Effects of interferon therapy in "non responder" patients with chronic hepatitis C

Impact of treatment against hepatitis C virus on overall survival of naive patients with advanced liver disease

The beneficial effect of achieving a sustained virological response (SVR) after antiviral treatment against hepatitis C virus is well established. However, it remains unclear whether unsuccessful treatment (non-SVR) also improves patient survival, especially in patients with advanced liver fibrosis. We retrospectively evaluated the incidence of death or liver transplantation in the 427 naive patients with a Child-Pugh score of A and advanced fibrosis newly admitted to the Hospital Beaujon between 2000 and 2010. Patients were followed for a median time of 5.5 years. The baseline characteristics of untreated (n=102) and treated (n=325) patients were largely similar, and there was no evidence of a bias of indication. Treated patients received a combination of interferon and ribavirin and had an SVR rate of 32%. The incidence of death or liver transplantation per 100 person-years was 1.00, 3.20, and 5.44 in SVR, non-SVR, and untreated patients, respectively. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, the risk of death or liver transplantation was significantly lower in SVR than in non-SVR patients and in non-SVR than in untreated patients (hazard ratios, 0.35 and 0.51, respectively; P=0.019 and 0.038, respectively). The effect of treatment in non-SVR patients was higher in patients who had a virological or a biochemical response than in those who did not have a virological or a biochemical response. The risk of death or liver transplantation was significantly lower in treated than in untreated patients. Moreover, there was a gradient of mortality between patients with SVRs, virological or biochemical responders, and untreated patients, suggesting that treatment, even in the absence of viral eradication, has a beneficial effect on survival.

Inhibition of hepatocellular carcinoma by PegIFNα-2a in patients with chronic hepatitis C: a nationwide multicenter cooperative study

BACKGROUND

We investigated whether the administration of maintenance doses of interferon prevented hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

METHODS

Study 1: A multicenter, retrospective, cooperative study was carried out to determine whether long-term administration of low-dose peginterferon alpha-2a (PegIFNα-2a) prevented HCC development in patients with chronic hepatitis C. In total, 594 chronic hepatitis C patients without a history of HCC were enrolled and treated with 90 μg PegIFNα-2a administered weekly or bi-weekly for at least 1 year. Study 2: HCC developed in 16 of 99 additional patients without PegIFNα-2a treatment during 3.8 years of observation. A propensity-matched control study was then carried out to compare the incidence of HCC between the 59 patients who received low-dose PegIFNα-2a (PegIFNα-2a group) and 59 patients who did not receive PegIFNα-2a treatment (control group), matched for sex, age, platelet count, and total bilirubin levels.

RESULTS

Study 1: HCC developed in 49 patients. The risk of HCC was lower in patients with undetectable hepatitis C virus RNA, ≤40 IU/L alanine aminotransferase (ALT), or ≤10 ng/L alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) 24 weeks after the start of therapy. Study 2: The incidence of HCC was significantly lower in the PegIFNα-2a group than in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose and long-term maintenance administration of PegIFNα-2a decreased the incidence of HCC in patients with normalized ALT and AFP levels at 24 weeks compared with patients without normal ALT and AFP levels.

Chronic hepatitis C and no response to antiviral therapy: potential current and future therapeutic options

A significant proportion of chronic hepatitis C patients fails to achieve sustained virologic response even after treatment with the current, more potent, combination of pegylated interferon-alpha (IFNa) plus ribavirin. Such patients represent a rather heterogeneous group and may be divided initially into relapsers and nonresponders. Both the type of previous therapy and of previous response are very important factors for the indication and the type of re-treatment. The combination of pegylated IFNa and ribavirin seems to be a rational approach for patients who failed to respond to IFNa monotherapy. Pegylated IFNa-based regimens appear to induce sustained responses in 40-68% of relapsers but in only 11% of nonresponders to previous therapy with standard IFNa plus ribavirin. Thus, new therapeutic approaches are needed for the latter subgroup of patients as well as those who fail to respond to pegylated IFNa-based regimens. Such new approaches currently under evaluation include the triple combination of pegylated IFNa, ribavirin, and amantadine, alternative types of IFN, use of agents with ribavirin like activity but lesser degrees of side-effects, inhibitors of hepatitis C virus (HCV) replication, mainly inhibitors of NS3 protease or helicase, antisense oligonucleotides, and ribozymes, and several immunomodulators. Moreover, maintenance antifibrotic therapy, mostly with low doses of pegylated IFNa, are under evaluation in patients with advanced fibrosis. Thus, even in the current era of the potent pegylated IFNa-based regimens, the management of these difficult-to-treat patients represents an increasingly frequent problem and perhaps the most challenging therapeutic task in chronic hepatitis C.

Hepatic fibrosis: from bench to bedside

Antifibrotic therapies are preferentially targeted to the activated mesenchymal cells in the liver that synthesize an excess of matrix proteins and resemble the myofibroblasts of healing wounds. These cells derive from normally quiescent hepatic stellate cells and (myo-) fibroblasts. Their activation is triggered and maintained by several fibrogenic modulators and cytokines, but also by mechanical stress. Whereas many agents inhibit stellate cell/myofibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis in vitro, only few of them are tolerable or effective in suitable animal models in vivo. An antifibrotic effect was demonstrated for silymarin, a defined mixture of flavonoids, sho-saiko-to which contains the related compound baicalein, for halofuginone, another plant-derived agent, for the phosphodiesterase inhibitor pentoxifylline and for LU135252, an oral inhibitor of the endothelin-A-receptor. The retrospective finding that interferon-alpha therapy for hepatitis C may halt or even reverse fibrosis, has to be confirmed in prospective randomized trials. Strategies to inhibit the profibrogenic cytokines transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta or connective tissue growth factor (e.g. by soluble decoy receptors) are evolving, but have not been convincing yet. Drug targeting to the fibrogenic liver cells is now possible by use of cyclic peptides that bind to receptors which are specifically up-regulated on activated stellate cells, for example those for platelet-derived growth factors or collagen type VI. In addition, blockade of such activation receptors can induce stress-relaxation which reverts the fibrogenic cells to a fibrolytic, collagen degrading phenotype. Combined with the evolving validation of serological markers of fibrogenesis and fibrolysis an effective and individualized treatment of liver fibrosis can be anticipated.

Serum HCV RNA levels correlate with histological liver damage and concur with steatosis in progression of chronic hepatitis C

The role of HCV RNA levels and host factors in the severity of liver injury was studied. Enrolled were 298 consecutive liver biopsy-proven chronic hepatitis (CH) C patients (179 men; median age: 52 years, range 19-68; CH, 198; cirrhosis, 100) and 18 chronic hepatitis C with normal ALT. HCV genotypes were: 1a, 4.3%; 1b, 53%; 2a/c, 28%; 3a, 7%; 4, 1.3%, and mixed 6.4%. Serum HCV RNA levels were similar for all genotypes (median: 2.8 x 10(6) eq/ml; range <0.2-69). In patients with chronic hepatitis without cirrhosis, the serum HCV RNA levels reflected the grade of liver necroinflammatory activity (R = 0.45; P < 0.001) and the stage of fibrosis (R = 0.51; P < 0.001), regardless of age, gender, HCV genotype, hepatic steatosis, and hepatic iron overload. Patients with high serum HCV RNA levels (> or =3 x 10(6) eq/ml) had higher ALT values (P < 0.002) than those with lower HCV RNA levels. Patients with normal ALT showed low HCV RNA levels (median: 0.82 x 10(6) eq/ml) and histological features of minimal or mild chronic hepatitis. Cirrhotic patients showed significantly lower levels of viremia than those with chronic hepatitis with a similar HAI. The data of a subgroup of 62 patients with an established time of infection showed that for a similar duration of disease, patients with serum HCV RNA levels > or =3 x 10(6) eq/ml had a significantly higher fibrosis score than those with lower levels. HAI and fibrosis score were significantly higher in patients with HCV RNA levels > or =3 x 10(6) eq/ml and grade 3-4 steatosis than those with lower HCV RNA levels and steatosis grades. The data indicate that the liver damage is correlated with the HCV RNA levels and that a high viral load acts together with steatosis in accelerating the progression of liver injury.

Effect of interferon therapy on the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of interferon in the prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma remains controversial.

AIM

In this meta-analysis we evaluated the hepatocellular carcinoma incidence in interferon-treated and -untreated patients with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis.

METHODS

Eleven studies with 2178 patients were found to fulfil our inclusion criteria. The pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated from the raw study data.

RESULTS

Hepatocellular carcinoma development was significantly more frequent in untreated (21.5%) than in interferon-treated patients (8.2%; OR: 3.0, 95% CI: 2.3-3.9). In the five studies reporting hepatocellular carcinoma incidence in patients with and without sustained response to interferon, hepatocellular carcinoma was detected at a much higher rate in patients without (9%) than with a sustained response (0.9%; OR: 3.7, 95% CI: 1.7-7.8). Moreover, hepatocellular carcinoma developed significantly more frequently in the untreated patients than in the non-sustained responders (OR: 2.7, 95% CI: 1.9-3.9). The benefit from interferon on hepatocellular carcinoma incidence was not influenced by the study type (prospective or retrospective), the follow-up duration, or the study origin.

CONCLUSIONS

Interferon therapy significantly reduces the hepatocellular carcinoma risk in patients with hepatitis C virus cirrhosis. Hepatocellular carcinoma development becomes almost negligible among sustained responders, but a reduction in hepatocellular carcinoma incidence is also achieved even in the non-sustained responders.