Transfusion-associated chronic hepatitis C: alpha-n1 interferon for 6 vs. 12 months

A decade of trials of interferon-alpha for chronic hepatitis C. A meta-regression analysis

The most relevant randomized controlled trials of interferon-alpha (IFN) for naive patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) published in a decade, just before appearance of pegylated IFN trials in 2000, were included in this paper. Its purpose is to review the relationship between sustained biochemical response in active versus control group versus usual clinical variables as IFN regimens, cirrhosis, genotype and versus less frequently addressed variables as funding, methodological quality or location of principal author. Meta-analysis estimates of global treatment effect varied according to trial design: group 1=IFN versus placebo/no treatment, 32 RCTs, 2499 pts, OR 9.5 (6.3-14.2); group 2a=comparison of IFN schedules, 43 RCTs, 7454 pts, OR 1.6 (1.4-1.9); group 2b=IFN+other drugs versus standard IFN, 30 RCTs, 4737 pts, OR 2.0 (1.6-2.6). Fixed effects (arm-level) meta-regression on the complete data set (171 arms, 10,580 pts) revealed that sustained response was most likely in experimental arms of IFN+ribavirin or other drugs (OR 2.4), arms using yearly schedule (OR 2.0), trial principal author from Asia (OR 1.7), trial sample size >200 (OR 1.4) and arms enrolling less than 50% of cirrhotics (OR 1.3). Moreover, focus was on some significant interactions too, as the effect of trial's quality interacting to the recorded funding (more benefit if no-profit, less if for-profit) and the effect of trial funding interacting to the location of first author (more benefit if from Asia). Three main effects (experimental arm, cirrhosis, funding) and one interaction (funding*location of principal author) explained 31% of between study variability in a random-effect meta-regression. In a subgroup analysis on a data set including available information on HCV genotype (93 arms, around 7000 pts), meta-regression revealed that genotype 1 or 4 less than 50% per arm and specialistic journal were significant predictors of either biochemical (transaminases) or virological (HCV-RNA) sustained response, in a model including the same main effects identified in the complete data set analysis. Finally, although mostly captured by different IFN regimens along time, heterogeneity of effect in a large set of (not-pegylated) IFN trials was also explained by HCV genotype and variables of quality and reporting, such as trial's principal author from Asia.

Dynamic decision analysis to determine optimal treatment duration in chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines for stopping treatment of chronic hepatitis C are based on hepatitis C ribonucleic acid measurements at 12 and 24 weeks.

AIM

To explore an alternative approach for making individualized recommendations about treatment duration, based on simple alanine aminotransferase tests and on cost-per-cure.

METHODS

We analysed individual patient data from 13 randomized, controlled trials with interferon alone or combined with ribavirin. Using multiple logistic regression, we built a model that estimated the probability of sustained virological response for treatment durations of 24 and 48 weeks. Decisions to prolong treatment were based on an increase in probability of sustained virological response. If the increase was 10%, the cost-per-cure became decisive with a limit of 50,000.

RESULTS

Noncirrhotics with genotype 2 or 3 did not benefit when treatment was continued beyond 24 weeks. Sustained virological response rates in cirrhotic patients increased by 14-47% if treatment was continued up to 48 weeks. In noncirrhotic genotype 1 or 4 patients who had elevated alanine aminotransferase levels at week 4, the probability of sustained virological response increased by <10% if treatment was continued up to 48 weeks; the cost-per-cure for these patients would exceed 50,000.

CONCLUSION

The dynamics of alanine aminotransferase levels and cost-per-cure provides a useful alternative to determine the duration of therapy in chronic hepatitis C.

[Elevated aminotransferse levels--diagnostic approach]

INTRODUCTION

Aminotransferase levels are a sensitive indicator of liver cell injury and is frequently used to identify patients with liver diseases such as hepatitis. Both aminotransferases are normally present in serum at low levels, usually less than 30 U per liter. Although these enzymes are present in tissues throughout the body, they are most often elevated in patients with liver diseases and may reflect liver injury. Raised aminotransferase levels of unknown origin are common problem in clinical practice. Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity, the variable most commonly measured to assess hepatic disease, fails to identify many patients with hepatic injury. On the other hand, elevated ALT level doesn't always confirm liver disease. The aim of this study was to show the most common reasons for elevated aminotransferase levels.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 27 patients with elevated ALT. All of them were followed-up for six months before liver biopsy was performed. All patients underwent routine laboratory tests and ultrasound of the abdomen.

RESULTS

We found that four patients had a nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), four patients had chronic hepatitis of unknown etiology, two of them had autoimmune hepatitis, four had mild lobular hepatitis (three of them unresolved acute hepatitis, one of them had nodular regenerative hyperplasia), six patients had normal results, and three had no specific changes.

CONCLUSION

Elevated ALT level doesn't always mean that there is a liver disease. If aminotransferase levels are persistently more than twice the normal value, a biopsy is recommended. Although results of biopsy are unlikely to lead to a diagnosis or to changes in management, they often provide reassurance to the patient and the physician to exclude serious pathology.

Interferon for interferon naive patients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

A previous meta-analysis of interferon therapy in naive patients with chronic hepatitis C has documented its efficacy in achieving virologic clearance, and improving liver biochemistry and histology; however, since its publication additional trials have been reported.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the response to interferon in interferon naive patients with chronic hepatitis C. The effect of treatment dose and duration, and the response in patients with cirrhosis and those with normal aminotransferases was also investigated.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (Cochrane Library Issue 1, 1999), MEDLINE (January 1966 to December 1999), and reference lists were searched, and pharmaceutical companies were contacted for unpublished trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing interferon with placebo, no treatment, or different regimens of interferon were selected. Abstracts were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome measure was sustained disappearance of serum HCV RNA (virologic sustained response (SR)). Biochemical and end of treatment responses, liver histology, and adverse events were also recorded. Assessment of drug efficacy used the methods of Peto and Der Simonian and Laird.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifty-four trials enrolling 6545 patients were included. Compared with no treatment, interferon 3 MU thrice weekly for 12 months increased the probability of a virologic SR (Peto odds ratio (OR) 4.60; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.53 to 13.85). At this dosage and duration of therapy, the rate of virologic SR was 17% (95% CI 10 to 28%) in interferon-treated patients versus 3% (95% CI 1 to 10%) in controls. A dose of 6 MU was more effective than 3 MU thrice weekly (OR for 12 months treatment, 2.21; 95% CI 1.10 to 4.45), as were durations of 12 months or greater versus six months (OR 1.87; 95% CI 1.30 to 2.67). Adverse events were more common with higher doses and prolonged durations of treatment. Compared with no therapy, interferon increased the probability of histologic improvement (OR 9.22; 95% CI 5.69 to 14.94). The response to interferon in cirrhotic patients (virologic SR, 17%; 95% CI 11 to 26%) was similar to that in non-cirrhotic patients. However, interferon was no more effective than control in patients with normal aminotransferases.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Interferon is effective in achieving viral clearance and improving liver biochemistry and histology in interferon naive patients with chronic hepatitis C. Higher doses and prolonged durations are more effective, but associated with more frequent adverse events. Interferon is associated with similar benefits in patients with cirrhosis, but the efficacy in patients with normal aminotransferases is unproven.

Meta-analysis of interferon randomized trials in the treatment of viral hepatitis C in naive patients: 1999 update

The aim of this study was to update our previous meta-analysis of interferon (IFN) in the treatment of hepatitis C and to analyse new factors, namely, HCV RNA end-point, patients with cirrhosis and patients with normal ALT. We use the Der Simonian and Laird method, with heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses. Seventy-six randomized control trials (RCTs) in naive patients were found but we focused our analysis on 59 RCTs with chronic hepatitis C (26 vs. controls and 33 comparing different regimens) and on seven RCTs in acute hepatitis. Interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) at 3 MU thrice weekly (TIW) for 12 months exhibited 39% of virological end-of-treatment response (ETR) and 17% of virological sustained response (SR), respectively, vs. 1% and 3% in untreated controls (all P < 0.001). There was a significant dose effect (in favour of 6 vs. 3 MU TIW): the virological SR at 6 months were 35% in the 6 MU group (95% CI: 24-47) and 16% in the 3 MU group (95% CI: 8-27) and were at 12 months 43% in the 6 MU group (95%CI: 31-56) and 25% in the 3 MU group (95% CI: 16-37). There was a significant duration effect (12 vs. 6 months) upon the virological SR rate both at 3 and 6 MU: 3 MU provided 14% of virological SR (95% CI: 11-19) in the 12 months group vs. 7% (95% CI: 5-11) in the 6 months group and 6 MU provided 22% (95% CI: 17-29) and 16% (95% CI: 11-22) virological SR in the 12 and 6 months groups, respectively. Cirrhotic treated patients had 17% of virological SR (95 CI: 9-24%; P < 0.001) vs. 0% in controls and provided a 20% reduction rate (95 CI: -2% to -37%, P=0.03) in hepatocellular carcinoma incidence. In acute hepatitis C, a 3-month treatment with IFN-alpha showed significant efficacy vs. controls upon the virological SR rate (32% vs. 4%, P < 0.001). In conclusion, we confirm the dose and duration effect of IFN in chronic hepatitis C, and the efficacy of IFN-alpha in the treatment of acute hepatitis and in cirrhotic patients.

Methodological issues in papers on IFN therapy: time for reappraisal

We conducted an analytical review of 194 full papers on interferon (IFN) therapy for chronic hepatitis C to evaluate current methodology (i.e. study design, criteria for evaluating the efficacy of therapy and predictors of response). Of the papers evaluated, 64 were randomized controlled trials (RCT), 40 were non-randomized controlled trials (NRCT) and 90 were observational studies (OS). The methodological analysis was focused mainly on clinical trials. The number of patients enrolled in RCT was higher compared with the number enrolled in NRCT. Uniform enrolment criteria were used in less than 50% of the trials. Only 20% of RCT and 2.5% of NRCT used criteria for defining sample size. The response rate was calculated on an intention-to-treat basis in 36 of the RCT and in 14 of the NRCT. The outcome of treatment and the criteria employed to define the response to treatment were found to be far from standardized. In 51.5% of the RCT and 42.5% of the NRCT, normalization of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level at the end of follow-up was the only marker of response studied. Only 57.6% of the trials considered histological evidence as an important outcome. Among the clinical trials, 71.1% evaluated predictors of good response to IFN therapy. In 51% of the OS, ALT normalization by the end of follow-up was the only criterion for defining response. In conclusion, to ensure a high level of reliability in comparing or combining the results of different studies, some basic general requirements must be followed when planning trials on antiviral therapy.

[Antiviral treatment of hepatitis C virus infection]

Hepatitis C virus infection is common and almost always chronic and can lead to cirrhosis and hepatocellular cancer. The primary goal of the treatment is virus eradication and the secondary is to reduce inflammation and liver cell damage. Interferon is the only effective therapy but disappearance of the virus is sustained in only 10 to 15%. The factors most closely associated with a response to treatment are absence of cirrhosis, low serum hepatitis C virus RNA level and genotype other than type 1. Recent studies have suggested that interferon treatment may reduce the subsequent risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in responders. The combination of interferon and oral ribavirin therapy increase the sustained response rate to about 40% in initial treatment and 50% for the treatment of relapse. The other therapeutic combination are less well documented. New agents such as hepatitis C virus-specific anti-protease may be available in the next future and treatment is evolving toward multiple-drug regimens.

Chronic hepatitis C and interferon alpha: conventional and cumulative meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of surrogate markers of the interferon effect (i.e., alanine aminotransferase levels and serum HCV-RNA status) as predictors of long term response, and to identify the optimal schedule of treatment for patients with chronic hepatitis C by means of meta-analysis.

METHODS

Pertinent randomized clinical trials and prospective studies were selected using MEDLINE (1986-1996), a reference list from published articles or reviews. Twenty-six prospective studies reporting data on surrogate markers of interferon response were selected. Thirty-nine trials comparing interferon alpha to no treatment and 25 trials comparing different schedules of interferon were reviewed. Conventional meta-analysis according to the DerSimonian and Laird method was used for the pooling of results.

RESULTS

The pooled probability of late relapse among sustained responders with negative serum HCV-RNA 6 months after treatment was very low (8.7%; 95% confidence interval 5.8-11.6%). The overall risk difference between treated and control groups was 16.63% (95% confidence interval 11.95-21.31%) for sustained aminotransferase normalization. Therapy with higher interferon dose compared with standard dose significantly improves the rate of sustained response (pooled risk difference 10.56%, 95% CI 5.47-15.65%). Cumulative meta-analyses suggest that a clear dose-response relationship exists across a wide range of interferon dosages. The multivariate meta-regression model confirms that the total interferon dose is an independent predictor of sustained response and that it seems more important than the length of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Testing for serum HCV-RNA, 6 months after interferon therapy in sustained biochemical responders, is useful for predicting long term response. The current standard total interferon dose of 234 mega-units is suboptimal. Further trials that directly compare different schedules of treatment are needed.

Efficacy of interferon dose and prediction of response in chronic hepatitis C: Benelux study in 336 patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS

In an attempt to improve the limited efficacy of treatment of chronic hepatitis C with interferon-alpha 3 MU tiw, we studied the effects of double-dose therapy followed by downward titration, and analyzed the pre- and pertreatment factors associated with response or non-response.

METHODS

Three hundred and fifty-four consecutive patients in 19 centers were randomized to interferon-alpha 3 MU tiw for 6 months or 6 MU tiw for 8 weeks followed by down-titration (3,1 MU tiw) till alanine aminotransferase remained normal and plasma HCV RNA was repeatedly undetectable. The primary outcome measure was sustained alanine aminotransferase and HCV RNA response 6 months after treatment.

RESULTS

Three hundred and thirty-six patients received treatment. The sustained response rate for patients receiving 3 MU tiw for 6 months was 14% (9-21%,) and for patients receiving double dose tiw for 8 weeks and thereafter titrated therapy 15% (10-21%) (p=0.8). Pretreatment factors associated with a sustained alanine aminotransferase plus HCV RNA response were the absence of cirrhosis, presence of genotype 2 or 3, a low viral load and, in addition, a low alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase ratio; a model was developed to allow estimation of the chance of response for the individual patient. The most powerful predictor of sustained response, however, was plasma HCV RNA at week 4; a positive test virtually precluded a sustained response (1.7%, 0.4-5.0%). If week 4 HCV RNA was not detectable, the chance of a sustained response was 21% (12-34%) for genotype 1 versus 40% (28-54%) for the others (p=0.02). Six MU tiw led to a significantly higher week 4 HCV RNA response (47% not detectable) than 3 MU (37%) (p=0.02). During down-titration this difference in viral on-treatment response was lost.

CONCLUSIONS

In the treatment of hepatitis C, an early HCV RNA response is a prerequisite for long-term efficacy. Doubling the initial interferon dose increases this early response, but subsequent downward titration negates this effect, especially in genotype 1.

Long-term course of interferon-treated chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To evaluate whether sustained response to a-interferon improves clinical outcome in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

METHODS

A cohort of 410 consecutive patients (65% with chronic hepatitis, 35% with cirrhosis) were treated with a-interferon in two trials (mean follow-up 62.1 months, range 7-109 months). All were serum HCV RNA positive before therapy and received first 10 then 5 million units of a-2b or a-nl interferon three times weekly for 6 to 12 months. Sustained response was defined as normal aminotransferases 12 months after stopping interferon.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients (15.1%: 54 with chronic hepatitis, eight with cirrhosis) were sustained responders. At the end of follow-up, 56 out of 62 sustained responders (90.3%) were serum HCV RNA negative. No biochemical relapse after 12 months was seen in sustained responders, regardless of initial histology, HCV genotype or persistence of HCV RNA. Although three died of non-hepatic causes, no liver-related events were observed among sustained responders. Complications of liver disease occurred in 34 relapsers/non-responders: nine hepatocellular carcinomas, 21 ascites and four portal hypertensive bleedings. Eleven relapsers/nonresponders died: eight of hepatic and three of non-hepatic causes. Event-free survival was significantly longer in sustained responders than in all the remaining patients. In a regression analysis, sustained response to interferon, low age and absence of cirrhosis were independent predictors of event-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatitis C virus is probably eradicated and progression of liver disease is prevented in most patients who remain HCV RNA negative with normal transaminases for more than 1 year after stopping treatment.

Prolonged treatment (2 years) with different doses (3 versus 6 MU) of interferon alpha-2b for chronic hepatitis type C. Results of a multicenter randomized trial

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To examine the effect of prolonged treatment with different doses of interferon alpha-2b on the relapse rate in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

METHODS

One hundred and seventy-one patients with non-cirrhotic chronic hepatitis C were enrolled in an Italian multicenter trial. All patients were treated for 3 months with 3,000,000 Units (3 MU) of interferon alpha-2b given subcutaneously three times a week (t.i.w.). Patients with abnormal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values were given 6 MU of interferon for an additional 3 months. If ALT remained persistently abnormal, therapy was then suspended. If ALT levels were normal, therapy was continued (6 MU t.i.w.) for an additional 18 months (total=2 years). Patients with normal ALT were randomly assigned to two groups, one receiving 3 MU and the other receiving 6 MU t.i.w. for an additional 21 months (total=2 years). Follow-up continued for 2 years after therapy withdrawal.

RESULTS

Seven patients stopped treatment during the first 3 months. Of the remaining 164 patients, 76 (46%) showed abnormal ALT levels after 3 months of therapy: 11 of these (14%) normalized ALT values when given 6 MU and a sustained response was maintained in eight during the follow-up. Overall, 54 and 34 patients were allocated respectively to the groups receiving the 3 MU and 6 MU long-term treatment. At the end of therapy, 35/54 patients of the group 3 MU and 21/34 patients of the group 6 MU showed normal ALT levels (65% vs 62%, p=N.S.). After 2 years of follow-up, 24/35 (69%) patients of the group 3 MU and 16/21 (76%) of the group 6 MU were still in remission (p=N.S.). In an intention-to-treat analysis, 48/171 (28%) patients showed a long-term response (normal ALT values, HCV-RNA negative). About 65% of the sustained responders showed low baseline viremia compared with 33% of non-responders (p=0.005) while genotype 1b was more frequently found among non-responders than in long-term responders (84% vs 25%, p=0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

About 14% of patients who do not respond to a 3-month course of 3 MU of interferon normalize ALT levels when given 6 MU. In prolonged treatment, there is no significant difference between 3 and 6 MU in inducing a sustained response. Patients with low baseline viremia and genotype 2a respond significantly better to prolonged interferon therapy than highly viremic patients with genotype 1b.

The effect of interferon on the liver in chronic hepatitis C: a quantitative evaluation of histology by meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Several randomized clinical trials of interferon in chronic hepatitis C have examined the histological changes in paired biopsy specimens. We have attempted a quantitative evaluation by meta-analysis.

METHODS

Randomized Clinical Trials found by MEDLINE search were included if: a) they compared different IFN regimens with non-active treatment or with each other, b) they obtained biopsies before starting and at the time of stopping IFN in a sizable proportion of the treated and control patients, and c) they assessed the biopsy-specimens semi-quantitatively according to Scheuer's numerical scoring system or Knodell's Histological Activity Index, with quantitation of fibrosis and of lobular, portal and periportal necroinflammation.

RESULTS

Seventeen trials were identified, in which 1223 adult patients had been studied. All trials homogeneously pointed towards a favorable interferon effect. The pooled data show a statistically significant histological improvement in treated patients as compared with controls for each of the four Histological Activity Index components and for the total Histological Activity Index score (overall improvement was -0.82 in favor of interferon, p<0.0001, 95% Confidence Interval -1.25 to -0.40). In the ten trials reporting histological changes separately in biochemical responders (primary and sustained responders) and non-responders, histological improvement was confined to the subset of biochemical responders. No change or very little change occurred in non-responders.

CONCLUSIONS

Interferon treatment in chronic hepatitis C significantly improves liver histology. The effect of interferon is closely related to biochemical response. Studies assessing histological outcome 1 year or more after interferon treatment in long-term responders and comparatively in non-responders or relapsers would be important to confirm the regression of the necroinflammatory process in the former, as suggested by the normal serum alanine aminotransferase levels.

[Therapy of hepatitis C]

The purpose of this review is an update of the therapy of hepatitis C especially with Interferon-alpha. From the large number of publications on this topic the established facts were worked out. Taking these facts as a base guidelines for the therapy in practical use were defined. In addition the aspects of therapeutic strategies of chronic hepatitis C which until now can not definitely be judged are discussed. In the relatively few patients in whom hepatitis C is diagnosed already in the acute phase, Interferon-alpha-treatment (3 x 3 million units 3 times a week) for 3 to 4 months increases the percentage of patients in whom HCV-RNA in the serum is eliminated. In patients with chronic hepatitis C, after decision finding for treatment, a standard scheme is recommended which consists of a monotherapy with recombinant Interferon-alpha. The dosage of Interferon-alpha is in the first 12 to 16 weeks 5 up to 6 million units given 3 times a week. For the further therapy 3 million units 3 times a week seems to be appropriate. The recommended duration of Interferon-alpha-therapy is 12 months. A long-term benefit of about 20% can be achieved in unselected groups of patients when judged on the permanent normalisation of serum transaminases and elimination of HCV-RNA in the serum. Important factors which may influence the probability of a sustained response, like HCV genotype, virus titer in serum, duration of the disease, high hepatic iron content and the presence of cirrhosis, are discussed. Up to now there exist no reliable guidelines in the case of a "no change" situation and for patients with a flare-up of inflammatory activity during or after therapy. Combination therapy of Interferon-alpha with other drugs like analogous of nucleotides (for example ribavarin), non steroidal antirheumatic drugs and ursodesoxycholic acid (UDCA) have still to be evaluated in controlled clinical trials.

Duration of HCV infection as a predictor of nonresponse to interferon

Duration of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a key feature in determining responsiveness to interferon (IFN). Studies assessing its value as a predictive factor in chronic HCV infection show that a long duration of infection reduces the likelihood of a sustained response to IFN (defined as ALT normalization and clearance of serum HCV-RNA). The effect of HCV infection duration is independent of the presence of cirrhosis and level of HCV viremia. Meta-analysis of IFN trials in acute HCV infection shows an obvious effect of the drug on long-term ALT normalization and HCV-RNA clearance. Treatment of HCV infection during the acute or early chronic phase could therefore maximize therapeutic effectiveness.