Third-generation hepatitis C virus tests in asymptomatic anti-HCV-positive blood donors

Future therapies for chronic hepatitis C

Therapy for hepatitis C has been fairly stagnant for the past decade, but the past few years have seen major progress and evolution, beginning with the approval of two HCV protease inhibitors in 2011. In spite of considerable improvements in response rates with these agents, a need for additional agents with improved potency and tolerability remains. Toward this goal and over the course of just a few months, the HCV therapy pipeline has already become crowded with direct-acting antivirals, host-targeted agents and unique interferons, all of which are positioned to be part of the next wave of therapeutic options. The ultimate goal of this push for new agents is to achieve a safe and straight forward yet highly effective therapy for hepatitis C that is widely embraced and readily available. Particularly among the 'baby boomer' population, it is predicted that over the next few years, more patients with currently quiescent infections will be newly diagnosed, and those currently diagnosed will be at increased risk of long-term complications of infection, and thus in need of treatment. A simple and safe treatment paradigm will become a necessity. This Review chronicles the latest developments in hepatitis C therapy and the potential effect these new treatments could have on delivery of care to patients infected with HCV.

Epidemiological, biological and histological characterization of patients with indeterminate third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay antibody results for hepatitis C virus

We studied the epidemiological, laboratory and histological characteristics of a group of patients with positive antibodies against hepatitis C virus (HCV) as determined by third-generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and with indeterminate HCV antibody positivity as established by third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA-3). The results obtained were compared with those recorded in a group of RIBA-3-positive patients. Both groups correspond to blood donors in whom the prevalence of hepatitis C is low. There were no statistically significant intergroup differences in mean age, or in the presence of infection risk factors. RNA positivity was much more frequent in the RIBA-positive group (71%vs 10%; P < 0.05), as was transaminase elevation during the 3 years of follow-up (54%vs 13%; P < 0.05). In 46% of the RIBA-indeterminate patients the liver biopsy proved normal, or only liver steatosis or minimal changes were detected, while 33% had persistent chronic hepatitis, and 21% showed active chronic hepatitis. A mean Knodell index score of 2.28 was recorded; 50% of the subjects showed no fibrosis, 46% grade 1 fibrosis (fibrous portal expansion), 4% grade 2 fibrosis (bridging fibrosis), and none grade 3 fibrosis (liver cirrhosis). In the RIBA-positive group, a greater percentage of patients had active chronic hepatitis, a greater Knodell index, and increased-grade fibrosis. It can be concluded that the RIBA-3-indeterminate group is epidemiologically similar to the RIBA-3-positive series, although with a lesser prevalence of laboratory test alterations, a lower viral replication index, and more likely to have benign disease - particularly in subjects without viral replication.

The usefulness of Umelosa hepatitis C vírus qualitative kit as supplemental test for confirmation of hepatitis C virus infection

Forty voluntary blood donors from two different blood banks in Havana, Cuba, who were repeatedly reactive on the routine screening of antibodies to hepatitis C virus, by Umelisa HCV test, were analyzed for the presence of HCV RNA using a nested PCR assay of the HCV 5' untranslated region, Umelosa HCV qualitative. Sera from 45 patients of a specialized gastroenterology consultation, positive to Umelisa HCV, were also assayed with the Umelosa HCV qualitative, to establish their condition related to the presence of HCV RNA previously to the indication of a treatment or after three, six or twelve months of antiviral therapy. Serum HCV-RNA was detected in 21/40 (52.5%) donors who had repeatedly positive ELISA results, confirming the HCV infection for them. In specialized consultation HCV-RNA was detected by PCR analysis in 30/45 (66%) analyzed sera.

Anti-HCV confirmatory testing of voluntary blood donors: comparison of the sensitivity of two immunoblot assays

BACKGROUND

In this study, the sensitivity of two commercially available anti-HCV immunoblot assays (HCV Western blot (Wellcozyme] and RIBA 3.0 SIA [RIBA-3, Chiron]) was compared in a voluntary blood donor population.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Four groups of donor samples were retrospectively tested in this study. Groups 1 and 2 were donor samples that gave positive or indeterminate band patterns, respectively, when originally tested on the HCV Western blot between 1994 and 1998. These samples were tested on the RIBA 3.0. Donor samples in Groups 3 and 4 were originally tested on RIBA-3 during 1998 and 1999 and gave positive or indeterminate blot results, respectively. In this study these two groups were tested on the HCV Western blot. Samples with discrepant results on the two immunoblot assays were selected for genotyping or serotyping.

RESULTS

The two immunoblots showed similar sensitivity to the core and NS5 proteins. However, of 35 samples positive on Western blot or RIBA-3, the Western blot failed to detect NS4 in 14 samples compared with only 5 for RIBA-3. As well, the Western blot failed to detect NS3 in 6 samples compared to 2 for RIBA-3. Five (27.8%) of 18 samples that were Western blot indeterminate due to core reactivity showed an additional NS3 band on RIBA-3. Of the samples with additional NS3 and/or NS4 reactivity on RIBA-3 that were genotyped or serotyped, all were HCV type 3.

CONCLUSIONS

Western blot and RIBA-3 showed similar sensitivity to the HCV core and NS5 proteins. However, RIBA-3 showed greater sensitivity to both NS3 and NS4 compared to the Western blot. The reduced sensitivity of the Western blot to the NS3 and NS4 proteins was observed with HCV type 3 samples.

Prevalence and risk factors for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among pregnant Brazilian women

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence and the risk factors associated with HCV infection among women at childbirth, and to assess potential for infectivity of anti-HCV-positive women.

METHODS

A total of 6995 women were interviewed and screened for HCV antibodies. Association and logistic regression analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

The anti-HCV prevalence was 1.5% by EIA-3 and 0.8% by RIBA-3; HCV-RNA (RT-PCR) was detected in 74% of the RIBA-positive samples. Blood transfusion, race (blacks), alcohol abuse, a history of STD and anti-HBc positivity were independent risk factors for HCV positivity. Except for parenteral exposure, independent predictors of anti-HCV were a history of STD, anti-HBc positivity, a sex partner with multiple sex partners and a sex partner with a history of hepatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of anti-HCV is higher in pregnant women than in blood donors. Sexual exposure may facilitate the spread of HCV and there is a high potential for mother-to-infant transmission.

Effectiveness of second- and third-generation immunoassays for the detection of hepatitis C virus infection in pregnant women

OBJECTIVE

To compare the sensitivity and specificity of a third-generation anti-hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) assay (HCV 3.0) with second-generation one (HCV 2.0), and correlate with HCV-RNA positivity by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

METHODS

We enrolled 197 pregnant women without screening for alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (Group A) and 324 pregnant women with elevated ALT activity (> 45 IU/l) (Group B). Each serum sample was tested by second- and third-generation tests, and anti-HCV titer was determined by serial dilutions. Anti-HCV-positive samples were subjected to HCV-RNA assays.

RESULTS

Three (1.5%) and 4 (2.0%) of the 197 group A subjects were anti-HCV-positive by the second- and third-generation methods, respectively, while 17 (5.3%) and 21 (6.5%) of group B were positive, respectively. Three (1.5%) in group A and 8 (2.5%) in group B were HCV 2.0-negative, but positive for HCV 3.0. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of HCV 2.0 and HVC 3.0 for positive HCV-RNA in both groups were 67 vs 100%, 30 vs 75%, 67 vs 92%, and 30 vs 100%, respectively. The anti-HCV-positive samples with optical density (O.D.) < 1.0 either by second- or third-generation test were negative for HCV-RNA, whereas samples with O.D. > or = 1.0 were all HCV-RNA-positive.

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of HCV 3.0 is better than that of HCV 2.0, and anti-HCV-positive samples with O.D. < 1.0 are negative for HCV-RNA.

Hepatitis C infection in an Italian population not selected for risk factors

AIMS/BACKGROUND

This study estimated the prevalence of HCV infection and relationship with viremia in a general population. The inhabitants of Albavilla town were personally invited to participate.

METHODS

Out of 3997 inhabitants falling within the age range 18-85 years, 2403 (participation rate 60.1%) were examined for transaminases, HCVAb, HCVRNA, genotype and immunoblot assay. The following information was collected: sex, age, blood transfusions, surgery, use of glass syringes, drug addiction, alcohol consumption, tattoos and body mass index.

RESULTS

115 (4.8%) were HCVAb+, the prevalence being 1.2% under 40 years. Transfusion in the past was the only risk factor for HCV infection. Among the HCVAb+ subjects, 71 (61.7%) were HCVRNA+. 40.8% of the HCVAb+/HCVRNA+ group had normal ALT, compared with 68% of those with HCVAb+/HCVRNA-. The HCV genotypes in the 71 HCVRNA+ subjects were: 2a/2c in 58 (81.7%), 40% of them with normal ALT;1b in 11 (15.5%), none with normal ALT; genotype 3 in two (2.8%).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of HCVAb in this general population was 4.8%. About 3% were HCVRNA positive and of these genotype 2a/ 2c was present in 81.6%.

Increased detection of antibody to hepatitis C virus in renal transplant patients by third-generation assays

To assess the sensitivity and specificity of third-generation assays for antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV), sera from 244 renal transplant patients (113 positive for anti-HCV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]-2) were studied. Hepatitis C virus RNA was detected by a reverse-transcripted nested polymerase chain reaction. Antibody to HCV was detected by ELISA-3 in 108 (96%) ELISA-2-positive samples. Five (4%) ELISA-2-positive sera were negative by both ELISA-3 and polymerase chain reaction. In the anti-HCV-negative group, six (5%) additional cases were ELISA-3-positive; three of these were confirmed by recombinant immunoblot assay-3 (RIBA-3) and polymerase chain reaction. Recombinant immunoblot assay-3 was used to resolve 82 RIBA-2-indeterminate and three RIBA-2-negative sera. Using RIBA-3, 49 (60%) RIBA-2-indeterminate samples were positive, five (6%) ELISA-3-negative samples were negative, and 28 (34%) were remained indeterminate. Recombinant immunoblot assay-2-negative samples were indeterminate with RIBA-3. Hepatitis C virus RNA was detected in all RIBA-3-positive and 58% of the RIBA-3-indeterminate samples. Third-generation assays for anti-HCV are more sensitive and specific than second-generation assays in renal transplant patients.

Risk of hepatitis C virus infection among household contacts of Saudi patients with chronic liver disease

To evaluate the intrafamilial transmission of hepatitis C virus and related risk factors among the Saudi population, two groups were investigated: 1) 20 index patients with chronic liver disease and their 127 family contacts, and 2) 20 blood donors who were anti-HCV-positive but with no chronic liver disease and their 91 family contacts. After a questionnaire on the risk factors for parenteral exposure, blood samples were obtained and tested for liver biochemistry and antibody to HCV (anti-HCV) by a third-generation enzyme immunoassay (UBI HCV EIA4.0). Only two spouses of 20 index patients were anti-HCV-positive while the remaining 125 family contacts were anti-HCV-negative. None of the 91 family contacts of the 20 anti-HCV-positive blood donors was anti-HCV-positive. The two spouses were wives of index patients but had a history of blood transfusion on at least two different occasions. Our results clearly indicate the intrafamilial transmission of HCV is not the route of transmission of HCV among Saudis and our results argue against sexual transmission of hepatitis C virus despite a relatively long duration of marriage.

Evaluation of third-generation hepatitis C antibody assay in chronic hepatitis C and chronic non-B, non-C hepatitis

Second-generation hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody assays are more sensitive and specific than first-generation assays in the detection of HCV infection; such tests are widely used. However, there are still HCV-infected patients who test seronegative for anti-HCV even by second-generation assays. In this study we evaluated the performance of the new third-generation HCV assay (HCV 3.0) in 230 individuals with different second-generation anti-HCV (HCV 2.0) and HCV RNA patterns. Our results showed the followings: only one healthy adult had a discrepant result in 200 subjects negative (group I) or positive (group II) for HCV 2.0 and HCV RNA; 7 of 13 (54%) HCV 2.0-negative but HCV RNA-positive patients (group III) were HCV 3.0-positive; two of 17 (12%) so-called chronic non-B, non-C hepatitis patients (group IV) were positive for HCV 3.0. We conclude that third-generation anti-HCV assays are more sensitive and specific than second-generation assays in the detection of chronic HCV infection; however false-positive results may be observed among low-risk healthy persons.