Pathologist's perspective on liver needle biopsy size?

Virtual liver needle biopsy from reconstructed three-dimensional histopathological images: Quantification of sampling error

INTRODUCTION

Prevalently considered as the "gold-standard" for diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis, the clinical liver needle biopsy is known to be subject to inadequate sampling and a high mis-sampling rate. However, quantifying such sampling bias has been difficult as generating a large number of needle biopsies from the same living patient is practically infeasible. We construct a three-dimension (3D) virtual liver tissue volume by spatially registered high resolution Whole Slide Images (WSIs) of serial liver tissue sections with a novel dynamic registration method. We further develop a Virtual Needle Biopsy Sampling (VNBS) method that mimics the needle biopsy sampling process. We apply the VNBS method to the reconstructed digital liver volume at different tissue locations and angles. Additionally, we quantify Collagen Proportionate Area (CPA) in all resulting virtual needle biopsies in 2D and 3D.

RESULTS

The staging score of the center 2D longitudinal image plane from each 3D biopsy is used as the biopsy staging score, and the highest staging score of all sampled needle biopsies is the diagnostic staging score. The Mean Absolute Difference (MAD) in reference to the Scheuer and Ishak diagnostic staging scores are 0.22 and 1.00, respectively. The absolute Scheuer staging score difference in 22.22% of sampled biopsies is 1. By the Ishak staging method, 55.56% and 22.22% of sampled biopsies present score difference 1 and 2, respectively. There are 4 (Scheuer) and 6 (Ishak) out of 18 3D virtual needle biopsies with intra-needle variations. Additionally, we find a positive correlation between CPA and fibrosis stages by Scheuer but not Ishak method. Overall, CPA measures suffer large intra- and inter- needle variations.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed virtual liver needle biopsy sampling pipeline provides a computational avenue for investigating needle biopsy sampling bias with 3D virtual tissue volumes. This method can be applied to other tissue-based disease diagnoses where the needle biopsy sampling bias substantially affects the diagnostic results.

Optical percutaneous needle biopsy of the liver: a pilot animal and clinical study

This paper presents the results of the experiments which were performed using the optical biopsy system specially developed for in vivo tissue classification during the percutaneous needle biopsy (PNB) of the liver. The proposed system includes an optical probe of small diameter acceptable for use in the PNB of the liver. The results of the feasibility studies and actual tests on laboratory mice with inoculated hepatocellular carcinoma and in clinical conditions on patients with liver tumors are presented and discussed. Monte Carlo simulations were carried out to assess the diagnostic volume and to trace the sensing depth. Fluorescence and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy measurements were used to monitor metabolic and morphological changes in tissues. The tissue oxygen saturation was evaluated using a recently developed approach to neural network fitting of diffuse reflectance spectra. The Support Vector Machine Classification was applied to identify intact liver and tumor tissues. Analysis of the obtained results shows the high sensitivity and specificity of the proposed multimodal method. This approach allows to obtain information before the tissue sample is taken, which makes it possible to significantly reduce the number of false-negative biopsies.

Enhancing the Value of Histopathological Assessment of Allograft Biopsy Monitoring

Traditional histopathological allograft biopsy evaluation provides, within hours, diagnoses, prognostic information, and mechanistic insights into disease processes. However, proponents of an array of alternative monitoring platforms, broadly classified as "invasive" or "noninvasive" depending on whether allograft tissue is needed, question the value proposition of tissue histopathology. The authors explore the pros and cons of current analytical methods relative to the value of traditional and illustrate advancements of next-generation histopathological evaluation of tissue biopsies. We describe the continuing value of traditional histopathological tissue assessment and "next-generation pathology (NGP)," broadly defined as staining/labeling techniques coupled with digital imaging and automated image analysis. Noninvasive imaging and fluid (blood and urine) analyses promote low-risk, global organ assessment, and "molecular" data output, respectively; invasive alternatives promote objective, "mechanistic" insights by creating gene lists with variably increased/decreased expression compared with steady state/baseline. Proponents of alternative approaches contrast their preferred methods with traditional histopathology and: (1) fail to cite the main value of traditional and NGP-retention of spatial and inferred temporal context available for innumerable objective analyses and (2) belie an unfamiliarity with the impact of advances in imaging and software-guided analytics on emerging histopathology practices. Illustrative NGP examples demonstrate the value of multidimensional data that preserve tissue-based spatial and temporal contexts. We outline a path forward for clinical NGP implementation where "software-assisted sign-out" will enable pathologists to conduct objective analyses that can be incorporated into their final reports and improve patient care.

The efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy versus percutaneous liver biopsy in patients with chronic liver disease: a retrospective single-center study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

There is limited literature on endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB), a new method of obtaining liver biopsy (LB).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of the efficacy and safety of EUS-LB compared to percutaneous liver biopsy (PC-LB) in patients with chronic liver disease at our center between January 2018 and August 2019.

RESULTS

Thirty patients underwent EUS-LB and 60 patients underwent PC-LB were identified (median follow-up post-LB was 8 days; interquartile range (IQR), 3-5 days). The median number of portal tracts was significantly higher in the PC-LB group (13 vs. 5; P < 0.0001). A histologic diagnosis was established in 93% of the EUS-LB group, compared to 100% in the PC-LB group (P = 0.841). Patients in EUS-LB group had significantly shorter hospital stay (median time of hospital stay was 3 vs. 4.2 h in the EUS-LB vs. PC-LB group, respectively; P = 0.004) and reported less pain compared to PC-LB group (median pain score was 0 vs. 3.5; P = 0.0009). EUS-LB were performed using a 19-gauge (n = 27) or 22-gauge (n = 3); there was a tendency towards higher number of portal tracts in the 22- vs. the 19-gauge needle group (6 vs. 5; P = 0.501). No patient in either group had significant adverse events such as bleeding or death.

CONCLUSION

EUS-LB is safe and is associated with less pain, shorter hospital stay, and high diagnostic yield (93%) compared to PC-LB. Randomized trials are needed to standardize the utility of EUS-LB.

2016 Comprehensive Update of the Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology: Introduction of Antibody-Mediated Rejection

The Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology reviewed and discussed literature evidence regarding antibody-mediated liver allograft rejection at the 11th (Paris, France, June 5-10, 2011), 12th (Comandatuba, Brazil, August 19-23, 2013), and 13th (Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, October 5-10, 2015) meetings of the Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology. Discussion continued online. The primary goal was to introduce guidelines and consensus criteria for the diagnosis of liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection and provide a comprehensive update of all Banff Schema recommendations. Included are new recommendations for complement component 4d tissue staining and interpretation, staging liver allograft fibrosis, and findings related to immunosuppression minimization. In an effort to create a single reference document, previous unchanged criteria are also included.

Will a second biopsy sample affect treatment decisions in patients with chronic hepatitis B?

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Liver biopsy is the gold standard for assessment of fibrosis in patients with hepatitis B. However, it has some disadvantages, including inter-observer and intra-observer variability in biopsy interpretation and specimen variation. A standard biopsy specimen represents only about 0.0002 % of the whole liver. It has been shown that two biopsy samples collected during a procedure have significant influence on the diagnostic performance of interpretation in patients with hepatitis C or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Therefore, we aimed to assess the influence of collecting two liver biopsy samples during a single procedure for staging and grading chronic hepatitis B.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

27 patients were included in the study. The median age of the patients was 43.51 ± 11.69. Fifteen patients were female, 12 patients were male. In the biopsy procedure, two samples of liver lobes were obtained. Grade and stage scores were compared between the two samples. Fibrosis staging and grading were assessed according to the Ishak scoring system.

RESULTS

Numbers of portal tract and biopsy size were equal in the two samples. There was a significant difference between the samples in terms of histological activity index (p value = 0.04). However, the difference was not enough to distinguish the mild and moderate stages. On the other hand, no significant difference in fibrosis staging between the two samples was found.

CONCLUSIONS

With this relatively small size of patients, in this study, we showed that a proper liver biopsy size is sufficient to predict treatment decisions in chronic hepatitis B patients. However, further studies are needed to show the association of sampling variability in patients with hepatitis B.

Pathologic Criteria to Estimate the State of the Liver in Potential Donors

OBJECTIVES

The pathologic evaluation of the liver is one of the most important issues in liver transplants. We evaluated the histopathological condition of livers in potential donors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After liver biopsy, 37 potential donor livers were histologically studied. Liver tissue was stained by hematoxylin and eosin as well as Masson Trichrome.

RESULTS

The results of the study showed the morphologic criteria used to estimate the state of the liver in potential donors is not only steatosis and fibrosis, but other important histologic criteria, such as proteinosis, necrosis of hepatocytes, endotheliitis of central veins, inflammatory infiltration, endarteritis in portal tracts and phlebitis in portal tracts, proliferation of the bile ducts, and cholestasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of the study showed that the morphologic criteria to estimate the state of the liver in potential donors includes not only steatosis and fibrosis, but other important histologic criteria as well.

Will a second biopsy sample affect treatment decisions in patients with chronic hepatitis B?

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Liver biopsy is the gold standard for assessment of fibrosis in patients with hepatitis B. However, it has some disadvantages, including inter-observer and intra-observer variability in biopsy interpretation and specimen variation. A standard biopsy specimen represents only about 0.0002 % of the whole liver. It has been shown that two biopsy samples collected during a procedure have significant influence on the diagnostic performance of interpretation in patients with hepatitis C or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Therefore, we aimed to assess the influence of collecting two liver biopsy samples during a single procedure for staging and grading chronic hepatitis B.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

27 patients were included in the study. The median age of the patients was 43.51 ± 11.69. Fifteen patients were female, 12 patients were male. In the biopsy procedure, two samples of liver lobes were obtained. Grade and stage scores were compared between the two samples. Fibrosis staging and grading were assessed according to the Ishak scoring system.

RESULTS

Numbers of portal tract and biopsy size were equal in the two samples. There was a significant difference between the samples in terms of histological activity index (p value = 0.04). However, the difference was not enough to distinguish the mild and moderate stages. On the other hand, no significant difference in fibrosis staging between the two samples was found.

CONCLUSIONS

With this relatively small size of patients, in this study, we showed that a proper liver biopsy size is sufficient to predict treatment decisions in chronic hepatitis B patients. However, further studies are needed to show the association of sampling variability in patients with hepatitis B.

Can neonatal hepatitis be more fatal than biliary atresia?

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The basic problem in diagnosis of neonatal cholestasis (NC) is to differentiate biliary atresia (BA) from other non-obstructive disorders. Because if bile flow cannot be provided by surgery, BA leads to cirrhosis and death within the first year of life. The aim of the present study is to determine histopathological features that may help to differentiate BA from neonatal hepatitis (NH).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study was carried out on 105 liver biopsy specimens of 74 infants with NC who were diagnosed between 2003 and 2012.

RESULTS

The mean age was 76.5 ± 40.64 days. The most valuable biopsy findings for the discrimination between NH and BA, in decreasing order of importance, were ductular proliferation (p < 0.001), cholestasis in neoductuli (p < 0.001), fibrosis (p = 0.002), and extramedullar hematopoiesis (p = 0.02). While Kasai operations were performed in 19 cases, liver transplantation was performed in 10 cases. Survival rate among the death cases with BA was longer than the survival time of the death cases with NH (p = 0.023). Currently more children live with a close to normal quality of life with portoenterostomy and/or liver transplantation. On the contrary, NH can be more fatal with associated disorders such as growth retardation, specific infections, respiratory distress, and metabolic or endocrine diseases.

What is expected from the pathologist in the diagnosis of viral hepatitis?

The clinician expects from the pathologist a clinically relevant diagnosis on the basis of liver biopsy interpretation. Today, a liver biopsy, as invasive procedure, is only justified when a significant benefit for the patient can be expected particularly with respect to the clinical management. Consequently, liver biopsy is usually not required in uncomplicated acute viral hepatitis. It is, however, an important diagnostic tool in chronic hepatitis and in transplanted liver to confirm the clinical diagnosis and to assess stage and grade of necroinflammation, treatment efficiency, and concurrent diseases. The diagnosis of liver disease is based on teamwork between clinician and pathologist. Evaluation of the biopsy in the clinical context requires clinical information and appropriate size and handling of the biopsy specimen. Aim of this review is the discussion of morphologic features of acute and chronic viral hepatitis with regard to their clinical relevance.

Maintenance ribavirin monotherapy delays fibrosis progression in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C at high risk of progression

BACKGROUND

Fibrosis in liver transplant recipients with recurrent HCV is fast, yet, different patterns of progression are recognized.

AIMS

To investigate histological findings associated with maintenance ribavirin monotherapy in patients with recurrent HCV transplanted > or =4 years earlier.

METHODS

14 recipients at high risk of progression (fibrosis progression rate >0.33 units/year and/or persistently elevated ALT) were assigned to receive ribavirin for 3 years. 11 patients at lower risk of progression (FPR < or =0.33 units/year and normal ALT) as controls. Biopsies were obtained yearly since transplant and 7 consecutive biopsies were evaluated.

RESULTS

Improved necroinflammation (reduction > or =2 grading) was observed in 7 treated with ribavirin and 3 untreated patients, while 1 and 3 patients worsened respectively. Fibrosis improved (reduction >1 staging) in 2 ribavirin-treated patients, unchanged in 10 and worsened (increase > or =1 staging) in 2. Fibrosis progression decreased from 0.48+/-0.27 observed during the 3-year pre-treatment period to 0.04+/-0.31 units/year (p=0.003) during the 3 years of ribavirin. Among untreated fibrosis remained unchanged in 1 and worsened in 10 (p<0.001), yearly fibrosis progression rate increasing from 0.15+/-0.17 units/year to 0.42+/-0.39 units/year (p=0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Maintenance ribavirin monotherapy delays fibrosis progression in high risk patients, offering an alternative strategy for those failing to respond to conventional treatment.

Percutaneous liver biopsy in clinical practice

Percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB) is the standard procedure for obtaining hepatic tissue for histopathological examination, and remains an essential tool in the diagnosis and management of parenchymal liver diseases. The use of liver biopsy (LB) is increasing with the advent of liver transplantation and the progress being made in antiviral therapeutic agents. While blind percutaneous needle biopsy is the traditional technique, the use of ultrasound (US) guidance has increased considerably. Literatures were reviewed to assess the existing clinical practice of PLB with an emphasis on the technique, the operator, types of biopsy needles, quality of LB specimens and the risk of complications. The best available evidence indicates that the use of ultrasound-guided biopsy (UGB) is superior to blind needle biopsy (BNB). The odds ratios of the controlled studies showed that BNB carried a higher risk for major complications, postbiopsy pain and biopsy failure. Therefore, percutaneous LB under US control is superior to BNB and it is recommended that UGB be considered the standard of care for this important and widely used invasive procedure in the field of clinical hepatology.

Liver biopsy assessment in chronic hepatitis

Liver biopsy has been a major diagnostic tool in the evaluation of individuals with chronic hepatitis for many decades and remains the most direct way of visualizing hepatic necroinflammation and fibrosis. In chronic viral hepatitis B and C, immune attack on hepatocytes bearing viral antigens results in the entry of lymphocytes and other effector cells through the portal tracts from which other lesions may evolve, including interface and lobular hepatitis as well as fibrosis or cirrhosis. Classification systems have been developed in order to provide semiquantitative grading of necroinflammation and staging of fibrosis and include the Scheuer, Batts and Ludwig, Ishak, and METAVIR systems. This review provides an historical perspective on histopathological methods of analyzing chronic hepatitis, describes the essential criteria of each of the major scoring systems and discusses problems related to sampling error, observer variation, and specimen size.

Transjugular liver biopsy in patients with diffuse liver disease: comparison of three cores with one or two cores for accurate histological interpretation

BACKGROUND

Transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) can be performed to obtain more than two cores safely. This advantage has not been evaluated in terms of diagnostic accuracy or grading/staging evaluation.

AIM

To evaluate whether three separate cores of TJLB provide more histological information compared with two or one cores.

METHODS

Twenty-three patients, who had three separate passes, with each core >/=7mm in length using a 19G Tru-cut needle, were evaluated. Each TJLB was blindly coded; the pathologist randomly assessed: (a) each core separately covering the other two, (b) two cores simultaneously covering the third and (c) the three cores together for diagnostic yield, inflammation and fibrosis.

RESULTS

The mean TJLB length was 32+/-5.5mm. In 12 one-core (52%) and 18 2-core (78%) assessments, diagnosis (mainly cirrhosis) was made correctly in each core. The within-patient standard deviations for one-core vs two-core assessment were similar for grading (0.42 and 0.47, respectively), but higher for staging (0.39 and 0.15, respectively). Staging was underestimated in assessing one-core and less for two cores compared to three cores.

CONCLUSION

Three non-fragmented cores (each core >/=7mm in length) of TJLB can be considered a minimum requirement for histological assessment, giving better reproducibility in diagnosis as well as for inflammation and fibrosis.

A systematic review of the quality of liver biopsy specimens

Characteristics for an optimal liver biopsy specimen were recently defined as 20 to 25 mm long and/or containing more than 11 complete portal tracts (CPTs). A systematic review of percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB) and transjugular liver biopsy (TJLB) series yielded only 32 PLB studies in which these characteristics were evaluated: mean +/- SD length, 17.7 +/- 5.8 mm and number of CPTs, 7.5 +/- 3.4; and 15 TJLB studies: mean +/- SD length, 13.5 +/- 4.5 mm and number of CPTs, 6.8 +/- 2.3. Studies of sampling heterogeneity and intraobserver and interobserver variability also used inadequate specimens by present standards. Only 11 (5.3%) of 207 therapeutic studies for chronic hepatitis B and C documented length and/or number of CPTs. Of the current 12 studies evaluating noninvasive fibrosis tests, only 8 documented length or number of CPTs, and only 1 documented length and number of CPTs. New studies are needed based on adequate liver biopsy samples to provide reliable estimation of grading and staging in chronic liver disease.

Variability of grade and stage in simultaneous paired liver biopsies in patients with hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Grading and staging of liver biopsies in patients with chronic hepatitis remains an inexact "gold standard" that is influenced by variabilities in scoring systems, sampling, observer agreement and expertise. Spatial disease variability relative to markers of the adequacy of biopsy has not been studied previously.

METHODS

Paired liver biopsy specimens were obtained from the right and left hepatic lobes of 60 patients with chronic hepatitis C. Histological grade and disease stage were assessed according to the Ludwig scoring system, and scores were evaluated in relation to differences in size and number of portal tracts in all paired samples.

RESULTS

The relative difference (%) in aggregate biopsy size and number of portal tracts was similar between paired samples with and without a difference in grade. Paired samples with a difference in stage showed a larger relative difference in biopsy size (p = 0.09) and in the number of portal tracts (p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows a difference of one grade or one stage in 30% of paired liver biopsies, due to a combination of sampling variability and observer variability. Acknowledgment of "built-in" variability in grading and staging chronic hepatitis C by both clinicians and pathologists is essential for managing the individual patient with chronic hepatitis C.

Nonobstructive neonatal cholestasis: clinical outcome and scoring of the histopathological changes in liver biopsies

The clinical outcome of nonobstructive neonatal cholestasis (NC) cases varies greatly and the prognosis is generally unpredictable. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic benefits of qualitative analysis of histopathological changes in nonobstructive NC cases. A total of 28 nonobstructive NC cases (18 neonatal hepatitis; 10 intrahepatic bile duct paucity) were studied. We analyzed the relationship between histopathological and clinical parameters. Hepatic inflammation, bridging necrosis, pericellular fibrosis, giant cell transformation, and extramedullary hematopoiesis were evaluated and scored according to their absence or presence in each case. The sum of the histopathological scores was accepted as "total pathological injury score." The height percentiles, the presence and the degree of hepatomegaly and ascites, and serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), albumin, and bilirubin levels and prothrombin time were also evaluated and scored. The patients were divided into 2 clinical course groups considered "good" or "bad" according to the total clinical scores. For statistical analysis, Pearson's chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U-test, and receiver operating characteristic curve were used. We found a statistically significant negative relation between the clinical course and total pathological injury score (P = 0.042) and pericellular fibrosis (P = 0.016). In conclusion, during the interpretation of liver biopsies of nonobstructive NC, scoring of histopathological changes should be done for assessing the clinical prognostic outcome.

Management of chronic hepatitis C virus infection: a new era of disease control

The management of chronic viral hepatitis has changed significantly with the availability of effective antiviral agents. There is now a high probability that timely intervention can arrest development of cirrhosis, thereby preventing mortality from portal hypertension, liver failure and liver cancer. This two-part review discusses the implications of this new era of antiviral therapy for physicians. The present review is about chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV); a similar review that considers the treatment of hepatitis B virus will be published in a later issue of the Internal Medicine Journal. Chronic HCV infection is common, but fibrotic progression of liver disease is slow and variable; many infected persons never develop cirrhosis. Case selection for antiviral therapy is crucial. The most effective therapy is a pegylated (long-acting) interferon with ribavirin. Sustained viral response (SVR) (absent viraemia 6 months after completing treatment) can be obtained in 40-60% of individuals infected with genotype 1 and in approximately 67% with genotype 4 after 12 months of treatment. Response rates are higher (75-85%) with genotypes 2 and 3 after only 6 months of treatment. Late relapse is negligible after SVR. This viral cure reverses hepatic fibrosis, reduces the risk of liver failure and of hepato-cellular carcinoma. Combination therapy requires a supportive setting to minimize the impact of side-effects and maximize therapeutic effectiveness. Overall management of HCV-infected persons must also embrace measures to improve quality of life by preventing or dealing with psychosocial issues and advocating lifestyle changes to counter comorbidity from alcohol, central obesity and insulin resistance. These latter factors favour fibrotic disease progression, complications of cirrhosis (such as hepatocellular carcinoma) and development of type 2 diabetes mellitus, as well as eroding the chances of SVR with antiviral therapy.

Controversies in liver biopsy: who, where, when, how, why?

Liver biopsy continues to have a central role in the evaluation of patients with suspected liver disease. The procedure is often indicated to evaluate otherwise unexplained liver biochemical test abnormalities, but the precise degree of serum aminotransferase elevations that should prompt a liver biopsy is controversial, as is the need for liver biopsy in all patients with suspected nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and chronic hepatitis C. Standard liver biopsy is contraindicated in patients with severe coagulopathy and ascites, although the degree of coagulopathy that contraindicates a liver biopsy is controversial. A transjugular approach is an alternative in patients with coagulopathy or ascites. Controversy surrounds all the technical aspects of liver biopsy, particularly the choice of needle (cutting vs suction) and the use of ultrasound to mark or guide the biopsy site. Bleeding is the major complication of liver biopsy, with a risk of 0.3%; cutting needles are more likely to cause hemorrhage than are suction needles. Traditionally, liver biopsy has been the province of the hepatologist/ gastroenterologist. However, an increasing number of liver biopsies are performed by radiologists. The implications of this trend with respect to patient outcome, safety, and training of fellows is unclear.