The cellular origin of extracellular matrix constituents

A nanotopography approach for studying the structure-function relationships of cells and tissues

Most cells in the body secrete, or are in intimate contact with extracellular matrix (ECM), which provides structure to tissues and regulates various cellular phenotypes. Cells are well known to respond to biochemical signals from the ECM, but recent evidence has highlighted the mechanical properties of the matrix, including matrix elasticity and nanotopography, as fundamental instructive cues regulating signal transduction pathways and gene transcription. Recent observations also highlight the importance of matrix nanotopography as a regulator of cellular functions, but lack of facile experimental platforms has resulted in a continued negligence of this important microenvironmental cue in tissue culture experimentation. In this review, we present our opinion on the importance of nanotopography as a biological cue, contexts in which it plays a primary role influencing cell behavior, and detail advanced techniques to incorporate nanotopography into the design of experiments, or in cell culture environments. In addition, we highlight signal transduction pathways that are involved in conveying the extracellular matrix nanotopography information within the cells to influence cell behavior.

Liver extracellular matrix in health and disease

Liver fibrosis is the hallmark of every chronic liver disease. It is also the major factor of morbidity and mortality due to the development of cirrhosis and its complications including hepatocellular carcinoma. But even at the beginning of the process of liver fibrosis and due to the strategic position of the extracellular matrix at the interface between blood flow and epithelial compartment, any quantitative or qualitative modification of extracellular matrix will rapidly affect structure and function of the liver. The development of several animal models of liver fibrosis as well as isolation and cultivation of hepatic stellate cells, the major fibrogenic cell type in the liver, led to the gathering of recent knowledge on the mechanism of liver fibrosis. Activation of hepatic stellate cells is a key event in this process and many details on this finely tuned mechanism are now available. In addition to these experimental data, experience from chronic hepatitis C now allows the development of new concepts and perspectives such as liver fibrosis regression and antifibrotic therapies.

Approaches for treatment of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C

In the past 20 years, the elucidation of the mechanisms responsible for liver fibrogenesis has provided many potential targets for antifibrotic treatments. Difficulty has arisen, however, from the fact that fibrogenesis is part of a general beneficial wound healing process. To be successful, an antifibrotic treatment of HCV might need to be delivered selectively to the hepatic site of fibrogenesis or targeted precisely at an HCV-specific regulatory mechanism. It is likely that in the future, besides viral eradication, another treatment goal in chronic HCV infection will be to reverse existing fibrosis, but considerable work is necessary before making this a reality.

Fibrosis and disease progression in hepatitis C

The progression of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C determines the ultimate prognosis and thus the need and urgency of therapy. Fibrogenesis is a complex dynamic process, which is mediated by necroinflammation and activation of stellate cells. The liver biopsy remains the gold standard to assess fibrosis. Scoring systems allow a semiquantitative assessment and are useful for cross-sectional and cohort studies and in treatment trials. The rate at which fibrosis progresses varies markedly between patients. The major factors known to be associated with fibrosis progression are older age at infection, male gender, and excessive alcohol consumption. Viral load and genotype do not seem to influence significantly the progression rate. Progression of fibrosis is more rapid in immunocompromised patients. Hepatic steatosis, obesity, and diabetes may also contribute to more rapid progression of fibrosis. There are no tests that reliably predict the rate of progression of fibrosis in an individual patient. High serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels are associated with a higher risk of fibrosis progression, and worsening of fibrosis is uncommon in patients with persistently normal serum aminotransferase levels. Serum markers for fibrosis are not reliable and need to be improved and validated. Liver biopsy provides the most accurate information on the stage of fibrosis and grade of necroinflammation, both of which have prognostic significance. Repeating the liver biopsy, 3 to 5 years after an initial biopsy is the most accurate means of assessing the progression of fibrosis.

Fibrosis and disease progression in hepatitis C

The progression of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C determines the ultimate prognosis and thus the need and urgency of therapy. Fibrogenesis is a complex dynamic process, which is mediated by necroinflammation and activation of stellate cells. The liver biopsy remains the gold standard to assess fibrosis. Scoring systems allow a semiquantitative assessment and are useful for cross-sectional and cohort studies and in treatment trials. The rate at which fibrosis progresses varies markedly between patients. The major factors known to be associated with fibrosis progression are older age at infection, male gender, and excessive alcohol consumption. Viral load and genotype do not seem to influence significantly the progression rate. Progression of fibrosis is more rapid in immunocompromised patients. Hepatic steatosis, obesity, and diabetes may also contribute to more rapid progression of fibrosis. There are no tests that reliably predict the rate of progression of fibrosis in an individual patient. High serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels are associated with a higher risk of fibrosis progression, and worsening of fibrosis is uncommon in patients with persistently normal serum aminotransferase levels. Serum markers for fibrosis are not reliable and need to be improved and validated. Liver biopsy provides the most accurate information on the stage of fibrosis and grade of necroinflammation, both of which have prognostic significance. Repeating the liver biopsy, 3 to 5 years after an initial biopsy is the most accurate means of assessing the progression of fibrosis.

Colchicine, like methylprednisolone, decreases the perilesional fibrosis secondary to a chronic brain granuloma in cats

We studied the effects of long-term administration of colchicine on the fibrosis surrounding a granulomatous lesion previously induced by stereotactic injection of aluminum silicate into the brain parenchyma of cats. Every week the animals received a single i.m. injection of colchicine (0.25 mg), or methylprednisolone (4 mg), or saline solution (controls) for 6 months. The mean area of fibrosis in animals treated with colchicine or with methylprednisolone was smaller than that of control animals (P < 0.05). In controls, a dense capsule of procollagen and collagen fibers was found around the granuloma, and myelinated neurites were scarce, whereas in animals treated with colchicine or with methylprednisolone the capsule and fibers were thinner and more myelinated neurites remained. These changes were more evident in animals treated with colchicine. Our results suggest that chronic administration of colchicine or methylprednisolone limit the fibrosis and histological damage around a granulomatous lesion of the brain.