our preceding study (Sonoo, M., Kobayashi, M., Genba-Shimizu, K., Mannen, T. and Shimizu, T. Detailed analysis of the latencies of median nerve SEP components, 1: selection of the best standard parameters and the establishment of the normal values. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1996b, 100: 319-331). Negative subcomponents in the CPc-NC lead and positive subcomponents in the Fz-NC lead constituted mirror images of each other, which suggested that these subcomponents were generated within area 3b.