Modified weekly regimen with vinorelbine as a single agent in unresectable non-small cell lung cancer

Monitoring Tumor Response after Liposomal Doxorubicin in Combination with Liposomal Vinorelbine Treatment Using 3'-Deoxy-3'-[18F]Fluorothymidine PET

PURPOSE

Surgical resection is the standard treatment for localized colorectal cancer, which is the most common type of gastrointestinal cancer. However, over 40 % cases are diagnosed metastasized and apparently inoperable. Systemic chemotherapy provides an alternative to these patients. This study aims to evaluate the therapeutic potential of liposomal doxorubicin (lipoDox) in combination with liposomal vinorelbine (lipoVNB) in a CT-26 colon carcinoma-bearing mouse model.

PROCEDURES

The in vitro cytotoxicity of Dox and VNB on CT-26 cancer cells was determined by MTT and colony formation assays. Mice were subcutaneously inoculated with 2 × 10⁵ of CT-26 cells in the right hind flank. When tumor size reached 200 ± 50 mm³, mice were assigned to receive different treatment protocols. The pharmacokinetics, micro single-photon emission computed tomography/x-ray computed tomography imaging, biodistribution, and immunohistochemical staining studies were performed to survey the therapeutic efficacy of each regimen.

RESULTS

Based on the results of pharmacokinetic study, co-administration of lipoDox and lipoVNB did not affect their individual systemic distribution, while lipoDox retained longer in blood than lipoVNB did. Superior tumor growth retardation was observed in the group received lipoDox plus lipoVNB administration (1 mg/kg each, namely D₁V₁) than those injected with lipoDox plus VNB (1 mg/kg each, namely D₁fV₁). No severe side effects were detected in each group. The tumor-to-muscle ratio (T/M) derived from 3'-dexoy-3'-[¹⁸F]fluorothymidine ([¹⁸F]FLT) micro positron emission tomography (PET) images of D₁V₁- and D₁fV₁-treated mice and the controls on day 7 was 6.88 ± 0.54, 7.50 ± 0.84, and 9.87 ± 0.73, respectively, suggesting that D₁V₁ is a more efficacious regimen against CT-26 xenografts. The results of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) immunohistochemical staining were consistent with those findings obtained from [¹⁸F]FLT microPET imaging.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that lipoDox in combination with lipoVNB was more efficacious than clinically used regimen, lipoDox plus VNB, in the treatment of colon carcinoma and [¹⁸F]FLT-PET is a promising approach in monitoring the treatment outcome at early stage.

Update on the role of topotecan in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is an aggressive disease that is generally resistant to chemotherapy. As a result, the prognosis for patients with NSCLC is poor. Currently, platinum-based regimens are the standard of care for patients with advanced NSCLC. However, these regimens are associated with severe and often cumulative hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities, limiting dose intensity. Therefore, novel chemotherapeutic agents and combination regimens may improve the outcome for these patients. A variety of new agents and combinations have been investigated in the treatment of NSCLC. However, to date, no clearly superior single-agent or combination regimen has emerged. Topotecan (Hycamtin; GlaxoSmithKline; Philadelphia, PA), a topoisomerase I inhibitor, is currently approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and is associated with manageable, noncumulative, hematologic toxicities. In addition, topotecan demonstrates a favorable nonhematologic tolerability profile compared with agents currently used in the treatment of patients with NSCLC. The success of topotecan in patients with SCLC has made it an attractive option in the NSCLC setting. Topotecan-based combination regimens in the first-line treatment of NSCLC have demonstrated promising antitumor activities with favorable toxicity profiles. Many topotecan combination regimens have induced stable disease, a response that may offer meaningful clinical benefit in the palliative treatment of patients with advanced disease. Topotecan plus gemcitabine (Gemzar; Eli Lilly and Company; Indianapolis, IN) and single-agent topotecan may be particularly appropriate for patients in the second-line setting, in which palliation of symptoms is an important outcome of chemotherapy. Herein, the future role of topotecan in the first- and second-line treatment of NSCLC and the potential role of resistance mechanisms obtained from in vivo dose-response studies in designing future combination regimens are discussed.

Phase II randomised trial comparing docetaxel given every 3 weeks with weekly schedule as second-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

BACKGROUND

Taxotere (docetaxel) at the dose of 75 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks is a standard therapy for pretreated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety profile of two schedules of docetaxel administration (every 3 weeks versus weekly) in patients with pretreated NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From February 2000 to February 2001, 125 patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC were randomised after failure of a previous platinum-based regimen to receive either docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) administered every 3 weeks (Dq3w) or docetaxel 40 mg/m(2) given weekly for 6 weeks followed by 2 weeks of rest (Dqw). Safety evaluations focused on grade 3-4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, nausea-vomiting and asthenia.

RESULTS

Patients' characteristics were well balanced between arms. The most common National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia, which occurred in 48.4% of Dq3w patients versus 15.9% of Dqw patients (P=0.001). In addition, febrile neutropenia were observed in 6.5% of patients in Dq3w versus 0% in Dqw. Grade 3-4 asthenia was more frequent in Dqw. Other non-haematological toxicities were very rare. Regarding efficacy, there was a trend towards a better disease control rate in Dq3w: 32.2% versus 25.4% in Dqw. Median time to progression and survival were rather similar in both arms, respectively: 2.1 months (range 2-3.2) and 5.8 months (range 4.0-7.0) in Dq3w and 1.8 months (range 1.6-2.3) and 5.5 months (range 3.7-6.6) in Dqw.

CONCLUSIONS

While both schedules had a favourable safety profile, a significant lower rate of severe neutropenia was observed in the weekly arm. Both regimens had similar efficacy. The weekly regimen could be considered as a good alternative for patients at risk of severe neutropenia.

A phase II study of non-platinum based chemotherapy with paclitaxel and vinorelbine in non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Paclitaxel and vinorelbine combination in previous untreated patients with stage IIIb-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as a phase II study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-four patients (4 patients with stage IIIb, 30 patients in stage IV), with median age 66 and performance status 0-1, were administered paclitaxel, 175 mg/m(2) in a 3-h infusion rate on day 1 and vinorelbine, 25 mg/m(2) in a 10-min infusion rate on days 1, and 8 with G-CSF and EPO support.

RESULTS

Among our 33 evaluable patients for toxicity 16 patients (48.4%) presented leukopenia and 15 patients (45.4%) presented anemia despite G-CSF and EPO administration. Two patients (6%) presented Grade III-IV peripheral neuropathy. The overall response rate was 67.7%; 5 patients (16.1%) showed complete response (2 patients stage IIIb) and 16 patients (51.6%) showed partial response (1 patient stage IIIb). The overall median survival time was 10 months (range 3-18 months) and the median disease-free survival was 9 months (range 3-15 months) with an 1-year survival time of 45.1% (14 patients).

CONCLUSION

The results of the combination as 1st line treatment for patients with non-operable NSCLC are promising and should be further investigated.

The novel and effective nonplatinum, nontaxane combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine in advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: potential for decreased toxicity and combination with biological therapy

BACKGROUND

Gemcitabine and vinorelbine are two of the most active third-generation agents for the treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The authors conducted a formal Phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of this combination in both untreated and previously treated patients with Stage IIIB (with pleural effusion) or Stage IV NSCLC.

METHODS

A total of 78 patients were treated on the current Phase II trial of front-line or second/third-line therapy with gemcitabine and vinorelbine in NSCLC. Eligible patients manifested either untreated disease (n = 42) or had received at least one but not more than two prior chemotherapy regimens (n = 36). The median age was 57.5 years (range, 33-79) with 57 men (73%) and 21 women (27%). The median performance status was one (range, one to two). The initial eight patients (four untreated and four previously treated) were treated at a previously established maximum tolerated dose of vinorelbine (30 mg/m(2)) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2)) on Days 1, 8, and 15, with significant myelosuppression seen in five out of eight patients requiring dose omission in the first cycle. The next 70 patients received a reduced dose of vinorelbine (25 mg/m(2)) followed by gemcitabine (900 mg/m(2)) on Days 1, 8, and 15.

RESULTS

Seventy eight patients were treated. Fifteen (36%) of the 42 evaluable patients who received front-line therapy had objective responses and 14 (33%) had stable disease. In the patients with prior treatment, 6 (17%) of 36 patients had partial response and 18 patients (50%) had stable disease. Median survival time for the previously untreated patient group was 10.1 months, with a one year survival of 43% and a two year survival rate of 32%. For the previously treated patients, the median survival time was 8.5 months, with a one year survival rate of 30%. Toxic effects were notable for significant myelosuppression, with > or =Grade 3 granulocytopenia seen in 55% of the patients on the untreated arm and 67% of the patients on the previously treated arm. Additionally, 9.5% and 13.9% (untreated and previously treated), respectively, of these patients experienced Grades 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia at some point in their treatment. A full dose delivery analysis showed that this myelosuppression resulted in Course 1, Day 15 skipped doses (even at the reduced dose level) in 42% of previously untreated patients and 47% of pretreated patients. Other side effects seen at Grades 3 and 4 in previously untreated and treated patients included anemia (9.5% and 2.8%), asthenia (4.8% and 5.5%), infection (14.3% and 5.6%), pain (9.5% and 19.4%), and pulmonary complications (4.8% and 13.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine/vinorelbine is an active, well-tolerated combination in both front-line and second/third-line therapy for Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC. The response rate, median survival rate, and one year survival rate compare favorably with platinum-based regimens. The toxicity profile of the gemcitabine/vinorelbine combination was quite favorable, with minimal Grade 3 and 4 toxic effects aside from granulocytopenia, which resulted in numerous Day 15 skipped doses but no significant febrile neutropenia or infection. The combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine could be a useful regimen in standard clinical practice and has the potential for efficient combination with biologic/targeted therapy. Multiple randomized trials of this combination versus platinum combinations are now ongoing [corrected].

Therapy for stage IIIB and stage IV non-small cell lung cancer

The treatment options for unresectable stage III NSCLC include definitive RT, chemotherapy, combined chemoradiotherapy, or supportive care. Compared with radiation alone or chemotherapy alone, the combination of chemotherapy and standard RT confers a modest survival benefit at the cost of increased toxicity for patients with an excellent performance status. For metastatic disease, combination chemotherapy--in particular, platinum-based regimens--improves symptom control and survival. Newer chemotherapeutic agents with higher response rates and favorable toxicity profiles are improving outcome even for the elderly and debilitated patients and those refractory to first-line chemotherapy. Evolving understanding of the molecular events in tumorigenesis is uncovering a host of promising targets for mechanism-based therapy. Many of these novel target modulators likely will require combination with conventional chemotherapy for optimal results.

Phase I study of paclitaxel (Taxol) plus vinorelbine (Navelbine) in patients with untreated stage IIIb and IV non-small cell lung cancer

A dose escalation study of paclitaxel in combination with vinorelbine was conducted in 21 patients with previously untreated stage IIIb or IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). All three patients treated with the initial dose of paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2) administered as a 1-h intravenous infusion and vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) experienced dose-limiting toxicity (febrile neutropenia). After modification of the dosing schedule, the MTD of paclitaxel was found to be 115 mg/m(2) when combined with vinorelbine 20 mg/m(2) on day 1, followed by vinorelbine 20 mg/m(2) on day 5. Partial responses were achieved in 24% of patients, with a median duration of response of 126 days (range from 84 to 484 days) and a 1-year survival rate of 42%. In conclusion, haematologic toxicity (febrile neutropenia/neutropenia) severely restricts the dosing schedule of combined paclitaxel and vinorelbine, and possibly limits anti-tumour efficacy.

Effect of vinorelbine, ifosfamide, and cisplatin combination chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is being tried in the treatment of nonoperable cases of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the prognosis is unfavorable and to improve survival, clinical studies using various combinations of a variety of drugs as well as experimental material are in progress. We compared the efficacy and toxicities of combination chemotherapy using different doses of vinorelbine and ifosfamide with a constant dose of cisplatin in this study. Patients diagnosed with inoperable stage III or IV NSCLC between June 1997 and December 1998 were included. Cisplatin was administered at a constant dose of 80 mg/m2 on day 5, whereas vinorelbine on days 1 and 5 and ifosfamide on day 5 were administered in one of two different doses. In arm A, vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 and ifosfamide 3.0 g/m2 were administered. In arm B, vinorelbine 20 mg/m2 and ifosfamide 2.5 g/m2 were administered. Also, we reviewed for phase II and III studies that test 1) cisplatin, 2) vinorelbine monotherapy, and 3) vinorelbine/cisplatin/ifosfamide combination chemotherapy for stage IIIb-IV non-SCLC. Summation dose intensity (SDI) was calculated in each published and current study. Twenty patients in arm A and 35 patients in arm B were available for evaluation. There was no difference in patient activity, pathologic diagnosis, and differentiation or stage between the two arms. The median number of cycles was four in both arms. The response rate was 50% in arm A and 30% in arm B. The median survival times for arm A and B were 40 and 42 weeks, respectively, whereas the SDI was 1.94 and 1.7, respectively. More than grade III leukopenia was observed in 28.9% in arm A, which is more frequent than the 17.2% in arm B. There was a significant correlation between the SDIs and response rates and median survival (r2 = 0.629, p = 0.001; r2 = 0.453, p = 0.001, respectively). Although the follow-up period is relatively short, the survival time was similar in both arms. Because a high response rate may not be followed by a high survival time in combination chemotherapy of NSCLC, further studies on the appropriate dose of individual agents with regard to the relationship between response rate, severity, and incidence of toxicities and survival rate should be carried out.