Prochlorperazine-induced chronic cholestasis

Chronic liver injury induced by drugs: a systematic review

To examine the available literature and summarize what is known about chronic drug-induced liver injury. We reviewed PubMed/MEDLINE through March 2015. We developed a MEDLINE search strategy using PubMed medical subject heading terms chronic liver injury, hepatotoxicity, drug-induced liver injury, cirrhosis and chronic liver disease. We reviewed the reference list of included articles to identify articles missed in the database search. Chronic liver injury from drugs is more common than once thought with prevalence as high as 18% based on large national registries. Patients with cholestatic injury, age ≤65 years, and a long latency period (>365 days) are at increased risk. Of the most common drugs associated with drug-induced liver injury, antibiotics (amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, azithromycin) are most likely to cause chronic injury. The presence of autoantibodies is common with chronic DILI, however, it is not diagnostic nor is it specific to autoimmune-like drug-induced liver injury. Immunosuppressive therapy may be necessary for individual cases of autoimmune-like drug-induced liver injury where cessation of the drug alone does not result in resolution of injury, however, the lowest dose should be used for the shortest duration with careful attention to the development of side effects. The effectiveness of treament of cholestatic liver injury with corticosteroids or ursodiol remains unclear. Cases of drug-induced fatty liver, nodular regenerative hyperplasia and peliosis hepatitis are less common subtypes of chronic drug-induced liver injury that deserve special consideration. A high degree of clinical suspicion is required for the diagnosis of chronic drug-induced liver injury and should be suspected in any patient with liver associated enzyme abnormalities that persist out past 6 months of initial presentation. Treatment with drug removal and/or immunosuppressive therapy appears to be effective for the majority of cases. More study into pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine may aid in predicting which patients will go on to develop chronic drug-induced liver injury.

Antipsychotics and abnormal liver function tests: systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Systematic assessment of the prevalence and pattern of liver function test (LFT) abnormalities associated with regular antipsychotics in adult humans and consideration of management of such abnormalities.

DATA SOURCES

Systematic search identifying cohort, cross-sectional or case studies/series, reporting LFT abnormalities in patients receiving regular antipsychotics. EMBASE, PsychINFO, and MEDLINE were searched for studies in English from record onset.

STUDY SELECTION

Abstracts were independently screened for eligibility by 2 researchers. Ineligible studies included those that did not report LFT reference ranges, those that studied fewer than 10 patients on a given antipsychotic, and those studying children.

DATA EXTRACTION

Key variables in group studies were extracted. Case studies/series were examined for patient outcome.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Ten group studies and 91 case studies/series were eligible, although quality was poor. All groups receiving regular antipsychotics had a prevalence of LFT abnormalities greater than chance. The median percentage of patients with any abnormal LFT on any antipsychotic was 32%, with a range of 5% to 78%. The median percentage of patients with clinically significant elevations was 4%, with a range of 0% to 15%. Transaminases were most commonly elevated. Abnormalities were generally asymptomatic, arose within 6 weeks, and were either stably persistent or resolved with continued treatment. Case reports suggested that antipsychotics can be associated with severe hepatitis, fatal in a small minority of cases. Chlorpromazine is most commonly associated with acute liver injury.

CONCLUSIONS

The LFT abnormalities in patients receiving regular antipsychotics are common but generally mild and transient. Very rarely, a severe or fatal hepatic injury can emerge.

Drug- and chemical-induced cholestasis

Cholestasis caused by medicinal and chemical agents is an increasingly well-recognized cause of liver disease. Clinical drug-induced cholestatic syndromes producing jaundice and bile duct injury can mimic extrahepatic biliary obstruction, primary biliary cirrhosis, and sclerosing cholangitis, among others. This article updates the various forms of drug-induced cholestasis, focusing on the clinicopathologic features of this form of hepatic injury and on the known or putative mechanisms by which drugs and chemicals lead to cholestasis.

Drug-induced cholestasis

Drugs may cause several overlapping syndromes of cholestasis, the pathophysiological syndrome resulting from impaired bile flow. These reactions comprise approximately 17% of all hepatic adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and they may be severe. Causes of 'pure' (bland) cholestasis include oestrogens and anabolic steroids; rarer associations are with antimicrobials and NSAIDs. 'Cholestatic hepatitis' is a common drug reaction in which liver injury and inflammation cause significant elevation of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) as well as cholestasis. Chlorpromazine and ketoconazole are classic examples, but it is now exemplified by amoxycillin-clavulanate and other oxy-penicillins. Chronic cholestasis results from small bile duct injury leading to the vanishing bile duct syndrome (VBDS), a disorder mimicking primary biliary cirrhosis, or from injury to larger bile ducts causing secondary sclerosing cholangitis. Whilst there is increasing evidence of a genetic predisposition to cholestatic drug reactions, there are currently no pretreatment tests to predict drug safety. Prevention of severe reactions therefore relies on early detection of liver injury and prompt drug withdrawal. Symptomatic management includes relief of pruritus and correction of fat-soluble vitamin deficiency. In small cohort studies, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) arrested progressive cholestasis in two-thirds of cases, but evidence for use of corticosteroids is anecdotal. This review considers diagnosis, pathogenesis, prevention and management of drug-induced cholestasis, with particular reference to frequently- and newly-described causes.

Bile duct disorders

Drug-induced bile duct injury related prolonged or chronic cholestasis is recognized as a common side effect of treatment with several drugs. The severity and duration of the clinical symptoms suggest that this increase in number of reports is not only related to clinician and pathologists being increasingly aware of the condition, but also may represent a true increase in incidence likely related to a time-related growing experience with newer drugs. This clinical presentation encompasses a wide variety of features that may be the source of diagnostic difficulties, especially in the cases where cholestasis occurs days or weeks after the completion of therapy. Even more puzzling is the initial picture of hepatocholangitis, which may be silent and ensuing bile duct paucity with chronic anicteric cholestasis may be another source of diagnostic difficulties in the long-term. These diagnostic difficulties suggest that some of the cases of the so-called "idiopathic adulthood ductopenia" may originate from overlooked drug induced vanishing bile duct syndrome. The pathogenesis of the syndrome remains largely unknown and the determinants of prognosis and outcome. From reproducible data obtained in different studies investigating HLA-dependent predisposition, one may assume that genetics plays a major role even if other unknown additive factors are also likely involved. Severity of initial hepatocholangitis is likely to represent another important determinant of severity and prognosis, however to be assessed in larger longitudinal studies. Therapy of large bile duct injury mimics that of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Treatment of small bile duct injury remains disappointing. Corticosteroids are invariably ineffective. Ursodeoxycholic acid as been shown to induce improvement of clinical and biochemical cholestasis in some selected cases, its efficacy being however unpredictable. Preliminary data about the natural history of the vanishing bile duct syndrome suggest that therapy might be more effective when initiated early.

An exploratory population-based case-control study of primary biliary cirrhosis

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is a disease of unknown etiology, with unexplained geographical variation. Various exposures have been suggested as triggers for disease development-possibly in susceptible individuals, but the evidence was not always well founded. We therefore conducted a population-based case-control study in Northeast England to investigate these and other exposures. All cases incident during 1993 to 1995 in a defined area of Northeast England were identified, and age- and sex-matched population controls were identified from primary care population registers. Cases and controls were sent postal self-completion questionnaires covering medical history and lifestyle. Information was received from 100 cases and 223 controls. The familial tendency of PBC was found to be less marked than has been claimed: Only weak associations were found with other autoimmune diseases. Among factors considered previously, no significant associations were found with surgical procedures, events in pregnancy, past infections, vaccinations, and medications. No significant associations were found for previously unconsidered lifestyle factors (drinking alcohol, previous pets, or stressful events), but there was an unexpected association with past smoking (ever smoked: 76% in cases vs. 57% in controls, odds ratio 2.4; smoked for 20 years or more: 64% vs. 35%, odds ratio 3.5). There were also unexpected significant associations with psoriasis (13% in cases vs. 3% in controls, odds ratio 4.6) and eczema (3% in cases vs. 11% in controls, odds ratio 0. 13). These findings merit further investigation.

Drug- and chemical-induced cholestasis

Cholestasis resulting from drugs is an increasingly recognized cause of liver disease. It produces a broad clinical-pathologic spectrum of injury that includes simple jaundice, cholestatic hepatitis, and bile duct injury that can mimic extrahepatic biliary obstruction, primary biliary cirrhosis, and sclerosing cholangitis. Although the risk of drug-induced cholestasis leading to a fatal outcome is quite rare, knowledge and recognition of the various forms of cholestatic injury assumes an importance whenever clinicians are confronted with jaundice or other manifestations of liver disease in patients receiving medicinal or chemical agents.