Is severe cryptogenic chronic hepatitis similar to autoimmune hepatitis?

Autoimmune Hepatitis: Epidemiology, Subtypes, and Presentation

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic immunologic disorder in which the immune system targets the liver. The disease has a genetic basis and this accounts for the epidemiologic variation observed in serologic testing and clinical presentation across different populations. The incidence of AIH increases with age into the 70s and seems to be increasing in prevalence. Most patients test positive for antinuclear antibody, ASMA, or anti-LKM but about 20% of patients do not have these serologic markers. At clinical presentation, patients may be asymptomatic, symptomatic, have acute liver failure, or decompensated cirrhosis.

Seronegative Autoimmune Hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a relatively rare liver disease with varying worldwide incidence of from 0.7 to 2 per 100,000 people. It is characterized by the presence of auto-antibodies. However, an average of 10% of AIH cases have AIH symptoms and pathology but lack autoimmune serology. For such seronegative AIH (snAIH) cases, there is currently no established diagnostic algorithm for diagnosis. and improper or delayed diagnosis of snAIH can lead to no or inappropriate treatment that results in progression to fulminant hepatitis or cirrhosis. This review aims to review the current literature and to present an update of seronegative autoimmune hepatitis, including its pathophysiology, clinical presentation, methods of diagnosis, and treatment in order to increase awareness and emphasize the necessity for timely management.

Most Cases of Cryptogenic Cirrhosis May be Nonobese Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis-Risk Factors of Liver Steatosis After Liver Transplantation for Cryptogenic Cirrhosis: A Retrospective Study

Aim The course of cryptogenic cirrhosis (CC) after liver transplantation (LT) is unknown. We therefore clarified the natural course post-LT for CC and investigated the etiology of CC. Methods Eighteen patients who underwent LT for CC were included. To rule out the possibility of NASH in patients with CC, those with a history of obesity or liver steatosis found pretransplantation were excluded. A liver biopsy was performed one year after LT and annually thereafter. Results Liver steatosis and steatohepatitis were identified in 61% and 39% of patients after LT, respectively, with a median time to the onset of 12 and 27 months, respectively. There were no other pathological findings such as liver allograft rejection, autoimmune hepatitis, or primary biliary cholangitis. The body mass index after LT (28.5 vs. 22.4 kg/m²; P=0.002) and mean muscle attenuation at the time of LT were significantly higher (33.3 vs. 25.8 Hounsfield units, P=0.03) and the postoperative hospitalization period shorter (50 vs. 102 days; P=0.02) in the steatosis group than in the non-steatosis group. Recipients were significantly younger in the steatohepatitis subgroup than in the simple steatosis subgroup (55.0 vs. 63.5 years old; P=0.04). Conclusions Despite excluding CC patients with a history of obesity, we observed that patients with CC had a high prevalence of steatosis after LT than those without CC. Young patients with a favorable postoperative course were noted to have a high risk of NASH after LT for CC. Patients with CC may represent cases of non-obese NASH.

Two decades of research on autoimmune liver disease in Turkey

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) are the 3 main autoimmune liver diseases (AILDs). The epidemiology of AILD in Turkey is not known. To determine the scientific status, we performed a scientometric analysis of AILD-related original articles that originated from Turkey.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched the Web of Science database, the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-E), and the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) by using the keywords "autoimmune hepatitis," "primary biliary cholangitis/primary biliary cirrhosis," and "primary sclerosing cholangitis" in conjunction with "Turkey." A scientometric analysis was done on the search results.

RESULTS

We identified 117 AILD-related papers that were published in Turkey from 1997 to 2019. Among these, 70 case reports, letters, and reviews and 2 original articles that were not cited in SCI-E/SSCI were excluded. The remaining 45 original articles were further analyzed. These studies were related to AIH (n=22), PBC (n=7), PSC (n=9), PBC-AIH overlap (n=5), and others (n=2). Four of the publications originated in pediatric settings; 9 of 45 papers were published from 1997 to 2008 and 36 papers were published from 2009 to 2019. Most papers (75%) were reported from 5 centers; 9 papers (20%) were published in journals with an impact factor of 3 or higher.

CONCLUSION

The overall number and quality of AILD-related papers in Turkey are unexpectedly low, although a number of papers have received considerable international recognition. More epidemiologic, prospective, and multicenter research projects are warranted to advance AILD knowledge and to produce high-quality research from Turkey.

Natural History and Treatment Outcomes of Severe Autoimmune Hepatitis

GOALS

The aim of this study was to analyze the natural history and treatment outcomes of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) variants presenting with severe-AIH.

BACKGROUND

Severe acute presentation is an uncommon manifestation of AIH, and it remains poorly characterized.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 101 patients with AIH from January 2011 to December 2015. Patients were classified as seropositive-AIH and seronegative-AIH. Patients with acute liver failure, acute-on-chronic liver failure, and severe acute hepatitis were defined as severe-AIH patients. Patient characteristics and treatment outcomes with follow-up until 12 months were analyzed between the different groups.

RESULTS

Out of 101 cases, 24 (23.76%) had severe AIH. Of them 9 (37.5%) had severe acute hepatitis, 3 (12.5%) had acute liver failure, and 12 (50%) had acute-on-chronic liver failure. Seronegative-AIH patients presented with severe-AIH significantly more frequently compared with seropositive-AIH patients (50% vs. 20.27%, P=0.022). Severe-AIH had 50% complete responders, 25% partial responders, and 25% treatment failures. Jaundice (88.88% vs. 68.7%, P=0.048), encephalopathy (55.55% vs. 6.66%, P=0.014), and higher international normalized ratio values (2.17±0.60 vs. 1.82±0.14, P=0.038) were factors associated with nonresponse rather than the presence or absence of autoantibodies in severe-AIH. The hazard ratio for predicting remission in the non-severe AIH group as compared with the severe-AIH group was 1.502, which was statistically not significant (95% CI, 0.799-2.827; P=0.205).

CONCLUSION

Approximately 24% of patients with AIH have severe-AIH. Conventional autoantibodies are often absent in severe-AIH; however, it does not alter the outcome. Immunosuppressants should be given expediently in patients with severe-AIH.

Histopathological Examination of Explanted Liver After Transplantation in Patients With Cryptogenic Cirrhosis

OBJECTIVES

Cryptogenic cirrhosis is a common indication for liver transplantation. Diagnosis is made after exclusion of other causes of cirrhosis. In this study, the aim was to evaluate patients with cryptogenic cirrhosis after histopathological examination of explanted liver.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective histopathological chart review of 117 patients with cryptogenic cirrhosis who had liver transplantation between November 2009 and June 2014 was performed. Age, sex, operative features, survival rates, and preoperative and postoperative diagnosis were evaluated.

RESULTS

During the study period, 123 liver transplantations were performed for these 117 patients. Deceased donor liver transplantations were performed in 23 (18.7%) of the cases. Retransplantations were performed in 5 patients. Median age was 48 years, and female-to-male ratio was 41:76. Hepatosteatosis were observed in 29 patients. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis were observed in 20 (12%) and 9 (7.7%) of these patients, respectively. Autoimmune hepatitis was observed in 2 patients. The definitive cause of cirrhosis was unclear in 68 (58%) of the patients. Incidental malignant and premalignant lesions were observed in 15 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Histopathological examination of the explanted liver after liver transplantation in those patients with cryptogenic cirrhosis may significantly help to diagnose the cause of cirrhosis, such as nonalcoholic steatohepatitis or autoimmune hepatitis, with using the scoring system developed by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Workgroup. In addition, incidental malignant or premalignant lesions may be observed.

Transitioning from Idiopathic to Explainable Autoimmune Hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis lacks an identifiable cause, and its diagnosis requires the exclusion of etiologically defined diseases that resemble it. Insights into its pathogenesis are moving autoimmune hepatitis from an idiopathic to explainable disease, and the goal of this review is to describe the insights that are hastening this transition. Two types of autoimmune hepatitis are justified by serological markers, but they also have distinctive genetic associations (DRB1 and DQB1 genes) and autoantigens. DRB1 alleles are the principal susceptibility factors in white adults, and a six amino acid sequence encoded in the antigen-binding groove of class II molecules of the major histocompatibility complex can influence the selection of autoantigens. Polymorphisms, including variants of SH2B3 and CARD10 genes, may affect immune reactivity and disease severity. The cytochrome mono-oxygenase, CYP2D6, is the autoantigen associated with type 2 autoimmune hepatitis, and it shares homologies with multiple viruses that might promote self-intolerance by molecular mimicry. Chemokines, especially CXCL9 and CXCL10, orchestrate the migration of effector cells to sites of injury and are associated with disease severity. Cells of the innate and adaptive immune responses promote tissue damage, and possible deficiencies in the number and function of regulatory T cells may facilitate the injurious process. Receptor-mediated apoptosis is the principal mechanism of hepatocyte loss, and cell-mediated and antibody-dependent mechanisms of cytotoxicity also contribute. Insights that explain autoimmune hepatitis will allow triggering exogenous antigens to be characterized, risk management to be improved, prognostic indices to be refined, and site-specific therapeutic interventions to emerge.

Causality assessment for suspected DILI during clinical phases of drug development

Causality assessment is a critical step in establishing the diagnosis of drug induced liver injury (DILI) during drug development. DILI may resemble almost any type of liver disease, and often presents a serious challenge to clinical investigators and drug makers. The diagnosis of DILI is largely based upon a combination of a compatible clinical course, exclusion of all other reasonable causes, resemblance of clinical and pathological features to known features of liver injury due to the drug (i.e., “drug’s signature”), and incidence of liver injury among patients treated with the drug compared to placebo or comparator. Causality assessment for suspected DILI is currently performed using either evaluation by physicians with expertise in liver disorders (i.e., expert opinion) or standardized scoring instruments such as the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM). Both approaches are widely used in the post marketing setting. Causality assessment based on expert opinion is considered superior to standardized instruments such as RUCAM, in the setting of drug development, and is currently the preferred approach during clinical trials. There is a need for a systematic revision of RUCAM that will render it more suitable for the setting of clinical trials and drug development. Careful monitoring and meticulous data collection during clinical trials are essential in all cases with established liver injury to allow for a proper causality assessment. A workshop was convened to discuss best practices for the assessment of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) in clinical trials. This publication is based on the conclusions of this workshop.

Autoimmune hepatitis in diverse ethnic populations and geographical regions

Autoimmune hepatitis has diverse clinical phenotypes and outcomes in ethnic groups within a country and between countries, and these differences may reflect genetic predispositions, indigenous etiological agents, pharmacogenomic mechanisms and socioeconomic reasons. In the USA, African-American patients have cirrhosis more commonly, treatment failure more frequently and higher mortality than white American patients. Survival is poorest in Asian-American patients. Autoimmune hepatitis in other countries is frequently associated with genetic predispositions that may favor susceptibility to indigenous etiological agents. Cholestatic features influence treatment response; acute-on-chronic liver disease increases mortality and socioeconomic and cultural factors affect prognosis. Ethnic-based deviations from classical phenotypes and the frequency of late-stage disease can complicate the diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis in non-white populations.

Autoantibody-negative autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis has a variable clinical phenotype, and the absence of conventional autoantibodies does not preclude its diagnosis or need for treatment. The goals of this review are to describe the frequency and nature of autoantibody-negative autoimmune hepatitis, indicate its outcome after corticosteroid treatment, and increase awareness of the diagnosis in patients with unexplained acute and chronic hepatitis. The frequency of presumed autoantibody-negative autoimmune hepatitis in patients with acute and acute severe presentations is ≤7%, and its frequency in patients with chronic presentations is 1-34%. Patients with acute presentations can have normal serum γ-globulin levels, centrilobular zone 3 necrosis, and low pre-treatment international diagnostic scores. Liver tissue examination is essential for the diagnosis, and hepatic steatosis can be a co-morbid feature. The comprehensive international scoring system can support but never override the clinical diagnosis pre-treatment, and non-standard serological markers should be sought if the clinical diagnosis is uncertain or the diagnostic score is low. A 3-month treatment trial with corticosteroids should be considered in all patients, regardless of the serological findings, and improvements have occurred in 67-87% of cases. Autoantibody-negative autoimmune hepatitis may be associated with an autoantibody outside the conventional battery; it may have a signature autoantibody that is still undiscovered, or its characteristic autoantibodies may have been suppressed or have a delayed expression. The pathogenic mechanisms are presumed to be identical to those of classical disease. Autoantibody-negative autoimmune hepatitis is an infrequent but treatable disease that must be considered in unexplained acute and chronic hepatitis.

Cryptogenic chronic hepatitis and its changing guise in adults

Cryptogenic chronic hepatitis is a disease that is unexplained by conventional clinical, laboratory and histological findings, and it can progress to cirrhosis, develop hepatocellular carcinoma, and require liver transplantation. The goals of this review are to describe the changing phenotype of cryptogenic chronic hepatitis in adults, develop a diagnostic algorithm appropriate to current practice, and suggest treatment options. The frequency of cryptogenic hepatitis is estimated at 5.4%. Cryptogenic cirrhosis is diagnosed in 5-30% of patients with cirrhosis, and it is present in 3-14% of adults awaiting liver transplantation. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease has been implicated in 21-63% of patients, and autoimmune hepatitis is a likely diagnosis in 10-54% of individuals. Viral infections, hereditary liver diseases, celiac disease, and unsuspected alcohol or drug-induced liver injury are recognized infrequently in the current cryptogenic population. Manifestations of the metabolic syndrome heighten the suspicion of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, and the absence of hepatic steatosis does not discount this possibility. The diagnostic scoring system of the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group can support the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis in some patients. Certain genetic mutations may have disease-specificity, and they suggest that some patients may have an independent and uncharacterized disease. Corticosteroid therapy is effective in patients with autoimmune features, and life-style changes and specific therapies for manifestations of the metabolic syndrome are appropriate for all obese patients. The 1- and 5-year survivals after liver transplantation have ranged from 72-85% to 58-73%, respectively.

Diagnostic value and utility of the simplified International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group criteria in acute-onset autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is already difficult, and that of acute-onset AIH with atypical features is even more challenging, even though the revised original diagnostic criteria created by an international AIH group were widely accepted and incorporated into clinical practice.

AIMS

Recently, simplified diagnostic criteria were proposed. We compared the performance parameters of the simplified scoring system in patients with acute-onset AIH and examined its usefulness and limitations.

METHODS

Fifty-five patients with acute-onset AIH (29 non-severe, 14 severe and 12 fulminant) were assessed according to the simplified scoring system and compared with the revised original one.

RESULTS

Of the 55 patients, 22 (40%) were diagnosed as 'definite' AIH, 28 (51%) as 'probable' and five (9%) as 'non-diagnostic' based on the revised original scoring system. By the simplified scoring system, six (11%) were diagnosed as 'definite' AIH, 16 (29%) as 'probable' and 33 (60%) as 'non-diagnostic'. Anti-nuclear antibody titres did not differ among the three groups. The immunoglobulin G level was higher in fulminant than in non-severe patients (P = 0.01). Sixty-five per cent showed acute hepatitis (massive necrosis, submassive necrosis and severe acute hepatitis) and 35% showed chronic hepatitis.

CONCLUSIONS

The revised original scoring system performed better in patients with acute-onset AIH than the simplified scoring system.

Acute presentation of autoimmune hepatitis: Does it exist? A published work review

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), initially called chronic aggressive hepatitis, is conceptually classified as a primary chronic disease; periportal fibrous expansion and periportal infiltration of mononuclear cells, including plasma cells, have also been considered to be histologically important diagnostic signs of AIH. However, several manuscripts which reported the acute presentation of AIH have been published recently and the reported cases of acute presentation in these manuscripts contained two different clinical entities. One is acute exacerbation of chronic AIH (acute exacerbation form) and the other is genuine acute AIH without chronic histological changes (acute form). It is clinically important to distinguish the acute form from the acute exacerbation form. The reports of the acute form revealed that the existence of centrilobular necrosis without chronic changes was the most important histological finding related to the acute form. Because the elevation of serum levels of immunoglobulin G and antinuclear antibody are not observed in some acute presentation AIH patients, the physician may not consider AIH when they encounter such patients. Therefore, it is very important to bear in mind a possibility of acute presentation AIH when the physician encounters patients with hepatic dysfunction of unknown cause because it became clear that delay of the diagnosis and start of therapy lead to the poor prognosis of AIH. In this review, we outline the current state of acute presentation of AIH including the genuine acute form based on the published clinical studies and case reports.

Clinicopathological features of severe and fulminant forms of autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Diagnosis of the acute presentation of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is difficult because patients do not always show typical clinicopathological features of AIH. Although some of them progress to fulminant hepatitis, the survival rate of which is <20% without liver transplantation, their clinicopathological features have remained uncertain. We examined them for a better understanding and improvement of the prognosis of "life-threatening" severe and fulminant AIH.

METHODS

Clinical, biochemical and pathological features of 28 patients with severe or fulminant AIH and treatment responses were examined retrospectively.

RESULTS

At the time of admission, mean immunoglobulin G was 2479 ± 1170 mg/dl, with 7 (25%) patients showing normal levels. Anti-nuclear antibody was ≤ 1:40 in 8 (29%). Liver histology showed severe activity in 95% and acute hepatitis in 86% of the patients. Centrilobular necrosis including submassive and massive necrosis was characteristic. Of the 25 patients treated with corticosteroids, 17 responded and 8 did not. Responders to corticosteroids showed younger age and higher prothrombin time (PT) activity than non-responders at the time of corticosteroid administration. The improvement of PT activity during 2 weeks and 4 weeks and total bilirubin level during 4 weeks was statistically significant in responders, but not in non-responders.

CONCLUSIONS

We should diagnose and treat acute onset AIH patients before they develop into severe and fulminant disease. Performing liver biopsy at the early stage of acute onset AIH, evaluating the biopsy specimens precisely and initiating corticosteroid therapy may be essential for improving the prognosis without liver transplantation.

Autoimmune fulminant liver failure in adults: Experience in a Japanese center

AIM

  After the establishment of the international criteria of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) in 1999 and the recognition of acute onset AIH, the diagnosis of patients with fulminant type of AIH came to be made. We diagnosed autoimmune fulminant liver failure based on the criteria, and discussed the etiology of fulminant hepatitis (FH) and late onset hepatic failure (LOHF), and the characteristics of autoimmune fulminant liver failure.

METHODS

  We investigated the etiology of 95 consecutive adult patients with FH or LOHF admitted to our liver unit between 1990 and 2009. Clinical and biochemical features, therapies and outcomes were examined in patients with AIH after 2000.

RESULTS

  Of 95 patients, 85 were FH and 10 LOHF. The etiology was due to viral infections in 51.6% (hepatitis A virus in 7.4%, hepatitis B virus in 43.2% and hepatitis E virus in 1.1%), AIH in 15.8%, drug allergy-induced in 12.6%, and unknown causes in 20.0%. The rate of patients with AIH increased significantly between 2000 and 2009 compared to the rate between 1990 and 1999 (P = 0.002). In recovered patients with AIH without transplantation after 2000, coma grade was lower, alanine aminotransferase level, prothrombin time activity and alfa-fetoprotein level were higher than in the others with statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

  AIH is not a rare cause of FH and LOHF, and the number of patients with unknown causes would surely decrease in concert with the precise diagnosis of AIH.

Histology of autoimmune hepatitis and its variants

Autoimmune hepatitis does not have a pathognomonic feature, and its laboratory, serologic, and histologic manifestations are shared with a variety of acute and chronic liver diseases. The disease has active and quiescent phases and thus variable histologic appearances. This article outlines the many histologic faces of autoimmune hepatitis. It discusses the fulminant and acute forms, as well as the chronic hepatitic forms. Overlap syndromes with primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis are described. The role of the pathologist in reporting the biopsies is discussed.

Non-classical phenotypes of autoimmune hepatitis and advances in diagnosis and treatment

Non-classical manifestations of autoimmune hepatitis can delay diagnosis and treatment. Our aims were to describe the clinical phenotypes that can confound the diagnosis, detail scoring systems that can ensure their recognition, and outline advances in treatment that can improve their outcome. Prime source and review articles in English were selected through Medline from 1970-2008 and assimilated into personal libraries spanning 32 years. Acute severe or asymptomatic presentations and atypical histological findings, including centrilobular zone 3 necrosis and concurrent bile duct changes, are compatible with the diagnosis. Cholangiographic abnormalities may be present in children and adults with the disease, and autoimmune hepatitis must be considered in patients without autoantibodies or with antimitochondrial antibodies and no other cholestatic features. Asymptomatic patients frequently become symptomatic; mild disease can progress; and there are no confident indices that justify withholding treatment. Two diagnostic scoring systems with complementary virtues have been developed to evaluate patients with confusing features. Normal liver tests and tissue constitute the optimal end point of treatment, and the first relapse is an indication for long-term azathioprine therapy. Cyclosporine, tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil are promising salvage therapies, and budesonide with azathioprine may be a superior frontline treatment. We conclude that the non-classical phenotypes of autoimmune hepatitis can be recognized promptly, diagnosed accurately, and treated effectively.

Precise histological evaluation of liver biopsy specimen is indispensable for diagnosis and treatment of acute-onset autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of acute-onset autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) has been difficult because patients do not always show clinicopathological features typical of AIH. We examined the important requirements for a definitive diagnosis of acute-onset AIH.

METHODS

Clinical, biochemical, and pathological features of 18 acute-onset AIH patients (16 women, 2 men; mean age, 54.3 +/- 12.3 years) with no history of liver disease and no signs of chronicity were examined.

RESULTS

Mean ALT was 679 +/- 431 IU/l, and mean T-Bil was 2.4 +/- 2.9 mg/dl. Mean IgG was 1801 +/- 446 mg/dl, with 7 patients (39%) showing normal levels. Antinuclear antibody was <or=1: 40 in 7 (39%). Liver histology showed severe activity in 17 (94%) of the patients and severe acute hepatitis in 7 (39%). Centrizonal necrosis and plasma cell accumulation were characteristic for acute-onset AIH. AIH score ranged from 7 to 18 (13.2 +/- 3.8) before treatment. All patients were diagnosed and treated early and responded completely to therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Histological examination of the liver is necessary for early diagnosis of acute-onset AIH. Moreover, we should evaluate liver biopsy specimens precisely and should be ready for a timely initiation of corticosteroid therapy to improve the prognosis.

Serologic markers do not predict histologic severity or response to treatment in patients with autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is characterized by the presence of circulating autoantibodies, hypergammaglobulinemia, necroinflammatory histology, and a response to immunosuppressive drugs. The goal of this retrospective study was to determine whether the presence of antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) or anti-smooth muscle antibodies (ASMAs) in patients with AIH correlated with clinical presentation, histologic findings, or response to immunosuppressive therapy.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients diagnosed with AIH, on the basis of the revised scoring system of International Autoimmune Hepatitis group, were reviewed. Data on age, gender, aminotransferase levels, autoantibody titers, treatment regimens, and response to treatment were recorded. Seropositivity was defined as ANA >1:40 or ASMA >1:40. Percutaneous liver biopsies obtained at the initial presentation were reviewed.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients with AIH (81%) were seropositive, and 10 (19%) were seronegative. Both groups were similar with respect to demographics, treatment regimens, and response to therapy. Histologic parameters were similar among the 2 groups, including portal and lobular inflammation, piecemeal necrosis, and centrilobular necrosis. There were no significant differences in aminotransferase levels at diagnosis or after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of ANAs or ASMAs did not correlate with the clinical or histologic severity of AIH at diagnosis. Furthermore, there was no correlation between antibody status and response to immunosuppressive therapy. Therefore, patients who meet the diagnosis of AIH on the basis of the revised scoring system of International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group should be given immunosuppressive therapy, regardless of antibody status.

Prevalence of metabolic syndrome, obesity and diabetes type 2 in cryptogenic cirrhosis

AIM: To evaluate the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MS), obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in a group of Mexican Mestizo patients with cryptogenic cirrhosis (CC) and to compare this group with patients with cirrhosis secondary to other causes (disease controls).

METHODS: Patients with CC, diagnosed between January, 1990 and April, 2005, were included in a retrospective study. Patients with cirrhosis caused by chronic hepatitis C, alcohol abuse or autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) served as disease controls.

RESULTS: A total of 134 patients with CC were analyzed. Disease controls consisted of 81 patients with chronic hepatitis C, 33 with alcohol abuse and 20 with AIH. The median age of patients with CC was 57 years (range, 16-87); 83 (61.9%) patients were female; 53 (39.6%) were Child A, 65 (48.5%) Child B, and 16 (11.9%) were Child C cirrhosis. The prevalence of MS (29.1% vs 6%; P < 0.001), obesity (16.4% vs 8.2%; P = 0.04) and T2DM (40% vs 22.4%; P = 0.013) was higher in CC patients than in disease controls. There were no differences in sex, age or liver function tests between the two groups.

CONCLUSION: The prevalence of MS, obesity and T2DM were higher in patients with CC than in patients with cirrhosis secondary to others causes. Our findings support the hypothesis that non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) plays an under-recognized role in CC.

Corticosteroid-responsive cryptogenic chronic hepatitis: evidence for seronegative autoimmune hepatitis

Cryptogenic chronic hepatitis (CCH) is diagnosed in patients with persistently elevated aminotransferase levels of unknown etiology. The workup of CCH patients must include a liver biopsy in order to exclude the largely unrecognized diagnosis of seronegative autoimmune hepatitis (SAIH). Patients with SAIH have demographic, biochemical, and histologic features of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and may be treated effectively with corticosteroids. Recognition and treatment of SAIH are necessary to prevent progression to end-stage liver disease. We performed a retrospective review of a database of 3507 patients seen at our institution over a 5-year period. Thirty patients with conventional AIH and an additional six patients with SAIH were identified. The two groups were similar with respect to mean age, gender, and baseline biochemistry. Of the 20 AIH patients who had pretreatment liver biopsies, 85% had moderate to severe interface hepatitis, compared to 83.3% of patients with SAIH. In the SAIH group, 83.3% had advanced fibrosis (stage 3 or 4), versus 40% in the conventional AIH group (P = 0.16). All patients were treated with corticosteroids followed by azathioprine. The mean time to remission (normal ALT) was similar in both groups, 2.6 vs. 2.7 months. Within 3 months, 88.9% of AIH patients and 66.7% of SAIH patients were in remission. We conclude that a trial of corticosteroids is a reasonable therapeutic measure in patients with chronic hepatitis that has features of AIH despite negative autoantibody markers. In most patients, clinical remission will be seen within 3 months, possibly avoiding progression to end-stage liver disease.

Cryptogenic cirrhosis and NAFLD: are they related?

Cryptogenic cirrhosis (CC), literally meaning cirrhosis of obscure or unknown origin, is a diagnosis of exclusion. The circumstantial evidence indicates that nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is perhaps one of the important causes of CC. There is also evidence, especially from the European literature, that some patients with CC may have undiagnosed or burnt-out autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Other rare causes may include "unknown" viral (non-A, non-B, non-C) hepatitis, and occult alcoholism. In this review, we examine the role of NAFLD and other causes in the pathogenesis of CC, and the impact of obesity on patients with chronic liver disease.

Diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune hepatitis at age 65 and older

AIM

To study features in older patients with autoimmune hepatitis, as this was considered mainly a disease of young females.

METHODS

Analysis of 28 patients diagnosed at age > or =65 years compared with 84 younger patients.

RESULTS

The incidence was similar at all age decades. The ratio M:F was 1:3 (> or =65 years) vs. 1:2 (<65 years). Presenting symptoms were not different when compared with younger patients and consisted of general malaise and fatigue (36%), jaundice +/- other symptoms (50%), or ascites (11%). Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) > or = 1/80 were positive in 93%, smooth muscle antibodies (SMA) > 1/40 in 50%, anti-liver kidney microsomes (anti-LKM) proved always negative. Histology showed acute necrotizing hepatitis in 19%, severe interphase hepatitis in 15%, chronic hepatitis with plasmo-lymphocytic infiltrate in 30%, cirrhosis in 29% (with active inflammation in one-third); biopsy was refused in 11%. The elderly responded very well to low doses of methylprednisolone (< or =8 mg) and azathioprine (1 mg/kg). This schedule obviates side-effects such as infections seen with higher dosages.

CONCLUSION

Autoimmune hepatitis has to be also looked for in the elderly with acute and chronic hepatitis. The steroid therapy should be individualized but kept at a low dose.

An evaluation of long-term outcomes after liver transplantation for cryptogenic cirrhosis

Patients with cryptogenic cirrhosis (CC) comprise a significant proportion of liver transplant recipients. Poor outcome after transplantation has been reported by some centers, with fibrosis occurring in a significant proportion of patients. Outcome of 46 patients with CC who underwent transplantation between 1989 and 1999 at King's College Hospital London were compared with time-matched recipients who underwent transplantation for hepatitis C virus (HCV) cirrhosis (n = 58) and patients with alcohol-related cirrhosis (AC, n = 53) during the same time period. Mean follow-up was 46 +/- 37 months for CC patients, 41 +/- 31 months for AC patients, and 49 +/- 31 months for HCV patients. No protocol liver biopsy specimens were obtained, and biopsies were performed only for investigation of biochemical abnormalities. Acute cellular rejection occurred in 30% of CC, 26% of AC, and 37% of HCV patients (P = NS). Overall patient and graft survival at 1 year was 85% and 80% for CC patients, 87% and 81% for AC patients, and 91% and 82% for patients with HCV (P = NS). Five-year patient and graft survival was 81% and 77% for CC patients, 60% and 48% for AC patients, and 79% and 57% for HCV patients (Log rank; P =.369). Twenty-two percent of CC patients had inflammation on last evaluable liver biopsy, compared with 25% of patients who underwent transplantation for AC and 68% of patients who underwent transplantation for HCV. No patient who underwent transplantation for CC had histologic evidence of cirrhosis on last evaluable biopsy, compared with 2% of patients who underwent transplantation for AC and 16% of patients who underwent transplantation for HCV (Chi-squared = 13.053, P =.0015). These results suggest that CC is a favorable indication for OLT and that although a proportion of patients develop inflammation in the liver allograft, this does not result in significant graft dysfunction or loss.

[Hepatitis of unknown origin with protracted liver failure in a 48-year-old patient with significantly increased pANCA titer]

In spite of intense diagnostic testing, no cause for the chronically aggressive hepatitis of a 48-year old male patient was found. Evidence for an autoimmune process, however, could be derived from a high titer of pANCA. Only according to the revised criteria of the working group on autoimmune hepatitis, but not to the first version, it was possible to classify this as an autoimmune hepatitis. Despite of high-dose steroid treatment and accelerated preparation for liver transplantation the patient died of the complications of rapid liver failure. Thus, in case of unclear rapid progressive hepatitis, the revised criteria of autoimmune hepatitis should be reviewed early and with high priority and consequent high-dose steroid therapy and preparation for liver transplantation should be initiated. The prognostic impact of a high titer of pANCA in patients with autoimmune hepatitis remains to be established.

[Interferon-alpha and auto-immunity]

PURPOSE

To assess the role of endogenous interferon alpha (IFN) in auto-immune experimental models and human diseases, and to evaluate its iatrogenic potential as a therapeutic agent.

MAIN POINTS

IFN is a cytokine involved in cellular immunity, that promotes both differentiation of dendritic cells and the TH1 pathway. Auto-immune side-effects of recombinant IFN depend on IFN dosage and the pathology concerned. The spectrum extends from occurrence of auto-antibodies in an asymptomatic patient to overt disease such as systemic lupus. Antigenic targets of auto-antibodies are diverse: blood cells coagulation factors, immunoglobulin, hormones, intrinsic factor, intracellular components. Thyroiditis is the most frequently reported auto-immune disease occurring during IFN treatment, including hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism or a bi-phasic pattern. Currently, true incidence of thyroiditis remains debated. It appears very low (under 1%) in hepatologic series using low-dose IFN. The fact that auto-immunity may be related to the treated disease--before use of IFN--must also be addressed: e.g. antinuclear factors and anti-DNA antibodies in chronic myeloid leukemia or anti-actin and anti-LKM antibodies in chronic C hepatitis.

FUTURE PROSPECTS

Recombinant alpha interferon appears more as a trigger than a de novo inducer of auto-immune disorders. Its use as an immunomodulator agent should be treated with caution.

Distinct enzyme profiles in patients with cryptogenic cirrhosis reflect heterogeneous causes with different outcomes after liver transplantation (OLT): a long-term documentation before and after OLT

BACKGROUND

Sound information is lacking about the clinical presentation of cryptogenic cirrhosis and its outcome after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).

METHODS

Among 856 patients who have been transplanted at our center, 40 patients had no evidence of any known etiologies and were therefore defined as suffering from cryptogenic cirrhosis. Their median follow-up period before OLT was 78 months (range, 1-264), and after OLT 97 months (range, 1-132). Laboratory and histological data were evaluated according to features being compatible either with a toxic, hepatitic, or cholestatic condition.

RESULTS

The clinical and histological findings differed specifically between these three groups. The toxic-like group (GGT 4-18 x upper limit of normal [ULN]) expressed significantly higher IgA levels, had histologically more often fatty liver changes, and risk factors for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis predominated (56% compared with 3% in the other groups, P=0.01). The hepatitic-like group (ALT 2-18 x ULN) showed histologically features of chronic hepatitis or hepatitic cirrhosis, and only among these patients a median International Autoimmune Hepatitis (IAH) score of 13 was found suggesting autoimmune hepatitis (AiH). In the cholestatic group (AP 2-8 x ULN) histology was compatible with a non-toxic inflammatory process but IAH score excluded AiH in all. After OLT, actuarial graft and patients survival was 90% at 5 years. Mild or moderate graft hepatitis occurred in 9 patients (23%) and was significantly associated with a pre-OLT IAH score >or= 10 (P =0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides arguments that cryptogenic cirrhosis is a heterogeneous disease in which autoimmune mechanisms might be predominately involved and being responsible for recurrence of chronic liver disease observed in some instances after OLT.

Autoimmune hepatitis: diagnostic criteria, subclassifications, and clinical features

The diagnosis of AIH depends on the finding of several suggestive features together with careful exclusion of liver diseases of other etiologies. Wherever possible, the diagnosis should be confirmed histologically by an experienced hepatopathologist. Seronegativity for the conventional autoantibodies at presentation does not exclude a diagnosis of AIH. It is important to test for anti-LKM1 antibodies to avoid missing a diagnosis of type 2 AIH, with potentially serious consequences. Although the syndrome is associated with characteristic biochemical abnormalities, and biochemical parameters are commonly used for monitoring response to therapy, it should be borne in mind that neither these nor autoantibody titers are completely reliable indices of disease activity. Although the various systems that have been promulgated for classification of the disease may identify different groups of patients on pathogenetic or clinical criteria and are useful for research purposes, none is yet sufficiently exclusive in terms of defining prognosis or planning treatment strategies to be applicable to the individual patient seen in the clinic. Clinical management should therefore continue to be individually tailored.

The role of histologic evaluation in the diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis and its variants

The diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis requires a constellation of clinical, laboratory, and histologic features that exclude other conditions and support the syndrome. Interface hepatitis is the histologic hallmark of the disease, and it may be associated with panacinar hepatitis with or without bridging necrosis or multiacinar necrosis. The liver tissue examination at accession supports the diagnosis and assesses disease severity. It can also suggest the diagnosis in patients with atypical presentations, including those with an acute onset or cryptogenic disease. The liver tissue examination during therapy defines end points of treatment (remission) and evaluates unexpected outcomes (treatment failure, incomplete response). Manifestations of bile duct injury are incompatible with the classic diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis, and they may be coincidental findings of no or uncertain clinical significance or weak expressions of a variant form. Histologic features of autoimmune hepatitis may intermix with those of PBC, PSC, and chronic hepatitis C infection, or they may occur in autoimmune cholangitis or cryptogenic chronic hepatitis. Conditions in which the histologic findings suggest the overlap of two disorders or are insufficient for designation as classic disease constitute the variant syndromes.

Type 1 autoimmune hepatitis in Turkish patients: absence of association with HLA B8

BACKGROUND

There is very little information about autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) in populations other than of white European or Japanese descent.

GOALS

To investigate the presenting features, immunogenetic background, and response to standard immunosuppressive therapy in native Turkish patients with AIH.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all patients referred between 1994 and 2000 to our hepatology clinic in Ankara who fulfilled international criteria for definite or probable type 1 or type 2 AIH.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients (15 female; median age, 31 years; range, 13-56 years) were identified. All had type 1 AIH. Clinical and laboratory features were broadly similar to those reported for white or Japanese patients. Five had the HLA DR3 allotype and 10 had DR4; however, in contrast to white and Japanese patients, DR4 was not associated with an older age at onset. Importantly, no patient had the B8 allotype (vs. 10.9% in 110 healthy Turkish subjects). Thus, none had the classic A1-B8-DR3 autoimmune haplotype: a major distinction from white individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

There appears to be genetic differences in type 1 AIH between Turkish and other populations. Genotyping of Turkish patients to identify alleles that may confer susceptibility or resistance to AIH may progress understanding of the genetic basis of the disease.

A case of autoimmune hepatitis with a high titer of antimitochondrial antibody and normal gamma-globulinemia

We report here a patient with chronic active hepatitis who had no markers for hepatitis viruses and no hyper-gamma-globulinemia, but had high titers of antimitochondrial antibody. Serum levels of alkaline phosphatase were normal, and antinuclear antibody, antismooth muscle antibody, and antiliver kidney microsome antibody tested negative. The titers of antimitochondrial antibody exceeded 1:640, and the positivity for anti-M2 was ascertained by using both ELISA and immunoblot with beef-heart mitochondria and a recombinant pyruvate dehydrogenase E2 subunit as antigens. This patient responded to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) therapy in the beginning, but her hepatitis flared up during UDCA therapy. In contrast, she responded completely to corticosteroid therapy. The clinical course and histological findings of this patient strongly suggest that this patient has autoimmune hepatitis.

Antibodies to soluble liver antigen: an additional marker in type 1 auto-immune hepatitis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Auto-immune hepatitis patients are divided into two well-defined subgroups on the basis of immunoserological markers, i.e. anti-actin cable and/or anti-nuclear antibodies for the auto-immune hepatitis type 1, anti-liver/kidney microsome type 1 and/or anti-liver cytosol type 1 for the autoimmune hepatitis type 2. Controversial antibodies to a soluble liver antigen have been proposed as a diagnostic marker for the putative auto-immune hepatitis type 3. The aim was to investigate the implication of anti-soluble liver antigen antibodies in the diagnosis of auto-immune hepatitis and their ability to define auto-immune hepatitis type 3.

METHODS

Sera from 483 patients with hepatic and non-hepatic diseases, and 102 sera from blood donors were analyzed by an inhibition capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

Anti-soluble liver antigen antibodies were found in 13 of the 106 (12%) auto-immune hepatitis type 1 patients and 10 of the 49 (20%) cryptogenic hepatitis patients tested. In contrast, they were not detected in auto-immune hepatitis type 2 (n=54), primary sclerosing cholangitis (n=37), primary biliary cirrhosis (n=52), hepatitis C virus infection (n=105), alcoholic hepatitis (n=25), various non-hepatic autoimmune disorders (n=55) and in healthy blood donors (n=102). The clinical and biological features of antisoluble liver antigen-seropositive patients were similar to those of auto-immune hepatitis type 1 and did not distinguish a subgroup of auto-immune hepatitis.

CONCLUSION

The data support the concept that antisoluble liver antigen-positive cryptogenic hepatitis is similar to auto-immune hepatitis type 1. Anti-soluble liver antigen antibodies can be considered as an additional and specific auto-immune hepatitis type 1 diagnostic marker.

Autoimmune liver disease

The incidence and prevalence of autoimmune hepatitis are greater than expected among white northern Europeans. Patients with type 2 autoimmune hepatitis have different HLA frequencies than patients with type 1 disease and HLA-DRB1*07 may be an important risk factor. Hepatitis C virus can trigger autoimmune hepatitis after needlestick inoculation. Elderly patients have milder disease than young patients and they are frequently untreated. Cryptogenic chronic hepatitis is indistinguishable from autoimmune hepatitis and it responds as well to corticosteroids. Variant syndromes are common and the degree of cholestasis influences the treatment response. Endomysial antibodies indicate celiac sprue in asymptomatic patients, and multiple endocrinopathies in individuals with type 2 disease may reflect molecular mimicries and cross-reacting autoantibodies. Phase I (cytochromes P-450) and phase II (uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases) drug-metabolizing enzymes are the autoantigens of syndromes characterized by liver/kidney microsomal autoantibodies. T-cell vaccination prevents the occurrence of experimental hepatitis in mice and it can also treat the disease. Liver transplantation can be complicated by recurrent disease, frequent allograft rejection, and de novo autoimmune hepatitis.