Insulin allergy; desensitization with crystalline zinc-insulin and steroid tapering

Evaluating insulindysregulation in horses: A two-step insulin-tolerance test using porcine zinc insulin

In insulin dysregulation, hyperinsulinemia (HI) can be accompanied by peripheral insulin resistance (IR) in horses, which can be diagnosed with an insulin-tolerance test (ITT). The administration of 0.1 IU/kg body weight of recombinant regular human insulin (RHI) should elicit a 50 % reduction of the initial blood glucose concentration at 30 min after insulin administration in insulin sensitive horses. Compared to RHI, porcine zinc insulin (PZI) is veterinary-approved and therefore easier accessible for many practitioners. The aim of this study was to compare the insulin and glucose dynamics during a standard ITT with RHI to an ITT performed with PZI. Twelve Icelandic horses were subjected to an ITT with RHI (ITT-RHI) and with PZI (ITT-PZI) at same dosages in a randomised crossover design. The insulin and glucose dynamics that resulted from these tests were compared, and the consistency of classification into insulin-sensitive and IR categories was evaluated. No complications were observed with the use of either RHI or PZI in ITT. A good correlation of the test results was observed (r = 0.88; P < 0.001). The blood glucose concentrations and the percentage reduction in glucose concentration did not differ significantly between the two tests (P = 0.053), but four out of twelve horses were classified as IR in the ITT-RHI whereas with the ITT-PZI seven out of twelve horses were classified as IR with the 50 % glucose reduction from baseline. Based on the Youden index, when using the ITT-PZI, an adjusted cut-off value for blood glucose reduction of 40 % at 30 min resulted in better test performance. With consideration for the seemingly weaker effect of PZI and the adjusted cut-off value, PZI can be an appropriate substitute to RHI in an ITT.

Development and validation of a machine learning model for classification of next glucose measurement in hospitalized patients

BACKGROUND

Inpatient glucose management can be challenging due to evolving factors that influence a patient's blood glucose (BG) throughout hospital admission. The purpose of our study was to predict the category of a patient's next BG measurement based on electronic medical record (EMR) data.

METHODS

EMR data from 184,361 admissions containing 4,538,418 BG measurements from five hospitals in the Johns Hopkins Health System were collected from patients who were discharged between January 1, 2015 and May 31, 2019. Index BGs used for prediction included the 5th to penultimate BG measurements (N = 2,740,539). The outcome was category of next BG measurement: hypoglycemic (BG  ≤  70 mg/dl), controlled (BG 71-180 mg/dl), or hyperglycemic (BG > 180 mg/dl). A random forest algorithm that included a broad range of clinical covariates predicted the outcome and was validated internally and externally.

FINDINGS

In our internal validation test set, 72·8%, 25·7%, and 1·5% of BG measurements occurring after the index BG were controlled, hyperglycemic, and hypoglycemic respectively. The sensitivity/specificity for prediction of controlled, hyperglycemic, and hypoglycemic were 0·77/0·81, 0·77/0·89, and 0·73/0·91, respectively. On external validation in four hospitals, the ranges of sensitivity/specificity for prediction of controlled, hyperglycemic, and hypoglycemic were 0·64-0·70/0·80-0·87, 0·75-0·80/0·82-0·84, and 0·76-0·78/0·87-0·90, respectively.

INTERPRETATION

A machine learning algorithm using EMR data can accurately predict the category of a hospitalized patient's next BG measurement. Further studies should determine the effectiveness of integration of this model into the EMR in reducing rates of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia.

The complexities of insulin allergy: a case and approach

Background

Insulin hypersensitivity is rare, but challenging for individuals with diabetes. The prevalence of insulin allergy has decreased since the introduction of human recombinant insulin preparations. Hypersensitivity reactions range from injection site erythema and swelling, to anaphylaxis. While some reactions are to excipients (zinc, protamine, metacresol), many are to recombinant insulin itself. We present a case of type 1 hypersensitivity to various preparations of insulin in a patient with insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Case presentation

A 61-year-old woman with a 30-year history of insulin-dependent T2DM was referred for evaluation of reactions to insulin. She had two episodes over 5-months; both required Emergency Department visits and epinephrine administration. The first episode entailed a burning sensation of the extremities and nausea, immediately after injecting NovoRapid^® insulin. The second event entailed a similar reaction but this time there was also angioedema of the upper airway with difficulty breathing and hypotension, immediately after injecting Levemir^® and NovoRapid^®, and taking metformin. There were no cofactors such as exercise, infectious illness, or NSAIDs use. Skin testing was performed with metformin, Lantus^®, Humalog^®, NovoRapid^®, glulisine, insulin regular, NPH, Levemir^® and the excipient protamine, as per published testing concentrations. Metacresol was not tested as its use was restricted by the hospital pharmacy. Insulin preparations with and without metacresol were included in testing however. A clinic staff served as a negative control. The patent had negative testing with protamine, but sensitization to all insulin preparations. Metformin skin testing and challenge along with latex IgE were negative. Subsequently, she underwent intentional weight loss of 70 lb, and was started on oral hypoglycemics with good effect.

Conclusions

Our case highlights the importance of diagnosing insulin allergy through a detailed history and focused testing. Therapeutic strategies include avoidance and insulin alternatives, alternate insulin preparations, or desensitization. In severe recurrent hypersensitivity reactions, Omalizumab or pancreatic transplantation have been effective.

Successful management of type IV hypersensitivity reactions to human insulin analogue with injecting mixtures of biphasic insulin aspart and dexamethasone

Although hypersensitivity reaction to insulin was supposed to be less-frequent with current insulin analogue, case reports with different types of allergic reactions to insulin analogue were still reported. The most common form is type I hypersensitivity reaction with IgE-mediated. Besides, type III (IgG and IgM-mediated) and type IV (T-cell mediated delayed reaction) hypersensitivity reactions were also reported. Here we presented a long-standing type 2 diabetes with insulin requirements with hypersensitivity reactions to insulin actrapid, insulin aspart, insulin glargine, insulin detemir, and biphasic insulin aspart 30. Insulin desensitization was performed as initial management but failed as skin biopsy with immunohistochemical staining proved type IV hypersensitivity reaction. We continued with the next treatment approach using subcutaneous injection with the mixture of biphasic insulin aspart 30 and dexamethasone to alleviate allergy, and the result was successful with steroid-free biphasic insulin aspart 30 injection eight months later. Besides, the treatment effect had lasted after ten years even with switched type of insulin analogue from biphasic insulin aspart 30 to insulin glargine and insulin aspart. The case report demonstrated a good example of how clinicians deal with the rare but important questions of hypersensitivity reactions to insulin analogue.

Successful management of insulin allergy and autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 4 with desensitization therapy and glucocorticoid treatment: a case report and review of the literature

Introduction. Insulin allergy is a rare complication of insulin therapy, especially in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Key manifestations are hypersensitivity-related symptoms and poor metabolic control. T1DM, as well as insulin allergy, may develop in the context of autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome (APS), further complicating management. Case Report. A 17-year-old male patient, diagnosed with T1DM, was treated with various insulin therapy schemes over several months, which resulted in recurrent anaphylactoid reactions and poor glycemic control, after which he was referred to our Endocrinology and Immunology Department. A prick test was carried out for all commercially available insulin presentations and another insulin scheme was designed but proved unsuccessful. A desensitization protocol was started with Glargine alongside administration of Prednisone, which successfully induced tolerance. Observation of skin lesions typical of vitiligo prompted laboratory workup for other autoimmune disorders, which returned positive for autoimmune gastritis/pernicious anemia. These findings are compatible with APS type 4. Discussion. To our knowledge, this is the first documented case of insulin allergy in type 4 APS, as well as this particular combination in APS. Etiopathogenic components shared by insulin allergy and APS beg for further research in immunogenetics to further comprehend pathophysiologic aspects of these diseases.

Desensitization of allergy to human insulin and its analogs by administering insulin aspart and insulin glargine

Insulin allergy is a rare clinical situation. We report a 51-year-old patient with type 2 diabetes who required multiple daily insulin injections. The patient developed allergy to human regular insulin and insulin analogs (insulin aspart and insulin glargine), which was resolved by subcutaneous insulin desensitization.

Severe insulin allergy successfully treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion

Insulin allergy is a rare complication of insulin therapy. Proper management, though difficult, is critical. Here, we report the case of a patient with type 2 diabetes and insulin allergy, successfully treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII).

Allergy to human insulin and specific immunotherapy with glargine; case report with review of literature

Insulin has an important role in the treatment of diabetic patients. Further, it can result in undesirable side effects. One of the problems that are associated with insulin therapy is allergic reactions. Although insulin allergy is uncommon, especially in patients with type-2 diabetes, but when it occurs, its management can be difficult. We report a 55-year-old woman with poorly controlled type-2 diabetes and insulin allergy. She revealed hypersensitivity reactions including urticaria and respiratory symptoms, immediately after injection. So, specific immunotherapy with other insulin preparations was done. Finally, after specific immunotherapy, we were able to treat the patient with short- and long-acting analogs successfully.

Immunoglobulin E-binding autoantigens: biochemical characterization and clinical relevance

Although immediate-Type I skin reactions to human dander have been described six decades ago, only the recent application of molecular biology to allergology research allowed fast and detailed characterization of IgE-binding autoantigens. These can be functionally subdivided into three classes: (1) self-antigens with sequence homology to environmental allergens belonging to the class of phylogenetically conserved proteins, (2) self-antigens without sequence homology to known environmental allergens, and (3) chemically modified self-antigens deriving from workplace exposure. As environmental allergens, also IgE-binding autoantigens belong to different protein families without common structural features that would explain their IgE-binding capability. Many of the self-antigens showing sequence homology to environmental allergens, are phylogenetically conserved proteins like manganese dependent superoxide dismutase, thioredoxin or cyclopilin. Their IgE-binding capability can be explained by molecular mimicry resulting from shared B-cell epitopes. A common factor of IgE-binding self-antigens without sequence homology to known environmental allergens is that they elicit IgE responses only in individuals suffering from long-lasting atopic diseases. In contrast, IgE-mediated reactions to modified self-antigens might be explained with the generation of novel B-cell epitopes. Chemically modified self-antigens are likely to be recognized as non-self by the immune system. The clinical relevance of IgE responses to self-antigens remains largely unclear. Well documented is their ability to induce immediate Type I skin reactions in vivo, and to induce mediator release from effector cells of sensitized individuals in vitro. Based on these observations it is reasonable to assume that IgE-mediated cross-linking of FcRIε receptors on effector cells can elicit the same symptoms as those induced by environmental allergens, and this could explain exacerbations of chronic allergic diseases in the absence of external exposure. However, because most of the described IgE-binding self-antigens are intracellular proteins normally not accessible for antigen-antibody interactions, local release of the antigens is required to explain the induction of symptoms.

Clinical applications of drug desensitization in the Asia-Pacific region

Drug desensitization is the induction, within hours to days, of a temporary state of tolerance to a drug which the patient has developed a hypersensitivity reaction to. It may be used for IgE and non-IgE mediated allergic reactions, and certain non-allergic reactions. The indication for desensitization is where no alternative medications are available for the treatment of that condition, and where the benefits of desensitization outweigh the risks. Desensitization is a therapeutic modality for drug allergy (similar to allergen specific immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis and insect venom anaphylaxis). In contrast, the drug provocation test is a diagnostic modality used to confirm or refute the diagnosis of drug allergy. This review discusses the clinical applications of desensitization for the treatment of common infectious, metabolic and cardiovascular diseases, and oncological conditions in the Asia-Pacific region.

[Anaphylactic shock due to recombinant human insulin: follow-up of a desensitization protocol by basophil activation test]

INTRODUCTION

Despite the occurrence of a severe allergic reaction including an anaphylactic shock, a drug may remain essential and impossible to replace. This may be the case of insulin in a diabetic patient. We describe the case of an anaphylactic shock to human insulin in whom a desensitization protocol was successfully achieved.

CASE REPORT

A 50-year-old type 2 diabetic man presented one year after initiation of the insulin therapy an anaphylactic shock following the subcutaneous administration of a human insulin containing protamine (Insulatard®). A desensitization protocol to human insulin was performed and allowed to use two human insulin analogues containing no protamine (asparte and glargine), with a two-year event-free follow-up. Positive skin tests with insulin and protamine, and the presence of insulin specific IgE were evidenced of an IgE-mediated mechanism. Desensitization was monitored by skin tests, Maunsell's test, measurement of specific IgE and IgG4, and the basophil activation test. The decrease of basophil sensitivity to insulin is an early marker for tolerance induction.

CONCLUSION

The effectiveness of the desensitization to human insulin underlines the importance to define the modalities of such desensitization protocol and of the monitoring of the tolerance induction.

[Antitumor effects of raddeanin A on S180, H22 and U14 cell xenografts in mice]

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE

Raddeanin A, a triterpenoid saponin from Anemone raddeana Regel, has good antitumor activity in vitro. This study was to investigate its antitumor effects on tumor cell xenografts in mice.

METHODS

The inhibitory effects of raddeanin A on the proliferation of human nasopharyngeal carcinoma KB cells and ovarian cancer SKOV3 cells were measured by MTT assay. The inhibitory effects of raddeanin A injection on the growth of sarcoma S180, liver cancer H22 and cervical carcinoma U14 cell xenografts in mice and the effect of raddeanin A lavage on the growth of S180 cell xenografts were measured. The acute toxicity of raddeanin A was also measured.

RESULTS

The 50% inhibition concentration (IC(50)) of raddeanin A was 4.64 microg/mL for KB cells and 1.40 microg/mL for SKOV3 cells. When injected with raddeanin A at a dose of 4.5 mg/kg, the growth inhibition rates of S180, H22 and U14 cell xenografts were 60.5%, 36.2% and 61.8%, respectively. When lavaged with raddeanin A at a dose of 200 mg/kg, the growth inhibition rate of S180 cell xenografts was 64.7%. The median lethal dose (LD50) of raddeanin A lavage was 1.1 g/kg and that of raddeanin A injection was 16.1 mg/kg.

CONCLUSION

Raddeanin A has good antitumor activity both in vitro and in vivo, and would be a potential antitumor medicine.

Allergic reactions to human insulin: a review of current knowledge and treatment options

Although the incidence of insulin allergy decreased after the introduction of recombinant human insulin preparations, it is still a major problem which may be life-threatening in some cases. In this article, we attempted to review current knowledge concerning allergic reactions to human insulin and discuss the available treatment options of insulin allergy.

Insulin glulisine in the treatment of allergy to rapid acting insulin and its rapid acting analogs

This is a case report of a patient with allergy to the rapid acting insulins and rapid acting analogs. Before trying insulin desensitization the treatment was changed to a basal-bolus regimen with glargine and glulisine with no signs of insulin allergy during the months after the start of the treatment.

Insulin allergy: clinical manifestations and management strategies

Insulin allergy in patients with diabetes mellitus on insulin treatment is a rare condition. It is suspected upon noticing immediate symptoms following insulin injections. The immediate vital implications for the patient call for prompt diagnosis and management of insulin allergy. We review current knowledge and procedures based on four diabetic patients who presented in our clinic. Insulin allergy was suspected as they showed immediate symptoms after insulin injection (urticaria, rash, angioedema, hypotension, dyspnea). A detailed allergologic work-up was performed and adequate therapy was initiated. In three of the four patients, a specific immunotherapy was started whereas in one patient a switch to oral antidiabetics was possible and consequently initiated. By standard prick testing and measurement of specific IgE antibodies, a type 1 IgE-mediated allergy was confirmed. After initiation of insulin immunotherapy, the symptoms completely resolved in two out three of patients and significantly improved in the third patient. The fourth patient was successfully switched to oral antidiabetics. Insulin allergy is a rare but severe condition that calls for immediate allergological work-up. It can be managed well in close cooperation between the diabetologist and the allergologist. Specific immunotherapy is efficient and should be considered.

Allergy reactions to insulin: effects of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and insulin analogues

The purification of animal insulin preparations and the use of human recombinant insulin have markedly reduced the incidence but not completely suppressed the occurrence of insulin allergy manifestations. Advances in technologies concerning the mode of delivery of insulin, i.e. continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), and the use of insulin analogues, resulting from the alteration in the amino acid sequence of the native insulin molecule, may influence the immunogenicity and antigenicity of native insulin. Instead of increasing allergy reactions, CSII has been reported to represent a successful alternative treatment in diabetic patients presenting local or generalized allergy to insulin or other components (zinc, protamine) of conventional treatment. Most recent reports concern CSII-treated patients using short-acting insulin analogues (essentially insulin lispro), although the precise role of these insulin analogues remains unclear as allergy to them has also been described. Finally, data on antigenicity and immunogenicity of long-acting insulin analogues (glargine, detemir), which may mimic the basal insulin delivery with CSII, remain scarce at present.

Insulin allergy and resistance successfully treated by desensitisation with Aspart insulin

A 25-year-old, with type I Diabetes Mellitus with a previous diagnosis of Protamine Allergy but not to human Insulin, started to notice anaphylactic reactions inmmediatly after bolus with Insulin. Skin prick and intradermal test were positive to all insulins. Skin tests to other potential allergens resulted negative. Examination after bolus of Human Insulin revealed urticaria. Daily insulin requirement were around 2-2,4 U/Kg/day. Slow desensitisation with Aspart insulin, the insulin with lowest size of skin test, was performed using subcutaneous insulin pump. Six months after the end of desensitisation his daily insulin requirement decreased to 0.8 U/Kg/day and oral corticosteroids are being reduced with no symptoms.