Autoantibodies associated with acute rejection after liver transplantation for type-2 autoimmune hepatitis

Diagnosis, pathogenesis, and treatment of autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation

Autoimmune hepatitis can recur or appear de novo after liver transplantation, and it can result in hepatic fibrosis, graft loss, and re-transplantation. The goals of this review are to describe the prevalence, manifestations, putative pathogenic mechanisms, outcomes, and management of these occurrences. Autoimmune hepatitis recurs in 8-12 % of transplanted patients at 1 year and 36-68 % at 5 years. Recurrence may be asymptomatic and detected only by surveillance liver test abnormalities or protocol liver tissue examination. Autoantibodies that characterized the original disease, hypergammaglobulinemia, increased serum immunoglobulin G level, and histological findings of interface hepatitis, lymphoplasmacytic infiltration, perivenular hepatocyte necrosis, pseudo-rosetting, and acidophil bodies typify recurrence. Premature corticosteroid withdrawal and pre-transplant severity of the original disease are possible risk factors. De novo autoimmune hepatitis occurs in 1-7 % of patients 0.1-9 years after transplantation, especially in children. The appearance of autoantibodies may herald its emergence, and antibodies to glutathione-S-transferase T1 have been predictive of the disease. Recurrent disease may reflect recruitment of residual memory T lymphocytes and host-specific genetic predispositions, whereas de novo disease may reflect an allo-antigenic immune response and molecular mimicries that override self-tolerance. Treatment should be appropriate for autoimmune hepatitis and not based on anti-rejection drugs. Corticosteroid therapy alone or combined with azathioprine is the essential treatment. The substitution of mycophenolate mofetil for azathioprine and switch of the calcineurin inhibitor or its replacement with rapamycin have also been used for refractory disease. Re-transplantation has been necessary in 8-23 %.

What is the long-term outcome of the liver allograft?

With improved long-term survival following liver transplantation (LT), issues relating to the assessment of the liver allograft in long-term survivors are becoming increasingly relevant. Histological abnormalities are commonly present in late post-transplant biopsies, including protocol biopsies from patients who appear to be well with good graft function. Recurrent disease is the commonest recognised cause of abnormal graft histology, but may be modified by the effects of immunosuppression or interactions with other graft complications, resulting in complex or atypical changes. Other abnormalities seen in late post-transplant biopsies include rejection (which often has different appearances to those seen in the post-transplant period), de novo disease, "idiopathic" post-transplant hepatitis (IPTH) and nodular regenerative hyperplasia. In many cases graft dysfunction has more than one cause and liver biopsy may help to identify the predominant cause of graft damage. Problems exist with the terminology used to describe less well understood patterns of graft injury, but there is emerging evidence to suggest that late rejection, de novo autoimmune hepatitis and IPTH may all be part of an overlapping spectrum of immune-mediated injury occurring in the late post-transplant liver allograft. Careful clinico-pathological correlation is very important and the wording of the biopsy report should take into account therapeutic implications, particularly whether changes in immunosuppression may be indicated. This article will provide an overview of the main histological changes occurring in long-term survivors post-LT, focusing on areas where the assessment of late post-transplant biopsies is most relevant clinically.

Current views on rejection pathology in liver transplantation

Histological assessments continue to play an important role in the diagnosis and management of liver allograft rejection. The changes occurring in acute and chronic rejection are well recognized and liver biopsy remains the 'gold standard' for diagnosing these two conditions. Recent interest has focused on the diagnosis of late cellular rejection, which may have different histological appearances to early acute rejection and instead has features that overlap with so-called 'de novo autoimmune hepatitis' and 'idiopathic post-transplant chronic hepatitis'. There is increasing evidence to suggest that 'central perivenulitis' may be an important manifestation of late rejection, although other causes of centrilobular necro-inflammation need to be considered in the differential diagnosis. There are also important areas of overlap between rejection and recurrent hepatitis C infection and the distinction between these two conditions continues to be a problem in the assessment of liver allograft biopsies. Studies using immunohistochemical staining for C4d as a marker for antibody-mediated damage have found evidence of C4d deposition in liver allograft rejection, but the functional significance of these observations is currently uncertain. This review will focus on these difficult and controversial areas in the pathology of rejection, documenting what is currently known and identifying areas where further clarification is required.

Autoimmune hepatitis: new paradigms in the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary biliary cirrhosis, and primary sclerosing cholangitis are the three major autoimmune diseases affecting the liver, and of these three, AIH is the most typical autoimmune disease being characterized by a T-cell-rich infiltrate, raised circulating γ-globulins, autoantibodies, HLA associations, and links with other autoimmune diseases. It is the only one, of the three diseases, that responds well to immunosuppressive therapy. AIH is caused by dysregulation of immunoregulatory networks and the consequent emergence of autoreactive T cells that orchestrate a progressive destruction of hepatocytes leading untreated to liver failure. T cells play a major role in the immunopathogenesis, and both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells are involved together with effector responses mediated by NK cells, γδ T cells, and macrophages. A number of triggering factors have been proposed including viruses, xenobiotics, and drugs, but none have been conclusively shown to be involved in pathogenesis.

Autoimmune liver diseases and recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation: what have we learned so far?

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) may all recur after liver transplant. Diagnosis of rPBC is defined by histology; rAIH by serology, biochemistry and histology; rPSC by histology and/or imaging of the biliary tree and exclusion of other causes of nonanastomotic biliary strictures. Criteria for recurrent disease (RD) may differ from those used in similar disease in the native liver: frequent use of immunosuppressive therapy changes the pattern and natural history of RD and can co-exist with other transplant-related causes of graft damage. RD may occur in the presence of normal liver tests; the reported incidence will depend on the way in which diagnostic tests (especially protocol biopsies) are applied. The risk of RD increases with time, but does not correlate with the rate of graft loss. Treatment is largely unproven: ursodeoxycholic acid will improve serology and may slow progression of rPSC and rPBC; introduction or increased dose of corticosteroids may reduce progression of rAIH. Risk factors for rPBC include use of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporine; for rPSC include absence of colon peri-transplantation and for rAIH possible associations with some HLA haplotypes have been suggested.

Interface hepatitis is associated with a high incidence of late graft fibrosis in a group of tightly monitored pediatric orthotopic liver transplantation patients

Chronic graft dysfunction, manifesting with elevated liver enzymes and histological features of interface hepatitis (IH), is being increasingly recognized as a long-term problem after liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to characterize our group of post-orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) patients with respect to clinical, laboratory, and histological signs of IH. A retrospective study of charts and liver biopsy specimens from patients transplanted between 1986 and 1999 was used. Histological features of IH were found in 29/119 patients at a median interval of 23.9 months (95% confidence interval -28.2 to 52.6) after OLT. All patients with IH had risk factors for chronic rejection, such as steroid-resistant rejection, acute rejection later than 3 months post-OLT, female receiver of male graft, or pretransplant cytomegalovirus (CMV)-positive serology with a CMV-negative donor liver. None of the 29 had features favoring a diagnosis of de novo autoimmune hepatitis, but 4 had isolated hypergammaglobulinemia, and 4 had non-organ-specific autoantibodies without hyperimmunoglobulin G. Sixteen of 29 patients also had features of chronic rejection, such as foam cell arteriopathy, loss of bile ducts, or pericentral fibrosis. After abnormal biopsy, all but 1 patient were switched to tacrolimus. During a median follow-up of 12 years, death occurred in 5, retransplantation occurred in 7, and definite cirrhosis occurred in 4. In conclusion, IH was detected in 24.4% of our patients and was associated with a high degree of fibrosis development. Most likely, IH represents a form of chronic rejection directed against periportal hepatocytes.

Natural history of unexplained chronic hepatitis after liver transplantation

Unexplained chronic hepatitis (CH) in the adult liver allograft recipient is not uncommon, but its natural history and clinical significance is unknown. A retrospective study was undertaken of adult liver allograft recipients to determine the frequency and natural history of unexplained CH. We evaluated only those patients who had undergone >or=2 liver biopsies after 6 months and were grafted for indications where recurrent disease could be confidently excluded (alcoholic liver disease [ALD] in those who remained abstinent and fulminant hepatic failure [FHF] from drug reactions). Of 288 patients who were transplanted for ALD or FHF, 30 fulfilled the above criteria. CH was first diagnosed at a median of 15.25 months after transplantation. A total of 24 patients showed mild necroinflammatory changes, and 12 had mild or moderate fibrosis. Liver tests did not reflect the presence or degree of inflammation or fibrosis. After a median of 4 years, necroinflammatory scores were increased in 5; new or progressive fibrosis was noted in 13%; 3 had developed cirrhosis; and 5 developed clinical evidence of portal hypertension. Progressive fibrosis was associated with a high titer of anti-nuclear antibodies (>1:1600) and a portal tract plasma cell infiltrate. There was a trend for correlation between necroinflammatory activity and fibrosis stage, but this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.06). Serum alkaline phosphatase (P = 0.012) and female gender of the donor (P = 0.033) were associated with progressive fibrosis. Unexplained CH is not uncommon in the liver allograft and may progress to established cirrhosis in a subgroup of patients transplanted for ALD or FHF. Standard liver tests do not reflect the extent of these changes, so protocol liver biopsies may be required to detect these changes. We recommend careful history and follow-up in these patients.

Liver biopsy interpretation for causes of late liver allograft dysfunction

Evaluation of needle biopsies and extensive clinicopathological correlation play an important role in the determination of liver allograft dysfunction occurring more than 1 year after transplantation. Interpretation of these biopsies can be quite difficult because of the high incidence of recurrent diseases that show histopathological, clinical, and serological features that overlap with each other and with rejection. Also, more than one insult can contribute to allograft injury. In an attempt to enable centers to compare and pool results, improve therapy, and better understand pathophysiological disease mechanisms, the Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology herein proposes a set of consensus criteria for the most common and problematic causes of late liver allograft dysfunction, including late-onset acute and chronic rejection, recurrent and new-onset viral and autoimmune hepatitis, biliary strictures, and recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. A discussion of differential diagnosis is also presented.

Progressive histological damage in liver allografts following pediatric liver transplantation

The long-term histological outcome after pediatric liver transplantation (OLT) is not yet fully understood. De novo autoimmune hepatitis, consisting of histological chronic hepatitis associated with autoantibody formation and allograft dysfunction, is increasingly recognized as an important complication of liver transplantation, particularly in the pediatric population. In this study, 158 asymptomatic children with 5-year graft survival underwent protocol liver biopsies (113, 135, and 64 at 1, 5, and 10 years after OLT, respectively). Histological changes we re correlated with dinical,biochemical, and serological findings. All patients received cydosporine A as primary immunosuppression with withdrawal of corticosteroids at 3 months post OLT. Normal or near-normal histology was reported in 77 of 113 (68%), 61 of 135 (45%), and 20 of 64 (31%) at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. The commonest histological abnormality was chronic hepatitis (CH), the incidence of which increased with time [25/113 (22%), 58/135 (43%), and 41/64 (64%) at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively) (P < .0001)]. The incidence of fibrosis associatedwith CH increasedwith time [13/25 (52%), 47/58 (81%), and 37/41 (91%) at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively) (P < .0001)]. The severity of fibrosis associated with CH also increased with time, such that by 10 years 15% had progressed to cirrhosis. Aspartate aminotransfemse (AST) levels were slightly elevated in children with CH (median levels 52 IU/L, 63 IU/L, and 48 IU/L at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively), but this did not reach statistical significance compared with those with normal histology. On multivariate analysis, the only factor predictive of chronic hepatitis was autoantibody positivity (present in 13% and 10% of children with normal biopsies at 5 and 10 years, respectively, and 72% and 80% of those with CH at 5 and 10 years, respectively) (P < .0001). Four children with CH and autoantibodies, who also had raised immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels and AST greater than 1.5 x normal fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for de novo autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Another two were found to be hepatitis C positive. No definite cause for CH could be identified in the other cases. In condusion, chronic hepatitis is a common finding in children after liver transplantation and is associated with a high risk of developing progressive fibrosis, leading to cirrhosis. Standard liver biochemical tests cannot be relied on either in the diagnosis or in the monitoring of progress of chronic allograft hepatitis. In contrast, the presence ofautoantibodies is strongly associated with the presence of CH. The cause of chronic hepatitis in transplanted allografts is uncertain but may be immune mediated, representing a hepatitic form of chronic rejection.

HUMAN CYP2D6 AND MOUSE CYP2DS: ORGAN DISTRIBUTION IN A HUMANIZED MOUSE MODEL

Polymorphic cytochrome P450 (P450) 2D6 (CYP2D6) metabolizes several classes of therapeutic drugs, endogenous neurochemicals, and toxins. A CYP2D6-humanized transgenic mouse line was previously developed to model CYP2D6-poor and -extensive metabolizer phenotypes. Human CYP2D6 was detected in the liver, kidney, and intestine of these animals. In this study, we investigated further the cellular expression and relative tissue levels of human CYP2D6 in these transgenic mice in liver, intestine, kidney, and brain. In addition, we compared this with the expression of mouse CYP2D enzymes in these organs. In humans, these organs are of interest with respect to P450-mediated drug metabolism, toxicity, and disease. The expression of human CYP2D6 and mouse CYP2D enzymes in humanized and wild-type mice was quantified by immunoblotting and detected at the cellular level by immunocytochemistry. The cell-specific expression of human CYP2D6 in liver, kidney, and intestine in humanized mice was similar to that reported in humans. The expression patterns of mouse CYP2D proteins were similar to those in humans in liver and kidney but substantially different in intestine. Human CYP2D6 was not detected in brain of transgenic mice. Mouse CYP2D proteins were detected in brain, allowing, for the first time, a direct comparison of CYP2D expression among mouse, rat, and human brain. This transgenic mouse model is useful for investigating CYP2D6-mediated metabolism in liver, kidney, and especially the intestine, where expression patterns demonstrated substantial species differences.

Autoantibodies against CYP2D6 and other drug-metabolizing enzymes in autoimmune hepatitis type 2

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a disease of unknown etiology, characterized by liver-related autoantibodies. Autoimmune hepatitis is subdivided into two major types: AIH type 1 is characterized by the detection of ANA, SMA, ANCA, anti-ASGP-R, and anti-SLA/LP. Autoimmune hepatitis type 2 is characterized to be mainly related with drug-metabolizing enzymes as autoantigens, such as anti-LKM (liver-kidney microsomal antigen)-1 against CYP2D6, anti-LKM-2 against CYP2C9-tienilic acid, anti-LKM-3 against UGT1A, and anti-LC1 (liver cytosol antigen)-1 and anti-APS (autoimmune polyglandular syndrome type-1) against CYP1A2, CYP2A6, and others. Anti-LKM-1 sera inhibited CYP2D6 activity in vitro but did not inhibit cellular drug metabolism in vivo. CYP2D6 is the major target autoantigen of LKM-1 and expressed on plasma membrane (PM) of hepatocytes, suggesting a pathogenic role for anti-LKM-1 in liver injury as a trigger. Anti-CYP1A2 was observed in dihydralazine-induced hepatitis, and radiolabeled CYP1A2 disappeared from the PM with a half-life of less than 30 min, whereas microsomal CYP1A2 was stably radiolabeled for several hours. Main antigenic epitopes on CYP2D6 are aa 193-212, aa 257-269, and aa 321-351; and D263 is essential. The third epitope is located on the surface of the protein CYP2D6 and displays a hydrophobic patch that is situated between an aromatic residue (W316) and histidine (H326). Some drugs such as anticonvulsants (phenobarbital, phenytoin, and carbamazepine) and halothane are suggested to induce hepatitis with anti-CYP3A and anti-CYP2E1, respectively. Autoantibodies against CYP11A1, CYP17, and/or CYP21 involved in the synthesis of steroid hormones are also detected in patients with adrenal failure, gonadal failure, and/or Addison disease.

Long-term outcome of liver transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation is the final therapeutic option for about 10% of patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) who do not respond to medical therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome in serologically defined subgroups of AIH after transplantation.

METHODS

Pre- and post-transplantation data of 28 patients with AIH transplanted between 1987 and 1999 were retrospectively analyzed and compared with 24 patients, who underwent liver transplantation because of Wilson's disease and glycogen storage disease type 1.

RESULTS

Serological analyses identified patients with AIH type 1 (n = 13), type 2 (n = 5), and type 3 (n = 10). The 5-yr patient survival rate after liver transplantation was 78.2%, which was not significantly different from the control group. Six AIH patients and four control patients required re-transplantation because of initial non-function, chronic rejection or AIH recurrence. Patients transplanted for AIH (88%) had more episodes of acute rejection when compared with patients transplanted for genetic liver diseases (50%). Clinical and histological features of chronic rejection were present in four patients, which did not differ significantly from the controls. Recurrence of AIH was diagnosed in nine patients (32%) based upon the presence of autoantibodies, increased gamma-globulins, steroid dependency, and histological evidence of chronic hepatitis. These combined features were not found in any of the controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data do not suggest that AIH subtypes influence prognosis after liver transplantation. Despite a high frequency of acute cellular rejection episodes and disease recurrence, transplantation for AIH has a 5-yr survival rate, which does not differ from that observed in patients transplanted for genetic liver diseases.

Autoimmune hepatitis and overlap syndromes

Autoimmune hepatitis is a well-established chronic liver disease. It primarily affects women, is characterized by circulating autoantibodies and elevated gammaglobulins and is associated with extrahepatic immune-mediated syndromes. Treatment regimens have remained unchanged for a number of years because of the high efficacy of steroid monotherapy, or combination therapy of azathioprine and steroids. In approximately 90% of patients remission of the disease is reached by medical therapy, which is usually administered lifelong because long-term remission after drug withdrawal is achieved in only 17% of patients. In 10% of patients treatment failure is observed. The challenge of remission induction involves the use of transplant immunosuppressants such as cyclosporine, mycophenolate moffetil, and tacrolimus. The challenge of maintenance therapy minimizing steroid side-effects involves the evaluation of topical steroids and the use of azathioprine monotherapy. Overlap syndromes occur in approximately 20% of autoimmune liver diseases. The diagnosis is broadly based on serological, biochemical, clinical and histological parameters. Most common are the overlap of autoimmune hepatitis and primary biliary cirrhosis, as well as autoimmune hepatitis with primary sclerosing cholangitis. These yet incompletely defined syndromes are an important differential diagnosis in the difficult-to-treat patient with autoimmune hepatitis.

Autoimmune hepatitis in children

AIH, ASC, and de novo AIH after liver transplantation are childhood liver diseases of an autoimmune nature. The mode of presentation of AIH in childhood is variable, and the disease should be suspected and excluded in all children presenting with symptoms and signs of prolonged or severe acute liver disease. Although corticosteroids are effective in all types of childhood AIH, patients with LKM1 have a higher frequency of acute hepatic failure and relapse after corticosteroid withdrawal than do patients with ANA/SMA. ASC occurs commonly in the absence of inflammatory bowel disease, requires cholangiography for diagnosis, and improves during corticosteroid therapy. The development of AIH de novo in children who undergo liver transplantation for nonautoimmune liver disease may reflect interference with the maturation of T cells by immunosuppressive drugs.

Response to steroids in de novo autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation

Graft dysfunction associated with autoimmune phenomena has been recently described in liver transplant recipients without previous autoimmune disease. However, the natural history, diagnostic criteria, and definitive therapeutic approach of de novo autoimmune hepatitis (de novo AIH) are poorly understood. We report 12 cases of de novo AIH 27.9 +/- 24.5 months after liver transplantation: the outcome of 7 patients treated with steroids is compared with a group of 5 nontreated patients. Nontreated patients lost the graft after 5.8 +/- 2.6 months from de novo AIH onset. All treated patients were alive after 48.4 +/- 14 (29-65) months from de novo AIH onset, and none of them lost the graft. However, 5 patients relapsed in relation to steroid tapering. All patients presented an atypical antiliver/kidney cytosolic autoantibody, associated to classical autoantibodies in 10 cases. Histological study showed several degrees of lobular necrosis and inflammatory infiltrate. HLA antigen frequencies and matching were compared with 2 control groups (16 orthotopic liver transplantation [LTX] patients without de novo AIH and 929 healthy blood donors); de novo AIH patients showed a higher prevalence of HLA-DR3 (54.5% vs. 25.9%, P =.04) than healthy controls, which was not observed in LTX patients without de novo AIH. In conclusion, this new disease should be included in the differential diagnosis of unexplained graft dysfunction. In addition, treatment with steroids results in a dramatically improved outcome. However, maintenance therapy is usually required.

Autoimmune liver disease

Autoimmune liver disorders are inflammatory liver diseases characterised histologically by a dense mononuclear cell infiltrate in the portal tract and serologically by the presence of non-organ and liver specific autoantibodies and increased levels of immunoglobulin G (IgG), in the absence of a known etiology. They usually respond to immunosuppressive treatment, which should be instituted as soon as diagnosis is made. The onset is variable and often mimics acute hepatitis. The previously accepted requirement of six month duration of symptoms before a diagnosis of autoimmune disease could be made has been abandoned.

Autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune liver disease encompasses several disorders (Table 1). Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) affects mainly women and is characterized histologically by a portal tract mononuclear cell infiltrate disrupting the limiting plate and invading the parenchyma ("interface hepatitis") and serologically by the presence of autoantibodies and increased levels of immunoglobulin G (IgG), in the absence of a known cause. AIH responds to immunosuppressive treatment. It can present insidiously or as an acute hepatitis. The previously accepted requirement of 6-month duration of symptoms before diagnosis can be made has been abandoned and treatment should be instituted as soon as the disease is diagnosed. In this review, we concentrate on those reports that add to our knowledge in terms of pathogenesis, differential diagnosis, treatment, and clinical course. Special attention is given to overlap syndromes.

Successful tacrolimus therapy for a severe recurrence of type 1 autoimmune hepatitis in a liver graft recipient

A 34-year-old woman underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for decompensated type 1 autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). She was administered standard triple-drug immunosuppressive therapy (cyclosporine, steroids, and azathioprine). Ten years after OLT, she developed a recurrence of AIH, with emergence of serological markers of autoimmunity (high anti--smooth muscle antibody [ASMA] titer, high serum gamma globulin level), abnormal liver function test results, and characteristic histological features on liver biopsy. Despite intensified steroid therapy, her clinical and liver function deteriorated. The onset of cutaneous alternariosis led to a steroid dose reduction and cyclosporine replacement by tacrolimus. Clear-cut amelioration was observed, with an improvement in liver function test results and reduction in ASMA titer. One year after the recurrence of AIH, the patient has normal liver function and physical findings. Tacrolimus therefore may be effective in patients with severe recurrent autoimmune liver disease. Further studies are needed to assess tacrolimus therapy in patients who fail to respond to standard immunosuppressive therapy.

Recurrent autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation: diagnostic criteria, risk factors, and outcome

Approximately 20% to 30% of patients undergoing liver transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) develop features of recurrent disease. Diagnostic criteria for recurrent AIH are similar to those used in the nontransplanted liver and include, in varying combinations, biochemical, serological, and histological abnormalities and steroid dependency. However, these criteria are more difficult to apply in the liver allograft because of potential interactions between recurrent AIH and other complications of liver transplantation, particularly rejection, and the uncertain effects of long-term immunosuppression. In the absence of other reliable diagnostic markers, a number of studies have used the histological finding of chronic hepatitis as the main or sole criterion for diagnosing recurrent AIH. However, this also lacks diagnostic specificity because there are many other possible causes of chronic hepatitis in the liver allograft. In addition, approximately 20% to 40% of biopsies performed on patients as part of routine annual review have histological features of chronic hepatitis, for which no definite cause can be identified. Risk factors that have been associated with the development of recurrent AIH include suboptimal immunosuppression, HLA phenotype, disease type and severity in the native liver, and duration of follow up. In many cases in which recurrent AIH seems to be related to underimmunosuppression, biochemical and histological features rapidly resolve once adequate immunosuppression is restored. However, in other cases, recurrent AIH behaves more aggressively, with progression to cirrhosis and graft failure. Areas that require further study include developing uniform criteria for the diagnosis of recurrent AIH, identifying risk factors for severe recurrent disease, and determining optimal levels of immunosuppression that minimize the impact of disease recurrence without exposing patients to the risks of overimmunosuppression.