Gemcitabine and vascular toxicity

[Digital ischaemia and gemcitabine. Two new cases]

Chemotherapy generates numerous adverse effects, but digital ischemia is usually associated with a paraneoplastic mechanism. In addition to thrombotic microangiopathy or hepatic or pulmonary venoocclusive disease gemcitabine appears to induce this type of complication. This study presents two cases of digital ischemia, which are very likely attributable to gemcitabine. The first case involved a 56-year-old female patient with lymph node metastatic squamous cell carcinoma, for which no primitive tumor could be identified. This carcinoma had been treated at a second stage with gemcitabine at a cumulative dose of 14 390 mg. Search for etiology revealed toxic vascularitis. Response was favourable after interruption of gemcitabine and prescription of a suitable medical treatment. The second case was a 74-year-old male patient with an infiltrating bladder urothelium carcinoma with lymph node metastasis. He had been treated by surgery and chemotherapy (gemcitabine and carboplatine). Gemcitabine-induced arterial thrombosis was diagnosed. Nine other cases of digital ischemia were identified in the literature. This rare adverse effect is probably underestimated. The other reported vascular side-effects are thrombotic microangiopathy, with an estimated occurrence of 1 per 6,000 patients and two cases of veno-occlusive disease. The pathogenic mechanisms have still not been fully elucidated. Precautions before use are necessary, especially in case of associated micro or macroangiopathy.

Biweekly Administration of Cisplatin/Gemcitabine in Advanced Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

In an attempt to increase the dose intensity of cisplatin and gemcitabine given to patients with stage IIIB or IV nonsmall cell lung cancer without increasing toxicity, we have studied a biweekly administration schedule. We analyze the safety and efficacy of this treatment.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

In this study, cycles of 50 mg/m2 cisplatin with 2500 mg/m2 gemcitabine were given on days 1 and 15 every 28 days. The median age of the 49 patients was 62 years and 23 were in stage IIIB patients (46.9%), whereas 26 (53.1%) were in stage IV.

RESULTS

Overall response rate was 38.8%, 52.2% for stage IIIB and 26.9% for stage IV. Median survival was 48 weeks and 1-year survival was 44%, with 66.7% of stage IIIB patients and 13.3% of stage IV patients surviving for 1 year. In the study, 178 cycles were administered, a mean of 4 cycles per patient. The intensity of the 359 administrations reached 91.16% of the planned dosage, although 49 were delayed for 1 week while subjects recovered from the toxicity. There was 1 toxic death and 2 patients experienced vascular toxicity with distal arterial ischemic severe changes in their lower extremities. There were 7 episodes of grade 2 neutropenia, 2 of grade 3, and one of grade 4; however, no cases of febrile neutropenia were seen. The predominant nonhematologic toxic effects were asthenia and nausea/vomiting.

CONCLUSION

The schedule of cisplatin and gemcitabine analyzed is active with a good therapeutic index.